Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2022 Season Opener, Colts @ Texans, Sept. 11, 2022, 1 PM EDT


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DougDew said:

You're joking?

 

We've supposedly got the best RB in football and the best LG of all time and people are complaining about the play calling, especially in OT?

 

Like he's suppose to let Pierce. Strachan, and Slow Mo win the games for us?

Don't forget Campbell, the new Ghost, because he's been about as ghosty as TY this game (meaning nonexistent)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DougDew said:

You're joking?

 

We've supposedly got the best RB in football and the best LG of all time and people are complaining about the play calling, especially in OT?

 

Like he's suppose to rely on Pierce. Strachan, and Slow Mo to win the games for us?

 

Frank sucked. 

No joking.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DougDew said:

You're joking?

 

We've supposedly got the best RB in football and the best LG of all time and people are complaining about the play calling, especially in OT?

 

Like he's suppose to rely on Pierce. Strachan, and Slow Mo to win the games for us?

It’s the players whose potential he and Ballard has been praising. Frank had so many bad playcalls it’s rdidiculous. 
 

This was a turd of a game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DougDew said:

You're joking?

 

We've supposedly got the best RB in football and the best LG of all time and people are complaining about the play calling, especially in OT?

 

Like he's suppose to rely on Pierce. Strachan, and Slow Mo to win the games for us?

Which brings up the obvious question. 

 

On 4th and 2 at the goaline why not run JT behind Nelson instead of the ridiculous wildcat play ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, coming on strong said:

lets be honest texans are a two win team .  its embarrassing and the colts have no chance against good teams .  colts are playing like 7 or 8 playoff teams  and we cant beat the texans

True, but when we were down by 17, if someone offered you a tie as opposed to a loss, would you take it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

A freakin miss FG, cost us the win. A Tie is 100's times better than a loss though. After being down 20-3 I guess I will take it. Blakenship may need to go. 

Blankenship had 3 major errors.  2 kicks OB and missing a game-winner.

 

He’s always been one of the weaker PKs in the league.  But Verity was no better.

 

I think we should’ve hung on to Badgley.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Numba1Colt said:

Colts beating themselves.... already sick of it. Dropped TD. Not taking 3 to go up 6-0 on the road... wildcat formation keeping the ball in the SMALLER RBs hands ???? Huh???

 

Ryan not lofting the screen pass over the defender who was right there

 

Frank not calling timeout after a nice pass to get 1st and 10 on the 35 with 1:05 left.... which leads to the Colts going too fast and quick snapping it and getting beat off the edge which ruins the drive... and Frank will go into half with 2 timeouts in his pocket

 

UNBELIEVABLE... 

 

how to beat yourselves 101

 

 

 

Well.... overtime. First and 10 36 yard field goal or whatever. All you have to do is run it up the gut 3x with JT if you are playing the game SCARED at that moment in time.

 

Colts were SCARED and played SCARED then. WHYYYYYY???? Texans were literally begging to be beat at the end of the 4th Q and in OT... and the Colts can't take advantage of it both times. JT runs out of bounds instead of running to get a first when Colts had 2 timeouts left???

 

in OT... 3rd down... rolling M.Ryan out and he doesn't throw it away he holds it until he gets SACKED to lose even more yards???? when Goggles is already suspect???

 

I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS TEAM.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No for me.  Alec is a cheap potential WR.  No bad can come from keeping him. 
    • I can see the need to improve the secondary, but Alec Pierce should be better this year, and he is so very cheap.   There is also a need for depth, as Pittman and AD Mitchell will need plays off.   I could see Pierce getting 20-30% of the snaps at either side     I am very excited by our offensive potential...... If we have health, this offense can stack up points. Our OL is very strong as well   Who do you double cover?   Last year it was Pittman   This year, with AD Mitchell AND Pittman, we will see deeper zones from our competition   When we had EDGE running the ball with our HOF WRs, Manning could dictate the play based on what the defense did.   8 Man Box?  - We will beat you deep.   4-3 defense/ Nickle?  We will run the ball   If AR5, can pick this up, we will be tough to stop.     I am SOMEWHAT excited by our defense, now that we SHOULD be able to bring more pressure.   But........   I would STILL bring in a vet at FS.......       We will probably wait until camp to do something here             
    • No way, we can sign a vet as good or better and still keep Pierce and see what this season brings.
    • Oh ok you mean overall passing at the time as opposed to Otto personally. I gotcha. For the time he was much more active throwing then most and one of the main reasons the passing game evolved (Along with rule changes). Like some have mentioned hard to compare stats from different eras because of this so won/loss record and titles easier (Though not perfect) for comparison sake. 1 amazing fact is Graham still holds the all time record of yards per pass attempt at 8.6 despite playing in that era. The more time people spend researching him the more they come to appreciate him. He is forgotten by man, when older QB's are brought up it is usually Johnny U. who 100% deserves mention in all greatest conversations but Otto laid that groundwork.
    • Not at all under consideration. O on a ten scale.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...