Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Bradley's D


bleed blue4life

Recommended Posts

Bradley hasn’t had a lot to work with this year. But if Steichen wants to make a change I trust he will make the right decision.

8 minutes ago, Bravo said:

Slow and conservative. Hate it.

 

If the Colts are going to give up 34 points would much rather them be aggressive.

You are correct here. At least try and blitz and go down swinging. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, krunk said:

I think we needed more blitzing today, but that's hard considering we had inexperienced cover guys on the outside

to match the higher talent that the Bengals had at WR. 

I think you are 100% correct here. This is why I am not too hard on Bradley.  But I also won’t get mad if Steichen wants to make a chance. We have to fix this defense. That means being much more aggressive and not go into the season with only Brent’s as the high CB pick.  He can’t stay healthy yet either. Need to go get a vet and draft.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bleed blue4life said:

Anyone else tired of this bend but do not break approach on defense? Never sends more than 4 after the qb.Drives me crazy.We are playing back up qb's.Put some pressure on em

I’d be okay with it if it was bend but don’t break, they break all the time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been posting for more blitzing all year, and then people say oh, well you can't with our secondary. 

 

This team is 30th in the league at blitzing. Yes, the front 4 get a decent amount of sacks, but cmon. The Colts constantly make mediocre QB's look like all-stars week in and week out. 

 

Barely ever blitzing (esp backup QB's) is ridiculous.

 

Grow a pair and pressure the QB instead of leaving your secondary 10 yards off the ball and letting the other team march down the field. 

 

I'm also sick of watching screens go for 20+ yards. Unreal. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I turned off the radio when the bengals were driving to go up 3 scores. I couldn’t take hearing the fans cheer every single play and Matt Taylor saying The 45 the 50 the 45 the 40 the 35 the 30 and he’s finally brought down at the 24 yard line in Colts territory. Or, and they bengals convert another 1st down on a 12, 15, 25 yard pass, or 50 yard screen. Demoralizing. 
 

this game was the game I wanted to see if the Colts would buy into their own hype. And it felt like they did just that. 
 

don’t get me started on the referees love fest for Ohio either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Indyfan4life said:

The thing is, we ALWAYS do this. We’ve been doing this since Dungy. 

yeah cause we keep hiring outdated DCs. Hopefully , with a bottom of the league ranking, Bradley will go after the season. Question is, who replaces him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fifty years of defensive game planning and strategy playing out right in front of our eyes again this season. You have to mix up your defense and throw in some blitzes from time to time so your defense is more effective. Our defense doesn't even play that badly most of the time. I know the stat, going into yesterdays game we had blitzed on the lowest % of defensive snaps of the 32 teams this season and were 2nd in sacks, just imagine how much more effective this defense could be with just 4 or 5 more blitzes mixed in per game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Experience matters in the secondary.  Look no further than the loss of Gilmore.  Big difference now that he has gone and we are playing inexperienced players learning on the fly.  Zone is the most popular coverage in the league.  It works especially with an experienced secondary and linebacker crew.  We don’t have either right now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest head scratcher to me is these coaches reviewing the tape every week and they can’t see this? You can’t argue our talent and what to run when we literally play soft coverage week in and week out. At least play some press man and make them beat you, because they’re kicking our * anyway

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is actually a decent defense

 

You need pass rush - we didn’t have it

You need good LB play - we didn’t have it except for 44

You need a playmaking FS - We don’t have it

You need physical CBs that can tackle -  We didn’t have it

 

Other than that it was amazing. 😀
 

 

I also amazed that we kept trying to run against an 8 man box 

 

again and again

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

This is actually a decent defense

 

You need pass rush - we didn’t have it

You need good LB play - we didn’t have it except for 44

You need a playmaking FS - We don’t have it

You need physical CBs that can tackle -  We didn’t have it

 

Other than that it was amazing. 😀
 

 

I also amazed that we kept trying to run against an 8 man box 

 

again and again

Linebacker play was so bad yesterday. Those screens aren’t as affective with bad line backer play. Oline wasn’t great either. Steichen needs to be more creative in the run game. He also came out throwing at the beginning and didn’t try to establish the run early.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MikChiken said:

The biggest head scratcher to me is these coaches reviewing the tape every week and they can’t see this? You can’t argue our talent and what to run when we literally play soft coverage week in and week out. At least play some press man and make them beat you, because they’re kicking our * anyway

 

Kinda makes you think don't it? LoL

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Indianapolis-Colts-Fan said:

this game was the game I wanted to see if the Colts would buy into their own hype. And it felt like they did just that. 

