Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Irsay says league admits they messed up


GoColts8818

Recommended Posts

Just now, RollerColt said:

Honestly good on Jim for bringing it to light. This confirms what we all saw on Sunday. 

It will be interesting to see if other owners come out and agree with him, looking at the Rams and Dolphins owners who had very questionable calls go against them sunday as well.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RollerColt said:

Honestly good on Jim for bringing it to light. This confirms what we all saw on Sunday. 

Till they dock us a pick also.

Just now, JediXMan said:

Isn’t this going to make the refs go against us even more now lol.

Can't be much worse 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, w87r said:

Till they dock us a pick also.

Can't be much worse 

Doubt they do that.  The NFL isn’t stupid and knows their fans have eyes.  Docking a team for publicly saying what the NFL told them and confirmed what fans saw will just make the league look bad.  They may fine him but I am guessing it ends there beyond maybe the league telling Irsay behind closed doors dude don’t do that.  Worth remembering that Goodell works for the Owners too.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Doubt they do that.  The NFL isn’t stupid and knows their fans have eyes.  Docking a team for publicly saying what the NFL told them and confirmed what fans saw will just make the league look bad.  They may fine him but I am guessing it ends there beyond maybe the league telling Irsay behind closed doors dude don’t do that.  Worth remembering that Goodell works for the Owners too.

I don't think so either, just would be the topping in the cake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CR91 said:

What does it matter if the league admits they messed up or not if there's no accountability? It's not like the refs lose anything.

I'm not sure if this is true, but I was told once the refs get graded and the best get to be refs in the playoffs/super bowl? If that's true I guess there's a loss of money, but if not then at least prestige?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad Irsay said it. Was frustrated that Steichen didn’t address it in his conference but likely was told by Irsay he would be doing so.

 

The only way things will change is if enough attention on the topic forces the league into responding.

 

When you have someone like McAfee, who has a very large audience openly making a connection between gambling and referees, it shows there is a large enough contingent who feel similarly right or wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Patrick Miller said:

Heck they should be giving us a pick.

I agree with this 100%. It should be a 1st rounder, just add an extra pick at the end of round 1 so it doesn't affect other teams 1st round picks. That would give us the 33rd pick. Something huge needs be done because the REFS cost us the loss. That loss was critical because now a team like the Browns has 2 less losses and the tiebreaker over us for Wildcard spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, my Raimann opinion is the exact same opinion as my Polian/Mathis opinion and NE/Brady opinion that I've carried for about 15 years.  But seems to get lifted into an argument when luck is attributed to Ballard.   Conceptually, no GM is any better at finding "late round gems" than any other.  Looking at how they passed on a player several times just like every other GM did, they probably just get lucky.   And that's basically what Ballard said...at least in this case when a talented player was still on the board (not exactly got passed over several times)
    • He was the 10th WR drafted.
    • Put it this way, your first post in this thread reminded me of your Raimann argument, and I figured it would come up eventually.   Regarding the reaction to Ballard if AD is a good player, meh. I don't think the main implication has been that Ballard played the game so well that he knew exactly what would happen before everyone else, and he got what he wanted. I think the argument is that whether a GM stays and picks a guy, or trades back and picks a guy, if the guy becomes a good player, it's a credit to the GM. Maybe you've interpreted that argument differently, but I think what you've said above is a misrepresentation.
    • LOL. Its not shocking at all if you bothered to understand anything about what my consistent message has been about capital being devoted to positional value...instead of Gs, ILBs, RBs, and goal keeper FSs.  When and if it would ever happen, I'd be happy.  I figured it would happen at some point.     Bust is a term used to describe a 1st round pick that went bad, and GMs should know enough about 1st round picks to not pick a bust.  That's my standard, and opinion.  QBs are an unusual pick, because so much "hope" and consequence is attached to the pick, so busts are going to happen with QBs.  GMs should never whiff on a position player in the 1st round, IMO.     What were talking about here are guys that might play better than anyone figured...which we know because 31 GMs passed on lower round guys multiple times.  The evaluation processes that all teams use....and professional pundits as well....fail to capture that lower round prospect.  So when the standardized process fails to recognize proper value, a team being rewarded with great value can be described as having good luck.
    • It was with McAfee, I did see that interview. I responded to this post with the following response when @RollerColt said something about it.    Just in case you missed this response.
  • Members

    • KB

      KB 1,143

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Crush22

      Crush22 488

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts.sb41

      Colts.sb41 258

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 1,446

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mikemccoy84

      Mikemccoy84 95

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 1,046

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,375

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Goatface Killah

      Goatface Killah 2,029

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,926

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,305

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...