Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

1/10 Ballard End of Season Presser


Bravo

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, philba101 said:

Can Ballard course-correct this ship? I have not seen evidence of that in his six years as captain.

True, and he admitted as such. Talk is cheap, but I inherently believe he rights his wrongs and breaks down the roster in terms of what opportunities we have rather than being a prisoner of the moment and assuming we are Super Bowl caliber. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 444
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, philba101 said:

So you are saying there's still a chance we could go the band-aid, retread route? Careful, CB could be taking notes. :facepalm::Cry:

I was sort of joking but Aaron is a top 7 QB of all-time and I actually think he still can play another 3 or 4 years. He had a broken thumb this year. I would still rather draft a QB and start fresh but I figured I would ruffle some feathers with that Aaron post haha 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AustinnKaine said:

There's no way we can gain any insight into our plan with Pick 4.  No GM in their mind is going to show their hand like that.  Take everything anyone in this thread has to say about anything regarding that with a grain of salt. 

 

the most important part is the accountability ballard took and the acknowledgement of failure, and his concession that the philosophy regarding roster building tactics (outside of the lines) will be looked at to change. 

I get that he is talking in generalities right now as he doesn't want to show his hand. I was being a bit sarcastic with my comments especially about Wentz. But, I am not convinced that Ballard believes he must draft a QB at #4 unless Irsay has mandated it for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I was sort of joking but Aaron is a top 7 QB of all-time and I actually think he still can play another 3 or 4 years. He had a broken thumb this year. I would still rather draft a QB and start fresh but I figured I would ruffle some feathers with that Aaron post haha 

No no no no no more retreads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, philba101 said:

I get that he is talking in generalities right now as he doesn't want to show his hand. I was being a bit sarcastic with my comments especially about Wentz. But, I am not convinced that Ballard believes he must draft a QB at #4 unless Irsay has mandated it for him.

yeah i just used your post as a general response, as im sure the first 8 pages of this thread are full of people debating if we take a QB or not due to Ballards same response as before.

 

My whole thing is there's no way we can get any insight into what they do with pick 4 based off of that press conference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AustinnKaine said:

I thinkt the answer there is obvious, but no I didn't hear anyone ask about Ryan's future. 

 

Someone did ask him about Ryan.  Ballard replied that Matt is a professional and blah blah and eventually he'll get to evaluating that situation, but right now the priority is the HC search.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

Someone did ask him about Ryan.  Ballard replied that Matt is a professional and blah blah and eventually he'll get to evaluating that situation, but right now the priority is the HC search.

yeah they mentioned Ryan, but he never specifically answered a question about Ryan's future here. 

 

(basically gives a non-answer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I have been a fan since 1984 and I can honestly say this may be the most critical year for decision making. We need the right QB and right coach. 

And an offensive line coach, offensive coordinator, and get rid of some of the deadwood players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate that Ballard admitted to making some mistakes and "failing" in his approach to the 2022 season, but I am unconvinced that he knows what to do to fix his previous mistakes. To be fair, I also did not expect him to outline for us how he intends to do things differently in the future in the end-of-the-season presser. He has a lot of work to do to clean up this mess right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

At that point, we knew Reich brought in Wentz, but we had no idea that Irsay and Ballard wanted to draft a QB (especially Irsay at that point), and Ballard was playing it off like he was ok with it. Ballard also has his philosophies on how he wants to build this team (through the draft, O-Line/D-Line, light on FA, sign our own). They didn't work when he didn't draft a QB, draft WRs around the veteran QBs for the most part (no 1st round WRs and very few quality WRs), and the O-Line declined heavily. Our top paid guys also fell apart due to performance or injury. 

 

Ballard was able to sweet talk his way out of criticism, but now it is out in the open, so much so, that he has done no conferences this year except for the interim coach hiring he was forced to attend. IMO, he is somewhat of a coward and wilts under pressure. 

 

As far as Ballard leading the charge for a new HC goes, he wasn't allowed to pick Saturday, and he also got overruled on getting rid of Wentz (along with Reich). So, there's some trust issues still IMO.

 

 I apprecate your perspective but...

 Each draft there are maybe 20 players with certain 1st rd grades.

