Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Trading down again.....


needanoline63

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, needanoline63 said:

While I wouldn’t complain to much about maybe trading down with bills for their 2 1st round picks, I hope we stay at 6. I’m hoping barkley or Nelson make it to 6. How do you feel about trading down again?

 

I doubt Barkley falls to 6. But if he does you thank the Foorball Gods and run to the podium to Draft him.

If he's not there at 6, you trade down if the haul is good. If not, draft BPA.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, krunk said:

Here's a mock Peter Schrager did on NFL.com with us trading back to #12 with the Bills.

 

Has us taking Harold Landry at 12 and Darius Guice at #22

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000923750/article/peter-schrager-mock-draft-20-bills-trade-up-for-baker-mayfield

 

Hes got us skipping over Quenton Nelson.

Don't like the mock there are better players than Landry still on the board like Edmunds and Davenport.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jameszeigler834 said:

Don't like the mock there are better players than Landry still on the board like Edmunds and Davenport.

I have no desire to trade down either.   From my standpoint its hard to say Davenport is better than Landry.   Everything with him is pure projection based on his size and testing.  There's not much to go off production wise.   Landry at least has a 16 sack season that tells us something.   Edmunds I will give you is better than both of them.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it goes 

 

QB

Barkley 

QB

Chubb

Nelson 

 

Definitely should Trade back. Could still get Ward, Edmunds, Roquan, Maurice Hurst and many others at 12

 

And I’m sure Buffalo is gonna have to give up more than just those 2 first rounders to move up to 6 from 12. The haul from 3 to 6 was big, 6 to 12 has to be big

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TKnight24 said:

If it goes 

 

QB

Barkley 

QB

Chubb

Nelson 

 

Definitely should Trade back. Could still get Ward, Edmunds, Roquan, Maurice Hurst and many others at 12

 

And I’m sure Buffalo is gonna have to give up more than just those 2 first rounders to move up to 6 from 12. The haul from 3 to 6 was big, 6 to 12 has to be big

Another first rounder is not big? If they added something else it would be small like a 5th.... And then we would probably have to swap 6th round positions are something silly

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TKnight24 said:

If it goes 

 

QB.  

Barkley 

QB

Chubb

Nelson 

 

Definitely should Trade back. Could still get Ward, Edmunds, Roquan, Maurice Hurst and many others at 12

looks risky.  edmunds , smith and ward could all be gone by the 12th.  hurst should be a late first round pick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, krunk said:

Here's a mock Peter Schrager did on NFL.com with us trading back to #12 with the Bills.

 

Has us taking Harold Landry at 12 and Darius Guice at #22

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000923750/article/peter-schrager-mock-draft-20-bills-trade-up-for-baker-mayfield

 

Hes got us skipping over Quenton Nelson.

 

Man, I would be all over trading back to #12 and still being able to get Edmunds. I just don't see the Colts passing on him there...though I am intrigued by Landry.

 

The problem with this trade back (for me anyways)...and I have noticed then in other mocks where the Colts do this...pick #22 is sort of no-man's land. The premium prospects (IMO) are gone at that point...and it's basically a crap shoot where you are picking from a bunch of guys around the same talent level and could likely end up reaching on a player. 

 

I would rather let BUF keep #22 and give me one of their 2nds and a future 1st. That way I can possibly still get a similar talent on day two AND have more ammunition for next year's stronger draft (at least on the DL).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Man, I would be all over trading back to #12 and still being able to get Edmunds. I just don't see the Colts passing on him there...though I am intrigued by Landry.

 

The problem with this trade back (for me anyways)...and I have noticed then in other mocks where the Colts do this...pick #22 is sort of no-man's land. The premium prospects (IMO) are gone at that point...and it's basically a crap shoot where you are picking from a bunch of guys around the same talent level and could likely end up reaching on a player. 

 

I would rather let BUF keep #22 and give me one of their 2nds and a future 1st. That way I can possibly still get a similar talent on day two AND have more ammunition for next year's stronger draft (at least on the DL).

What you're saying makes sense, although I might add there is a strong chance you may have a guy like Maurice Hurst sitting there at #22.   I've been saying he'll go 2nd round, but maybe we may want to take him at 22.  Best 3 technique in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, needanoline63 said:

While I wouldn’t complain to much about maybe trading down with bills for their 2 1st round picks, I hope we stay at 6. I’m hoping barkley or Nelson make it to 6. How do you feel about trading down again?

CB has already stated he doesn’t want to leave the top 10. Chubb or Nelson will fall to us at 6 then we have 3 second rounders for day 2 to address a couple key needs. 

 

Now if for some reason chubb, barkley and Nelson are off the board ( won’t happen ) we trade down for more picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, krunk said:

What you're saying makes sense, although I might add you may have a guy like Maurice Hurst sitting there at #22.   I've been saying he'll go 2nd round, but maybe we may want to take him at 22.  Best 3 technique in the draft.

 

Yeah...Hurst definitely sticks out from that group. And I would also have no problem with LVE...if they didn't have Edmunds. And McGlinchey would be interesting...but he likely won't be there as the top LT in this draft.

 

I was just thinking about ways to maximize the value of that #6 pick in a trade. While the #22 pick has a lot of value and the Colts would "win" this trade going away (according to the trade chart)...I just think that, in this draft, I would sacrifice that for some (potentially strong) future value and then take my chances with another mid-2nd round pick. Taking a player like Guice at #22 just because they have the pick doesn't really do much for me...especially when I can get a good RB in the next round. Same with one of the OGs. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 5 talent cornerstone type players on the board, you take them. I laugh each and every time I see us being mocked to fall further back in the draft. when its clear the Colts need all the absolute top flight play makers we can get. Do those play makers exist further back? 100%. But, its easier to hit the top than project what may or may not happen (See Edmunds. Freak of Nature, but does have troubling traits which MUST be worked out)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Yeah...Hurst definitely sticks out from that group. And I would also have no problem with LVE...if they didn't have Edmunds. And McGlinchey would be interesting...but he likely won't be there as the top LT in this draft.

