Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Grading The Vontae Davis Trade (So Far)


DS3

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

border line C+ /B-

he has been beat on a few plays, some plays he looks out of shape, and the injuries do not help the cause. yeah he made some good plays but def. was not worth a 2nd round pick. especially when guys like talib and assante samuel went awhole lot cheaper. i think we could have had him with a 3rd or 4th round pick mixed in with a 6th or 7th round pick.

but i am happy the colts did try to improve the secondary with this trade, that i give an A+ too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

border line C+ /B-

he has been beat on a few plays, some plays he looks out of shape, and the injuries do not help the cause. yeah he made some good plays but def. was not worth a 2nd round pick. especially when guys like talib and assante samuel went awhole lot cheaper. i think we could have had him with a 3rd or 4th round pick mixed in with a 6th or 7th round pick.

but i am happy the colts did try to improve the secondary with this trade, that i give an A+ too.

Talib brings to his new team his off-field issues, Samuel - his big contract and age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B-

Really if you take a look at some of the guys drafted in 2nd round this year half of them if not most of them are either not starting or not have very good production in their rookie years. The Davis trade has given us a starter, but is worth the potential for what we could have gotten in the 2nd round? Only time will tell, but when I see Powers is on IR and Vaughn is next up to be our No.1, I become thankful that Grigson made this move. We needed a starting CB and we got him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give Davis a C.

 

He's had some very bad games this year. Last week, he allowed 8 catches (on 10 targets) for 118 yards, and a touchdown. That's terrible for a #1 corner.

 

He allowed a huge game from Calvin (although, I'll give him some slack there).

 

However, he is an upgrade over any cornerback the Colts have had in the last 5 years, and I love the trade that Grigson did, and I think time will help him grow into a better player, and get him more comfortable with this system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I'd give Davis a C.

He's had some very bad games this year. Last week, he allowed 8 catches (on 10 targets) for 118 yards, and a touchdown. That's terrible for a #1 corner.

He allowed a huge game from Calvin (although, I'll give him some slack there).

However, he is an upgrade over any cornerback the Colts have had in the last 5 years, and I love the trade that Grigson did, and I think time will help him grow into a better player, and get him more comfortable with this system. "

Davis rarely linep up across from Calvin. For the majority of the snaps, Vaughn was covering Calvin and allowed lots of yards. Didn't get much help either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I'd give Davis a C. He's had some very bad games this year. Last week, he allowed 8 catches (on 10 targets) for 118 yards, and a touchdown. That's terrible for a #1 corner. He allowed a huge game from Calvin (although, I'll give him some slack there). However, he is an upgrade over any cornerback the Colts have had in the last 5 years, and I love the trade that Grigson did, and I think time will help him grow into a better player, and get him more comfortable with this system. " Davis rarely linep up across from Calvin. For the majority of the snaps, Vaughn was covering Calvin and allowed lots of yards. Didn't get much help either.

 

 

Davis saw a little less than 50% of the snaps against Calvin, and during that time allowed big plays including a touchdown.

 

There's much more than that game too.,... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give Davis a C.

 

He's had some very bad games this year. Last week, he allowed 8 catches (on 10 targets) for 118 yards, and a touchdown. That's terrible for a #1 corner.

 

He allowed a huge game from Calvin (although, I'll give him some slack there).

 

However, he is an upgrade over any cornerback the Colts have had in the last 5 years, and I love the trade that Grigson did, and I think time will help him grow into a better player, and get him more comfortable with this system. 

Andre Johnson makes 95% of CB's look silly, so I won't even knock him for that.

 

I give him a B so far. He's forced QB's to throw to the other side of the field a lot. That's where most completions have come against us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give him a C+ he has been good at times, but against big names he is less of a factor. I think if we were able to get more pressure on qbs, he would be far better. That said, as a true 3-4 defense fills in around him, I think he will get a LOT better. We need to get way more pressure. It could definitely turn into turnover city. Cassius and Darius both look aggressive when they know they have help which I think is important, and since they are young, I think they could actually become viable starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B- (must stop dropping easy passes, must start making hard catches) not that he hasnt made some tough catches but he needs to step his game up, HOWEVER, he is a rook, so was Garcon. Garcon is much better 2nd 3rd years. i think he's got a high ceiling .... if he gets an A or A+, then he's already great. not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B- (must stop dropping easy passes, must start making hard catches) not that he hasnt made some tough catches but he needs to step his game up, HOWEVER, he is a rook, so was Garcon. Garcon is much better 2nd 3rd years. i think he's got a high ceiling .... if he gets an A or A+, then he's already great. not the case.

What did I just read?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B- (must stop dropping easy passes, must start making hard catches) not that he hasnt made some tough catches but he needs to step his game up, HOWEVER, he is a rook, so was Garcon. Garcon is much better 2nd 3rd years. i think he's got a high ceiling .... if he gets an A or A+, then he's already great. not the case.

Who are you talking about? I think you're in the wrong thread....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B- (must stop dropping easy passes, must start making hard catches) not that he hasnt made some tough catches but he needs to step his game up, HOWEVER, he is a rook, so was Garcon. Garcon is much better 2nd 3rd years. i think he's got a high ceiling .... if he gets an A or A+, then he's already great. not the case.

