-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
One went to Stanford and the other was academic all american with 4.0gpa. Your turn -
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
Sometimes you have to go off your own knowledge and eye test and not go by any metric system or PFF, etc.. There is no way in hell I would trade Q or Leonard straight up for Godwin. Godwin is good but Q and Leonard are great at their respective positions. -
By NewColtsFan · Posted
I’ve now seen this other post of yours and thought I’d share some thoughts. If someone wanted to claim that Godman is better than Q or better than Leonard, I think that’s a debate you can have. I personally wouldn’t be on that side, but you could have the debate. But once you made it Godwin better than Leonard AND Q, I think the debate was over before it started. I think you’re giving too deep of a discount to the WILL and the LG, and giving too much value to WR. There’s only one Quenton Nelson. There’s one of a small handful of Leonard’s, maybe 5? But aren’t there dozens of very good receivers all over the NFL? Dozens. And if there are, doesn’t that pretty much end the debate we're having? That’s how this strikes me. -
It doesn't matter what I think and my post was not about what I think. It was about what PFF's numbers likely are saying. You are doing the same thing w87r is doing with the raw numbers. They don't tell you the story of how good/valuable the player has been in PFF's system. Their grades and WAR derived from the grades should tell you whether he's more or less valuable. If you asked me whether I would trade DL+Q for Godwin my answer would be HELL NO. Now if you ask if I would trade one of them for Godwin... that might be worth a discussion.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts