Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
coltsfeva

Romo - Yeah or Nay?

Recommended Posts

  I was talking to my son in law and he seems (like many), to like the way Romo “predicts” the upcoming play: watch the wr screen, it’s going to be a run up the middle”, etc.

   For me, not so much. One poster put it this way;, “he’s like the uninvited drunk, who crashes the party”! I totally agree. Just too much talking and after a drop or bad pass, its “you’ve got to hold onto that one” or “he should have thrown that with a little more air”!

  What say ye about Romo?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Romo is much better than the stiffness Simms brought. The only problem Romo had was he would talk over Nantz at times but he's getting better at not doing that. I give a Romo a thumbs up.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like how Romo predicts plays. Yeah he's talkative, but he's different than just a cookie-cutter analyst. And I like that about his style.

 

Jason Witten should take Jim Nantz's place though :sarcasm:

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lower his mic down a few clicks and switch him to decaf and I might be okay with him.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In a very short window,  he went from the new buy to one of the best,  if not THE best.

 

In TV that's NOT an easy thing to do.

 

 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he could commentate every game/sport I watch with the same level of knowledge and enthusiasm I would be thrilled. NFL, MLB, tennis, MMA...Olympic curling. I'm all in. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not Tony Kornheiser bad, but I'm not a fan.  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, #12. said:

He's not Tony Kornheiser bad, but I'm not a fan.  

Kornheiser was awful, I could do a better job than him in my sleep. :funny:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's very, very difficult to listen to.

Sometimes he predicts plays..sometimes he is wrong.

..Sometimes he predicts more than one play

 

But the problem is: He just babbles...he keeps a stream of talk going by never finishing a sentence.

The best TV announcers use silence....to let the viewer get into the scene.

I love to hear the crowd and the QB calling signals. The sounds of the game.

Romo talks over all that.  

Its very hard to enjoy a game when he's doing it because he just doesn't shut up.

I end up eventually turning the sound down when hes on.  Every time

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

In a very short window,  he went from the new buy to one of the best,  if not THE best.

 

In TV that's NOT an easy thing to do.

 

 

 

New Buy?      New BUY?!?      What the *%#!

 

How about New Guy!    New GUY!!!

 

Ugh!      I hate, Hate, HATE when I make typos!!        HATE THEM!!!       :facepalm:

 

Doh!!      :wall:       

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Romo is an awesome commentator. He's calling plays because he watches the team's tape like a coach. More than I can say for 7/8 of the rest of the commentators. Dude knows his stuff, that's for certain.

 

A corpse would be better than Collinsworth, but Romo certainly is light years better than him. 

 

I'm not sure who is even as good as him now that I think about it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love him.

 

The thing for me is not the fact that he predicts the plays, it's that he talks you through what he sees before the snap that means he can predict the plays. 

 

For example "Gronk out left one on one, if the safety doesn't sneak over to double cover, expect the ball to go there".  He is educating the viewer, not just showing off by saying what is going to happen.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 The best thing to happen to football.
 And that is teams getting up to the line quicker. We were being inundated with stories about players families during the game. Producers trying to outdo each with their ability to put together human interest stories. Yes they were touching, but they went on throughout the game taking away analysis and replays so we could see what was actually happening within the plays.
 With a faster paced game, we are back to football and Romo is really sticking out.
This is what i want, more replays and great analysis. That is football on TV.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like him for the most part. He's better than anything ESPN has produced lately. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't care less if a guy can predict plays or not beforehand.

 

I don't get the love for Romo.  He's fine, but nowhere near the hype he seems to get.  He's like a 7/10.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2019 at 4:31 PM, MacDee1975 said:

I couldn't care less if a guy can predict plays or not beforehand.

 

I don't get the love for Romo.  He's fine, but nowhere near the hype he seems to get.  He's like a 7/10.

See I don’t get the hate for him. You hate him because you can hear the passion in his voice for the game? That he talks to much? They all do at least he is adding something.. lol  

 

i cant stand hearing Troy Aikman announce a game he is just awful.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, JimJaime said:

See I don’t get the hate for him. You hate him because you can hear the passion in his voice for the game? That he talks to much? They all do at least he is adding something.. lol  

 

i cant stand hearing Troy Aikman announce a game he is just awful.

 

Where did I say I "hated" him or anything about the passion in his voice, or that he talks too much?  I said none of those things.

 

I said I don't care if he can predict plays beforehand, and I rated him a 7/10.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hes alright, much better than sims or collinsworth 

 

aikmen is decent im not crazy about his high voice though 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2019 at 8:23 AM, DaveA1102 said:

Love him.

 

The thing for me is not the fact that he predicts the plays, it's that he talks you through what he sees before the snap that means he can predict the plays. 

 

For example "Gronk out left one on one, if the safety doesn't sneak over to double cover, expect the ball to go there".  He is educating the viewer, not just showing off by saying what is going to happen.

