Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Fleener


spartancolt

Recommended Posts

Balled out today..Nice to see him targeted so much!!Showed fight with extra curriculars.. Flat out dragging defenders..He is no Gronk tho..those posters please fall back.

 

The offense has seemed to target the TEs much more in the last 5 quarters of play than they have in the prior 11 quarters of play.  The philosophy seems to be changing which is what needed to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get the obsession with Coby's hair. What difference does it make how he wears his hair. That crap is what my old man used to tell me growing up.

 

i really don't care how he wears it. but i do think it he looks a lot better without it. nothing against long hair in general, but it doesn't work for everyone

 

at this point i just think it's funny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do we know that Allen is a better player than Fleener? He had two holding calls against him the last time I checked. Just saying. :thmup:

It's not a secret that Allen is superior to Fleener, especially because of his better blocking ability, it's just his injuries pile up every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i really don't care how he wears it. but i do think it he looks a lot better without it. nothing against long hair in general, but it doesn't work for everyone

at this point i just think it's funny

Same here... Maybe a little bit of hair envy too, says the bald guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fleener's been needing to get more targets. We're just finally starting to get him the ball. He can be a top 10 TE in the league IMO. And his hair is awesome btw. If we only keep one TE this offseason its gotta be Fleener. Allen cant play a full season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen is slowly playing himself out of Indy while Fleener, who is not as good, is at least consistently healthy.

Allen just can't stay healthy.  Fleener can.  Fleener is who they will keep.  I know Allen might be more well rounded (and that's a matter of opinion) but being well rounded does you no good if you know that player is going to miss at least a handful of games every season.  It wouldn't shock me if they go with Fleener, Doyle (who while not flashy isn't bad), and a new tightend next season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a secret that Allen is superior to Fleener, especially because of his better blocking ability, it's just his injuries pile up every year.

How do you figure he is superior when he don't contribute? Skill means zero if you can't stay healthy. To say one is better than the other means little when their talents are different. I seen Doyle make as good of blocks as I have seen Allen make so does that make Doyle as good as Allen just because of blocking? To compare the two makes little difference because they both do their jobs when on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fleener can't block well enough to hold.

 

One,  he wasn't drafted for his blocking skill.

 

Two,  his blocking has gotten better and is not a problem.     Fleener is never going to be a blocking tight end,  but he still brings a special skill set to the team.

 

He's a weapon for the Colts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a secret that Allen is superior to Fleener, especially because of his better blocking ability, it's just his injuries pile up every year.

 

I don't know how you could say that considering Allen is always hurt as you say.  His reputation from the few times we saw him early on in his career has carried him.  But looking at actual productivity, I find it hard to say he's superior to Fleener.  Also, watch Coby when he does block.  Not the greatest, but huge improvement over past seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think out of our successful draft a few years back Allen will be the odd one out who doesn't get a contract, from the coaches perspective, Fleener is a better receiver and Doyle can be the blocker (maybe not as good as Allen but stays healthy and fills the role), because of injuries he will likely walk and we might bring someone in or someone up (Mgrath?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Found Stanley’s Pro Day Results from 03/25/2024.  Hands 9 3/8, decent wingspan of 79 ½”. Stanley ran slower at his pro-day than Kamren Kinchens did with a 4.78s 40-yard dash which was even worse than James Williams SAF Miami (FL).  Curious if he was injured or that Is his top speed.  His vertical was only 33” which was still better than Jaylon Carlies, Josh Proctor, Patrick McMorris, Demani Richardson, and James Williams.  Even his broad jump was much better than those mentioned above, except Josh Proctor (10’1”), and bested Kamren Kinchens, Kitan Oladapo, and Daijah Anthony from the Combine.  Stanley’s 3-Cone Drill and 20 Yard Shuttle were actually better than some of the cornerbacks drafted this time around.     Still went through PFF's recent 2024 UDFA tracker and still could find Stanley mentioned.  Guess teams are ignoring him with such a slow 40-yard dash time.  If he was injured might account for his speed and sub-par vertical jump. 
    • Come on now…  Lamar Jackson is a two time NFL MVP.   Justin Fields is entering his 4th season, and he wasn’t terrible with Chicago.    Anthony Richardson started 4 games for the Colts.  He’s thrown just 84 total passes.   We’re all pulling for the kid to succeed,  but he’s got a lot to prove before  anyone can credibly say AR is better than Fields or Jackson.    There are plenty of questions to be asked and the answers wont come until early next year.    We all could be having an entirely different conversation next off-season.    
    • People saying he was a run first QB never watched his college tape. I won't lead the witness, but you can make some basic assumptions as to why people believed that.   IMO, his actual football problems coming into the league were:   - bad footwork. Made him have some inconsistent, wild throws at times. - not that great at making easy, short passes. The layups, essentially.     I'd say in the short sample we saw last year, that the latter issue he dramatically improved on. For the former, there were still some erratic throws (when he missed, he really missed), but he also showed progress there a s well (his completion percentage in the NFL was 59.5 vs 53.7 in his one year starting at college. It's usually the opposite trend for most rookies)   I'm absolutely on board on AR becoming a franchise QB, the only issue he has is proving he can stay healthy. I also don't think calling out two minor injuries vs one major injury is enough to call injury prone, but he has to prove it all the same.
    • He can’t as you pointed out those contracts are more or less slotted.
  • Members

    • Happy2BeHere

      Happy2BeHere 2,655

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 61

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,491

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Southern Cal

      Southern Cal 7

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 3,250

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,304

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 1,047

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...