Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mr.Debonair

Clyde Christensen

141 posts in this topic

Feelings about him being the O-Coordinator if Arians leaves. I felt like he did a good job with the Offense today. Thoughts??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought he did a pretty good job today given the circumstances. Play calling was not the problem, the drops were. If Arians leaves I'm sure he will get serious consideration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought this was our best play calling all season. The players just couldn't find the endzone unfortunately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He should definitely be considered. He did a fairly good job today. 

 

He's definitely not the reason the offense wasn't great today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He did well, but it was very vanilla.

After the short stuff didnt work for 3 1/2 qts, it was time to try something else tho.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he did fine, considering the circumstances. He didn't make the gameplan, he had to do the best he could to run the offense of the OC the team was familiar with, and the results weren't terrible minus the not reaching the end zone part.

 

The curious thing about Clyde is that I'm not sure we know what he wants to do. With Manning, he had to try and run Peyton's offense. No matter what he wanted to do, I doubt you change much up on one of the greatest. Then he had Curtis, and that speaks for itself. Now he had to call Bruce's stuff and execute that plan, and he did well.

 

I really can't say I know what he'd do, but he didn't look bad today.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I liked the calls and the balance up until the last of the 4th quarter which couldn't be helped at that point.  Did he do any play calling when Arians was filling in for Pagano?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I realized today:  without the chunk plays, the Colts aren't talented enough to methodically move the ball down the field. At this stage, they need the chunk plays.  Baltimore's big plays were the difference in the game.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought he did well. the drops and our porous O line really did not help.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He did well, but it was very vanilla.After the short stuff didnt work for 3 1/2 qts, it was time to try something else tho.

You can't just go long every play, they were bringing it. Luck would have been killed.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good playcalling for the most part just awful execution 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought he did well. the drops and our porous O line really did not help.

This ^.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Clyde called a very good game. We were in the game till 9-17 when AV missed the kick. We moved the ball well, got a lot of first downs, dominated time of possession. The issue was that the O-line and WR drops did not help Luck in the red zone whatsoever. That was the difference, plus the gazillion false starts.

 

This Ravens' D could be had, IMO. We left at least 10 points on the field, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally hate Arians offense.  I know, it will be said we won 11 games and Luck set passing records.  But it is too hit or miss.  Drive will be going well, they take a shot down the field, gain two yards, then are in 3rd and 8.   You have to ask yourself if that 50% completion is worth the occasional long passes.  I think it is wrong offense for Luck.  He is talented enough to make any offense run pretty well, but I personally would like to see Arians get a HC job, and another OC brought in with a new system that is more west coast based.

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One thing I realized today:  without the chunk plays, the Colts aren't talented enough to methodically move the ball down the field. At this stage, they need the chunk plays.  Baltimore's big plays were the difference in the game.

they did not have chunk plays vs the Texans and played well, Just the one long pass to Hilton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think BA would've done better even if he was vomiting profusely. 

 

We should've went no huddle from jumpstreet. I saw no effort to call plays in a way that left extra guys back to block. Zero downfield attempts in the first half, reflecting no desire to stretch the Baltimore defense. 

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't do a great job by any means. This team was not a dink and dump offense. It reminded me greatly of last year trying to get the qb to pretend to be Manning. I think he called one pass to the end zone all game in the redzone. Play calling was way too conservative on the offense. Really wish Arians was here for this game.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a fan of Christensen. I think he did ok, not great, not bad. Than run play on 2nd and 10 was a bad choice I think...

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not a fan of Christensen. I think he did ok, not great, not bad. Than run play on 2nd and 10 was a bad choice I think...

Which one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
they did not have chunk plays vs the Texans and played well, Just the one long pass to Hilton

 

That 70 yarder and the 101 yard KO were the difference in the game.  Without the big plays, it's a different game.  That's what I'm saying.  For all the talk of play calling, I'm not sure this team is talented enough to methodically move up and down the field and compete without the big plays. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Clyde called a very good game. We were in the game till 9-17 when AV missed the kick. We moved the ball well, got a lot of first downs, dominated time of possession. The issue was that the O-line and WR drops did not help Luck in the red zone whatsoever. That was the difference, plus the gazillion false starts.

 

This Ravens' D could be had, IMO. We left at least 10 points on the field, IMO.

 

 

I think BA would've done better even if he was vomiting profusely. 

 

We should've went no huddle from jumpstreet. I saw no effort to call plays in a way that left extra guys back to block. Zero downfield attempts in the first half, reflecting no desire to stretch the Baltimore defense. 

 

 

The false start on this drive was the ball game. Looked like it was play action pass and with 1st and 5 could have been a new ball game.

