Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

prediction


OLD FAN MAN

Recommended Posts

One of the two teams will surprise everyone as it happens every season. The Bears will never catch the Viks but the Colts can get back within one game of Houston as the Texans play the Vikings. Opportunity is knocking Colts so if you don't win this one which one will you win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are the kinds of games teams with any character, any heart, any interest, have to win.  Home against an inferior opponent (ok, similar?).  These are the kinds of games teams with playoff aspirations win period.  So it has to be the Colts, right?  I sure hope so.  I'm tired of being angry on Sundays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NorthernBlue said:

If they don't win this one, I don't even know what to say at that point haha

 

Colts 31 - 20 Bears

 

Luck 2 Touchdowns and a pick, 300 yards.

Allen and Dorsett with scores.

Yeah this game might be for the season. If we lose to the bears I can't imagine how we make it to the playoffs. 

 

I say the Colts win because we have too. 1-4 would be a disasterous start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RockThatBlue said:

Yeah this game might be for the season. If we lose to the bears I can't imagine how we make it to the playoffs. 

 

I say the Colts win because we have too. 1-4 would be a disasterous start. 

This is  one week i cant even make a prediction if I am honest with myself.  My homerism is waning, my optimism is fading and using reverse psychology by predicting a Bears win seems pointless now. 

 

I have been a glass half full guy with this team and will root for them each week regardless of the outcome.

 

With that said, if they dont win this week against the bears at home and at almost full health with 4 games under their belt, there wont be any more excuses to feed my hope.  

 

Colts: 

Bears:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TKnight24 said:

Colts will be 3-3 heading into game against Houston 

 

10-6 final record, SB51 Win 

 

Sorry, TK....

 

But 3-3 going into the game with Houston is literally impossible.

 

We're 1-3 now and we only have this week's game with the Bears before our game with Houston.

 

So,  we will either be 2-3 or 1-4 when we play Houston.     But we can't be 3-3.

 

As for your other predictions.....    10-6 is not looking likely.....   and winning SB51 seems the longest of long shots....     but I hope you're right....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they do unfortunately fall to 1-4 is definitely over. No chance they only loss 2 or 3 more the entire season to get to 9-7 or 10-6.

 

They've left themselves no wiggle room for error.

 

In all honesty, this is a perfect measuring stick. A team like Pitt now would be disastrous, but CHI shouldn't be a tremendous challenge if the 16' Colts are somewhat legit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coltfreak said:

Over under is 48.   

 

I took the over 

Can I ask why? I think this game will be under 40 honestly. Bears offense is crippled, we can't score. I think this will be a crawl to the finish. I think it'll be 21-17 Colts, 38 points scored. Don't see how either team will put up points in this game. I could be dead wrong though. Usually I don't bet on non playoff games, but I put $5 on the under here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Can I ask why? I think this game will be under 40 honestly. Bears offense is crippled, we can't score. I think this will be a crawl to the finish. I think it'll be 21-17 Colts, 38 points scored. Don't see how either team will put up points in this game. I could be dead wrong though. Usually I don't bet on non playoff games, but I put $5 on the under here. 

 

 

its at home    The Bears suck and I think it is a statement game. If we score a lot of points it will detract from the negativity surrounding the team.  They will be concentrating on a fast start.  Honestly I dont think Pat see the field much as a punter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Less than 2 months away when the greatest crushes this Jake Paul guy. Tyson in 3. Tyson is getting in great shape, he looks fast and strong as of now.    When I list boxers where they rank all-time, I go by peak. You have to when it comes to boxing because most fighters Don't last long. Mike Tyson from 1985-1995 only lost once in 10 years. His record in that time frame was 43-1 37 KO's. Buster Douglas KO'd him in the 10th round in a fight where Mike didn't even train for and Mike Actually KO'd him in the 8th, Douglas got a 13 count.    Notable wins in that 10 year frame.   Berbick Holmes but he was old. Tucker  Spinks Bruno Ruddock (twice)      
    • I'm excited about our future. I think Ballard put together 2 very nice drafts in a row. Never thought we would get Latu, thought we had a better chance at Bowers. Still holding out hope for Cross, he flashes greatness than dissappears, hope he's consistent. Hope Woods takes lead in TE room. I keep writing off Granson, but he keeps impressing. Even if Richardson has a mediocre season I think the team around him could get us to 10-7. 
    • I think you understood his words in a "positive" way, but that's not what he said.   He DID NOT say that "most of you would choose to get married..."   That's your implication. Of course, only women can bring children in this world and most of the women will choose to be married and have children, but that's not exactly what he said.   He said, "doing so - while some others will go on to lead successful career in the world - will take you closer to God's Will"    Here's what he said from the transcript:    He could've said, "even if you go on to have a very successful career, and get the greatest accolades of the world, I think the most important title of a woman is :  Homemaker. And, that would take you closer to God's Will"    But, he didn't say so because he wanted to say exactly what he believes women should do and brought God into that by saying that's His Will.    I think he made a mistake of implying that women are generally excited about marriage and having kids and being a homemaker, when that's only part of a woman's life - even though that could be the most cherished and blessed part of the life.   He only looked at how that made his wife's life - his words, not his wife's words by the way - and projected that to all the women. 
    • This happens every single year and every single year people worry about the occasional unsigned rookie when we haven't even gotten into June yet.   Guys/gals... it's really a big nothing burger. Ever since the NFL introduced rookie scale contracts this has been a non-issue. Everything important in those contracts has been made non-negotiable. The negotiable things are largely minutiae - it's about schedule of payment...it's about off-set language, or language about voiding salary payments(for example - can the team void payments for suspensions and stuff like that), etc.   There are two cases I remember in the last 10 years where this has become a problem and the player has actually missed training camp practices because of it - Joey Bosa(because of schedule of payments dispute) and Roquan Smith(because of dispute about the language about voiding payments for suspensions because of play). And as you see... Both of those were top 10 picks. (i.e. more money on the line)...   Holdouts/holdins of day 2 and day 3 picks are pretty much unheard of. I personally couldn't find a single case when I looked for it.    AD seems to be taking part in both rookie mini camp and in OTAs and hasn't missed any practice, we haven't heard about any sort of dispute so far, so my assumption would be there is nothing to see here and it's all formality.    So yeah... Unless we hear there is a problem I would just assume everything is good.    
    • I was referring to the images on the colts website 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...