Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

BProland85

Still too conservative

53 posts in this topic

Im happy we won, but I thought we should have blown these guys out. 20 points by the offense and only 6 points in the 2nd half worries me that Arians is still too conservative with his playcalling.

What happened to letting Luck loose like in the Green Bay and Miami games? He is our best weapon, so we need to use him. But a win is a win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lighten up man! 6-3! People though we would win 4 games ALL SEASON. ENJOY THE WIN

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im happy we won, but I thought we should have blown these guys out. 20 points by the offense and only 6 points in the 2nd half worries me that Arians is still too conservative with his playcalling.

What happened to letting Luck loose like in the Green Bay and Miami games? He is our best weapon, so we need to use him. But a win is a win.

You have to keep in mind that we're missing a lot of starters on both sides of the ball. "You play to win the game" We did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad we won, but I'm tired of us not finishing drives in the red zone. The offense really only scored 14 points, when we should have scored around 28, or more. It's going to come back and bite us at some point. We have to get better in the red zone. Good win though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*Checks score*

No problem with today's game whatsoever.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was perfect, grabing a lead running in the second half and playing defense... that's what great teams do.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically beating a team by 2 TDs would usually be considered a blowout.

When you are dominating a team like we did against them tonight, why would you be aggressive and try to run up the score?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Still too conservative

I know, right....It's like we're just winning too many games.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude we didn`t play well enough to EARN that lead. Guess you were not watching.

Linkenboob is GUARANTEED to cause damage, he will be the one to get Luck injured. He is sad at tackle. What is new?

Shipley is only decent at Center, he isn`t fast enough to get outside and make the outside blocks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) We beat them by 17 in their house. That's a blowout by NFL standards.

2) Offensively, we still need to develop our run game and offensive balance because there's times where we won't be able to drop Luck back 50 times and win. Running well doesn't happen automatically, we have to put the reps in. So far, it's working- our run blocking is significantly better than it was the first few games.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that was a 6min drive we went on in the 4th quarter with 9min left in the game, and leave 3 min on the clock after we get the field goal. How on earth is that conservative? that's exactly how you draw it up at practice

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont know what let Luck loose means but Im more interested right now with our Corner controversy, as for how Link played at Right Tackle, he is who we thought he was there so not concerned, he should be moved back to Guard, Justice was out so not concerned

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im happy we won, but I thought we should have blown these guys out. 20 points by the offense and only 6 points in the 2nd half worries me that Arians is still too conservative with his playcalling.

What happened to letting Luck loose like in the Green Bay and Miami games? He is our best weapon, so we need to use him. But a win is a win.

why throw up 35 or 42 points??? we were up 27-3 we pretty much had their hearts ripped out already. no sense in risking luck getting hurt. he was already hit pretty hard a couple times that resulted in penalties no need to put him in harms way in dropping back to pass. and dont worry you will get your air attack next weekend against new england.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sigh...

6-3 and folk are crying....

AFTER LAST SEASON.............

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They weren't conservative at all. They turned the ball over and didn't finish drives. If anything, they should have been more conservative in a few of those situations, played for FGs and put the game away sooner.

6-3 is great, but in order to beat playoff teams, they must start finishing drives. I'm not sure I've ever seen a team drive up and down the field more with less to show for it.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what im enjoying is watching this butler kid. where the heck did he come from??? 2 INT's one taken for a TD, and a fumble recovery??? thats just crazy. he had more turn overs tonight himself then the whole colts team has had in the last month. how about putting Butler and davis as the two starting CB's and powers as the nickel??? lol

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

too conservative? We were up 24-3 in the 4th quarter. Why would you be throwing on every down in that scenario.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They weren't conservative at all. They turned the ball over and didn't finish drives. If anything, they should have been more conservative in a few of those situations, played for FGs and put the game away sooner.

6-3 is great, but in order to beat playoff teams, they must start finishing drives. I'm not sure I've ever seen a team drive up and down the field more with less to show for it.

It's ABSOLUTELY imperative we start finishing these drives with TDs instead of turnovers and field goals. Against teams like New England and Houston it will cost us the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who cares we won. This offense is not a well oiled machine by any means and probably won't be this year. The Oline is not good enough. The young WRs drop too many passes. As long as we win I'll take it at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are still protection issues and Mandrew uses his pocket prowess to erase a lot of it. This is not the best situation to be airing it out. What should be appreciated, rather than questioning it is.....

We ran the ball to kill time and to finish the game which is something we use to wish we could do! Out....freaking.....standing.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to keep in mind that we're missing a lot of starters on both sides of the ball. "You play to win the game" We did.

