Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Do you think Irsay will make changes?


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I really think he should make changes and eat the contracts. I believe Luck is an awesome QB, but he is just getting killed back there. This is just my opinion , but I think Irsay sees a lot of his younger self in Grigson. Polian was kind of a mentor to Irsay, and I think Irsay has projected the older statesman / mentor to Grigson. This was Jim's first real picks post Polian , so it will be very hard for him to let Grigson go. Some insight into this was the Manning/ Luck decision/ comments Irsay made repeatedly. This was Irsay's chance to put his stamp on the team and get out of Polian's shadow. It's not the same, but somewhat similar to the Jimmy/ Jerry affair in Dallas. 

Now I bring this up because I believe Pagano will get the boot for all of this, but Grigson will stay. I've brought this up in different posts, but like in Philadelphia, Grigson's record starts out strong, than diminishes. If I were Irsay, I would clean house. All organizations have ups and downs, but you can't be throwing good money after bad. Just move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did the Colts lose to the Texans on 12/11/2016? 

The same way the Colts lost to the Jags in London....

Cant convert on a 4th and 1!!!

 

Why did they call some kind of screen pass to Turbin (incomplete pass)? Coaches/Management I thought we learned from the London lost to the Jags but apparently we haven't. 

 

You can let Gore run for 1 yard. Or how about 1time in the entire game, Call a play where Luck runs/sneak for 1 yard. 

 

I bet the Patriots would have converted on 4th and 1. Yes I said it! Now get mad at yourselves!!!!!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jimmy g said:

Colts lost 3 (maybe 4) games because of coaching, but Houston actually has better talent.  I think Irsay gives them another chance, and Colts probably win next year against what looks like a 3rd place schedule.  Lose next year, and all bets are off!

Say "hi" to your brother Kenny.   He plays a mean clarinet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he just gave Pagano and Grigson extension in the offseason so I do not see him turning around after just one season and eating that money.  There maybe changes at the assistant coach level, but Pagano is not going anywhere and neither is Grigson.  

 

Both will get at least one more season with this new power structure. Now if we miss the playoffs again next year then I can see Irsay letting them both go, but you best get comfortable as you will see those two next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, IrishColt22 said:

We basically have a completely new coaching staff this year so players learning a new system

 

The system they're learning is bad, especially on offense. The defense needs all new players, so they'll be learning a new system anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Gavin said:

If that was so Peyton would have never played a snap in Denver and he would not have went public multiple times about having words about losses over the recent years with this current regime. Irsay has made a few bad decisions over the last 4-5 years but none of them have been do to him not having a spine

 

Irsay has proven that his decision making isn't driven by ego, pride and emotion. I don't understand why people keep projecting this stuff onto him. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was a betting man I would say no. But I also think it depends on who is available. I saw that it is a very real possibility Harbaugh leaves Michigan. Me being an Ohio State fan, I'm undecided if I want Urban to come to Indy if he decided to leave college football. Both are great coaches. Tom Coughlin and John Gruden are the other two I would love to have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Colts1324 said:

If I was a betting man I would say no. But I also think it depends on who is available. I saw that it is a very real possibility Harbaugh leaves Michigan. Me being an Ohio State fan, I'm undecided if I want Urban to come to Indy if he decided to leave college football. Both are great coaches. Tom Coughlin and John Gruden are the other two I would love to have. 

 

If the Colts pitched to Harbaugh I think he would listen mostly due to Luck being the QB. I don't think he would come though. Meyer I think is completely out of the picture. He has no ties to the current team like Harbaugh does and he has it made at Ohio State whereas Harbaugh is not nearly as established at UM. You never know though.

 

I would prefer to take a chance on a hot assistant in the NFL. McDaniels would do wonders for the Colt's offense. He has that first stint in Denver that may somewhat hold him back from being on peoples' radars, but he has been a top assistant for NE now for years. There are probably some other good candidates out there in assistant positions. I just prefer they have more than 1-2 years experience as a coordinator unlike Pagano did when Pagano was hired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Superman said:

 

Irsay has proven that his decision making isn't driven by ego, pride and emotion. I don't understand why people keep projecting this stuff onto him. 

