Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

TonyBungee

Member
  • Content Count

    284
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

194 Starter

Uncategorized

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

3,995 profile views
  1. Dontrelle Inman (I know I'm a broken record).
  2. I'm sure there will be disagreement over which WRs make the roster. Heck, I'm still not happy that Inman wasn't re-signed.
  3. What struck me looking back at that draft was that Bobby Wagner and Lavonte David went after Fleener.
  4. I'd give them next year's 2nd round pick we got from Washington.
  5. I think it was a mistake not going for 16-0. But that's not what costs them the SB. If I have to point to one thing, it's Caldwell coaching scared at the end of the 1st half. You have a lead, time on the clock, and maybe the best offense in football, and you try to run out the clock? If the Colts go down & score on that drive, even a field goal, they likely go to halftime up 13-3, with momentum. Instead, it became obvious that one coach was playing to win, and one was just trying not to lose.
  6. I know it's water under the bridge, but the Rams didn't deserve to be in that SB. Everyone knows the Saints were screwed, but really we were all robbed of either Brees vs. Brady or Brees vs. Mahomes. Either way, it would've made for a much better game. JMO.
  7. I voted for Cain, but don't count out Jordan Wilkins. I know RB is a little crowded, & Mack appears to be the man, but I really like the way Wilkins runs.
  8. I like Luck's chances to be as good or better than any of Warner's top 5 this year. But so far, he hasn't proven to be better than any on the list, so I won't argue with it. Yet.
  9. I'm gonna say it now: the winner of the week 1 Colts/Chargers game goes to the Superbowl.
  10. Agreed. He was the 2nd best WR on the Colts last year, and it wasn't even close. Maybe DF & Cain might have outplayed him this year, but I wouldn't bet on it. I get going with youth, but I still say this year's Colts roster would be better with him than without him.
  11. Yeah, 2 small, quick WRs on the same team never works.
  12. I hate this. I understand the desire to go younger. But I loved the way Inman played last year, and really wanted him to get a chance to continue with the chemistry he was building with Luck. Beside Hilton, there are 3 WRs on the roster that might be better than Inman this year, but none that I would bet on. Having said that, I'll admit that I'm impatient. I'm thinking about this year, and for this year, the Colts are better with Inman than without him. But Ballard's playing the long game, and he appears to be really good at it.
  13. So Sweat goes 26, just not to us.
×
×
  • Create New...