And these show up to us as publicly declared ones by web sites, including the NFL site. And right before the draft occurs it is impressive how similar the boards look.

  BUT, the only board that matters is the COLTS board.

 And i would bet Pittman DID have a 1st rd grade. So there is one. Campbell was a very solid 2nd rd pick with high upside. Pascall had put up 60+ catches and was a high end blocker. A solid piece. Frank TOUTED Hines as a very important piece to a passing game.

 Franks was given some very good pieces. And of course he had TY to compliment the group.

  IMO, QB killed us, and Turay, Banogu, Lewis failing to live up to the draft rooms hopes, took away 3 very valuable picks that could have filled big needs.

 Rotsa Ruck! 

 We all wince at paying our All-Pro players their due, too bad.

Think about all the hype Frank spewed and how many of his players met or exceeded our expectations. Did Frank and his coaches develop players well?

 I couldn't be prouder of Irsay for knowing Frank needed out of the building and him laying down the hammer.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Blueblood23 said:

And an offensive line coach, offensive coordinator, and get rid of some of the deadwood players.

 

 Saturday spoke of doing some things different.

  For those listening, he was firm in saying you play like you practice.

As we watched Franks teams come out flat as a pancake over and over and over. Post Sirriani, Frank was a DUD!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, AustinnKaine said:

yeah i just used your post as a general response, as im sure the first 8 pages of this thread are full of people debating if we take a QB or not due to Ballards same response as before.

 

My whole thing is there's no way we can get any insight into what they do with pick 4 based off of that press conference. 

 

  I EXPECT all the top QB'S here for a grilling. Figuring out Levis and how they see him 3 years down the road is the big question. If you believe you can win with the top 3... that would be the ideal. If not... ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really appreciated the way he opened it up and just took ownership of it all, entirely unprompted. I loved the honesty he used to outright admit this was a culmination and it’s time for a fresh start. This press conference reminded me why I like Ballard. 
 

The only part that I didn’t enjoy was when asked if he would be surprised if he didn’t take a QB in the first round and he said no, and then fell back on that same defense he’s used to this point about how everyone would want to see him fired for not getting it right. 
 

Dude we already want to see you fired because you have a sub .500 record after six years and we keep doing this stupid dance. If he doesn’t take a QB in the first this year we Colts fans wouldn’t be out of line and to overthrow his office and remove him from power ourselves. Ijs.
 

% or get off the pot, dude. You kicked the can down the road until it rolled off a cliff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stephen said:

I mean pittman isnt exactly a super star wr. Higgins, brown, mclaurin,hill diggs,adams,metcalf, and several others are better than him. Heck I think pierce will be better than him

Pittman when given crazy targets  was doing great for us. He has great hands and is a red zone target our best on the goal line tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, will426 said:

Pittman when given crazy targets  was doing great for us. He has great hands and is a red zone target our best on the goal line tbh

he doesnt make clutch catches, he gets dumb penalites, he loses the ball and he is just okay in terms of talents. Just another guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, philba101 said:

Sure he can. He gets to keep his job and still has the endorsement of the owner. Unless Irsay has mandated that he draft a QB, we know how Ballard feels about the process. He has a history of acquiring re-treads, and there could potentially be an abundance of  retreads to choose from. We also know that he loves draft picks. With the right trade partner he could turn the #4 pick into multiple  draft picks. He has given us no reason to believe that he won't do the same things he has done all along.

That’s true but if that strategy fails, it would be hard to come back from having the number 4 overall pick and not coming out with a QB. Some of the QBs that have come out since Luck retired are

-Tua

-Burrow

-Herbert

-Love

-Hurts

-Murray

-Lawrence

-Wilson

-Fields

-Lance

-Mac Jones

-Kenny Pickett

 

There are three guys that went number 1 overall, so they probably weren’t available.  But Ballard has had his fair shot at QBs. This year will probably be his best yet. If he passes on the guys from this year’s class and the Colts still have issues at QB later down the road, then he’d be out of excuses.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, #12. said:

It tells me he's not expecting to have an elite QB, and if you don't, you still have to find a way to win.

Yea, I think its one of those things where you build the team to win with the expectation of average QB play. If you get above average or elite QB play, you're that much better of a team.

 

2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

i called it!!!

Called what?