 

People are just wanting to vent frustrations. I'm surprised some here have not started to blame the water boys yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dudley Smith said:

 

If the Colts pitched to Harbaugh I think he would listen mostly due to Luck being the QB. I don't think he would come though. Meyer I think is completely out of the picture. He has no ties to the current team like Harbaugh does and he has it made at Ohio State whereas Harbaugh is not nearly as established at UM. You never know though.

 

I would prefer to take a chance on a hot assistant in the NFL. McDaniels would do wonders for the Colt's offense. He has that first stint in Denver that may somewhat hold him back from being on peoples' radars, but he has been a top assistant for NE now for years. There are probably some other good candidates out there in assistant positions. I just prefer they have more than 1-2 years experience as a coordinator unlike Pagano did when Pagano was hired.

Yeah I believe Meyer will stay at Ohio State where he is being paid extremely well and having great success. And helping my bucs go far every year.

I believe Harbaugh might leave. Jeff Fisher just got fired. There is an opening there. The problem with us getting Harbaugh is, other teams might already be talking to him before Irsay decides what happens with Pagano and Grigson. 

I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT want another assistant coach. It's a big risk that we can not afford if it does not work out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fishers available, I'll Take Pagano.  How about trading for the great Super Bowl coach Pete Carroll of The Seahawks.  Wait he is the great coach who decided to throw the ball on the one yard line with Beastmode in the back field and cost them a SB.  Point being all of these coaches make bad or stupid calls, all of them.  No one is exempt.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A point I struggle to understand in these debates is how it seems as if it is taken for granted that Pagano's extension from last year is "guaranteed". That signing him to another four years means four years of pay regardless. I understand these contracts don't work the same way as a player's contract and that it is in theory a more secure contract. How come one is able to draw this conclusion? How do we know there might not be off-setting language in the contract of sorts? Especially considering the pressure Pagano was under last year at this time when signing the new contract and therefore the cards Irsay had at hand in these negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gavin said:

People are just wanting to vent frustrations. I'm surprised some here have not started to blame the water boys yet

Well said. The idea of bringing in a whole new regime and possibly having to wait another 3 years is not appealing. Maybe fans think an immediate turn around will happen again, which is not the norm. It would take a pretty competant coach and GM to do that... lol.   It takes time to build a championship. Despite what people say, this team has the nucleus to get there but has had an inordinate amount of injuries from day one this year and as a result, has had to play younger players who lacked experience. As far as the "bone-headed" play calls, if they were executed properly, would have been considered brilliant. Even if the Colts don't make the postseason, (which now looks likely), I hope Irsay keeps both for 2 or 3 more years to see what happens with another good draft or two and a healthy team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I wasn't sure if you meant "just signed" him like in the past few hours or like in the offseason.  Obviously I have the context I need now with the news of the firing.

He signed it 1 week ago, an extension. Now he's fired. ?Apparently the backlash was effective . That's bizarre. Wonder how much extra $ he got for that extra week. How stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Mjølner said:

A point I struggle to understand in these debates is how it seems as if it is taken for granted that Pagano's extension from last year is "guaranteed". That signing him to another four years means four years of pay regardless. I understand these contracts don't work the same way as a player's contract and that it is in theory a more secure contract. How come one is able to draw this conclusion? How do we know there might not be off-setting language in the contract of sorts? Especially considering the pressure Pagano was under last year at this time when signing the new contract and therefore the cards Irsay had at hand in these negotiations.

 

Typical coach contracts are fully guaranteed, with offset language. So if Pagano gets fired, the Colts will owe him salary through 2019, but if he coaches for another team, his new salary will offset what the Colts owe him.

 

Say his contract is $4.5m/year (per link below), but he's fired after 2016. The Colts would still have to pay him through the rest of his contract. But if he takes another NFL job making $1m/year, the Colts only have to pay him $3.5m/year, because his new salary would offset his Colts' guarantees. If he takes another NFL job making $5m/year, the Colts wouldn't have to pay him anything.

