Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Grigson says Luck's contract affects Colts Defense


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 270
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep he's going to take some heat over that comment.  Not a very smart thing to say considering Luck was a bargain for the early part of his career. I know Grigson thinks he is the smartest man alive but he's actually pretty dumb if he thinks that explanation will fly with most.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing Grigson said is that they've missed on picks. And that's the primary reason the defense isn't where it should be. Werner, no first for Richardson, D'Joun Smith, Hughes, Andrew Jackson, etc., etc. That's reason #1.

 

However -- and I said this during the offseason, and it's still true -- when you commit a bunch of cash, you can't just go on a spending spree. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Superman said:

First thing Grigson said is that they've missed on picks. And that's the primary reason the defense isn't where it should be. Werner, no first for Richardson, D'Joun Smith, Hughes, Andrew Jackson, etc., etc. That's reason #1.

 

However -- and I said this during the offseason, and it's still true -- when you commit a bunch of cash, you can't just go on a spending spree. 

 

Image result for stumped gif

 

Wait, didn't Elway do that exact same thing? Seemed to work out pretty well for Denver. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, lollygagger8 said:

 

Image result for stumped gif

 

Wait, didn't Elway do that exact same thing? Seemed to work out pretty well for Denver. 

 

No, he didn't. 

 

The most the Broncos paid Manning in a given year was $19m in 2015, after his postseason bonuses. Second highest was $18M in 2012. 

 

The Colts are paying Andrew Luck $44m in 2016.

 

But the main difference is the Broncos drafted better than the Colts have. Part of that is Von Miller at #3, but the other part is Derek Wolfe, Malik Jackson, Danny Travathan, Sylvester Williams, Kayvon Webster, Bradley Roby -- all defensive contributors, mostly starters, on rookie contracts. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

Ya, this is excuse making at it's finest. I fail to see how Luck signing the big deal this off season has effected the paltry results of the defense over the previous 4 years. Do your job Mister Grigson. Start drafting players that are going to make a difference and quit making excuses. If you draft right you don't have money concerns with those players for 4-5 years. I'm ready for this guy to go. Ive been pretty silent to this point but I'm sick of him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

But the main difference is the Broncos drafted better than the Colts have. Part of that is Von Miller at #3, but the other part is Derek Wolfe, Malik Jackson, Danny Travathan, Sylvester Williams, Kayvon Webster, Bradley Roby -- all defensive contributors, mostly starters, on rookie contracts. 

Good point that just go to show that FO has been fooling around waaaay to much doing the wrong moves.:Gaah:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I liked how Grigson admitted he made a lot of bad picks on defense, however I don't like the fact that he pretty much ignored how bad he was the past four seasons as the GM when it comes to free agency and not addressing important needs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do yourselves a favor and listen to the entire interview: http://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/media/play/27375889/

 

Florio via Zak Keefer totally pulled that quote out of context. As @Superman said, Grigson actually said the main problem is bad drafting on the defensive side of the ball. When I first read the quote, I was going to say it is egregious, but in the context of the entire interview, he is just being realistic, and actually admits he has messed up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd be nice if the article posted the quote in its entirety.  I saw this article somewhere else and nothing he said was wrong.  They've missed on picks and they spent a lot on Andrew Luck.  I mean, maybe he didn't labor over his missed picks more and glossed over his short comings, but what person doesn't do that?  You don't go into an annual evaluation and celebrate your shortcomings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Grigson isn't wrong. When you pay any player as much as the Colts are paying Luck then you will be limited as to how much you spend in other areas.

 

As many have already pointed out, Luck's current salary did not cause all of the awful decisions that this front office has made. His current salary did not prevent this front office from doing a good job of drafting players over the last 4-5 years...their incompetence did. 

 

This sounds more like an excuse on why this team will be lousy for the next 2-3 years. It's like Grigson is setting it up early.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone here Made an excellent point about Grigson: He seems preoccupied and obsessed with finding diamonds in the rough and I think he because of that tend to loose the plot and instead for just getting that solid player that will just work, he reaches for someone that might have some superior intangibles.He is simply outsmarting himself at times.

 

Pick "safe" in round 1-3, then go diamond in the rough hunting for all I care.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zak took it out of context because he knew people would go crazy over it. But Grigson didn't say it the way its being interpreted. 

 

Click the link Larry Horseman  posted above so you can hear the whole thing. I have issues with Grigson but I hate when people are taken out of context.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

It'd be nice if the article posted the quote in its entirety.  I saw this article somewhere else and nothing he said was wrong.  They've missed on picks and they spent a lot on Andrew Luck.  I mean, maybe he didn't labor over his missed picks more and glossed over his short comings, but what person doesn't do that?  You don't go into an annual evaluation and highlight your flaws, you acknowledge them and then quickly move along.  If you're boss wants to discuss weaknesses, that's one thing, but you don't celebrate them.