Whaaaa?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a solid B or A trade. 

 

This is a decent trade made great seeing as how our draft picks are coming at the very end of the round.

 

Highly doubt you find a great corner that is just as good as Vontae Davis without really gambling or taking a shot on someone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was skeptical of this trade when it happened, but it was due to off-field concerns. He's got the talent to be a top corner. If he continues on this path and doesn't let his head get in the way, then I'd say this was a good trade worthy of at least a solid 'B'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • I give it an A-,  The guy  has played well ( today case in point) and seems to have a bright future. The key is he is very young and still on his rookie conntract. So it is not like we gave a pick for a high priced veteran. 

Another way to look at is, can you imagine if we we didn't have him going into next year. Everyone would be clamouring to draft a CB in the first round.

I have no idea why these bullet points are coming up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said incomplete earlier in the thread.  I now move his grade to a solid B.  His run defense is going to be the best since Sanders in time (did I say that? :)) and I love the way he uses his body in coverage.(yes I know Sanders was a safety)

 

I am old school Colt Fans........I still cringe on giving up a 2.  We would not however get anyone as ready to help us next year in this year's draft.....so we have a very solid start at corner!!  I pronounce the trade a winner.  :rock:  :headspin:  :dancing: !!!!  If Butler continues to improve, we bring in a FA and/or some draft help we will be set for awhile.  Go Davis....go  :coltshelmet:  :coltshelmet:  :coltshelmet:  :coltshelmet:  :coltshelmet:!!!!!!!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vontae Davis: A

Throw in David Amerson, Carrington Byndom, Keenan Lewis, or Milli from Bama & I'll be happy. Davis is our best CB by a longshot all we need is a partner in crime for him & a dominant pass rush. The future is looking bright for this Defense. Teams won't be so confident facing our Defense like they've been in past years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give it a B+, but I think this one is going to work out into an A in time.

I'm really hopeful that the Chapman pick works out for us next year (he sounds like he could be a good one when he is healthy). I think we need another solid DE for the rotation across from Redding. Moala could be the guy, but I think we might be able to do better.

Beef up the offensive and defensive lines (maybe add another young corner), and we should be immensely better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vontae Davis: A

Throw in David Amerson, Carrington Byndom, Keenan Lewis, or Milli from Bama & I'll be happy. Davis is our best CB by a longshot all we need is a partner in crime for him & a dominant pass rush. The future is looking bright for this Defense. Teams won't be so confident facing our Defense like they've been in past years

I like Jordan Poyer from Oregon State as well. As far as corners go, even Logan Ryans from Rutgers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just saying that I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s all we get. 
    • This is true. But even once AR started throwing downfield more (comeback against LAR and TEN game), AP still only had one downfield target. With AD here and Downs coming into year 2, I just don't see a huge bump for AP coming. 
    • I think AD can win on the nine routes well enough to be that deep threat (he's got the long speed), but more importantly, he also can win on all the routes where AP really hasn't (AD really shined in the RZ too at Texas).   I think he will be a RZ threat right away and can be a really solid WR2 (assuming he becomes a willing blocker and the effort stuff is behind him). Don't know if he will ever a YAC machine though.   Does Harmon mean that his evaluation of AP coming out of college was similar to the "DK can only run nine routes and can't move laterally" evaluation? I don't entirely remember DK's evaluation, but I recall it sounding something like that.
    • Lawrence Owen recently said that Brandon Aiyuk is a "system WR who wouldn't put up 700 yards on 90% of NFL teams." He's about as untrusty of a narrator as you can possibly get. And like us watching at home, he is not privy to the route calls, the playcalls, the reads, etc.    But I watched the video. AP had a great game. However, Lawrence is driving this narrative with this one game against arguably the worst pass defense in the NFL last year. Fulton (#26), who was on AP much of this game, was especially bad last year, registering a 46 PFF grade.     They had mismatches all over coming into the game and they exploited it from the beginning, hence AP's involvement. It's really not any deeper than that. This game was a complete outlier from any other game too, as far as production.       So Minshew held back the whole team, but benefited MPJ and Downs?    If AP was getting open all the time and it was "like this every game", he wouldn't have ended up #124 in win route rate or #110 in avg. separation (min. 45 tgts). The people who watch every game and the tools that track these stats don't support this idea.   As someone said earlier, targets are earned. Minshew is executing the offense, but Steichen is the calling the plays and assigning reads in the RPO. So why wasn't Steichen dialing up more plays after this TEN game? Minshew made the throws in this game, so clearly he can make the throws.   And even with AR, who we know can make all the throws, they were hardly dialing up plays for AP either.   With the drafting of AD, it speaks volumes about who is holding back AP.
    • It’s gotta be one of those two or Laiatu.  I guess I’d say Odunze, since TE didn’t end up being a position we hit at all, so there’s no proof CB considered it a need.  However, that doesn’t mean we wouldn’t trade up for a unique talent (Bowers) for whom we have a “plan”…
  • Members

    • SC-Coltsfan

      SC-Coltsfan 109

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C0LT5

      C0LT5 87

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 3,250

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 25

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtMan

      ColtMan 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blueblood23

      Blueblood23 1,004

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,913

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HOZER

      HOZER 4,639

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsHappy

      ColtsHappy 7

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...