Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Art Jones


dw49

Recommended Posts

Anyone other than me think there's a chance he could be back next year ? His play has been ravaged by injury for the 3 years with Indy. But he's still only 30 years old .. If he agreed to a similar contract as last year , he would only cost 2.5 in base salary plus incentives that would kick in if he regained his form.. Everyone is saying he's 100% certain to be gone as he counts 7,300,000 vs the cap and we save a little over 5 mill if we cut him. But if he does what he did last year . its FAR different from that.

 

Here's the way I look at it ..

 

If he signs for the same 2.5 mill base as last year and you add the 1.1 mill prorated bonus , he has a cap number of 3.6 million. If you cut him he counts 2.2 mill (1.1 for last 2 years of his deal) in dead money against the cap. 

 

Thus if he is willing to take a pay cut , it's really a different story than looking  at his contract. He actually cost you about 1.5 mill in 2017 cap money . The you would add to that the earned incentives if he played well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dw49 said:

Anyone other than me think there's a chance he could be back next year ? His play has been ravaged by injury for the 3 years with Indy. But he's still only 30 years old .. If he agreed to a similar contract as last year , he would only cost 2.5 in base salary plus incentives that would kick in if he regained his form.. Everyone is saying he's 100% certain to be gone as he counts 7,300,000 vs the cap and we save a little over 5 mill if we cut him. But if he does what he did last year . its FAR different from that.

 

Here's the way I look at it ..

 

If he signs for the same 2.5 mill base as last year and you add the 1.1 mill prorated bonus , he has a cap number of 3.6 million. If you cut him he counts 2.2 mill (1.1 for last 2 years of his deal) in dead money against the cap. 

 

Thus if he is willing to take a pay cut , it's really a different story than looking  at his contract. He actually cost you about 1.5 mill in 2017 cap money . The you would add to that the earned incentives if he played well. 

 

+1.     

 

I'm for bringing Jones back on a reduced contract just like he played for this year.

 

Jones can play all three spots.    He's quality depth at a reasonable price.

 

I'd be shocked if he didn't agree to another year of a reduced contract.

 

If you cut him,  you've got to replace him and odds are whoever they get will cost more,  not less.

 

Depth is invaluable.     I'm all for keeping Jones one more year at the right price......

 

Good post.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I could see them retain him until at least this summer. Might be cut when the roster has to be cut to 53 if they have acquired a suitable replacement then in the draft or FA. You have to remember a lot of moves are still made after the draft when teams knows more about what talent they have acquired.

 

Above decent players are released on teams with a lot of talent in that position so that is happy shopping time for a team in dire need of players like the Colts. 

 

This off season is going to be fun:rock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's as good as cut. 

 

He played decently when he played, but he never played... 17 games in 3 years I think he played and it's not like he set the world on fire in those games. 

 

He missed 4 last year because of suspension and ended the last two on IR. The very definition of unreliable. I don't see what he brings to the team. 

 

I do see your point. At a reduced salary, he won't be a risk or a hindrance as far as building a defense for the future goes. I just don't think he's shown that he can be available when we need him.

 

I'd rather see a young player with upside take the roster spot... It's better than bringing up a P.S. player when Art is injured. JMO, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he brings any value to the team. It's great to have depth but when you use him you never know when he will get injured. He's always rusty because when he is healthy he's coming off of injury. Even as a back up, I feel it's not worth it because he will just get injured as a back up as well, whether that be in practice or in an actual game, won't matter. Sorry but if you can't stay healthy you aren't worth keeping. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NannyMcafee said:

I don't think he brings any value to the team. It's great to have depth but when you use him you never know when he will get injured. He's always rusty because when he is healthy he's coming off of injury. Even as a back up, I feel it's not worth it because he will just get injured as a back up as well, whether that be in practice or in an actual game, won't matter. Sorry but if you can't stay healthy you aren't worth keeping. 

Whilst i mostly agree with your post, tell that to Bob Sanders.

I'll be clear in that I dont think Jones is anything like or near the same playing level as Sanders was.... I just meant in relation to your last comment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chucklez said:

Whilst i mostly agree with your post, tell that to Bob Sanders.

I'll be clear in that I dont think Jones is anything like or near the same playing level as Sanders was.... I just meant in relation to your last comment.