Good point. But that don't fit into the narrative that supports their claim that Grigson is the worst.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:

Zak took it out of context because he knew people would go crazy over it. But Grigson didn't say it the way its being interpreted. 

 

Click the link Larry Horseman  posted above so you can hear the whole thing. I have issues with Grigson but I hate when people are taken out of context.

Twitter is going crazy over it too. Turd move by Keefer to get a bunch of clicks, IMO....he's knows darn good and well most are too lazy to actually look at the larger context of the quote. He did send out the link later, but he still knows no one is going to look into it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

I listened to it live yesterday. This is so far out of context that I actually thought it was a completely different interview.

 

5 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

I listened to it live yesterday. This is so far out of context that I actually thought it was a completely different interview.

Don't know why it quoted you twice. But its sad that sports journalists are not very honest.  Maybe Zak should join CBS ABC NBC or Fox if he wants to be a dishonest journalist.

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

He screwed up the first four years.  He's making the point that because they had to pay Andrew they couldn't get more players this off-season to make up for the four years of mistake.  

 

Whole true still annoying as a fan to a fan to hear when we know he screwed up a lot defensive players on the past four years and then let one of the few he got right walk for chicken feed in NFL terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what i read, Grigson does admit he has missed some picks.  But then he instantly turns around and pats himself on the back for his drafting overall.  Even says other teams scouting departments would say they have done a good job, at least on the offensive side of the ball. To me, the comment on Luck is still ludicrous and not needed. If Grigson would have done as great a job as he thinks he has, he wouldn't be having to toss out his QB's contract that he knew was coming for years as the reason as to why the D is terrible. He doesn't say the D is bad because he messed up, he just says it's going to take a while to fix because of Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Superman said:

First thing Grigson said is that they've missed on picks. And that's the primary reason the defense isn't where it should be. Werner, no first for Richardson, D'Joun Smith, Hughes, Andrew Jackson, etc., etc. That's reason #1.

 

However -- and I said this during the offseason, and it's still true -- when you commit a bunch of cash, you can't just go on a spending spree. 

Ok and spent big money on the free agency players before and see how that turned out this is just a poor excuse he's not good at recognizing the talent we need

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes.   Totally different treatment for the Ravens than for other teams (Broncos).   Pittsburgh should be throwing a fit.  They are getting screwed because the NFL is favoring the Ravens just like they did the Titans.  
    • I would say that RYS has shown a little step back but teams have not thrown at Rhodes as much as they have Ya-Sin.  Teams will pick on him making it look worse than it is.  That being said, he is an all-state champion wrestler and not a long tenured football player.  He will take time at the position because he is used to grabbing and tying up (wrestling background) versus anything else.  Ballard drafted the athlete with promise but that is not going to be a two year deal.  He will be another year or two in my eyes, if he ever fully develops.  I still love his potential.
    • Right, I agree but they also got caught the week before with their Strength coach violating protocols.  A + B = C to me.  https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/ravens/2020/11/25/ravens-discipline-coach-for-conduct-covid-19-cases/115050108/
    • As of right now a big Colts News update is we might be without AC for a game or more.  La'Raven Clark has shown nothing but bad play at LT so I hope we can finish the season strong and stay in the playoff run. 
    • I would say that if you hit a certain number, you forfeit your next game.   The Ravens have had at least 11 players and 10 staff test positive.     Steve Saunders is the Ravens' head strength and conditioning coach. According to multiple reports, he was the staff member punished by Baltimore for conducting relating to the team's COVID-19 outbreak.  According to the Baltimore Sun, Saunders "had not routinely worn the proximity tracker required by the NFL for contact tracing or reported potential COVID-19 symptoms as he worked with players." NFL Network added in its reporting that the punished staff member had not consistently worn a mask. How COVID-19 spread on the Ravens It's not immediately known how COVID-19 spread through the Ravens' roster, with the Baltimore Sun calling it "unclear." The punishment for a staffer, reportedly Saunders, likely points to belief that his behavior, if not the root, was a factor in the outbreak. According to ESPN, the staffer was the first positive test in this string of positives, though.  Baltimore's outbreak resembles that of Tennessee's from earlier in the season, when a number of players in different positional groupings tested positive over the course of more than a week. ESPN wrote that the Ravens conducted multiple in-person activities, including meetings and an on-field workout, after Ingram and Dobbins came back with positive tests on Monday, Nov. 23   https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/ravens-covid-list-players-outbreak-steelers/a93po5qll7s41v7pcc07de0tq
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...