This was my concern too. A comment EJ Speed made during one of his interviews last week was WAY too cocky and had me worried they were getting overconfident. Yep.....

 

3 hours ago, csmopar said:

yeah cause we keep hiring outdated DCs. Hopefully , with a bottom of the league ranking, Bradley will go after the season. Question is, who replaces him

I like Gus as a man, but I'm definitely leaning towards wanting him gone after this season. I've said it a few times, but I think he is the opposite of Steichen when it comes to talent utilization. Steichen adjusts his scheme to what his players do best and Gus makes players fit into his scheme. We need a much more innovative scheme and imaginative playcalling.

 

If we decided to go the route of guys that have no NFL DC experience:

- DJ Eliot, Eagles LB coach - A lot of college experience, Steichen has familiarity with him.

-Mike Rothenberg, Jets LB coach -  Would bring Saleh's creative scheme, has a lot of college and solid pro experience. Was also the DC for the National team in the 22 Senior Bowl.

 

Assuming he doesn't get a HC position this go around, Ejiro Every could be an option, especially since he spent a lot of time interviewing with our team and there's some familiarity of what his defensive vision is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, we are playing backup or bad qbs that we should be blitzing often. We arent blitzing at all thats the issue. Browning isnt good and should have been blitzed to force him to throw under pressure. The rest of the QBs we face arent that good and should be blitxed a lot to pressure them no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MikeCurtis said:

This is actually a decent defense

 

You need pass rush - we didn’t have it

You need good LB play - we didn’t have it except for 44

You need a playmaking FS - We don’t have it

You need physical CBs that can tackle -  We didn’t have it

 

Other than that it was amazing. 😀
 

 

I also amazed that we kept trying to run against an 8 man box 

 

again and again

 

  Bradley has a bunch of bums in his back 7. This kind of results should be Expected. We are Not what some knuckleheads think we should be.

 With Minshews arm teams should always play 8 in the box. Stop our run game and give him his dink and dunks. He is constantly inconsistent and struggles to get all the way to the end zone.

 We are now playing like we were expected to play.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shive said:

This was my concern too. A comment EJ Speed made during one of his interviews last week was WAY too cocky and had me worried they were getting overconfident. Yep....


 

it was something I was hoping to see leave with Frank Reich. Any time the colts were doing well, and the media and fans started to hype them, they’d buy into their invincibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

  Bradley has a bunch of bums in his back 7. This kind of results should be Expected. We are Not what some knuckleheads think we should be.

 With Minshews arm teams should always play 8 in the box. Stop our run game and give him his dink and dunks. He is constantly inconsistent and struggles to get all the way to the end zone.

 We are now playing like we were expected to play.

 

 

I wouldnt say that ALL of our back 7 are bad

 

We had one LB on the field yesterday that could actually play 

 

Our CBs were getting mauled by the WRs of the Bengals

(This is ANOTHER example of WHY we need a WR1 as Well as Pittman)

 

We NEED a playmaking FS that is not on this team today.....  

 

We NEED an OLB that can make a tackle. - Missing Speed KILLED this defense....

In the offseason, we need to replace SHAQ

 

The WEAK OL from the Bengals stopped our DL with ease We did NOT generate pass rush

Maybe its time that we BUY a DE in FA

We have our QB and LT on contract......  

 

And lastly

 

If you see the defense in an 8 man box...... why run the ball? - Time to Audible

 

JT would have been able to bounce a few of those outside, but of course he didnt play

 

I like the gutsyness of our QB, but will be happy when AR5 is back

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

 

I wouldnt say that ALL of our back 7 are bad

 

We had one LB on the field yesterday that could actually play 

 

Our CBs were getting mauled by the WRs of the Bengals

(This is ANOTHER example of WHY we need a WR1 as Well as Pittman)

 

We NEED a playmaking FS that is not on this team today.....  