Not only that but that was our largest winning margin of the season. With that said the offense scored three points in the second half that's not going to work in New England and some of the better teams we have coming up. I don't think that's due to being too conservative. It's due to being a young team that is still learning how to finish drives and still makes too many mistakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, right....It's like we're just winning too many games.

Conservatively winning games....

haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are up big, I don't mind us going conservative. As long as we don't get too complacent and let the other team back in it, I have no problem reducing the playbook and getting other guys in for more experience. That way, we develop players more and we expose less of the playbook to other teams. We have more surprise plays that they haven't seen before that we can break out when we really need them

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What happened to letting Luck loose like in the Green Bay and Miami games? He is our best weapon, so we need to use him. But a win is a win.

You mean those games where we were behind in the second half?

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are up big, I don't mind us going conservative. As long as we don't get too complacent and let the other team back in it, I have no problem reducing the playbook and getting other guys in for more experience. That way, we develop players more and we expose less of the playbook to other teams. We have more surprise plays that they haven't seen before that we can break out when we really need them

It may just be me, but it seems that we actually Try to pick up the first down on those time killing possesions when we are up instead of running 3 times for no gain, puntting, and hoping the D holds......... like we used to do.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We mixed it up last night and the lead allowed us to run the ball more and not depend on the passing game as much. My one criticism is the use of the WR screen....it rarely works and teams are always ready for it. I know if you get that one key block it can go for a big gain, but that block doesn't seem to happen. I like all the motion on offense prior to the snap, the different formations and our RB rotation. The one play that almost broke for a huge gain was the end around to Hilton...would like to see us take advantage of his speed more. Alas, I'm not a coach and don't pretend to be one. I know every play is designed to work, but defenses prepare to stop those plays, too. The more different looks you can show, the better the chance of a couple of them resulting in huge gains, or TDs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasnt worried about the more conservative play calling in the 2nd half. I do hope we can start converting more TD's in the red zone instead of FG's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Conservatively winning games....

haha

HEY.....we've lost three games this year. That is inexcusable and a direct result of terrible, conservative play calling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HEY.....we've lost three games this year. That is inexcusable and a direct result of terrible, conservative play calling.

Aha! So you're the StampedeBlue mole account lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont know what let Luck loose means but Im more interested right now with our Corner controversy, as for how Link played at Right Tackle, he is who we thought he was there so not concerned, he should be moved back to Guard, Justice was out so not concerned

I think he wants Luck to throw it 60+ Times a Game, cause obviously 40-45 isn't enough for him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We literally DISMANTLED the Jags on all 3 Phases today. Offense, Defense, & Special Teams. I don't think it was Conservative with that long Drive we had late in the Game.

Arians said at Halftime he was gonna "Stomp on the Jags Throat" & I believe he did that. We ran the ball very effectively & held the ball for a Good period of time. That T.O.P. of ours speaks for itself

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im happy we won, but I thought we should have blown these guys out. 20 points by the offense and only 6 points in the 2nd half worries me that Arians is still too conservative with his playcalling.

What happened to letting Luck loose like in the Green Bay and Miami games? He is our best weapon, so we need to use him. But a win is a win.

Correctomundy, oh wise sage...

Keep your foot on the gas...on both sides of the ball...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im happy we won, but I thought we should have blown these guys out. 20 points by the offense and only 6 points in the 2nd half worries me that Arians is still too conservative with his playcalling.

What happened to letting Luck loose like in the Green Bay and Miami games? He is our best weapon, so we need to use him. But a win is a win.

You're joking, right? Why would we continue to air it out with a double digit lead? We had 2 long, time consuming drives in the 2nd half that all but ending the Jags chances of mounting a comeback. The only thing I'd like to see them do more of is finish the drives and stop settling for FG's. That will all come with time. I didn't have a problem with the game management last night, at all. Pass to score, run to win. That's what we did and we won. End of story

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad we won, but I'm tired of us not finishing drives in the red zone. The offense really only scored 14 points, when we should have scored around 28, or more. It's going to come back and bite us at some point. We have to get better in the red zone. Good win though!

You make a good point. Yes, a win is a win, but if we are going to be a playoff team, then we need to finish like one. You can't stall out when you're so close to putting up a TD.

Before I get started, I know that college and pro are two different levels of competition, but certain principles still apply. When I watch great college coaches like Saban, I see them striving for perfection even when the game is in the bag. I'm not talking about running up the score, I'm talking about execution. When someone misses a defensive assignment, or a blocking assignment he immediately talks to that player about the mistake. He is always teaching and practicing for the next game.

Right now, the Colts need to practice finishing in the red zone, even when the game is won. That needs to be the focus for the offense and the OC.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's ABSOLUTELY imperative we start finishing these drives with TDs instead of turnovers and field goals. Against teams like New England and Houston it will cost us the game.