 

There are likely other contingencies in his contract terms. He may have even negotiated for no offset language, though I doubt it. So while there are missing details, that's generally the way NFL coaching contracts work.

 

http://coacheshotseat.com/NFLCoachesSalaries.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mahagga73 said:

He signed it 1 week ago, an extension. Now he's fired. ?Apparently the backlash was effective . That's bizarre. Wonder how much extra $ he got for that extra week. How stupid.

 

Don't understand why the Rams would let him wait 3+ months to sign an extension offer, then fire him a week after he signs it. They basically just paid him an extra $10m for no reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Typical coach contracts are fully guaranteed, with offset language. So if Pagano gets fired, the Colts will owe him salary through 2019, but if he coaches for another team, his new salary will offset what the Colts owe him.

 

Say his contract is $4.5m/year (per link below), but he's fired after 2016. The Colts would still have to pay him through the rest of his contract. But if he takes another NFL job making $1m/year, the Colts only have to pay him $3.5m/year, because his new salary would offset his Colts' guarantees. If he takes another NFL job making $5m/year, the Colts wouldn't have to pay him anything.

 

There are likely other contingencies in his contract terms. He may have even negotiated for no offset language, though I doubt it. So while there are missing details, that's generally the way NFL coaching contracts work.

 

http://coacheshotseat.com/NFLCoachesSalaries.htm

 

Thank you very much for the clarification. That certainly helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Superman said:

 

Don't understand why the Rams would let him wait 3+ months to sign an extension offer, then fire him a week after he signs it. They basically just paid him an extra $10m for no reason.

Oh to be a billionaire and laugh at the idea of $10m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Gavin said:

If that was so Peyton would have never played a snap in Denver and he would not have went public multiple times about having words about losses over the recent years with this current regime. Irsay has made a few bad decisions over the last 4-5 years but none of them have been do to him not having a spine

He kept Pagano and Irsay despite the team not progressing. Moreso he kept Grigson who allowed his QB to get beat up year after year.

 

He's quick to throw shade at the old regime in the media but will make all types of excuses for the current regime besides calling it how it is.

 

He lacks spine IMO. He refuses to tell it like it is and wont make the tough but obvious decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

He kept Pagano and Irsay despite the team not progressing. Moreso he kept Grigson who allowed his QB to get beat up year after year.

 

He's quick to throw shade at the old regime in the media but will make all types of excuses for the current regime besides calling it how it is.

 

He lacks spine IMO. He refuses to tell it like it is and wont make the tough but obvious decisions. 

Yes. His "we could be 6-0" comment made me realize he thinks this is actually a good football team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Superman said:

 

Typical coach contracts are fully guaranteed, with offset language. So if Pagano gets fired, the Colts will owe him salary through 2019, but if he coaches for another team, his new salary will offset what the Colts owe him.

 

Say his contract is $4.5m/year (per link below), but he's fired after 2016. The Colts would still have to pay him through the rest of his contract. But if he takes another NFL job making $1m/year, the Colts only have to pay him $3.5m/year, because his new salary would offset his Colts' guarantees. If he takes another NFL job making $5m/year, the Colts wouldn't have to pay him anything.

 

There are likely other contingencies in his contract terms. He may have even negotiated for no offset language, though I doubt it. So while there are missing details, that's generally the way NFL coaching contracts work.

 

http://coacheshotseat.com/NFLCoachesSalaries.htm

I was listening to JMV today and Rick Venturi was on doing his normal Monday segments.  They started taking about Jeff Fisher and contracts and Rick pretty much said what you said but that it really only applies to assistant coaches. Rick said he would be surprised if the extension Fisher signed was guaranteed past this year and left me with the impression that Pagano's might not be either.  

