Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mr.Debonair

Darius Butler vs. Cassius Vaughn

40 posts in this topic

I would feel much more comfortable with Butler starting instead of Vaughn but maybe the coaches see something on film or in practice to justify Vaughn starting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Butler has been good covering in the Nickel package. i think if we can find someone in the DRaft or FA. we keep Butler in the Nickel... but Vaughn if in his last yr of his contract won't be returning i think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Butler is a good nickel.

Vaughn I can not stand... We have nothing else though so have to stick with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Butler is a good nickel.Vaughn I can not stand... We have nothing else though so have to stick with him.

Besides him not being able to cover or tackle, what's not to like about Vaughn?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way the Colts have it now is the best way.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The way the Colts have it now is the best way.

Butler  is better against the pass but terrible against the run. Vaughn is solid against the run but below average against the pass. Starting Vaughn and bringing in Butler for the pass is the best way for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vaughn drives me insane. Also, the other team's best WR always lines up on his side. I wish we bounce are CBs around so that Davis was always on the #1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We should leave Butler right where he is.  He is doing quite well there.  In free agency or the draft we need to find a better #2 than Vaughn.  Although I don't think Vaughn is that bad as others do, we need a bit more talent at his spot.

 

 

What I like best about Butler is he has tremendous instincts when it comes to jumping routes. I'm not sure if Asante Samuel was on the Pats when Butler was there.  If he was it sees he learned a thing or two from him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vaughn should be call "the detective".  Because he is always a couple steps behind the receiver he is covering.   He needs to go. I don't expect him on the team next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like both of them.   I hope both are back on the team next year with a contract that works both for the player and the team.

 

Davis is a starter.   Hopefully we get another starter in FA.

 

Then Butler and Vaughn can be 3 and 4.   I don't care which is which, except that I like them both.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They

I would feel much more comfortable with Butler starting instead of Vaughn but maybe the coaches see something on film or in practice to justify Vaughn starting.

They both play....and there's not a significant difference between the two......again we pit our own players against each other...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vaughn is the worst player on the field in any three phases of the Colts team. So crazy how opposing O's so obviously key on him in passing plays. He can't cover a cough. I, too, don't see how Butler doesn't start over Vaughn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Butler 4 INTs 1 FF 30 Tackles.

 

Vaughn 1 INT 0 FF 56 Tackles.

 

Stats and the eyeball test prove that Butler is better than Vaughn.

 

Another case of the coaching staff seeing something in the less talented player with someone who has more experience in the system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Butler 4 INTs 1 FF 30 Tackles.

 

Vaughn 1 INT 0 FF 56 Tackles.

 

Stats and the eyeball test prove that Butler is better than Vaughn.

 

Another case of the coaching staff seeing something in the less talented player with someone who has more experience in the system.

Butler 4 INTs 1 FF 30 Tackles.

 

Vaughn 1 INT 0 FF 56 Tackles.

 

Stats and the eyeball test prove that Butler is better than Vaughn.

 

Another case of the coaching staff seeing something in the less talented player with someone who has more experience in the system.

the
Butler 4 INTs 1 FF 30 Tackles.

 

Vaughn 1 INT 0 FF 56 Tackles.

 

Stats and the eyeball test prove that Butler is better than Vaughn.

 

Another case of the coaching staff seeing something in the less talented player with someone who has more experience in the system.

There is no such thing as the eyeball test. That's like the 'clutch gene' somebody made it up..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no such thing as the eyeball test. That's like the 'clutch gene' somebody made it up..

 

Well then whatever you want to call looking at how each players perform, even when stats don't tell the whole story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever it is, Ryan Grigson sure hoodwinked John Elway by giving him a FB we wont use in Chris Gronkowski to get a serviceable CB like Cassius Vaughn, IMO. Grigson did win on that trade, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Butler has been a happy suprise IMO. Not saying he's a world beater or anything, but he has given us a few sparks this year. I.E. the pick 6s yesterday.

I don't hate Vaughn but we need an upgrade. He has done his job for us admirably this year, but he is no long term solution.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We wouldn't have this Problem if Mr. Jerruad Powers didn't get injured. I get highly upset everytime he Tweets on Twitter. He always says "Good Win today" or something & I'm just like "Dude, you're not even out there"

Idk, it just upsets me each time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Butler and its not even close. what would you rather have? Picks or penalties? Butler has instincts of an actual NFL Corner, Vaughn just has not showed that, He's Jerraud Powers with a bit more speed

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vaughn is the worst player on the field in any three phases of the Colts team. So crazy how opposing O's so obviously key on him in passing plays. He can't cover a cough. I, too, don't see how Butler doesn't start over Vaughn.[/quote

Sorry, that award must go to Jerry Hughes....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vaughn is the worst player on the field in any three phases of the Colts team. So crazy how opposing O's so obviously key on him in passing plays. He can't cover a cough. I, too, don't see how Butler doesn't start over Vaughn.[/quote

Sorry, that award must go to Jerry Hughes....

