Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Sick of Gregg Doyel


Dr. T

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

45 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:

 

Here's a review from a journalists point of view.

 

There's nothing wrong with it.    Doyle has his facts and he used them well.   He was a little over the top but most columnists are.   

 

Doyle notes that Belichick is the exception to the rule when it comes to coaches who lose their first go around and then become winners.    Except he forgets Pete Carroll who did ok in NE and got fired and then had one season with the Jets and got fired after one year.   Pat Schumur had a losing go around in Cleveland and is about to be hired.   I'm sure there are others.   

 

And lets not overlook this...   a good number of teams wanted McDaniels this year.   Ballard isn't alone in being willing to give him another chance.   I think this was not a great class of coaching candidates.   I don't have a real problem with McDaniels.

 

But...   on balance I thought it was a reasonable column.   If you're not a Colts fan and you happen to read it, there's nothing wrong with it.   But I'll close with this...  I'd like to be there when Doyle and McDaniels first meet!    THAT should be interesting!      :peek:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doyel is all about sensationalism -- from the first day I heard him while driving and listening to Dakich (many moons ago), while he (Doyel) was at CBS Sports , I could tell it was all about getting reactions and trying to move the needle.  Everything he says has to be taken with a grain of salt, filtered, then assessed.  Every so often there is something worthwhile coming out of his "reporting" that could be considered concrete, the balance of the time, it's hyperbole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I'd like to be there when Doyle and McDaniels first meet!    THAT should be interesting!      :peek:

 

Why in the world would you like to see a confrontation between a brand new Colt coach and a jerk sports writer. Not a great first impression of the city by the new coach and no need for him to be confronted with this just starting off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Here's a review from a journalists point of view.

 

There's nothing wrong with it.    Doyle has his facts and he used them well.   He was a little over the top but most columnists are.   

 

Doyle notes that Belichick is the exception to the rule when it comes to coaches who lose their first go around and then become winners.    Except he forgets Pete Carroll who did ok in NE and got fired and then had one season with the Jets and got fired after one year.   Pat Schumur had a losing go around in Cleveland and is about to be hired.   I'm sure there are others.   

 

And lets not overlook this...   a good number of teams wanted McDaniels this year.   Ballard isn't alone in being willing to give him another chance.   I think this was not a great class of coaching candidates.   I don't have a real problem with McDaniels.

 

But...   on balance I thought it was a reasonable column.   If you're not a Colts fan and you happen to read it, there's nothing wrong with it.   But I'll close with this...  I'd like to be there when Doyle and McDaniels first meet!    THAT should be interesting!      :peek:

 

My problem with it is that he treats this hire like it's happening in January of 2011 after he's been fired by Denver. His faults are forever and irredeemable, his wins and successes are momentary and due to luck and/or everybody else but himself. It's an extremely slanted/trollish article. I would like to know if anybody would want to be judged like that - take the worst parts of your professional experience, ignore everything good? Is this how Doyel himself would like to be judged? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, stitches said:

My problem with it is that he treats this hire like it's happening in January of 2011 after he's been fired by Denver. His faults are forever and irredeemable, his wins and successes are momentary and due to luck and/or everybody else but himself. It's an extremely slanted/trollish article. I would like to know if anybody would want to be judged like that - take the worst parts of your professional experience, ignore everything good? Is this how Doyel himself would like to be judged? 

 

Yes......    agreed.      Very good points by you.    I had the same thoughts.    No one wants to be judged on their worst days.     Really good post.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, stitches said:

My problem with it is that he treats this hire like it's happening in January of 2011 after he's been fired by Denver. His faults are forever and irredeemable, his wins and successes are momentary and due to luck and/or everybody else but himself. It's an extremely slanted/trollish article. I would like to know if anybody would want to be judged like that - take the worst parts of your professional experience, ignore everything good? Is this how Doyel himself would like to be judged? 

 

I think it is every true Colts fans' hope that the team restores its' winning ways, Coach McDaniels leads us to multiple Super Bowls, and Mr. Doyel has to eat crow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Doyel know Josh personally to call him a punk? If I was Josh, I go all Joe Pesci from Casino or Goodfellas on him; this is meant for laughs here. He must be annoyed as proclaimed Toub was going to be the HC. I would get RB at 3 in draft as can create many different matchups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  1. I don't live in Indy, don't get the Indy papers, so I had no clue who he is, or what he writes. 

 

And for the record, I get the majority of my Indy news right here on the Forum.   For me, it's the best place to stay up to date on what's going on.