 

 

 

 

DRIVE TOTALS: IND 9, BAL 17, 7 plays, 49 yards, 2:31 ela t and 10 at IND 29 V.Ballard left end to IND 34 for 5 yards (C.Graham; A.Jones).     2nd and 5 at IND 34 (No Huddle) A.Luck pass short right to R.Wayne to BLT 47 for 19 yards (C.Graham).     1st and 10 at BAL 47 V.Ballard left guard ran ob at BLT 23 for 24 yards (E.Reed).     1st and 10 at BAL 23 (No Huddle) V.Ballard right guard to BLT 24 for -1 yards (C.Upshaw, D.Tyson). PENALTY on BLT-T.Cody, Defensive 12 On-field, 5 yards, enforced at BLT 23 - No Play.     1st and 5 at BAL 18 (No Huddle) PENALTY on IND-M.McGlynn, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at BLT 18 - No Play.     1st and 10 at BAL 23 A.Luck pass incomplete deep left to R.Wayne [P.Kruger].     2nd and 10 at BAL 23 V.Ballard right tackle to BLT 22 for 1 yard (H.Ngata, P.McPhee).     3rd and 9 at BAL 22 (Shotgun) A.Luck pass incomplete short right to D.Avery.     4th and 9 at BAL 22 (Field Goal formation) A.Vinatieri 40 yard field goal is No Good, Wide Right, Center-M.Overton, Holder-P.McAfee.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That 70 yarder and the 101 yard KO were the difference in the game.  Without the big plays, it's a different game.  That's what I'm saying.  For all the talk of play calling, I'm not sure this team is talented enough to methodically move up and down the field and compete without the big plays. 

 

I disagree. We needed better red zone plays, the plays between the 20s were done right and obviously we were talented enough to march down the field methodically, I am not going to sell this group short, they are better than we give them credit for.

 

I do think we were conservative closer to the red zone and did not use our TEs and seam routes well enough there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think BA would've done better even if he was vomiting profusely. 

 

We should've went no huddle from jumpstreet. I saw no effort to call plays in a way that left extra guys back to block. Zero downfield attempts in the first half, reflecting no desire to stretch the Baltimore defense. 

BA would have been better with some tweeking as the game progressed, if only from the familiararity standpoint. This is a new team with new coaching. Clyde needs to go live with the Polian's and play golf. Hire Norve Turner and get it overwith. And get an NFL offensive line.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I disagree. We needed better red zone plays, the plays between the 20s were done right and obviously we were talented enough to march down the field methodically, I am not going to sell this group short, they are better than we give them credit for.

 

That's the problem I'm getting at, Chad.  With the talent level and level of experience, if you attempt to methodically move the ball all day, something bad is bound to happen - a missed block, drop, or whatever it might be.  If you occasionally move in chunks, flawless execution is not required.

 

This team, at this stage, probably needs a little of that, in my opinion.

 

Manning, Brady, a veteran team - sure, they can do it all day.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not a fan of Christensen. I think he did ok, not great, not bad. Than run play on 2nd and 10 was a bad choice I think...

It was far worse than I think we realize. 

 

The most notable issue was the obviousness of our intent to run pre-snap. I swear, everytime EVRYTIME I thought "This will be a run"....sure 'nuff, it was a run. Very few playaction attempts as well, but given the horrid play @ RT by Sowell and the speed in which Bal defenders were getting to Luck maybe that was best not to draw things out. 

 

A glaring issue to me was a lack of aggression, safe-mode style playcalling that attempted to cause over-pursuit but usually failed. A no-huddle, aggressive 'caution to the wind' style of calling was necessary but utterly lacking. 

 

Ballard was atrocious at picking up free-blitzers. I would've been happy to see Allen at FB to help while we took shots down-field. 

 

I would grade the playcalling and offensive approach as a D-

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That 70 yarder and the 101 yard KO were the difference in the game.  Without the big plays, it's a different game.  That's what I'm saying.  For all the talk of play calling, I'm not sure this team is talented enough to methodically move up and down the field and compete without the big plays. 

They were talented enough to beat the big time playoff teams, thats just a fact, we were not going to beat Baltimore, we could in Indy but it simply was not going to happen this year in Baltimore, we have a horrific O Line, we were at our best when moving the ball methodically up and down the field, of course we need "chunk play" as Arians calls them, all teams use them to (some alot more then others) but those chunk plays cant just be "Oh lets throw one deep and see what happens several times a game". Back in the Manning era we had chunk plays but they were balanced out with short to intermediate plays (alot of them) and run play THEN we went deep off of playaction(which Luck needs serious work on selling). I'd like to get a bigger wr to LATE in the draft

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ruksak is right, as usual of course.

lol...just don't bring up my attempt at picking games this year. It was.....unfortunate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clyde's play calling reminded me of last year.. 

