Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Dontari Poe scheduled to visit


Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

I would think he'd want to stay in a 3-4, but he probably wants to penetrate more than he's been allowed to the past couple years. Both the Jags and Falcons run a 4-3, similar to Seattle. 

 

He'd probably 2-gap in Seattle/Falcons 4-3 under D. Quinn had Brandon Mebane in that role in Seattle and seems like he wants his own Mebane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 822
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

As I said in the other post,  you've changed the argument.

 

Your first argument was not about elite nose tackle....    it was just about filling the spot.

 

Here is your sentence,  I'm cutting and pasting it....

 

"3-4 NT is possibly the hardest position to fill in the nfl next to QB."

 

 

 

well if you are going to be that technical then you can fill any spot easily

 

sign me up for QB.  I WILL FILL THAT SPOT

 

of course i was talking about finding players that are actually note worthy.  you can throw guys like parry or chapman at NT and call it good i guess, but good players at that position are more rare than almost anything else

 

there really hasnt even been an elite NT in the nfl the past few years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aaron11 said:

well if you are going to be that technical then you can fill any spot easily

 

sign me up for QB.  I WILL FILL THAT SPOT

 

of course i was talking about finding players that are actually note worthy.  you can throw guys like parry or chapman at NT and call it good i guess, but good players at that position are more rare than almost anything else

 

there really hasnt even been an elite NT in the nfl the past few years

i agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Horse Shoe Heaven said:

I wouldn't be and expect the colts to look for one in free agency or draft. You can't have a guy undersized playing the amount of snaps parry plays getting pounded on almost every play without a guy to help him out.

i concur

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aaron11 said:

well if you are going to be that technical then you can fill any spot easily

 

sign me up for QB.  I WILL FILL THAT SPOT

 

of course i was talking about finding players that are actually note worthy.  you can throw guys like parry or chapman at NT and call it good i guess, but good players at that position are more rare than almost anything else

 

there really hasnt even been an elite NT in the nfl the past few years

 

Because almost no one puts an athlete with an elite skill set at that position.    

 

The reason:    Because that player gets beaten up by the center and the two guards.     Playing the position is like being in a traffic accident.     So, putting a player with elite skills there is mostly a waste.

 

Poe is an exception to the rule because he was naturally a NT.    He's 6'3" and 345 without trying to be big.    He just IS big.      

 

Poe is what teams would like to have but he's a unicorn.    You almost never see one.    And this guy is not as he once was.     He has slowly but steadily deteriorated.      That's not typically the case with premium elite pass rushers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

Wonder how many teams he visited wanted long term deals...

I don't see why you wouldn't give him a 1 year deal if he wanted it. Seems like most players would rather have the financial security. I'd rather give him a 1 year contract than a 4 year contract personally. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh. I don't know about you all but the fact that he wants a 1 year deal and that we were rumored to want him long term, the only team to specifically have been rumored to want him long term as far as rumors go.

I don't care too much one way or the other if we get him, especially on just one year. I know, it's fair and he wants to be able to hit the open market again if he proves his worth. But I don't really want for Ballard, or selfishly us as fans, to go through another Poe FA tour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

Huh. I don't know about you all but the fact that he wants a 1 year deal and that we were rumored to want him long term, the only team to specifically have been rumored to want him long term as far as rumors go.

I don't care too much one way or the other if we get him, especially on just one year. I know, it's fair and he wants to be able to hit the open market again if he proves his worth. But I don't really want for Ballard, or selfishly us as fans, to go through another Poe FA tour.

 

My theory on that is this...both Poe and Ballard know that Poe's back is 100%.  Poe knows that if he plays at 100% then he'll have a better season in 2017 than he has the past 2 thus increasing his market value allowing him to get a better long term contract next year than he'd be able to get this year.

 

Ballard knows this and would prefer to lock him in long term now before his price goes up if he does have a bounce back year this coming season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jason_S said:

 

My theory on that is this...both Poe and Ballard know that Poe's back is 100%.  Poe knows that if he plays at 100% then he'll have a better season in 2017 than he has the past 2 thus increasing his market value allowing him to get a better long term contract next year than he'd be able to get this year.

 

Ballard knows this and would prefer to lock him in long term now before his price goes up if he does have a bounce back year this coming season.