 

2 hours ago, philba101 said:

I wouldn't be shocked if Ballard was thinking that. 

He was asked about Raimann and without outright saying it, it sounds like Ballard has him penciled in as our LT next season.

 

20 minutes ago, John Waylon said:

I really appreciated the way he opened it up and just took ownership of it all, entirely unprompted. I loved the honesty he used to outright admit this was a culmination and it’s time for a fresh start. This press conference reminded me why I like Ballard. 
 

Agreed.

 

20 minutes ago, John Waylon said:

The only part that I didn’t enjoy was when asked if he would be surprised if he didn’t take a QB in the first round and he said no, and then fell back on that same defense he’s used to this point about how everyone would want to see him fired for not getting it right. 
 

Dude we already want to see you fired because you have a sub .500 record after six years and we keep doing this stupid dance. If he doesn’t take a QB in the first this year we Colts fans wouldn’t be out of line and to overthrow his office and remove him from power ourselves. Ijs.
 

% or get off the pot, dude. You kicked the can down the road until it rolled off a cliff. 

I think that was really just GM speak to not tip his hand one way or another. I don't disagree with his belief that you don't just take QB up top in the 1st just to take one, you need to make sure you're taking the right guy. Taking one to take one gets you the Jake Lockers, Brandon Weedens, and Chad Hennes. That said, I think there's a couple of guys we'll have on our board, so I don't see us making it out of the draft this year without one of those QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

That’s true but if that strategy fails, it would be hard to come back from having the number 4 overall pick and not coming out with a QB. Some of the QBs that have come out since Luck retired are

-Tua

-Burrow

-Herbert

-Love

-Hurts

-Murray

-Lawrence

-Wilson

-Fields

-Lance

-Mac Jones

-Kenny Pickett

 

There are three guys that went number 1 overall, so they probably weren’t available.  But Ballard has had his fair shot at QBs. This year will probably be his best yet. If he passes on the guys from this year’s class and the Colts still have issues at QB later down the road, then he’d be out of excuses.

 

Ballard passed up who from that list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Brady, Tannehill, Jimmy G, Brisett, Mayfield, Mariota are all retreads.  They have played for more than one team.   Rodgers and Carr are not.  They are still with their original teams.  

Retread is any QB that’s passed their prime going to a new team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally watched the full presser and it’s not enough for me

 

There is accountability, but there isn’t enough conviction and there isn’t enough un-filtered talk. That’s with Saturday too. Until the Colts get a Mike Tomlin type of personality at HC and GM, they aren’t going anywhere. If I’m a player, nothing about what Ballard said makes me think I need to do better. Nothing he said would make me think my job was on the line.

 

He seemed to hold back from saying what he really wanted to say about the Kayvon situation. You can tell it did really bother him when it happened, but he should have emphatically said “Yeah that’s unacceptable and that’s nonsense”. 
 

I also don’t like the non-commitment on drafting a QB. He doubled down on what he’s said in the past. “I’m not taking one just to take on”. I also don’t get why he keeps saying “if that guy doesn’t play well then….”. I’m tired of him driving this fear campaign that drafting a QB is such a risky move that you have to exercise such extreme caution because you can never recover from that. How many times this season when we talk about the Philadelphia Eagles do we talk about the fact that they drafted Carson Wentz with the number 2 overall pick? 

 

Also, to try and attach job security to drafting a QB that ends up not being good when you were 4-12-1 without one is silly. What has avoiding taking “risks” on QB gotten us? Hasn’t gotten any AFC South titles and hasn’t gotten any playoff wins. I don’t get why he can not come out and firmly say “Yeah enough is enough. What we were doing hasn’t been working and we’ve got to figure out a way to get a young QB on this team and have an environment for him to flourish”. I don’t get as a GM how he can live with the fact that he’s never taken a serious swing at drafting a QB.

 

It’s not about missing. It’s about when you miss, can you identify why you missed and quickly can you fix your mistake. Eagles missed on Wentz and fixed it with Jalen. They also missed on Jefferson but they’ve got Brown and Smith now. Ballard has to stop playing scared. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Finally watched the full presser and it’s not enough for me

 

There is accountability, but there isn’t enough conviction and there isn’t enough un-filtered talk. That’s with Saturday too. Until the Colts get a Mike Tomlin type of personality at HC and GM, they aren’t going anywhere. If I’m a player, nothing about what Ballard said makes me think I need to do better. Nothing he said would make me think my job was on the line.

