Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The Holding Calls. The right calls?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

They were right by the law but my problem is the Packers were doing the same thing and the flags weren’t coming.  I mean they tackled a guy about to sack Rodgers on the last drive.  

The refs definitely tried to give the Packers a way to stay in the game - pathetic 

Lets put it this way...how often does a potentially game sealing drive end w 6 offensive holds in the final 2 minutes?

Just now, csmopar said:

Dude, I literally chunked the remote across the room and I rarely ever get mad.

Haha....man! I know. Me too, I rarely get mad, BUT, I had never seen anything like that before. Even the broadcasters couldn’t believe what they were seeing.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, poaponies said:

this almost feels like the no pass interference on the hail marry. In some ways  

Its what should happen. You could call hold or pass interference, or defensive holding on the vast majority of plays,  but its never called that way. So when it actually is called that way, there's an appearanxe of unfairness, or impropriety... disproportionately at the very least.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to hijack your thread Statesman, but another call I wondered about was the kick off that landed on the goal line. Yeah it hit the goal line but he picked it up out of the end zone and tried to advance it. How was that ruled a touchback? Seems it would be the same thing as returning a kick that you caught in the end zone?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Archangel said:

The sad thing now that the Refs did the holding calls. they will be watching the colts extremely close the next few games.

I hope it means the league will be watching this reffing crew extremely close the next few games.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dunk said:

Not to hijack your thread Statesman, but another call I wondered about was the kick off that landed on the goal line. Yeah it hit the goal line but he picked it up out of the end zone and tried to advance it. How was that ruled a touchback? Seems it would be the same thing as returning a kick that you caught in the end zone?

That’s the kind of thing reich should be yelling to the refs.  It’s my only complaint about him.  I haven’t seen him plea for calls.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d hate for the NFL to turn into the NBA when it comes to penalties.  In that league, it depends on the time of the game and the player involved if the ref will call the foul.  The NBA is unwatchable for me because of that.  
 

Those were good calls, but like everyone has said, they can call holding (and pass interference) on just about every play if they wanted.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Dunk said:

Not to hijack your thread Statesman, but another call I wondered about was the kick off that landed on the goal line. Yeah it hit the goal line but he picked it up out of the end zone and tried to advance it. How was that ruled a touchback? Seems it would be the same thing as returning a kick that you caught in the end zone?

Once he gave himself up/called for a fair catch in the endzone, and it hit in the endzone?

 

The ball is dead.  Doesn't matter what happens after.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive never seen that many calls made in a clutch point in the game. They definitely didnt call the whole game like that, nor did they call the Packers the same way.

 

On that deep shot to MVS the next drive there was the same type hold in the endzone that got called 3 times against us...it seems like they tried to hand it to the Packers.

 

Whatever we won , i question the integrity of the NFL sometimes though.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, StatesmanN said:

Once he gave himself up/called for a fair catch in the endzone, and it hit in the endzone?

 

The ball is dead.  Doesn't matter what happens after.

I would have to see the play again. I don't think he called for a fair catch, he didn't think the ball entered the end zone, picked it up and tried to advance it. No one else questioned the overturn, so I'm probably wrong, but thought I'd ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, StatesmanN said:

Even Tony Dungy just said that the Reich were terrible with the passing calls under 2 minutes that went incomplete.

 

 

 

Yeah, but Tony always played it conservative, personally I've really liked how Frank calls plays aggressive. Any other coach would of punted it on 4th and 4 and Rodgers would of probably scored having the extra time. So you gotta take the good with the bad

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought most were legit.  The one on Pascal I would have let go because it appeared *to me* that the defender actually ran Pascal over and he was just trying to keep from falling down and both were literally out of the play at that point.  The rest I don't have a problem with.  Pittman looked like he was trying to makeout with the guy.  The ones on the OL were legit to me.  Just a bad bad bad drive there.

 

What I have most problem with are several I saw the Packers committing that weren't called.  At least make it equal there.  But not much of a problem with the Colts penalties.  And no, while I'm sure the league and the general NFL fan would like to see the Packers do well, I don't think there is any agenda there.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, superrep1967 said:

Yeah, we need a new o-line coach. 

I have been of that opinion for a while now.  I think Nelson may still be hampered from the back issues he was having before the start of the season, but that asside, the O line is shell of what they were last year. 

Im opinion they have been on a steady decline sence they changed coaches.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2017 rule: The ball is dead if it is downed in the end zone by the receiving team.
New rule: The ball is dead for a touchback if it touches the ground in the end zone, even if hasn't been touched by the receiving team. The returner doesn't have to down the ball in the end zone to get the touchback. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Dunk said:

I would have to see the play again. I don't think he called for a fair catch, he didn't think the ball entered the end zone, picked it up and tried to advance it. No one else questioned the overturn, so I'm probably wrong, but thought I'd ask.

This. I think the refs went with “what the player meant” to do. But he still advanced it. So even if he did intimate a fair catch, he ran out with it. Which in the even of a fair catch, it’s a flag for unsportsmanlike conduct. 
 

Edit: see above. Apparently it’s a new rule.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What confounded me was the lack of calls on GB and the suddenness of all the calls.

 

Ive watched enough games to know that these holds happen on almost every play. The fact that the refs could see all of these on the colts side leads me to believe they are pretty keen observers so they willfully did not call any on the pack.

 

Additionally another item has to be brought up, did the colts o line play this way all game and the flags weren’t thrown any other time (that many flags) or did the o line suddenly regress for just one series?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PeterBowman said:

Not so much the holding being called, it was blatant lack of consistency and the timing.