Yeah, I could see that. And even if it's not 100%, I could see it just being like it was last season for him, just kind of a minor situation, discomfort that comes and goes, that he can still play through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jason_S said:

 

My theory on that is this...both Poe and Ballard know that Poe's back is 100%.  Poe knows that if he plays at 100% then he'll have a better season in 2017 than he has the past 2 thus increasing his market value allowing him to get a better long term contract next year than he'd be able to get this year.

 

Ballard knows this and would prefer to lock him in long term now before his price goes up if he does have a bounce back year this coming season.

For me if he is 100% then pay him as the top NT in the league and sign him long term.  I don't think anybody is willing to make him the highest paid at his position.  I think that's what he wants. If he gets it he will sign a LT deal.  I consider him a foundation player for our defense.  Signing him to a one yr. deal doesn't sound like a foundation piece to me.  So if he is 100% we should pay him.  If not 100% and the only way to get him is the one yr. deal so be it then I bring in Hankins as well.  We are losing Kerr and probably Perry as well and Hankins is a solid young player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

Poe is an exception to the rule because he was naturally a NT.    He's 6'3" and 345 without trying to be big.    He just IS big.      

 

so everything i said is true?  guys like poe or hampton are rare, and sometimes we go years without seeing anyone be that good at the positon

 

just stop with the coaches dont put good players there.  they cant put a good player there if they dont exist!

 

your argument does not make sense! if what you said is true then guys like poe or hampton would not play the nose becasue they are too good and the coaches would put them somewhere else????

 

your unicorn comment is exactly what i am saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, richard pallo said:

For me if he is 100% then pay him as the top NT in the league and sign him long term.  I don't think anybody is willing to make him the highest paid at his position.  I think that's what he wants. If he gets it he will sign a LT deal.  I consider him a foundation player for our defense.  Signing him to a one yr. deal doesn't sound like a foundation piece to me.  So if he is 100% we should pay him.  If not 100% and the only way to get him is the one yr. deal so be it then I bring in Hankins as well.  We are losing Kerr and probably Perry as well and Hankins is a solid young player. 

 

the reports have said the Colts Are trying to sign him long term, but it sounds like that's not what he wants because he thinks he'd get a better long term deal after having a bounce back 2017 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jason_S said:

 

the reports have said the Colts Are trying to sign him long term, but it sounds like that's not what he wants because he thinks he'd get a better long term deal after having a bounce back 2017 season.

The crazy thing is that he could get even more money not only by playing well on a one year deal but by salary cap rise alone (Doesn't it increase consistently every year nowadays?) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Jason_S said:

 

the reports have said the Colts Are trying to sign him long term, but it sounds like that's not what he wants because he thinks he'd get a better long term deal after having a bounce back 2017 season.

 

If this is true, then that means he believes he is healthy and he will be motivated to produce this upcoming season. Sign that guy immediately. Worst case scenario is he plays well and leaves in FA...giving the Colts a very high comp pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not signed, there is nothing else to talk about and I am bored.  
    • Yes, I know. The Stanford teams  when Hogan was the starting QB were full of top recruits on offense and defense. It was so much fun being a fan then. I'm not as big a fan of Stanford as you are. Being on the East Coast makes it hard to follow them as much as I used to.   Overall, I am becoming less and less interested in sports. For over 20 years, I used to listen to sports radio whenever I had free time.  I used to follow tennis, golf, baseball, college basketball, a little NBA and NHL as well as NFL and college football. I once went to 20+ baseball games in a year.  The only sport I still follow religiously now is NFL football. I try to follow my favorite baseball team, the Mets, but not enough. I attribute my loss of interest to there being too much change and movement of players, coaches, teams, conferences, etc. Stanford is now part of the ACC! My goodness! (Shaking my head) I don't like all these changes in conferences.   I was a big fan of Ted Leyland, Stanford's former athletic director many years ago. It saddened me when Leyland left Stanford to go to the University of Pacific which was his alma mater. I see he retired. He hired Buddy Teevens who died last year. Back in those days, I followed Stanford football a lot more closely. They were not great years but I loved rooting for players who also excelled in the classroom.   TL;DR 😉
    • Oh I think they are ready. They are right in the thick of it. Well educated and smart women. They are more in tune with the Indianapolis Colts than all of the new ownership in the league is with their respective franchises. I'm not concerned in the least with these ladies taking over moving forward. I think it's a great thing and speaks to the stability that the organization is preaching and looking to build. 
    • I'm out this year. I'm going to be focusing on my bestballs and daily fantasy. I already have $400 invested and am making a concentrated effort this year to win some money.
    • I got the email but I’ll put it here too, I’m in.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...