So.....

to those of you who are very knowlegeable about the goings on, I say thank you for keeping me informed. :hat: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gramz said:
  1. I don't live in Indy, don't get the Indy papers, so I had no clue who he is, or what he writes. 

 

And for the record, I get the majority of my Indy news right here on the Forum.   For me, it's the best place to stay up to date on what's going on.

So.....

to those of you who are very knowlegeable about the goings on, I say thank you for keeping me informed. :hat: 

I live on East Coast, but check Indy Star online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, hoosierhawk said:

 I'd like to be there when Doyle and McDaniels first meet!    THAT should be interesting!      :peek:

 

Why in the world would you like to see a confrontation between a brand new Colt coach and a jerk sports writer. Not a great first impression of the city by the new coach and no need for him to be confronted with this just starting off. 

Will be something if he's the first person to ask Josh a question. Will Josh go Ryan Leaf on him or be programmed for Q & A?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gramz said:
  1. I don't live in Indy, don't get the Indy papers, so I had no clue who he is, or what he writes. 

 

And for the record, I get the majority of my Indy news right here on the Forum.   For me, it's the best place to stay up to date on what's going on.

So.....

to those of you who are very knowlegeable about the goings on, I say thank you for keeping me informed. :hat: 

hes also at post game interviews if you ever watch those

 

hes the one asking ridiculous questions that chuck never answered 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

Everyone has their agenda and reason. Didn't Jason Whitlock rag on the Colts because he was a big Jeff George fan and didn't like how the Colts treated him? I am not sure what the root of Doyel's saltiness is though.

Whitlock was on George HS team wasn't he ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dr. T said:

Are there any old time posters here who used to refer to the Star as "Rats" (Star in reverse)? At that time, there were no Colts fan forms set up by the team and all we had was the "Rats" online forum!

I was on that forum, but I don't remember "rats".

Probably a ME problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/17/2018 at 3:29 AM, NewColtsFan said:

 

Here's a review from a journalists point of view.

 

There's nothing wrong with it.    Doyle has his facts and he used them well.   He was a little over the top but most columnists are.   

 

Doyle notes that Belichick is the exception to the rule when it comes to coaches who lose their first go around and then become winners.    Except he forgets Pete Carroll who did ok in NE and got fired and then had one season with the Jets and got fired after one year.   Pat Schumur had a losing go around in Cleveland and is about to be hired.   I'm sure there are others.   

 

And lets not overlook this...   a good number of teams wanted McDaniels this year.   Ballard isn't alone in being willing to give him another chance.   I think this was not a great class of coaching candidates.   I don't have a real problem with McDaniels.

 

But...   on balance I thought it was a reasonable column.   If you're not a Colts fan and you happen to read it, there's nothing wrong with it.   But I'll close with this...  I'd like to be there when Doyle and McDaniels first meet!    THAT should be interesting!      :peek:

 

 

NCF, I enjoy and appreciate your posts a lot, but as a journalist myself (out of the trade now), I personally think that your defense of Doyel is misguided in this case. Sure, he might note a couple of facts, but then he write this: 

 

Quote

And I still can’t believe this is happening. Can’t believe McDaniels will soon be hired by the Colts, and entrusted with Andrew Luck. Can’t believe he was the hottest commodity on the coaching market this fall. McDaniels is Lane Kiffin to me, an arrogant young punk who ascended rapidly after Daddy got him a cherry first job in coaching – McDaniels’ father, Ohio high school legend Thom McDaniels, was friends with Nick Saban, who hired Josh as a grad assistant at Michigan State in 1999 – and who kept getting promoted to the point of failure.

 

I know that is a column, an opinion to stir up things, but that piece of misguided rage is just unacceptable in my book, sorry. I would tell him to either get in controls of his rampant emotions, or find another job. And I'm what most would call a "soft" guy. :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Irrelevant said:

 

NCF, I enjoy and appreciate your posts a lot, but as a journalist myself (out of the trade now), I personally think that your defense of Doyel is misguided in this case. Sure, he might note a couple of facts, but then he write this: 

 

 

I know that is a column, an opinion to stir up things, but that piece of misguided rage is just unacceptable in my book, sorry. I would tell him to either get in controls of his rampant emotions, or find another job. And I'm what most would call a "soft" guy. :thmup:

 

His writing style is not mine.    And it's not the style that most sports writers use.

