Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Jags OG Uche Nwaneri on the "Colts"


MTC

Recommended Posts

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1rp8e2m

 

"It's the Colts. That's how I look at it. They can't stop us from running the ball; that's how I feel every time we play them. I don't care who they have at quarterback. I don't care who they got on defensse. It's the Colts. For us to come out and not be able to run the ball on the Colts, it's mind-boggling. ... It's a lot easier for a defense when they don't have to defend the run so much."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta luv it.  The AFC better get used to it, this ain't the Colts team they are used to seeing.  Yes we can score points but we also stop you from running the ball and scoring isn't nearly as easy as it used to be.  Can you remember when we could stop Jones/Drew from running the ball.  in the 1st Q, Jags needed about 2 feet to make a 1st down and the Colts D stuffed JD.  Wow, was I impressed with our D line.  And they are just going to get better and better.  It's a new day fans.  I'm luvin it.  :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1rp8e2m

"It's the Colts. That's how I look at it. They can't stop us from running the ball; that's how I feel every time we play them. I don't care who they have at quarterback. I don't care who they got on defensse. It's the Colts. For us to come out and not be able to run the ball on the Colts, it's mind-boggling. ... It's a lot easier for a defense when they don't have to defend the run so much."

haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they got 40 yards total, some people never learn, stop talking * because you will eat your words.

I couldn't agree with you more some players need to just shut up and play and quilt telling people you are going to destroy this team just because you did in the past past is past it no longer matters that guy is just mad because they got owned by the better team plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These aren't the same old Colts anymore.  We got a D now and it was so nice to see MJD getting stuffed by it for once!

Well, we better enjoy this one.

Next week is a tough test...Seahawks come to town after coming back to beat the Steers 23-20.

Russell Wilson ran all over the place on them...could not be contained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1rp8e2m

 

"It's the Colts. That's how I look at it. They can't stop us from running the ball; that's how I feel every time we play them. I don't care who they have at quarterback. I don't care who they got on defensse. It's the Colts. For us to come out and not be able to run the ball on the Colts, it's mind-boggling. ... It's a lot easier for a defense when they don't have to defend the run so much."

This clown is dellusional...living in some other world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uche, Hey bro......1st & goal at the 2 & your offense comes away with.....................(wait for it).....NOTHING!!!

A drive that only got that close because the refs forgot what sport they were officiating.

Remarkably called a face mask for touching the top of a helmet.

Painful to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we better enjoy this one.

Next week is a tough test...Seahawks come to town after coming back to beat the Steers 23-20.

Russell Wilson ran all over the place on them...could not be contained.

Yes next week will be a tough game. The Colts did a pretty good job of containing Kaep so maybe they can have that success with Wilson. The Texans put up 476 yards and had 3 turnovers on the Seahawks. Wilson had 123 yards passing with no TDs. I hope the Colts can get some of that action without the turnovers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked how much tough talk their D was doing with 4 minutes to go in the game.

Deflect a pass when the game has been decided? Definitely deserves a "not today" finger wag.

I was thinking the same thing during the end of the game. The Jags defense was acting like they had done something special. The only thing they did was give up was 437 yards and 37 points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The funniest part?  They threw it incomplete 3 times!  Only tried 1 run (2nd down to MJD for -2 yards!) attempt!  LOL

If I was MJD I would have demanded a trade a long time ago, He aint real old but still he aint getting any younger at his position. He will be 29 in March, Jags wont be competitive(for SB's) by the time he is on the downside of his career

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was MJD I would have demanded a trade a long time ago, He aint real old but still he aint getting any younger at his position. He will be 29 in March, Jags wont be competitive(for SB's) by the time he is on the downside of his career

 

in retrospect, I believes he probably should have rather than wait out the turnaround with new ownership.

 

** Jags- 'Hmmm 1st and goal at the two with a 3 time Pro Bowl RB, or leave it to Gabbert and young unproven no name recievers?  OK, lets air it out and get this score!!'  **

 

Fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Cardinals need to sweep the Marlins in their 3 game series.  At minimum win 2/3.   It's a chance they cannot mess up.
    • Honestly, isn't that kind of a base level journalistic integrity and ethics? I don't think he's setting up some arbitrary litmus test. I'm no journalist and have no idea what the professional standard is, but this to me seems like a pretty reasonable standard - if you are writing about someone and a source is sharing pretty disparaging information that might affect the subject to the tune of millions of dollars, the least you should probably do is to ask for comment from said subject, before you print that information.
    • Kind of seems like you're setting up a litmus test for whether a reporter is "good" or not based on whether they do this thing you don't like. So maybe you could share some well-respected media in your opinion -- sports would be most relevant -- and then we could share some examples.    I agree that the best practice would be to reach out to the subject for a response. But if the subject declines or doesn't acknowledge the request, now what? Add a line saying 'subject declined to respond,' and now the unnamed sources are viewed with more legitimacy? 
    • You want a pricey decending player, Ballard needs ascending players for our next SB run in a year or two. Simmons would be a waste here.   Cross over performed his last couple games Hawkeye, maybe you should lighten up Francis. Besides, Ed Reed couldn't cover both sides of the field when neither of his corners could cover deep. That is where the heartache is coming from again.  
    • Give me an example of that. A report by a reporter from a legit news organization that doesn't at least attempt to give the subject a chance to respond. I think you can find bad journalism examples of what you're saying is common, but I don't think you can find good journalism examples - by which I mean examples from well-respected reporters and well-respected media. What you're suggesting is okay definitely isn't okay based on what they teach in journalism schools.  
  • Members

    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,217

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,524

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,974

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,408

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 7,099

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 21,093

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 1,002

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 5,311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Waylon

      John Waylon 5,271

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...