The timing is true.  They didn’t call the holding that way anywhere else in the game.  Yes they made some other holding calls but they weren’t that tight the rest of the day.  That’s unacceptable.  You can’t call the game one way one drive and another way the rest or the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone that thinks the refs were pulling for the Pack is full of playdough. Get over yourselves. Pathetic number of holding violations that Reich should fine his players for. But to the real issue is the Colts appear to be playing better every week. There was a time when they failed to comeback to win games. Every player is getting the job done and as pointed out in the game there re no weak spots.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, King Colt said:

Anyone that thinks the refs were pulling for the Pack is full of playdough. Get over yourselves. Pathetic number of holding violations that Reich should fine his players for. But to the real issue is the Colts appear to be playing better every week. There was a time when they failed to comeback to win games. Every player is getting the job done and as pointed out in the game there re no weak spots.

I don’t think the refs were pulling for the Packers.  I do think they called the game differently on that drive than they did the rest of the day.  Yes they were holds but other than one or two of them they were holds you could call on any play but officials don’t because the league doesn’t want it called like that.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

They had to do something they were getting flagged anytime they tried to run.  The passing was working and they were a first down away from either being in field goal range or running out the clock.  

 

Right, it was 1st and 20, and the refs were throwing a flag every run play, literally. Throwing was reasonable. 

 

Also, I don't care about Dungy's opinion when it comes to play calling and game management. He's incredible conservative and risk averse, and I don't think he would be able to handle the recent data trends regarding pass/run, 4th downs or two point attempts. So offering Dungy as an authority here doesn't work for me. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Nadine changed the title to The Holding Calls. The right calls?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Those three PLUS wide receiver!   Those Big 4 match our four biggest needs. 
    • *Colts re-sign Justin Houston- This may be after the draft but as of now I think he is the best chance to help our pass rush not take a step back unless we want to try Ingram or Clowney.   **I still have hope Ertz could end up available but if not oh well.   Here we go... yep. No trades.   1. Sam Cosmi- LT- The time to replace AC is now. This may not technically be the best valued player available but he's not far off. If we wait until 54 I think there will have been a run on the best remaining OTs. Take a quality athletic LT at 21 and keep the o-line in great shape. Next year we are likely without a 1st, there may not be a better time. We could trade back but that's hard to predict. We would need a great deal to pass on our pick of the litter imo.    2.  Ifeatu Melifonwu- CB- Great fit. Tall, athletic, excels in zone. Not quite as big a need as DE but not far behind. Rhodes only has one year for now and I, like others, would like to see an upgrade over RYS.   4. Elerson Smith- DE- With the need at LT and the lack of value in round two we opt to dig for athletic upside for our pass rush addition. We come up with Smith. He's a bit of a forum favorite and I get why. We can't confidently fix every issue this year imo, but if you can't, at least find some upside.   5. Dazz Newsome‐ WR- We may very well pass up a lot of good value at WR this draft but the good news is some solid prospects are likely to fall into the later rounds. An explosive prospect who can compete with Campbell to replace Hilton as our little guy speedster. Lol   6. Quentin Morris- TE- One of my favorite late round prospects. With this being an average to below average TE class after Pitts, Morris offers some upside to provide us with a move TE down the line.   7. Franklin McCain III- CB- Borrowing again from a pool of forum recommendations. You can't realistically expect late round guys to all be hits but I'm down for investing those final picks in depth we can groom.   Final notes:   - Cosmi and Melifonwu are my favorite no trade 1-2 realistic punch. Value and need matches pretty nicely imo.   -I've seen Newsome graded as a 2nd rounder but most have him at rounds 4-5. He also ran a 4.38 so I might be a bit optimistic about his availability   -I could always do another mock but I don't see my view changing much from now until the 29th.
    • It’s the University of Michigan for goodness sake!    It would be a bigger deal if Dodds wasn’t there!   
    • I'd like to hear the board's thoughts on this topic from more of an outside perspective. From my experience Steelers fans fall into two camps (generally speaking); totally irrational and loyal to the death, highly critical of anything to do with Pittsburgh Football unless it results in a championship (and not always in a rational manner).     Now for my thinking, this issue should have been addressed much sooner, but if nothing else after the disaster that was the 2019 season. You have an aging QB who just blew his elbow out and were starting "junior varsity" replacements. You have been bleeding free agents all off season in 2020 and have lost or watched the decline of key players at LT, C, LB, RB, S, CB and just resigned a WR free agent. Plus, you also need a LG. These stooges are actually suggesting using a 2nd round pick on a QB from college when the decision to do nothing about the QB position has caused half the team to get sent packing because you have next to nothing to spend in free agency.   This is after these same people lauded the Dwayne Haskins singing as a "steal". Pittsburgh literally got him for nothing this year after WFT ate all the "bad" in his contract, a 15th overall pick coming into his 3rd year in the NFL who drastically needed a change of scenery.   I'm convinced that if it was up to Tomlin he would have already moved on. We all know he's a master at coach speak at the podium but he's a completely different guy otherwise. Even at that, he's started to unravel a bit because you can tell he's getting frustrated with some of his more recent public comments. He is no BSer. I get the warm fuzzy feeling we all have when a team is loyal to a player who has been valuable and produced at a high level, but I mean even New England and Indianapolis let Manning and Brady walk after all of their success.   Please tell me in what universe does any of this even make sense? I am confused.
    • Gonna be on vacation next week. Sorry
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...