Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Ryan kelly and jon bostic going to IR


VaAllDay757

Recommended Posts

 

Posted December 5

 

So many guys going on IR. It's all just a ploy to give Chuck the ammo he needs to have Irsay/Ballard give him a pass for this disastrous season. Luck being out wasn't going to cut it, so Chuck is upping the ante...with Swoope, Desir and now Simon all being put on IR.

 

I fully expect to see Ryan Kelly join them next...and Tolzien to be starting games by Week 15 at the latest.

I was being sarcastic...:thinking:

 

Just watch...Tolzien will be the starter before the season's end. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

OH BOY.      I have added Center to the positions of need.

Only reason he is IR'ed is because there are 2 games left, and no playoffs..... why rush back for nothing?  This also gives the front office 2 weeks to evaluate some fringe players off the street to see if they deserve a minicamp invite this spring..... nmothing wrong with being thorough as a priority with this roster, at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Looks like Glowinski was starting for Seattle during camp...

But struggled mightily.

Based on the article below... here he is a perfect fit.

 

 Seahawks reportedly demote RG Mark Glowinski from starting lineup

https://www.fieldgulls.com/2017/9/24/16357260/seahawks-reportedly-demote-rg-mark-glowinski-from-starting-lineup

We are just trying to fill starting spots for the final two games then the roster likely gets overhauled again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shastamasta said:

 

Posted December 5

 

So many guys going on IR. It's all just a ploy to give Chuck the ammo he needs to have Irsay/Ballard give him a pass for this disastrous season. Luck being out wasn't going to cut it, so Chuck is upping the ante...with Swoope, Desir and now Simon all being put on IR.

 

I fully expect to see Ryan Kelly join them next...and Tolzien to be starting games by Week 15 at the latest.

I was being sarcastic...:thinking:

 

Just watch...Tolzien will be the starter before the season's end. 

 

 

I really think these are Ballard's moves not Chucks.  Maybe he's going for the No.2 pick and giving himself more ammo to give Chuck another year.  No, he couldn't be thinking that way could he? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I really think these are Ballard's moves not Chucks.  Maybe he's going for the No.2 pick and giving himself more ammo to give Chuck another year.  No, he couldn't be thinking that way could he? 

If true then Ballard should also be fired 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Kelly is really dissapointing, i was hoping he would be our center of the future, but seems to spend most of his time on the injured list

He is our future center. He missed no games last season and now 9 this season with a broken foot and a concussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, indyagent17 said:

it appears we have 17 on the IR. Washington has about 20 and SF has nearly 2, NE has 14

 

There are a lot of team with more than 12 too 

 

its bad league wide except with a few rare occasions 

 

That list only includes the players CURRENTLY on our IR. It does not include any of the players we have waived with injury settlements. Looking at our transaction list, we have sent a whopping 34 players to IR this year.  Admittedly, the same could be happening with these other teams as well, keeping their numbers down, I dont really have the time to sift through every teams transactions pages. But it does seem like we have waived a higher than usual number off of our IR list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SaturdayAllDay said:

That list only includes the players CURRENTLY on our IR. It does not include any of the players we have waived with injury settlements. Looking at our transaction list, we have sent a whopping 34 players to IR this year.  Admittedly, the same could be happening with these other teams as well, keeping their numbers down, I dont really have the time to sift through every teams transactions pages. But it does seem like we have waived a higher than usual number off of our IR list.

Good point brother I had not took that into account

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/rams-tried-to-trade-up-for-brock-bowers-then-byron-murphy   You seem to be right.
    • Read this this morning. Thought it was interesting    https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/indianapolis-colts/news/colts-rams-nfl-draft-trade-offer-revealed-rejected/be019bcd2ee81b6ffeb4656e     "This was the rejected trade offer from the Rams to the Colts in the first round:     Rams get: Nos. 15, 191   Colts get: Nos. 19, 99, 154   While that's the kind of deal Chris Ballard would be expected to take in the past, the Colts clearly had an eye for edge rusher Laiatu Latu.   It's clear that it would have taken much more in the offer for the Colts to move off the chance of selecting the prospect they believe was the best defender in the entire draft.   There were a few viable prospects available at the time so it would have made sense for the Colts to trade back.   But this only proves how convicted they were in draft Latu."     Not too surprised we turnt that down as it has us losing on the draft chart by a little bit, but does show the conviction they had in Latu.
    • Offense wins in the league now and to take it a step further the QB is by far the lost important piece on any team.    So, on offense you need the best possible QB with the best possible supporting cast and on defense you need players who can affect the play of the opposing QBs directly. 
    • This is definitely an issue. So, either Ballard is A.) Cheap and he doesn't want to spend money on FAs (even with injuries happening) or B.) He can't build a competitive enough team to attract any worthwhile FA's after 7 going on 8 years now.    If AR and the current team can't attract FAs that could theoretically get a starting job at the S position for a year, then we are in big trouble according to the opinions of the players of the NFL. Personally, I think Ballard just avoids FA so much that he doesn't want to bring outside help in. He wants to be known as the GM who builds his team from the draft.   Wish the local media would call him out on this.
    • I think the Colts have the money to be competitive for a good free agent safety.  I think bringing in one of them may depend on whether a player like Simmons wants to play for the Colts.  They may be hoping to sign for a team with a better chance of making the playoffs.   So I don’t know if Ballard is making a statement or not?     Hope my answer makes sense to you….    
  • Members

    • Kc77

      Kc77 11

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,397

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,964

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 962

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,968

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonC

      ClaytonC 69

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 176

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CrazyHorse

      CrazyHorse 6

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Old Colt

      Old Colt 289

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...