Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Pats trade for Dwayne Allen [Merge]


backshoulderfade

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 520
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

14 minutes ago, Horse Shoe Heaven said:

I wanted to keep Doyle you don't get that Doyle and Allen play the same positions, but have different skill sets. I wanted both!!You HIGHLY UNDERESTIMATE Allens ability NE doesn't.

 

His ability has nothing to do with his production. In our system Allen didn't excel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we're going to need another blocking tight end.  allen was very good at this.  If we could get Roberts in the 4th or lower, it would be a major pick-up 

 

Michael Roberts, TE, Toledo 
 Height: 6-4. Weight: 261. Arm: 33.25. Hand: 11.63. 
 Projected 40 Time: 4.74. 
Projected Round (2017): 3-5. 

 2/25/17: Roberts is a blocking tight end for the NFL, yet has some receiving ability. Scouting sources said that Roberts could be the best pure Y (blocking) tight end in the 2017 NFL Draft. They say he is athletic enough to make some plays as a short option or in the red zone. Roberts had a quality week at the Senior Bowl, minus a few dropped passes. 

Roberts made 45 receptions for 533 yards with 16 touchdowns in 2016. As a junior, he had 21 catches for 234 yards with four scores. 
Read more at http://walterfootball.com/draft2017TE.php#QPFTj4CDIj2LXeyK.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NorthernBlue said:

 

 

This off season has gotten off to a much more entertaining start than last years. Last year I'm pretty sure all we had was Grigson and Pagano are staying, Colts sign Patrick Robinson and then the draft haha.

Other than Pat retiring every single one of these are great moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I know Allen's ability just fine. He's a great blocker and he can catch balls in the end zone. He also has poor hands though. Blocking TE's are easier to find than receiving TE's, which is why it's easy to replace him. Allen was a huge burden and really only produced one game when scored 3 tds. More importantly, he keeps Doyle off the field, when Doyle is a huge safety valve for Luck. I wouldn't mind making Allen the 2, but if it's between Doyle and Allen, and we can get value for Allen, then you do it 100 times out of 100.

His hands are fine, BURDEN WHAT???, the Patriots like him, It was never a choice between one or other???? They complement each other!!!! We run a lot of 2 TE sets.I guess we can agree to disagree! Allen will play well for the Patriots that I can tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chrisfarley said:

we're going to need another blocking tight end.  allen was very good at this.  If we could get Roberts in the 4th or lower, it would be a major pick-up 

 

Michael Roberts, TE, Toledo 
 Height: 6-4. Weight: 261. Arm: 33.25. Hand: 11.63. 
 Projected 40 Time: 4.74. 
Projected Round (2017): 3-5. 

 2/25/17: Roberts is a blocking tight end for the NFL, yet has some receiving ability. Scouting sources said that Roberts could be the best pure Y (blocking) tight end in the 2017 NFL Draft. They say he is athletic enough to make some plays as a short option or in the red zone. Roberts had a quality week at the Senior Bowl, minus a few dropped passes. 

Roberts made 45 receptions for 533 yards with 16 touchdowns in 2016. As a junior, he had 21 catches for 234 yards with four scores. 
Read more at http://walterfootball.com/draft2017TE.php#QPFTj4CDIj2LXeyK.99

seems great but not a defensive player which is what we need!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Horse Shoe Heaven said:

seems great but not a defensive player which is what we need!

Yeah I've heard that he would cost every single pick and not a fourth or fifth. Only player in history of the draft to be chosen under this condition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DougDew said:

If we can seriously make this Alabama TE the slot WR in the three wide then maybe it makes sense....but we'd have to move Dorsett for some real value to get a good defensive player or a RB.  Just seems like a complicated way to justify selecting a TE at 15. 

I don't want to take a TE but if he's the best player there what do you do reach or trade down. I would rather trade down or take him than reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Horse Shoe Heaven said:

I don't want to take a TE but if he's the best player there what do you do reach or trade down. I would rather trade down or take him than reach.

I don't care what combination of 14 players go before us, OJ Howard will not be the best player available at 15. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Horse Shoe Heaven said:

really some would argue that.

You really want to argue that he will be BPA at our pick? Ok, I'll call your bluff, start a thread, name your top 15 players, and make a case for OJ Howard to be BPA at our pick. I doubt many people will agree with you. You'll probably say our opinions don't matter and the GM's know better, well, Ballard won't take a TE either. Make a thread with your argument that Howard is a good pick for us and BPA. Lets see how it turns out. use your "sources" that would argue I'm wrong. Even if someone had him ranked in top 15, it won't be us taking him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

I'm good with it.  Allen never lived up to the hype.  We now have an extra 4th rounder and a little extra cap room.  Trade bait for the draft?

We could definitely use it to trade up in the 2nd. Get a 1st rounder that falls potentially. No way it'll make a difference in the 1st though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im pretty torn on this...always been a DA fan. I defended his contract and I cant say Im against the trade because it wasnt all that team friendly. Clearly the Colts have a lot of faith in Doyle and Swope (and perhaps a draftee). DA was injury prone and thats about the only way I see us "winning" this trade. We still lost a good player, even if he was a fan fave that lost some followers along the way. 

 

Anyway, i think this trade says more about swope than doyle. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't see us taking Howard or Njoku with the 15th pick.....

 

But for anyone arguing that's he's not a top 15 player,  consider this....

 

Todd McShay has Howard ranked 8th

Lance Zierlein has Howard ranked 10th

Daniel Jeremiah has Howard ranked 13th

CBS Sports has Howard ranked 7th

 

Kiper's next Big Board comes out in a week, I think. 


