-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
If he trades down, I could see him getting Cooper and Arnold. -
Agreed. I’m starting to warmup to the idea of trading down in the first. Maybe even as far as 29 with lions. That should net us an extra 2nd. If we can’t get Q Mitchell, Bowers, Nabers, etc. The value says trade back. I hate it but in the end we honestly just have too many holes. Maybe one day we’ll be able to afford the luxury of trading up for a stud.
-
Some vague comments from Ballard in his end of season presser about mixing in coverages. So, not really.
-
By ColtStrong2013 · Posted
I doubt one player from what they consider at second tier will be targeted over the others. I think the only way they stay at 15 is if someone from their top tier falls. Otherwise, I agree with you that trading down gets the same level player, and what I expect to happen. -
We'll have first shot at the second tier of players, IMO. Good in one way, bad in other ways. Unless there is one player being targeted at 15, trading down a few slots gets you the same level of player, IMO.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts