Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts are Super Bowl contenders in 2017


ponyboy

Recommended Posts

What is a “Super Bowl contender”?


IMO, if a team can reach the playoffs they are a Super Bowl contender.  It’s not always a top seeded team that wins the Super Bowl.  A lower seeded team with momentum entering the playoffs often makes a run.  Get into the playoffs and it only takes a 2 or 3 game winning streak to reach the Super Bowl.

 

- The Colts are clearly contenders for the AFC South.  Even this year, you could argue the Colts were 1 play away from winning the AFC South -- change 1 play at the end of the 4th quarter in the first game against Houston and the Colts are the AFC South champs at 9-7

 
- With a healthy Andrew Luck, I think the Colts have shown that they are capable of beating the best teams in the NFL any given week.  Except for NE, they have competed closely with or beaten some of the best teams each year.  Even in the down years of 2015 and 2016 they beat or some top teams.  They were even competitive late in some of the NE losses.
 
- I don’t see any truly elite teams in the NFL.  NE is the closest but no other team really stands out to me.  And Brady has to start a decline soon, doesn’t he?

 

My point is, win the AFC South, and if Andrew gets on a hot streak in the playoffs the Colts could realistically put together a 3 game win streak to reach the Super Bowl – despite the obvious deficiencies on defense.

 

Maybe I'm delusional, but I feel with a few upgrades in 2017 the Colts could realistically be a Super Bowl contenders for the reasons stated above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ponyboy said:

What is a “Super Bowl contender”?


IMO, if a team can reach the playoffs they are a Super Bowl contender.  It’s not always a top seeded team that wins the Super Bowl.  A lower seeded team with momentum entering the playoffs often makes a run.  Get into the playoffs and it only takes a 2 or 3 game winning streak to reach the Super Bowl.

 

- The Colts are clearly contenders for the AFC South.  Even this year, you could argue the Colts were 1 play away from winning the AFC South -- change 1 play at the end of the 4th quarter in the first game against Houston and the Colts are the AFC South champs at 9-7

 
- With a healthy Andrew Luck, I think the Colts have shown that they are capable of beating the best teams in the NFL any given week.  Except for NE, they have competed closely with or beaten some of the best teams each year.  Even in the down years of 2015 and 2016 they beat or some top teams.  They were even competitive late in some of the NE losses.
 
- I don’t see any truly elite teams in the NFL.  NE is the closest but no other team really stands out to me.  And Brady has to start a decline soon, doesn’t he?

 

My point is, win the AFC South, and if Andrew gets on a hot streak in the playoffs the Colts could realistically put together a 3 game win streak to reach the Super Bowl – despite the obvious deficiencies on defense.

 

Maybe I'm delusional, but I feel with a few upgrades in 2017 the Colts could realistically be a Super Bowl contenders for the reasons stated above.

We are a lot better than people think...We add 3 or 4 guys on defense and hire a good coach we will be in the conversation...We will have a top 5 offense, if we just improve the defense a little by adding a pass rush we could be a 12-4 team next year easy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a difference between playoff teams like NE, Pittsburgh and Seattle, and playoff teams like Miami and Houston.

 

Granted those teams don't have star QBs like Luck, so that could make the colts contenders if they make the playoffs. BUT, those teams that are contenders have great supporting casts around their Quarterbacks.

 

A star QB can mask a lot of problems. But not all of them. Just ask Drew Brees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, runthepost said:

With no pass rush or run d we ain't beating Pitt Oak or NE... we won't make the playoffs till we beat Brock 

We had 32 sacks this season......  take a guess who had 38?     Our highest sack leader was 11 with Walden.  Theirs was 5. Harrison 

Yep the Steelers    While a pass rush can be great.   It is not the end all to be a good team 

 

but they have the 3rd ranked Oline and a top RB and WR     

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things can change in a hurry in the NFL.  So with that, yeah the Colts are contenders, or have the potential to be.  But I think they will need to change a few things to improve their odds.  I don't think staying status quo and just expecting everyone to perform better is the answer.  At this point, it appears like that's what they are doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume tnat if we get  to the play offs, which is a reasonable acheivement, Luck would be let loose to run a lot more. A valuable addition to the offense that is being curtailed due to fear of injury. Watching the playoffs this year, those star QB's are not playing it safe and nor should they. Add that in the mix to all the other hypotheticals....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, braveheartcolt said:

I assume tnat if we get  to the play offs, which is a reasonable acheivement, Luck would be let loose to run a lot more. A valuable addition to the offense that is being curtailed due to fear of injury. Watching the playoffs this year, those star QB's are not playing it safe and nor should they. Add that in the mix to all the other hypotheticals....

