Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Punt play fail (merge)


Crunked

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 588
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

ive have never seen anything dumber in my life, pivotle point in the game, could have pinned them deep, ou D had just stopped them one drive ago, 1 possession game, it totally killed all of our momentum, I have no words none except dumbest play ive ever seen in 35 years of watching football, im so mad at these coaches right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The play was designed to confuse the defense and try to draw them off sides. It didn't work and will probably go down as one of the worst plays in Colts history.

That is a terrible excuse. Terrible.

If that was the plan, why wouldn't we send out Luck and his hard count?

If it was a play that we were going to run of everyone followed the formation it was still an entirely illegal formation and would have been called back.

There is no excuse for whatever that was, whether it was supposed to be snapped or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whalen for snapping it. You absolutely can't snap that under any circumstances unless you a) have favourable numbers, b) have someone offside.

Someone had to draw it up for him to have the chance to snap it. He was confused as everyone else and didn't wanna be the cause of a delay of game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coaching staff. Terrible idea, terrible call in a six point game. What was the point? You're going to take a delay of game and give them 5 yards in what had been a field position battle in the 3rd?

Outside of that play, win or lose, you could have felt good about the result. Instead, they're a punchline for the next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes why would you snap it, but more importantly why would you run it? are we so desperate that we need that kind of trick play....? but its probably the 5th WR's fault for that play call

 

I think somebody on the coaching staff was trying to out-patriot the patriots.  Too cute for their own good and put the team in a hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a terrible excuse. Terrible.

If that was the plan, why wouldn't we send out Luck and his hard count?

If it was a play that we were going to run of everyone followed the formation it was still an entirely illegal formation and would have been called back.

There is no excuse for whatever that was, whether it was supposed to be snapped or not.

This ^^^

 

I was fine with the onside kick....and I thought we'd recovered it....but this dopey punt formation was an embarrassing sandlot fiasco, nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Colts part in the podcast is from 9:50 til about 13:40, so it is a short listen. He said LT is a big question. Struggled at that position since Castanzo left. Raimann has not really panned out. Need the position to be solidified. Like the Oline man from Pitt and there is a belief that he can play LT. It could mean nothing but teams do draft for next years free agent market. I believe Raimann is up for a contract and could give the Colts some flexibility if Raimann wants huge money and/or if they don't really think he is he answer moving forward and Conclaves shows something. Let be honest,  Cosell could be totally opposite of what the Colts think of Raimann as a LT.  
    • Agree in that he may have used the incorrect words in trying to get his point across.   I would have to listen to it again but I believe he did say that the Colts have basically not found their starting LT.
    • Not unless they feel that one of the Oline men they drafted could develop into a LT. They used a 3rd a 4th on Oline this year and that is what they used on Raimann when they drafted. I am not saying Raimann is trash. Like I said, a lot of people on this forum and the media are high on him and Cosell is not.  He could be some where in the middle in how the Colts feel about them. If that is true, then  I would tend to believe that he has not cemented himself as the franchise LT moving forward.
    • If he said something like 'Raimann isn't a franchise LT, but he's serviceable,' I probably wouldn't bat an eye. If he said 'they could probably improve at LT because I'm not sure Raimann will hold up,' my ears would perk up a little, but that's still a defensible opinion. Saying he has not panned out is a different story. I interpret that as meaning he thinks Raimann has played poorly, which is objectively not true.   Like you said, we can disagree on a draft prospect, and only time will tell. If someone has doubts about how someone on the team will perform in the future, that's fair. But saying Raimann has not panned out is based on what we've already seen, and in this case, I think Cosell is just wrong.    Maybe I'm taking his comment too literally. I listened to the interview, it was just one line in a broader discussion, and maybe if he was going to clarify he'd state his position differently. 
    • We would have to pick pretty high to move on from Rainmann. That would mean a bad season and that isn’t happening.  I doubt they would pay a LT in FA. That’s too much money.
  • Members

    • G8R

      G8R 54

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 21,033

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,520

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MB-ColtsFan

      MB-ColtsFan 2,666

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 206

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • All Outta Luck

      All Outta Luck 4

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bluephantom87

      bluephantom87 1,193

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 4,673

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Demo627

      Demo627 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...