 

 

I thought about Bob Sanders too, you weren't the only one. But in the end, it was health concerns that kept us from keeping him on the team. No doubt a HOF talent when healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Art Jones just isn't a good player... I guess he won't hurt the Colts badly as a backup... But I wish we had a backup that had a chance of developing into a good player... Art is only gonna get worse with age, and he is already pretty bad and never available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

+1.     

 

I'm for bringing Jones back on a reduced contract just like he played for this year.

 

Jones can play all three spots.    He's quality depth at a reasonable price.

 

I'd be shocked if he didn't agree to another year of a reduced contract.

 

If you cut him,  you've got to replace him and odds are whoever they get will cost more,  not less.

 

Depth is invaluable.     I'm all for keeping Jones one more year at the right price......

 

Good post.

 

 

Yeah.. what's the harm ? We have no idea how the Colts view him but if we don'ts him cut in the next week or so , maybe it's a sign both sides want to do one more year ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Depth without availability doesn't do us much good.

 

 

24 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

Well put.  He can't be considered 'depth' unless he can actually play. 

 

But the issue is really with his contract.  Is it worth paying him and take the risk? 

Totally agree. And it's not worth paying him another year to find out what they already know: he is injury prone and rarely available. That is not quality depth. Move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chucklez said:

Whilst i mostly agree with your post, tell that to Bob Sanders.

I'll be clear in that I dont think Jones is anything like or near the same playing level as Sanders was.... I just meant in relation to your last comment.

 

 

Amend that sentence to "Unless you are an elite player if you can't stay on the field you arn't worth keeping" and it's pretty much the same thing.

 

Sanders might have been worth keeping because having him healthy at just the right time can put the team over the top.  

 

But no one is going to say that about Art Jones.  No one says "Well if we could just keep Art Jones on the field, we could contend for the SB."  

 

All they can say "Well on the occasion that he is able to play he's decent depth"  That's not worth his cap hit, no where near.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dw49 said:

 

Yeah.. what's the harm ? We have no idea how the Colts view him but if we don'ts him cut in the next week or so , maybe it's a sign both sides want to do one more year ? 

 

This is EXACTLY my hope too.

 

Give him a chance and let's see what happens.     If worst comes to worst, we can always cut Jones in August.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look here. I have a couple points here. I want him cut if it saves us a few more million to use in FA. But if we could restructure his contract or something, bring him back with a really low cap hit then yeah that'd be fine. My other point is Jones was a dang good player when we signed him. He was one of those ascending players who was getting better and better in Baltimore. H broke out his last year in Baltimore and I loved it when we signed him. But injuries have just screwed him up. IF not for the injuries Jones would have been a mainstay on our DL the last 3 years. And don't forget his first year with us, when he played. When he played.....He was an absolute force against the run and played very well all the way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on a minute. While the chance of Chandler hitting the market is almost nil. We may want to hold onto Jones until we know that for sure. Until we know Chandler cant be had. You know he'd love to play with his brother, so other than the buckets of money, playing with his brother would be cool for him you know. So.. Something to consider maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand injuries, and am glad he took a paycut, but the suspension on top of it is what breaks the camels back for me. Thought he was different from his brothers. 

 

http://www.colts.com/news/article-1/Knowing-When-To-Move-On-From-A-Player-Key-For-Chris-Ballard/de081a5f-0c57-45f2-9bb2-4108285b92d4

 

I would be surprised if Ballard kept him. Keeping him doesn't make us better. He's not a person I want in my locker room. I'd rather have someone younger and healthier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ridgeway and McGill are as good as Jones... and are paid less. Even 2 mil. is too much for depth player. Cut Jones (post June 1 desig.) and Langford, save 10 mil. (+5 mil. for Jackson, +2 for McAfee), sign Calais Campbell and Brandon Williams (BAL). Starters: Anderson, Williams, Campbell. Depth: McGill, Parry, Ridgeway, Kerr. + rookie ILB, rookie P. Same money. Better players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna pass on Art Jones. He can't stay healthy, his impact when on the field has been unimpressive, and I would like to see player who can get upfield more effectively than he can/does. If it were up to me, he would have walked out right behind Jackson yesterday; don't forget he missed the first four games of the season with a PED suspension.

 

I could see them keeping him on another reworked contract, but I don't like the games played incentive for him again. To me, it's not about whether he plays, it's about whether he plays well. I'd rather replace him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
  • Members

    • CardiacColts

      CardiacColts 342

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,136

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,434

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,279

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,410

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,756

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bravo

      Bravo 1,439

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NYFAN

      NYFAN 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 588

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 102

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...