Very astute observation and point. :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NorthernBlue said:

There's a difference between playoff teams like NE, Pittsburgh and Seattle, and playoff teams like Miami and Houston.

 

Granted those teams don't have star QBs like Luck, so that could make the colts contenders if they make the playoffs. BUT, those teams that are contenders have great supporting casts around their Quarterbacks.

 

A star QB can mask a lot of problems. But not all of them. Just ask Drew Brees.

Ask Phillip Rivers too. Hes been great pretty much every year, and even he can't get that team to the playoffs recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think if we have a really good off-season we can contend for........      the AFC South title.

 

But a deep run in the playoffs?      Not likely.     Perhaps not impossible,  but certainly not likely.

 

Now....   Super Bowl contenders?      Only if you define that as making the playoffs,  which I don't.

 

So.....     no,  really not likely to be a contender for the Super Bowl.....    not in 2017.

 

Get back to us in 2018 or 19....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, braveheartcolt said:

I assume tnat if we get  to the play offs, which is a reasonable acheivement, Luck would be let loose to run a lot more. A valuable addition to the offense that is being curtailed due to fear of injury. Watching the playoffs this year, those star QB's are not playing it safe and nor should they. Add that in the mix to all the other hypotheticals....

 

 

Not trying to start a fight here,  but wanted to drop a few facts here....

 

There is a perception this year that Luck has been encouraged to run less....

 

Here are his run totals for his 5 seasons....

 

12:   62

13:   63

14:   64

15:   33   (7 games)

16:   64   (15 games)

 

So, as anyone can see....   Luck is still running at the same frequency that he's been since he arrived in the NFL.   Nothing has changed except we've asked him to be smarter about it.    And we've encouraged him to slide and sacrifice a few extra yards rather than keep running and getting blasted.


The wort year was 15 where Luck was running more than ever on a per game basis.    But his 16 numbers match up pretty well with his numbers in his first three years.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ponyboy said:

What is a “Super Bowl contender”?


IMO, if a team can reach the playoffs they are a Super Bowl contender.  It’s not always a top seeded team that wins the Super Bowl.  A lower seeded team with momentum entering the playoffs often makes a run.  Get into the playoffs and it only takes a 2 or 3 game winning streak to reach the Super Bowl.

 

- The Colts are clearly contenders for the AFC South.  Even this year, you could argue the Colts were 1 play away from winning the AFC South -- change 1 play at the end of the 4th quarter in the first game against Houston and the Colts are the AFC South champs at 9-7

 
- With a healthy Andrew Luck, I think the Colts have shown that they are capable of beating the best teams in the NFL any given week.  Except for NE, they have competed closely with or beaten some of the best teams each year.  Even in the down years of 2015 and 2016 they beat or some top teams.  They were even competitive late in some of the NE losses.
 
- I don’t see any truly elite teams in the NFL.  NE is the closest but no other team really stands out to me.  And Brady has to start a decline soon, doesn’t he?

 

My point is, win the AFC South, and if Andrew gets on a hot streak in the playoffs the Colts could realistically put together a 3 game win streak to reach the Super Bowl – despite the obvious deficiencies on defense.

 

Maybe I'm delusional, but I feel with a few upgrades in 2017 the Colts could realistically be a Super Bowl contenders for the reasons stated above.

 

 

Only if 'few upgrades' involves a good D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If making the playoffs=SB contenders, then yes, I agree... 

 

Look at the teams we face next season... I wouldn't have a hard time predicting 11 wins and a trip to the playoffs for next year, even with this year's roster... We lucked out in the sense that we finished 3rd in the division... The second place schedule was a bit tougher. 