Your hatred for Jerry Hughes is misplaced and honestly laughable, you blatantly disregard that he has been productive in a new scheme at a young age (24 by the way) for the first time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your hatred for Jerry Hughes is misplaced and honestly laughable, you blatantly disregard that he has been productive in a new scheme at a young age (24 by the way) for the first time

Sorry Gavin. I think he is an undisciplined waste of a spot. It is only my opinion, as my sig says. You are welcome to your view as well. I'm disregarding nothing by the way....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry Gavin. I think he is an undisciplined waste of a spot. It is only my opinion, as my sig says. You are welcome to your view as well. I'm disregarding nothing by the way....

Opinion Based on what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Opinion Based on what?[/

He was a first round pick. He is expected to be as good as freeney when he was young and to be better than Mathis. do you think he fits that criteria? I don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Opinion Based on what?[/

He was a first round pick. He is expected to be as good as freeney when he was young and to be better than Mathis. do you think he fits that criteria? I don't.

you expect that to happen in spot duty? he has actually started 6 games and has 4 sacks this year in those 6 starts, thats pretty good (I expect its not easy to get into the flow of a game if your subbed in and out for 23 of your first 24 games and I dont expect all of those situations were to pass rush), Given a full 16 game season starting I think he will be pretty good if given that chance, he is not a 1 trick pony who can just rush the passer he can actually play the run as well so maybe he will never have a ton of sacks but I think he can give ya 7 to 9 (average) if he was given a full 16 starts in a season plus 60-80 tackles (he has 39 in only 6 starts)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're both decent back up material. Though both seem to have more production than a lot of our guys last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Opinion Based on what?

Based on his visibility, effectiveness, value for money, his unruly nature and penalty count, and an overwhelming feeling that he is very very good at turning up to a play when it has finished. I may not notice everything during or after a game, but I have never ever said to myself, "he's played well"........

Perhaps it's just me....

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Based on his visibility, effectiveness, value for money, his unruly nature and penalty count, and an overwhelming feeling that he is very very good at turning up to a play when it has finished. I may not notice everything during or after a game, but I have never ever said to myself, "he's played well"........ Perhaps it's just me....

His cap hit is 1,691,250,000.00$, Next year (the last year in the deal) it is 1,926,250,000.00$. His effectiveness is 4 sacks and 39 tackles being a backup rotational OLB for the first time in a new scheme in his first 6 games starting. Do I think there were other better options available based on what we needed? yes of course but lets be honest its not like he is being paid 19 million dollars for his production. The upside to Hughes in this scheme is very good in my opinion and it has showed in limited snaps, will he be a Dwight Freeney sack master? No probably not, not alot are. but he obviously can get you sacks and I think he can get you double digits, also he he has 40 tackles in those limited snaps and starts so its not like he is a 1 trick pony, He is also 24 alot of time to grow into the Robert Mathis role. Bill was right on with Hughes in that he has alot of talent even if he passed on a couple other guys. The penalties I agree (7 I think) is a little much 4 of them have been for offsides (5 yard penalty). Given time I expect that will be corrected, 5 of his penalties have been pre snap. Not good but Demarcus Ware has 8 and 7 of his are for offsides(I bet alot of pass rushers draw quite  a bit of those do to wanting to ge a good jump on the ball) and a 15 yard horse collar to his credit to. Im not making excuses for the penalties just saying all players get some penalties from time to time especially pass rushers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Besides him not being able to cover or tackle, what's not to like about Vaughn?
The dumb way he cheers of every single play

No matter how bad he is looking in the game if he makes a easy tackle he will get up and cheer like he is the best player in the planet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
His cap hit is 1,691,250,000.00$, Next year (the last year in the deal) it is 1,926,250,000.00$.

Jerry Hughes is costing us nearly 4 billion dollars over the next 2 years? I think we may have over paid.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jerry Hughes is costing us nearly 4 billion dollars over the next 2 years? Damn, I think we may have over paid.

Not sure your joking or not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure your joking or not

Your numbers are in the 1 billions, not 1 millions. So, yes, I am joking about your goof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your numbers are in the 1 billions, not 1 millions. So, yes, I am joking about your goof.

Math is not my strong suit lol, Its been a while

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jerry Hughes WAS NOT expected to be Freeney OR Mathis. IMO that is a Total Falsehood.

He was expected to be Jerry Hughes and to be able to develope pass rush skills.

IMO what he did under the last regime counts very little, they were bumbs. Jerry is playing well and there is no reason to think he can`t continue to improve.

Some opinions are less valuable than others, IMO, I bet he is liked by those that oversee his play.

The corners in question are not finished products. Neither are the physical backs we are looking for, but they both have a decent shot of being on the team two years from now and being solid contributors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Butler a lot. I think he's great in the nickel and he's got good ball hawking skills.

