Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts vs Browns post game reactions


GoColts8818

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Terrible job of blocking Garrett. Everyone knows he's an elite player, but come on... Not only did he singlehandedly destroy our passing game, he was also constantly stuffing the inside running game. 

Honestly, we should have put Nelson and his 20  mill a year on thr right side lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hoose said:

Four fumbles on two games? That tuen into multiple points for the opposing team?Sorry…. That’s an issue. 

Block better and it wouldn’t happen. When you barely touch the dlineman and just let them go right by you then yes it’s super easy to fumble when you get hit from behind. It was on our line this game that didn’t block garret.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tweezy32 said:

Block better and it wouldn’t happen. When you barely touch the dlineman and just let them go right by you then yes it’s super easy to fumble when you get hit from behind. It was on our line this game that didn’t block garret.

There are good ends in this league. You have to hang on to the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

I’ve watched PLENTY of heartbreaking losses with the colts but man….This one is WAY up there. Completely gutted how we lost that game with the refs. The first Flag Cooper INITIATED the contact. Im beyond p****. This game was ours! 
 

Need a break from watching football the rest of the day. Losing is one thing. Losing like that?? Nah. 

I said that to but might wat h dolphins eagles game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also an issue with the Colts is they don’t have enough players that can dominate or win one-on-one. That’s also why they’re always losing games they shouldn’t. We don’t have an edge rusher who can consistently beat NFL tackles one on one. Pierce is great out of the slot but we don’t have an X receiver who can line up outside and beat most corners in press. We don’t have a LT that can neutralize/slow down some of the better pas rushers in the league. When you don’t have those type of guys at those positions, it’s hard to win in this league. You can’t survive on scheme forever. Eventually you have to have guys that are scheme beaters.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me tell you something the defense made good plays all day. But when Brents had an injury, Baecher could not even hold his water we get a fumble recovery, but they call a phantom defensive holding play that was absolutely ridiculous. There was such a little contact if I any at all and I’m tired of these officials throwing flags changing games the way they do

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

That’s valid at least regarding the sacks, but Minshew coughed up the ball as soon a he was touched - same situation last game. He needs to improve on that. 

 

I don't think he has a lot of pocket presence . Hard to protect the ball when you have no clue a hit is coming.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bluebombers87 said:

What game?

People want to focus on the penalties and the  loss. I focus on the plays before the penalties. Wide-open in the middle.  U could tell the Browns were targeting the corner. He sucks and he cannot cover. People want to focus on the penalty and not on the lack  of talent on this defence. Penalties or not, they cannot close out a game.  Win or lose going  forward, this D  needs to be retooled in terms of scheme, coaching and talent. Sure, blame the penalties but I am going to blame Ballard. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moosejawcolt said:

People want to focus on the penalties and the  loss. I focus on the plays before the penalties. Wide-open in the middle.  U could tell the Browns were targeting the corner. He sucks and he cannot cover. People want to focus on the penalty and not on the lack  of talent on this defence. Penalties or not, they cannot close out a game.  Win or lose going  forward, this D  needs to be retooled in terms of scheme, coaching and talent. Sure, blame the penalties but I am going to blame Ballard. 

 

So…. What game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

There are good ends in this league. You have to hang on to the ball.

Trust me, as a person that has played football before… it’s harder said then done to hold onto the ball when you don’t see and 6ft+ 285 lb man coming full speed blindside tackle you. To just say you have to hold onto the ball is showing us you clearly don’t know football and what it’s like to be hit. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moosejawcolt said:

People want to focus on the penalties and the  loss. I focus on the plays before the penalties. Wide-open in the middle.  U could tell the Browns were targeting the corner. He sucks and he cannot cover. People want to focus on the penalty and not on the lack  of talent on this defence. Penalties or not, they cannot close out a game.  Win or lose going  forward, this D  needs to be retooled in terms of scheme, coaching and talent. Sure, blame the penalties but I am going to blame Ballard. 

 

"Can't close out games."

 

The.

Defense.

Forced.

A.

Fumble.

And.

It.

Was.

Negated.

By.

A.

Garbage.

Penalty.

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoColts8818 said:

Yeah I noticed the same thing.  What a bad decision by him on that play.

Yep.  Or if he led Pittman up the field it isn’t picked.  Steichen has done a good job improving the offense and he’s creative in his play calling.  However, he did botch the end of the first half and probably cost the Colts 10 points.  It was impressive they overcame the turnovers.  Ridiculous to have the game end on bad officiating.   
 

Picking up the flag on the ineligible player down field was terrible. As was the hold on Fries and the two calls at the end. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moosejawcolt said:

People want to focus on the penalties and the  loss. I focus on the plays before the penalties. Wide-open in the middle.  U could tell the Browns were targeting the corner. He sucks and he cannot cover. People want to focus on the penalty and not on the lack  of talent on this defence. Penalties or not, they cannot close out a game.  Win or lose going  forward, this D  needs to be retooled in terms of scheme, coaching and talent. Sure, blame the penalties but I am going to blame Ballard. 

 

I never blame the refs.  But blaming Ballard for this loss is asinine.   Turnovers lost the game.   That's not on Ballard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

It’s one thing to lose because your just not good enough. Then you can accept that and try to get better players. What makes this worse is we are just giving games away just like last season.

This team looks NOTHING like last season, they played their guts out today!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Good play  calling does not equal situational awareness and decision making.