 

Here is a link to the segment. This discussion  starts around the 13 minute mark. Definitely not trying to say you are wrong. I had always heard the same thing so when Rick said this it caught my attention. I will say that he also admits that nobody really knows what all is in the head coaches contract. 

http://www.1070thefan.com/personalities/ride-jmv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2016 at 7:10 PM, lennymoore24 said:

I think at least at coach, only if an obvious upgrade is available  I think he would bring in Jim Harbaugh if he could get him.  But to get someone else's assistant is just a roll of the dice.

Maybe McDaniel's in NE, but I get nightmares of how he butchered Den's roster by chasing away top talent when he was their coach. But the prospect of Luck running a NE type (short passing game) offense would help ease the pressure on the Oline and I feel we have the WR's to run McDaniel's scheme.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Btown_Colt said:

I was listening to JMV today and Rick Venturi was on doing his normal Monday segments.  They started taking about Jeff Fisher and contracts and Rick pretty much said what you said but that it really only applies to assistant coaches. Rick said he would be surprised if the extension Fisher signed was guaranteed past this year and left me with the impression that Pagano's might not be either.  

 

Here is a link to the segment. This discussion  starts around the 13 minute mark. Definitely not trying to say you are wrong. I had always heard the same thing so when Rick said this it caught my attention. I will say that he also admits that nobody really knows what all is in the head coaches contract. 

http://www.1070thefan.com/personalities/ride-jmv

 

Rick Venturi definitely has more personal insight into this than I do, but I personally haven't been impressed with his statements regarding contracts in the past.

 

I'm pretty sure guaranteed money for NFL coaches is all a point of negotiation, but full guarantees are typical. For instance, the Niners owe Jim Tomsula all of his contract even though he was only head for one season: http://www.csnbayarea.com/49ers/york-money-not-issue-rebuild-49ers/ Chud's contract with the Browns had a $10.5m buyout: http://nesn.com/2013/12/report-browns-will-pay-rob-chudzinski-10-5-million-for-firing-first-year-head-coach/ Lovie Smith's Bucs contract was guaranteed, but had offset language: http://www.tbo.com/sports/colleges/ex-bucs-coach-lovie-smith-hired-as-illinois-coach-20160307/ (see sidebar)

 

I'd bet Pagano's contract is guaranteed, but with a buyout and/or offset language. That seems typical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I told everyone he was healthy a month ago, and I had 2 posters in here tell me was full of it. I heard him say he 100% on the McAfee show and he never felt stronger, that was a month ago. Get the Andrew Luck syndrome out of your brain to the people that think he is injury prone. Last year's injuries were a fluke, we will go 10-7 as long as he plays in 15 games, and we will either win the Division or make a 6th or 7th seed. You guys know how good I am at predicting, so I will let it be 
    • This is buy or sell weekend for me! Cubs have a 3-game set with the Brewers, if we don't take 2 of 3, I say sell. We have to prove we can play with these guys, and this is a pride thing IMO. I have had enough of this bull, and I would fire Counsell while I am at it. We are currently 10.5 games behind the Brewers and in last place in the NL Central = unacceptable. Only 4 games behind the Cards for the final WC Spot but if we look bad in this set, it's over.    I remember when @HOZERand at @PuntersArePeopleTootoo gave me grief when I was hesitant about the Counsell hire, now you guys know why. Brewers had loaded teams that should have won at least 1 WS and they choked every year in the Playoffs. In my honest opinion if something doesn't change this weekend, I would rather have Ross back.   This is far from an overreaction because half the season is over, and we are 38-44. With the roster we have, we should be at least 6 games above .500 (not below) with the proper management.
    • I hate the idea he’s playing basketball.  He comes down funny from a dunk and BAD things can happen.  Be smart.  Don’t do that.      The passing looks fine.  But I want to hear from AR how is the shoulder feeling?  
    • I agree.   Speaking as someone who has worked in insurance, much of the time, whoever is 'disabled' is an office politics decision, not a medical assessment.     There's an old joke:   Patient: doctor, what is my diagnosis? Doctor: It depends what's covered by your insurance.    
    • Gotta admit though, that's insane athleticism 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...