Again,  I see us going defense, defense and defense with picks 1, 2, 3....    but that doesn't mean that Howard isn't worth the 15th overall pick.

 

Just saying.....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I don't see us taking Howard or Njoku with the 15th pick.....

 

But for anyone arguing that's he's not a top 15 player,  consider this....

 

Todd McShay has Howard ranked 8th

Lance Zierlein has Howard ranked 10th

Daniel Jeremiah has Howard ranked 13th

CBS Sports has Howard ranked 7th

 

Kiper's next Big Board comes out in a week, I think. 


Again,  I see us going defense, defense and defense with picks 1, 2, 3....    but that doesn't mean that Howard isn't worth the 15th overall pick.

 

Just saying.....

 

I hope he does go in the top 15. If he went before us, that would be very lucky. Hopefully some team takes a chance and a defensive player drops to us. I know he had a great combine, but a TE that early is very unusual. In any case, as you said, we won't touch him, so it's a big positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Horse Shoe Heaven said:

really some would argue that.

 

1 hour ago, Jared Cisneros said:

You really want to argue that he will be BPA at our pick? Ok, I'll call your bluff, start a thread, name your top 15 players, and make a case for OJ Howard to be BPA at our pick. I doubt many people will agree with you. You'll probably say our opinions don't matter and the GM's know better, well, Ballard won't take a TE either. Make a thread with your argument that Howard is a good pick for us and BPA. Lets see how it turns out. use your "sources" that would argue I'm wrong. Even if someone had him ranked in top 15, it won't be us taking him.

BPA  & Need I can give you 2 names that may be there at 15 that should easily be taken over OJ Howard

 

Derek Barnett 

Tim Williams 

 

Even throw in Taco Charlton & Teez Tabor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Horse Shoe Heaven said:

His hands are fine, BURDEN WHAT???, the Patriots like him, It was never a choice between one or other???? They complement each other!!!! We run a lot of 2 TE sets.I guess we can agree to disagree! Allen will play well for the Patriots that I can tell you.

Until he get a high ankle sprain 3 games in.  And his hands were poor last season....in big situations.

 

i have always liked DA, but he's gotten worse, not better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After taking in the ramifications involved,  I then look at this in wide lens amusement...

 

At big picture level I see a player we used a round 3 draft pick on...  Give that 3rd round draft pick player and a 6th draft pick so we can have a late 4th or early 5th round pick.  A 3rd and a 6th, just to get a 5th.  And people are quite pleased.

 

Then I also see others wanting to move one of our #1 round draft picks... for maybe/hopefully a 3rd rounder?

 

Just seems like going to a car lot, buying a 45k SUV.  Then a ways down the road, you move it on to someone else for 28k, even though you still owe 35k, and yet are still somehow happy about it.

 

But that's the price you pay in disaster cleanup, I guess.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was all about just getting rid of Allen.  We really did not get jack from this trade other than some cap room and another roster spot.

We basicly traded Allen for 45 spots up from our 6th round pick.  Could have done that with nearly every player on the roster.  Colts brass (Ballard)basicly just wanted out of Allens contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I don't see it as a problem really.  What Doyle's contract told me is they were probably going to release Allen at some point anyway.  May as well take what you can get for him and they got about 1 1/2 round moved up in the draft.  Hey, it beats just releasing him for nothing.  And those spots could be a big difference in the kind of player you land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, I get people are saying that he'll go on to New England and have success but the key is that he wasn't having the success here. Whether its because of injuries, lack of focus or whatever, he simply wasn't productive here. Add in the facts that Doyle just got brought back, Swoope has flashed potential and that Allen's contract wasn't justifiable, you end up having the perfect storm for this trade.

 

Bigger however, is that it sends a message that Ballard doesn't want mediocrity on the team if he can help it. Doyle clearly outperformed Allen last year while being the #2 TE. Doyle got rewarded with a nice contract, Allen got traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jules said:

The 4th and 1 in London will never leave my memory bank.

 

 

I was there..... It was gut wrenching after watching the team almost come back from the hole they shouldnt have dug themselves in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

After taking in the ramifications involved,  I then look at this in wide lens amusement...

 

At big picture level I see a player we used a round 3 draft pick on...  Give that 3rd round draft pick player and a 6th draft pick so we can have a late 4th or early 5th round pick.  A 3rd and a 6th, just to get a 5th.  And people are quite pleased.

 

Then I also see others wanting to move one of our #1 round draft picks... for maybe/hopefully a 3rd rounder?

 

Just seems like going to a car lot, buying a 45k SUV.  Then a ways down the road, you move it on to someone else for 28k, even though you still owe 35k, and yet are still somehow happy about it.

 

But that's the price you pay in disaster cleanup, I guess.

 

true and a good analogy.  

 

but let's say you had tons of problems with that SUV and you get sick of paying a 5-7 hundred dollar or more a month car payment on a vehicle that spends 2/3rd of the month in multiple shops as they try to fix one thing after another, half of which aren't covered under warranty.  So you end up selling the thing, taking a small loss, and you go out and get you something half the cost, now you're back in the black within a short time.  Is it an ideal situation, absolutely not, do you initially loose money, absolutely, but in the long run, you're saving money and you may potentially get a vehicle that while not as flashy, may just end up being more reliable. Therefore, its a win over the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts in the middle of the night?   I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   By the way, I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.     Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.     Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
    • Ballard has said in a recent presser that Paye needs to get better as a pass rusher, so I doubt they are getting what they want from him. 
  • Members

    • Stephen

      Stephen 4,090

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Trace Pyott

      Trace Pyott 316

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 1,335

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • OhioColt

      OhioColt 433

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PlayForTheTie

      PlayForTheTie 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jimmy g

      jimmy g 712

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...