 

Good running, a decent amount of production through the air. Not one TD. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's the problem I'm getting at, Chad.  With the talent level and level of experience, if you attempt to methodically move the ball all day, something bad is bound to happen - a missed block, drop, or whatever it might be.  If you occasionally move in chunks, flawless execution is not required.

 

This team, at this stage, probably needs a little of that, in my opinion.

 

Manning, Brady, a veteran team - sure, they can do it all day.  

 

Luck took plenty of shots downfield today. He just didn't connect on any of them. I think Clyde did a great job of mixing it up, and in my opinion, put Luck into better plays when the Ravens tried to bring pressure. He used more screens, and I liked the little stacked receiver pick play they kept running every time the Ravens blitzed. Can't say I remember Arians using that one too often. He also used more outside runs and stretch play-action in tandem (which many have called for) and stayed committed to establishing the run. I think our offense will be fine, regardless of who is here next year. Clyde is capable of running the show, in my opinion. Our problem today was all execution. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He did an ok job considering but I still would not SETTLE for Clyde as the oc. That's the safe choice. I've seen enough from Clyde the last 3yrs to know he's not the answer. Go out and get Norv or somebody with an aggresive style on offense. With an upgrade on the O-line the sky would be the limit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Arians will get a HC job. If he does I'de rather not have Christensen. Arians is old, most teams would rather have a younger OC to hire as a HC like Jay Gruden/Kyle Shanahan.

To be honest Ide rather have Norv than Clyde.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fickle Charger fans might bolt [no pun intended there.] However, diehard San Diego fans aren't going anywhere. Losing Bosa isn't gonna jeopardize their shot at a new stadium either since even if Joey had showed up at the beginning of training camp & balled out; His presence alone wasn't gonna generate droves of revenue from the CA legislature courtesy of tax payer funds that residents approved of. Financing is usually generated by ownership, city council members, zoning committees; vendor appeal; & taxpayers who are convinced by elected officials in Congress that this new stadium structure will pull in money from hosting other events adding lucrative annual revenue directly into your state.    Yes, winning football teams make it easier to get land & financing faster for a new NFL home than a losing franchise sure, but the league understands all 32 teams need to thrive fiscally in order to make the shield more profitable both in the US & abroad.    Even with salary guidelines in place now based on the CBA & when a player was drafted, losing out on Bosa won't be that demoralizing to me because all scouting departments do rigorous workups, interviews, & 1 on 1 sessions with players they are interested in before & after the Combine so it's not they were blindly throwing darts at a board here. I don't feel sorry for San Diego at all. They pulled the trigger on Bosa, retracted their offer, & now get to eat their homework research failure. Life goes on. 
    • This is an owners thing,  not a players thing.   The things that the owners are asking for were not spelled out in the new CBA.   They're asking for the large bonus to be paid out nearly a year after being drafted.    AND,  they're also asking for the off-set language to go in their favor.       And since neither was addressed in the CBA,  both issues have to be negotiated by each team and player.       The owners are asking for both.     Most players are giving one or the other but not both.   Believe me,  this will be addressed in the next CBA.   This is not all Bosa.....  
    • Not for his majesty King Belichick and their prince Brady you are correct.
    • Maybe he shouldn't have gave an answer to the Bosa question but his answer wasn't wrong. 
    • I think you might play better than Butler did last year and what little I've seen of him this year He gave up a 117 passer rating when targeted in the slot last year.  He could never play outside. We need  an upgrade. I think we got what we could out of him.    I'm now getting frustrated with Smith. I thought he looked more comfortable vs Ravens and was hoping to see a little more this weekend. i was fine with limited action in the preseason but come he out again. I hope he's ready week 1.  
  • Welcome New Members

    • Hey there Amy,    Nice to meet ya & don't be shy. It's an awesome mixture of deep thinkers, jokesters, & diehard horseshoe fans here. All opinions & perspectives are welcome here. We have football fanatics, causal observers, & just curious people on here who like to vent, blow steam, broaden their horizons, & just chuckle at stuff the regulars always say. All team allegiances are encouraged to express themselves politely & peacefully here, which is pretty cool too.    I just watch the games at home on Direct TV Sunday ticket by myself usually. 
  • Members

    • GOCOLTS_ROLLTIDE

      GOCOLTS_ROLLTIDE 372

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 9,079

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoDeep

      GoDeep 421

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 100GFB

      100GFB 488

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LJpalmbeacher

      LJpalmbeacher 550

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Crofan

      Crofan 28

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 799

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Draztik

      Draztik 26

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 3,739

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • southwest1

      southwest1 8,682

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.