 

I was just thinking about ways to maximize the value of that #6 pick in a trade. While the #22 pick has a lot of value and the Colts would "win" this trade going away (according to the trade chart)...I just think that, in this draft, I would sacrifice that for some (potentially strong) future value and then take my chances with another mid-2nd round pick. Taking a player like Guice at #22 just because they have the pick doesn't really do much for me...especially when I can get a good RB in the next round. Same with one of the OGs. 

 

 

Maybe we could even get Jaire Alexander, Rashaan Evans with that pick or Mike Hughes if still on the board.  But again I definitely see the value in your approach also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade down again I want either the Bills’ or Dolphins’ 2019 1st round picks.

Good chance of a top 5 pick with them even if they do pick Mayfield/Allen. That and maybe an extra 3 this year and I’m happy with that trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

looks risky.  edmunds , smith and ward could all be gone by the 12th.  hurst should be a late first round pick 

 

23 minutes ago, TdungyW/12 said:

CB has already stated he doesn’t want to leave the top 10. Chubb or Nelson will fall to us at 6 then we have 3 second rounders for day 2 to address a couple key needs. 

 

Now if for some reason chubb, barkley and Nelson are off the board ( won’t happen ) we trade down for more picks. 

This is my mock draft with the trade back with Buffalo for their 2 first rounders. Chubb, Barkley & Nelson were gone. Denzel Ward to pair with Quincy and Sam Hubbard at DE. While he’s no Bradley Chubb, still a pretty good player

2007FA09-3507-42DA-B73E-EF5D120541A8.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, krunk said:

Here's a mock Peter Schrager did on NFL.com with us trading back to #12 with the Bills.

 

Has us taking Harold Landry at 12 and Darius Guice at #22

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000923750/article/peter-schrager-mock-draft-20-bills-trade-up-for-baker-mayfield

 

Hes got us skipping over Quenton Nelson.

 

I was just about to post this. I might be in the minority, but I'd be very happy with a day 1 haul of Landry & Guice, especially if we're able to squeeze an additional 2nd rounder out of the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TKnight24 said:

 

This is my mock draft with the trade back with Buffalo for their 2 first rounders. Chubb, Barkley & Nelson were gone. Denzel Ward to pair with Quincy and Sam Hubbard at DE. While he’s no Bradley Chubb, still a pretty good player

2007FA09-3507-42DA-B73E-EF5D120541A8.jpeg

i see you like ward.  im starting to wonder if hes the right fit for our zone defense

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aaron11 said:

i see you like ward.  im starting to wonder if hes the right fit for our zone defense

 

 

Denzel to me is the best CB in the draft. He was a lockdown CB at OSU, I’d imagine some coverage would be a breeze with his athleticism & intelligence

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

I was just about to post this. I might be in the minority, but I'd be very happy with a day 1 haul of Landry & Guice.

I like the players.  What I don't like in this example is we skipped over Nelson, Edmunds, Roquan Smith, Denzel Ward to do so.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TKnight24 said:

 

This is my mock draft with the trade back with Buffalo for their 2 first rounders. Chubb, Barkley & Nelson were gone. Denzel Ward to pair with Quincy and Sam Hubbard at DE. While he’s no Bradley Chubb, still a pretty good player

2007FA09-3507-42DA-B73E-EF5D120541A8.jpeg

I’m good with this IF chubb, Nelson and Barkley are gone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TdungyW/12 said:

I’m good with this IF chubb, Nelson and Barkley are gone 

I use firstpick.com and a lot of the drafts I’m doing have all 3 of those guys gone by the time I’m on the clock at 6 so I’ve been doing a lot of trading back. 

 

I’ve landed Roquan, Denzel, & Edmunds the most

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, krunk said:

I like the players.  What I don't like in this example is we skipped over Nelson, Edmunds, Roquan Smith to do so.

 

As good as Nelson is, I wouldn't be opposed to passing on him and taking a guard in the 2nd round that isn't quite as polished, as long as we get pure playmakers in the first.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

As good as Nelson is, I wouldn't be opposed to passing on him and taking a guard in the 2nd round that isn't quite as polished, as long as we get pure playmakers in the first.

Some good guards will still be available I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, krunk said:

Some good guards will still be available I agree.

 

There are a decent amount of 2nd round options that can step in and be every bit as good as a young, healthy Jack Mewhort. I get being fixated on Nelson though, he's a generational talent at that position, as strange as it may sound to say that about a guard.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shastamasta said:

The problem with this trade back (for me anyways)...and I have noticed then in other mocks where the Colts do this...pick #22 is sort of no-man's land. The premium prospects (IMO) are gone at that point...and it's basically a crap shoot where you are picking from a bunch of guys around the same talent level and could likely end up reaching on a player. 


Pretty much how I feel. The 22nd pick doesn't seem as appealing as I first thought, especially after digging through lots of mocks. It seems like every one I look at, right around that 20ish range, I start liking the possibilities less and less. Of course somebody could always drop, but yeah.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if it were me making the decision, to trade down with the Bills, I would require both of their 1sts rounders this year, AND ...

 

- either a 2nd or maybe a 3rd rounder this year ...

- or no less than a second rounder next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...