 

He seemed to hold back from saying what he really wanted to say about the Kayvon situation. You can tell it did really bother him when it happened, but he should have emphatically said “Yeah that’s unacceptable and that’s nonsense”. 
 

I also don’t like the non-commitment on drafting a QB. He doubled down on what he’s said in the past. “I’m not taking one just to take on”. I also don’t get why he keeps saying “if that guy doesn’t play well then….”. I’m tired of him driving this fear campaign that drafting a QB is such a risky move that you have to exercise such extreme caution because you can never recover from that. How many times this season when we talk about the Philadelphia Eagles do we talk about the fact that they drafted Carson Wentz with the number 2 overall pick? 

 

Also, to try and attach job security to drafting a QB that ends up not being good when you were 4-12-1 without one is silly. What has avoiding taking “risks” on QB gotten us? Hasn’t gotten any AFC South titles and hasn’t gotten any playoff wins. I don’t get why he can not come out and firmly say “Yeah enough is enough. What we were doing hasn’t been working and we’ve got to figure out a way to get a young QB on this team and have an environment for him to flourish”. I don’t get as a GM how he can live with the fact that he’s never taken a serious swing at drafting a QB.

 

It’s not about missing. It’s about when you miss, can you identify why you missed and quickly can you fix your mistake. Eagles missed on Wentz and fixed it with Jalen. They also missed on Jefferson but they’ve got Brown and Smith now. Ballard has to stop playing scared. 

All great observations! Worried Chris will not take QB at 4 then trade down. I have no confidence in him as he admitted to being stubborn to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 Saturday spoke of doing some things different.

  For those listening, he was firm in saying you play like you practice.

As we watched Franks teams come out flat as a pancake over and over and over. Post Sirriani, Frank was a DUD!

After watching these season starts the last few years I could not help but conclude his regiment was way too soft. He let influences such as his player rep  have a voice in the amount of padded practices and practice schedules. Reich it appeared only got softer with the the teams off season program. Looking forward to this team being ready to start a season- It has been a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

Right, but who was there when Colts had chance to get QB since Luck retired?

Do you mean without trading up? Brock Purdy. Obviously that list is short, but no one cares what the Chiefs paid to move up to get Mahomes. No one cares what the Bills paid to move up for Allen. Pay the price. Move up. Get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL, its been happening for 50 years.  Not rich, but the equivalent visibility offered by small groups of vocal protesters having their visibility elevated by sympathizers with cameras and microphones for all to see their screaming lectures.        These weird conflicts are caused by extremists being triggered by centrist choice-based comments like Butker's.  They seem to wrongly think that Butker is the extremist and then expose their intolerance for people who support a different path.
    • I stand by HIS right to believe what he wants and to say what he wants   Don't like it ?  ......... that's up to you......   No one was harmed by HIS opinion   Freedom of speech used to be just that........   We have become an era of thought police   You'd better get in sync.....    Or people will call for your head.......   Sad times......
    • For me, it depends on the pass rush and FS play.   im in the minority when it comes to our corners.  I think we have a solid group.  Not great, not bad, but solid.  However, I think they can look good with a good pass rush.  If Latu comes in and becomes a wrecker then our defense will be good.  If our pass rush looks like last year, then we’ll see the same thing as last year.  A good pass rush can make a bad defense look good.   for FS, we need better play.  A lot of people last year thought it was our corners, I thought it was the FS play.  I’m hoping we eventually put a vet back there but Ballard wants to evaluate what we have currently so we’ll see.  This cover 3 defense is dependent upon a good pass rush and good safety play.  We’ll need both for this defense to be good.   All in all, I’m hopeful.  I thought last year our defense was going to be absolute trash and it was better than I thought.  Can also thank a historic year of qb injuries for that, but hey, you play who you play.  
    • I agree on offense. I think we'll need it with our defense which is currently very hard to evaluate.
    • This defense is a very big concern to me. I'm not sure we have the right mix of personnel, either on the field or in the coaching staff.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...