 

The defense is full of holes that need to be plugged before we can realistically compete with the best teams in the league, but next year's schedule won't require much turnover to make the playoffs, imo. Pagano and Grigson will be with the Colts in 2018 whether they deserve to be or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

 

Not trying to start a fight here,  but wanted to drop a few facts here....

 

There is a perception this year that Luck has been encouraged to run less....

 

Here are his run totals for his 5 seasons....

 

12:   62

13:   63

14:   64

15:   33   (7 games)

16:   64   (15 games)

 

So, as anyone can see....   Luck is still running at the same frequency that he's been since he arrived in the NFL.   Nothing has changed except we've asked him to be smarter about it.    And we've encouraged him to slide and sacrifice a few extra yards rather than keep running and getting blasted.


The wort year was 15 where Luck was running more than ever on a per game basis.    But his 16 numbers match up pretty well with his numbers in his first three years.

 

 

 

 

Ok good point. I will rephrase. He needs to use his wheels a lot more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want us to be buuuuut...we have lost 3 straight to Houston...I can't count how many straight we have lost to NE and Pittsburgh. The good thing is the NFL turns over the playoff teams pretty regularly but the teams that have and should be on the top...I don't see us fairing well against. I hope it changes...we are due for a win against some of those teams but it isn't looking good unless a lot changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DougDew, I have disagreed with you on many things.  However, I will give credit when it is due, this is the most cogent post I remember you making, excellent.
    • You know football season is back when this forum is in meltdown mode in May... Lol
    • Yeah, I don't think their QB problem is completely solved, but going from Pickett/Trubisky for Wilson/Fields, for less money and basically some pick swaps? That's great work. Even if Wilson is cooked and Fields is a mess, there's way more upside with Fields alone, not to mention a potential baseline level of competence that Wilson might provide if he's not completely done.   Even if Wilson is pretty good, I think they'll want to get Fields on the field for meaningful snaps, just to see what they might have before he hits free agency. He's too talented to let him ride the bench all season.
    • Hopefully Pitt is ok.   Loving the vibe and energy from everyone. I truly believe it's going to be a special season 
    • I'm pretty sure there's nothing that can be added in reference to anything medical.     Offsets could be part of what's being negotiated.    More than that, I think the sticking point in this range of the draft is overall guaranteed money. From the top of the second round to the middle, the difference in overall guarantees has been slightly growing in recent years, as early second round guys are getting more guaranteed.    For example, in 2021, the #33 pick was Tyson Campbell, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1&2 salary, and part of his Year 3 salary. The #52 pick that year was Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1&2 salary. In 2023, the #33 pick was Will Levis, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1-3 salary, and part of his Year 4 salary. The #52 pick was Zach Charbonnet, and his guarantees were the same as the guy in 2021 -- signing bonus +Year 1&2 salary. So there's been a lift at the top of the second round, but it has not extended to the middle of the round. Yet.   (A slight monkey wrench last year is that the Dolphins lost their first round pick for tampering, so the #33 pick in 2023 was actually the second pick of the second round, not the first pick of the second round. That would have been #32, Joey Porter Jr, who also got guaranteed money into Year 4.)   Plus, as more gets guaranteed in this range, the offset discussion becomes more important. No one cares about offsets when only Year 1 is guaranteed. As those guarantees go into Year 3 or 4, now we need to talk about offset language. Especially since fourth year players are not subject to waivers.   So I think the middle of the second round is where there's a big sticking point right now. In 2011, this was more seen at the end of the first round (which is why Anthony Castonzo's negotiations went a few days into training camp). It keeps moving back gradually, but this explains why only 11/32 second round picks are signed so far. As the dominoes fall, everyone kind of finds their level, and then the next year's class tries to push the guarantees a little bit further. By the end of the decade, the entire second round might be getting the first three years fully guaranteed, with no offset language.   By the way, there are 20 unsigned first rounders (including eight of the top ten), and 21 unsigned second rounders (including the five players who went right before AD Mitchell, and the eight players who went right after him). So everyone should buckle up, because there's a lot of work to be done league-wide, and for the most part it has nothing to do with the individual players involved.   (Sorry this went so long, I started getting carried away.)
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...