 

We NEED an OLB that can make a tackle. - Missing Speed KILLED this defense....

In the offseason, we need to replace SHAQ

 

The WEAK OL from the Bengals stopped our DL with ease We did NOT generate pass rush

Maybe its time that we BUY a DE in FA

We have our QB and LT on contract......  

 

And lastly

 

If you see the defense in an 8 man box...... why run the ball? - Time to Audible

 

JT would have been able to bounce a few of those outside, but of course he didnt play

 

I like the gutsyness of our QB, but will be happy when AR5 is back

 

 

From what I know, it is not a weak OL. They have some good players on there - OBJ, Kappa and Ted Karras. It is a middle of the road OL, but not a bad one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We talk soo much about being mentally strong and emotional intelligent but one loss and we want everybody fired, amazing.

 

Eventually, we want every DC fired.

 

I want Gus another year with Flowers, Brown and Brents back, maybe another veteran CB.

 

Give Gus a Micah Parsons and this D would be amazing, is not scheme, just personel.

 

Week 13, 2nd in sacks, 2nd in takeaways, Shane will not fire him.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, lollygagger8 said:

I've been posting for more blitzing all year, and then people say oh, well you can't with our secondary. 

 

This team is 30th in the league at blitzing. Yes, the front 4 get a decent amount of sacks, but cmon. The Colts constantly make mediocre QB's look like all-stars week in and week out. 

 

Barely ever blitzing (esp backup QB's) is ridiculous.

 

Grow a pair and pressure the QB instead of leaving your secondary 10 yards off the ball and letting the other team march down the field. 

 

I'm also sick of watching screens go for 20+ yards. Unreal. 

I agree that we need to blitz more, especially against 2nd string QBs.  The only comment that I made about blitzing is that it likely wouldn't stop the screens that killed us.  But yes, we need to blitz more.  Elite teams like the Cowboys and Eagles do it, so why shouldn't we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DiogoSales said:

We talk soo much about being mentally strong and emotional intelligent but one loss and we want everybody fired, amazing.

 

Eventually, we want every DC fired.

 

I want Gus another year with Flowers, Brown and Brents back, maybe another veteran CB.

 

Give Gus a Micah Parsons and this D would be amazing, is not scheme, just personel.

 

Week 13, 2nd in sacks, 2nd in takeaways, Shane will not fire him.

I agree.  This isn't about scheme.  At least, not totally.  And it's not totally about defensive play calling either.  This is about personnel.  They've been down to 3rd/4th string and rookie DB's all year.  Their FS can play -- barely.  They were without Grover for 6 weeks.  Their DE's are good but not great.  Sacks have to be manufactured; they don't come from talent alone.  Their starting LB's make a lot of tackles, but are still not elite.  And the one guy who used to be the Big Playmaker on defense could no longer do it, and he's gone.

Gus tried running his standard Cover-3 earlier this year.  And his crappo backup CB's got completely toasted.  He's now playing a lot more Cover-2, Quarters, and Zone to accommodate his lack of skill at that position.  His two best players are a 3-technique DT and a Nickle Corner.  He doesn't dare blitz that much, because it would only be worse if they didn't get the sack.  It would be all-or-nothing.

I think he's done a pretty good job, considering his lack of talent on that side of the ball.

As you say, just give him One Prime Time Player, like Parsons, and it would be a whole lot easier.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

  Bradley has a bunch of bums in his back 7. This kind of results should be Expected. We are Not what some knuckleheads think we should be.

 With Minshews arm teams should always play 8 in the box. Stop our run game and give him his dink and dunks. He is constantly inconsistent and struggles to get all the way to the end zone.

 We are now playing like we were expected to play.

 

ballard must have liked gus and our defensive players. this is what he chose to start our season. they must all be better than we think they are, we just dont know talent and playmakers when we see them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...