 

We shouldn't have been in the game with 4 turnovers against the number one defense that led to 17pts. By all accounts this game should've been a blowout!!!! We still scored 38 points... Did you stop to think that his situational awareness and decision making had to do with Minshew turning the ball over?!

This is NOT Shane's first rodeo with Gardner.

 

As a matter of fact in his two starts in Philly last season Minshew had 3 ints and 4 fumbles. Frank gets blown out in this game! We usually agree on most things but not this one. Shane was trying to win by not allowing Minshew to COST us the game in the end with another turnover and TRUSTED the soft defense to hold the Browns from going 70+ yds while needing a TD. I think we're in good hands with the rookie hc whose still learning also SEVEN games in.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@NewColtsFan not sure what you're confused about.

 

if you march down the field, and turn the football over, and have to march down the football field again, to score the same points you should've already scored, thats how you end up with garbage yardarge.

 

so yeah, the stat sheet looks nice in terms of YPG, but when you factor in the turnovers does it matter?

 

Remember the year Jameis Winston threw 30TDs and 30interceptions? Maybe you do, maybe you don't, they didn't accomplish anything. Shocker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tweezy32 said:

Trust me, as a person that has played football before… it’s harder said then done to hold onto the ball when you don’t see and 6ft+ 285 lb man coming full speed blindside tackle you. To just say you have to hold onto the ball is showing us you clearly don’t know football and what it’s like to be hit. 

Exactly...90 % on here have never played the sport and have no clue.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to negate garbage ref calls by claiming the team shouldn't have committed turnovers is such a brain dead take. The team made the plays to cancel out their garbage turnovers and the refs negated them. It's really not hard to understand.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoColts8818 said:

Positives:   
 

Offense put up 38 points in the number one defense in the NFL.

Taylor looks to be regaining his form.

Kenny Moore played a great game.

the return of down the field passes in the Colts offense.

 

Negatives:


you can’t turn the ball over four times and have a blocked field goal and win.

Questionable calls aside the Colts remain way too undisciplined and commit way too many penalties

The play calling at the end of the half that gave the ball back to the Browns that let them get a cheap three that ended up being the difference in the game.

Way too much cushion on the WRs in crunch time, stop me if you’ve heard that one before.

Missed Grover on that TD play at the end.

But I thought we played press man... lol...that cushion makes me cringe....Brents going out may have had something to do with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tweezy32 said:

Trust me, as a person that has played football before… it’s harder said then done to hold onto the ball when you don’t see and 6ft+ 285 lb man coming full speed blindside tackle you. To just say you have to hold onto the ball is showing us you clearly don’t know football and what it’s like to be hit. 

Minshew is the only QB coughing up the ball on 50% of sacks. It’s a him thing, not a everyone else not playing football thing. Lol. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, RollerColt said:

I was never high on Gus Bradley coming here. I disagree with his scheme and philosophy… I think we should’ve given Shane the chance to choose his own DC. 


Shane will likely get his own DC either next year, or the year after.  You’ll get your wish.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wonder if there will be settlements to the people that have ordered the NFL package for many years   Im in it for 20 years.......  
    • Don’t worry. This is pretty common for the 2024 Reds. They always win the first game of the series in convincing fashion, and then the bats get cold for the rest of the other 2-3 games. 
    • I gotta say you make arguments that you’d never accept from your students because they’re so superficial.      So saying Ballard has been mediocre to bad is tissue paper thin.  Why hasn’t Irsay fired this mediocre to bad GM?  Because he signed off on what Ballard did each year in real time, not after the fact.   Irsay knows Ballard has an eye for talent.  And as Ballard freely admitted in January, the Colts haven’t had more success because he failed to get the QB right.  These aren’t excuses, but it IS badly needed context — which you’d realize if you weren’t always looking for new ways to hate on CB.      As to what you and Moose “supposedly said”  there’s a simple way to verify.  Go to the Day 2 draft thread of Friday April 26.  It was between 3a and 4 my time when I saw it.  I believe it was recent.  Just add 2-3 hours depending on your time zone and you can see your conversation with Moose.   What was so astonishing, what makes me “prattle on” as you put it is how you two ever thought you were right?!?   Given your career choice you jumped to conclusions I’d like to think you’d never accept from your students.   Why you thought Ballard didn’t know more?  Why you thought you two knew better?   Ballard not only knows more, he knows dramatically more.  As I said in another post, he shared the tip of the iceberg.  He doesn’t share the part of the iceberg that you can’t see.  The 90 percent.  The absence of curiosity is stunning given your occupation.    Now, at the bottom of your post you brought up a new line of attack on me and I have no idea what you’re talking about?   I’m not an optimist?   Since when?  Based on what?   In my 12 years here, only 1-2 posters have ever made that claim.   So what are you talking about?     Finally….   You can stop calling me Sir.  It’s normally said with respect.  You don’t respect me at all.   I’ve extended olive branches publicly and privately, and both have been rejected.  Your choice.  So calling me sir is intended as an insult.   It’s old and boring.   Move on.   I don’t know why you “enjoy engaging with me”.   You take a beating.  But if that’s what you’re in to, be my guest.    Sorry this went so long….       
    • He loves you, you just don't know it (sarcasm) 
    • Cubs actually won one - beat the Giants finally.
  • Members

    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,692

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,859

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 1,508

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gspdx

      gspdx 1,657

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,570

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • G8R

      G8R 57

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...