As quite a few posters said, the Colts needed to get better at running the ball and with a lead the best thing to do is run the clock down and give the defense a rest. The Colts will be passing alot against New England, that is a guarentee, but being a balanced attack against New England is very important and being able to run the ball makes the Colts much more difficult to defend. People have been complaining about the Colts running too much, but it is finally paying off and it hasn't been a waste of time. If the Colts never worked on their run game and remained a one dimensional offense, New England would have a much easier time defending them. Luck has gotten plenty of passing reps, heck from what I know, more than any other rookie QB, I am sure he hasn't forgotten how to pass. I also expect a completely different gameplan against New England.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we were too distracted by these guys

baguars.gif

and blaine gabbert's awful mustache

gabbstache-600x337.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but with all respect, this kind of post makes no sense to me. We are not running a June Jones run and shoot. It was a perfectly called game....maybe not perfectly executed, but perfectly called. For whatever reason, we now have a running game, so why not use it, especially when you're up and don't need to fling it as much? Luck threw the ball 26 times. That's plenty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we woudl have blown them out but costly turnovers and bad mistakes...it seemed to me like we had good long drives and then we just failled from 40 yard - redzone...either fumble, INT, drop, penatly etc.

it looked to me like we could have scored at least 10 more points but we didnt get them...signs of ayoung team which is fine since we are a young team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Woman has to know her place....
    • As far as I know, Eminem is the only rapper to list his favorite rappers in a song.   His top rappers are:   1.  Reggie  (His uncle) 2.  Jay-Z 3. Tupac 4.  Biggie 5.  Andre 3000 6.  Jada 7.  Kurupt 8.  Nas 9.  Eminem   Being last does not offend him, he made the list.   Either way, the spirit of God lives in us.
    • Very sad... He was a part of so many amazing tunes.   
    • I don't like anything about Frank Sinatra, tbh.    His music was before my time, but I enjoy a lot of other music and film from that era. I'm from the Midwest and it's hard for me to relate to those songs. They all seem to have a New York/Vegas feel to them (and not in a good, Sonic Youth way). A lot of it seems... insincere, for lack of a better word. I kind of compare it to today's teen bop bubble gum type music where the personality and public persona and "coolness" factor of the artist are as important as the actual music. However, like I said, I wasn't alive at the time to know whether that is the case or not.   Maybe I just don't get it (like many people don't get rap or jazz) but what Sinatra did doesn't sound like singing to me. He didn't seem to have any vocal range. He didn't play instruments (that I know of) or dance. It's really bewildering to me that he is such a cultural icon.    His persona is grating, to me. I never like performers whose image is rich/smooth/connected. Just not my cup of tea.    It also seems to me that Sinatra wasn't that great of a guy, either. I know that there is a culture gap between his generation and mine, so I won't judge him too harshly about what his social views were w/ regard to race and gender equality, but his coziness with organized crime figures ( ie murderers) is troubling.   All of this is just my opinion, of course. I'm not a Frank Sinatra expert, by any means. He just appears, to me, as the antithesis of everything that I enjoy about art.   He's on my short list (along with Gene Simmons, Andy Warhol, L. Ron Hubbard, Ronald Reagan) of sainted cultural icons who didn't actually contribute anything of value to their respective fields. Again, jmo... your definition of value might differ from mine. 
    • Not to mean this in an argumentative way but the changes in the Colts winning ways was started by Harbaugh. We were one play from reaching the super bowl against the Steelers. Take away the illegal TD that Stewart caught and that game may have had a different turn out.
  • Welcome New Members

    •   Sorry to keep harping on the Irish thing, but did you know the horseshoe has seven points on it?  (The Colts horseshoe, anyway.  Actual shoes for horses depend on the farrier).   Seven is considered a lucky number...  Lucky.  Luck.  I'm telling you, you picked the right team to root for.   7    
    •   Don't hold Boston against the Irish.  It's not our fault.    We love our green, which makes Indiana a tearmann.   I love it that you chose to root for an underdog instead of the Pats.  I don't think it's coincidence that you became a fan around the time Luck got drafted to the Colts.  That's providence.     Horseshoe?  Luck?  Four-leaf clover?  Come on.  Hoosier Hospitality has roots in Irish fun-lovery.  If you're lucky enough to be Irish, you're lucky enough!  May the luck of the Irish be with you!  
  • Members

    • Nadine

      Nadine 4,899

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 4,947

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 1,135

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BOTT

      BOTT 9,406

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 195

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 322

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Peterk2011

      Peterk2011 32

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 216

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.