 

Vaughn couldn't cover a twin size bed with a king size comforter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In nickel, I thought Butler switched to the outside and Vaughn moved to nickel back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @Finball and Chicago are up next
    • With the 220th pick, The Washington Redskins select:    Travin Dural, WR, LSU   @Finball and The Bears are on the clock
    • I wanted to create a topic where we could discuss the facts that were presented in Stampede Blue's film breakdown of our current Offensive lineman and some info I pulled from PFF, and hopefully get a better understanding of what it is they do well and where they need to improve. I see a lot of people that post here that have some misconceptions about each player, and these film breakdowns may clear up some of that, so that we can have a more appropriate discussion on what to do in the draft and where we stand as a team.   So, for the sake of saving time, I put a link to all the articles below, and summarized the main takeaways from each. (Everything below was taken from the articles I've linked, none of it is my own deductions or thoughts.)   PFF Offensive Line Rankings- Colts Ranked 25th Overall- The most interesting bit of information from this was that they felt Castonzo had a really strong year, and that our original starting 5 were far superior to ANY combination we used when we had to account for injuries.   Anthony Castonzo - PFF 20th Ranked LT Strengths- Good awareness, athletic and strong, good ability to anchor, wins most of the time when he initiates contact. Weaknesses- Way too inconsistent, sometimes utilizes poor technique, susceptible to bull rushes Pass Protection- Good
      Run Blocking- Good-  (PFF ranked Castonzo as our top rated run blocker) Upside- If he can work on his technique, he can become the top level LT that we need him to be, and that he was a few years ago. Overall- Solid Starter   Jack Mewhort  Strengths- Everything- Athletic, intelligent, great in both pass protection and run blocking. Mewhort should be a rock on our O-line for years. Weaknesses- Very little, occasionally released a block too early. Pass Protection- High Quality Run Blocking- High Quality Upside- Perennial Pro-Bowler
      Overall- High Quality Starter   Joe Haeg at RG and Joe Haeg at RT Strengths- Very mobile, able to get to and be effective at the second level, good technique, like Castonzo he wins most of the time that he initiates contact, good run blocker Weaknesses- Very poor anchor that becomes a major liability in pass protection, not physically strong enough to beat some defenders when asked to "hold the line," victim of making some mental errors that could be attributed to being a rookie Pass Protection- Below Average
      Run Blocking- Good Upside- If he is able to add strength in the weightroom and develop a stronger anchor, Haeg could be a strong starter at RG or RT in the future. But until he can add strength and develop his anchor, his ceiling is very limited.
      Overall- Back-Up with upside.     Le'Raven Clark Strengths- In his rookie season, Clark showed flashes of being a High Quality Starter. Incredible athlete, great anchor, long arms and strong hands, can shadow defenders well, athletic enough to get to the second level in the run game.  Weaknesses- In his rookie season, made some mental errors, susceptible to being beat with leverage when he punches and pushes off instead of locking on. Pass Protection- Good Run Blocking- Good Upside- As he develops, Clark could become our future LT if Castonzo doesn't improve. This upcoming year could be a breakout year for Clark.
      Overall- Solid Starter     Denzelle Good- Pass blocking and run blocking Strengths- The biggest and perhaps strongest lineman on the roster, can win one-on-one in pass protection and run blocking, great anchor, viscous at the point of attack, mauler and brutish run blocker, wins more often than not Weaknesses- Lacks technique in certain areas such as dealing with speed rush, releases blocks too quickly on occasion, not very mobile in the run game, loses his balance in both the run game and passing game Pass Protection- Good Run Blocking- Good Upside- Good has the ability to be our starting RG if he can develop his technique, work on keeping his balance, and potentially drop weight in order to become more mobile in the run game. Hopefully, with help from Joe Philbin, as he enters his 3rd season, he shows improvement in those areas and can put a strangle hold on the RG spot.
      Overall- Solid Starter ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________   Missing from this list is obviously Kelly, but we all know he's a stud and is going to be our starting Center for years to come. Also, there is no info on newly signed Brian Schwenke.   Using this information, I think we can see that there is a ton of upside with our current roster.    Kelly, Mewhort, and Le'Raven Clark look to be the real deal. Denzelle Good has size and strength that cannot be taught. If he can work on his technique a bit he could become a huge asset for us. Same thing with Haeg. Haeg shows very good technique, and if he can add some strength and develop a strong anchor (easier said than done, I know) I think Haeg could turn into an All-Pro RG or RT. And if we can get Castonzo back to the level he was playing at before, then we're all set at LT and RT.   I bring a lot of this up because I know the media has made a big deal about the Colts spending a high draft pick on OL. Now, I was all for trying to sign one of the top Free Agent Guards, because we had the money, but I think we have more pressing needs to address in the draft. Good is starting his 3rd year, Haeg and Clark are entering their second. If these guys can take some big steps forward and can STAY HEALTHY, our line could be leaps and bounds better.   Personally, looking at the information above, I think it would be a mistake to use anything more than a 4th round pick on another lineman.   And as a side note, the O-line has been in Indy working together, training and in the weight room for a lot of the off-season. That gives me even more hope, especially for a player like Haeg.
    • I started watching the Oklahoma State-Texas Tech Softball Game since the NASCAR race was postponed then the IndyCar Race so I missed the end
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.