 

But Doyle isn't alone in his very aggressive dramatic style.    I wasn't comfortable with it,  but he's not unique this way.   He's not a unicorn.   Plenty of columnists write this way to try and generate reactions and clicks and so forth...  

 

Believe me,  I wasn't trying to say I like it,  or enjoyed it,  or even agreed with it.    I didn't.    Just that I didn't find it so objectionable that the man should lose his credential, which is a popular sentiment in this thread discussion.

 

By the way,   I'm mostly out of the business as well.    I've got some connections to some work still....   but not much.

 

I'm mostly a bystander these days.       So, how is it you've been here so long and this is the first time I'm learning you were a journalist before?     I'm sorry you didn't share that sooner.      Please feel free to contact me privately.    I'd love to learn about your years in the business.     I'll bet you have GREAT stories to tell.    And I'd love to read them all!

 

Just send me a private message here....    and if you need more room,  I'll send you my e-mail!

 

Thanks for reaching out.....

 

Michael

NCF

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every team in the NFL has that one journalist that are always controversial and or negative  Even the Patriots have a couple. It's comes with the territory. To make a big issue out of it is feeding into what that journalist wants. Attention and hits.

Every time one of us goes to his site he gets exactly what he is wanting regardless of how you feel about him. (or her for that matter)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

His writing style is not mine.    And it's not the style that most sports writers use.

 

But Doyle isn't alone in his very aggressive dramatic style.    I wasn't comfortable with it,  but he's not unique this way.   He's not a unicorn.   Plenty of columnists write this way to try and generate reactions and clicks and so forth...  

 

Believe me,  I wasn't trying to say I like it,  or enjoyed it,  or even agreed with it.    I didn't.    Just that I didn't find it so objectionable that the man should lose his credential, which is a popular sentiment in this thread discussion.

 

By the way,   I'm mostly out of the business as well.    I've got some connections to some work still....   but not much.

 

I'm mostly a bystander these days.       So, how is it you've been here so long and this is the first time I'm learning you were a journalist before?     I'm sorry you didn't share that sooner.      Please feel free to contact me privately.    I'd love to learn about your years in the business.     I'll bet you have GREAT stories to tell.    And I'd love to read them all!

 

Just send me a private message here....    and if you need more room,  I'll send you my e-mail!

 

Thanks for reaching out.....

 

Michael

NCF

 

 

 

Ok, great post, Michael/NCF! Now I understand your post. :thmup:

 

I have to work now, but will get in touch with you later. Take care! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Roger's could get turned but catch back up before the ball got there.   I was rooting for Flowers especially because up he did run I n the 4.3s.  It is so sad that "intelligent" posters here post endless endlessly that in Gus's D our corners don't need speed.   With two deep safeties any good QB will pick it apart with current rules. Playing single high when they stack receivers the CB on the opposite side is really playing regular old everyday man. Per Pro football Reference Gus" played man 28% of the time. What kind of madness is it to put a 6'2" CB that ran a 4.57 on ANY of the Many 4.3's WR's? This is your plan?
    • I think what happened is Ballard had a list of 3-4 guys he was willing to take on the trade-down. Mitchell was on top of his list. He might have thought because of the rumors of character concerns and poor work ethic that he may fall to 52, and he had a few backup options on top of his board behind him he was fine with. It was probably worth the gamble to Ballard to get two extra 5th round picks since we only had 7 picks at the time and Ballard likes to build through the draft.
    • This was my point that I posted not long after AD was selected. Many have said and are still saying that Ballard was a genius that figured out the 6 picks that followed him trading back in round 2. There's no was Ballard said something like "wow , I can't believe this guy fell to us ." I could take him here but , I know he's not going to be selected in the next 6 picks , so I'll trade back." It's way more likely that he trades up 4-5 spots if he valued AD that much  more than the other players at the top of his board.  I think Ballard did a really good job in this draft but there's no way in heck , he traded back with certainty that AD would be there at 52.
    • Wow!    You're on fire today.   Post after post that are classically you.  Only you have these views.   That’s why these posts are so easy to remember for years.   I’m struggling to find anything to agree with.   Not that you’d care what my opinion is.  I just couldn’t help but finally respond today.   Sorry. 
    • Great interview!!   Both the Colts 1st round and 2nd round picks fell right in to their laps!!   Preparation + luck are equal parts of the equation!!
  • Members

    • chad72

      chad72 18,306

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,764

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • midmoColtsfan

      midmoColtsfan 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SurfinKal

      SurfinKal 264

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 3,240

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 427

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 1,446

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,076

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 9,030

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...