 

This

 

Gives the viewers a glimpse of what players and coaches are looking for when they watch film.  You can somewhat get a peek of what the "chess match" between coordinators looks like. 

 

Also shows IMO how hard Romo works at his job.  He doesn't just know this stuff, it shows that when he's not at the games he's watching film of the teams so he knows their tendencies.  

 

Best color analyst on TV.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

This

 

Gives the viewers a glimpse of what players and coaches are looking for when they watch film.  You can somewhat get a peek of what the "chess match" between coordinators looks like. 

 

Also shows IMO how hard Romo works at his job.  He doesn't just know this stuff, it shows that when he's not at the games he's watching film of the teams so he knows their tendencies.  

 

Best color analyst on TV.  

 

Indeed!

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001014429/article/tony-romos-colleagues-laud-his-preparation-intellect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Romo is the only commentator that actually gives insightful information during the game, rather than some of the clearly biased commentators they have now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/10/2019 at 10:48 PM, NewColtsFan said:

Ugh!      I hate, Hate, HATE when I make typos!!        HATE THEM!!!       :facepalm:

 

I hate when you make them too :P

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You live your life like the Coyote chasing the Road Runner....    and you keep running into the mountain side,  or running off the cliff....     OK....    you're not going to change....   So, I'll take apart your nonsense --- again.    This will be the longest post I've ever made,  trying to answer all your nonsense.    Doubt you'll read it.    But here it comes....     Of course we know if Luck's injury, whatever it is,  ISN'T minor.   What minor injury do you know lasts four months?    He barely participated in any off-season program.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    The Colts have NEVER, EVER called it minor.   Not once.  The only thing they've said is he hopes to be back by certain deadlines,  and he's missed almost every one.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    This paragraph may confuse you.   It's full of common sense and logic.   I don't know how you got the nerve to try to argue that no one knows.   Unbelieveable!   Nope.   No Tantrum from me.   Just pointing ot what should be obvious,  but apparently the obvious isn't obvious to you.     By the way,  while you were giving me a sad on my post to my friend CBE,   do you know who was giving me a "like"?    CBE.    I criticized his post and he still gave me a like.    He know while we may not agree,  he knows I'm not trying to pound him.   I'm  trying to be as honest and factual as I can.    No wonder you can't see for yourself.   What triggered me, was your latest attempt to sound like you know what you're talking about.   You judged Willis on half of the first pre-season game.    That's all you've got.    That's it.   Doesn't even occur to you that that is.....   NOTHING!    Hello?    And you present it like it should be taken seriously,  when it should be laughed at.    Goodness gracious, you want to go back to the media draft comparison?    I was hoping for your sake that you wouldn't.    But since you insist.     Did you ever really look at that poll?   Seriously,  did you look at the four category breakdown?    Did you see what was actually involved?    If you did,  you shouldn't have been crowing about it.    First,  what I care about from guys like Kiper and McShay and Jeremiah and others isn't just the first round.   My  momma can do a decent job on the first round, and she's been dead for nearly 30 years!    I care about their view on ALL ROUNDS.   And your survey was only about the first round.   That's it.   There were four categories.    In three of them,  the leader got no more than 50%.   That's it.   The best person in three of the four categories scored no more than 50 percent.   When the top guy is scoring no more than 50 percent and everyone else is close behind,  then no one really knows anything.    And the one category that the winner did well in --- one category --- he scored in the 90's.   And everyone else was right behind him.    So, most everyone did well in ONE OUT OF THE FOUR categories.   Big stinking deal.    I tried to tell you this silly survey didn't support what you believed but you wouldn't listen.   No surprise there.  All you cared about the results.   The fatal flaw.     Finally,  without a single fact,  you offered this opinion in that post.    I remember it like it was yesterday,  that your new age guys were doing a better job than the more traditional scouts.   Based on one poll.   One poll of one round.    And you said the older guys like Kiper and company were resting on their laurels and not working as hard.   Nope, the old guys were covering all seven rounds.    Most of your guys,  covering one round.   You have no facts to support that, but that's your view.    When logic and common sense would tell you that the guys I prefer make a ton more money and have their reputation at stake.    They have more to lose.    There's no way they're resting on anything.    But you'll say ANYTHING to try and prove a point.   There's no argument you won't twist to try to win an argument, no matter how foolish the argument is.   I've told you publicly and privately,  you're not interested in honest debate.   You're the least honest poster here.  You're only interested in winning and you'll do anything, say anything to do that.      As to the WR study.    You got crushed.   I'm talking about a bank safe fell on you and your response was to talk about cherry picking stats.    Either English is a second language or you don't know the meaning of the words.     I made two links for you.    One was almost identical to yours.    Yours covered 25 years dating back to a time when passing rules were dramatically different so comparing a receiver from 1990 to one from 2018 was silly.   We're playig a different game now.    My first link covered 20 years from 1995 to 2014 .   There was great over-lap in the two studies.  But the conclusions were entirely different.   The only reason I used it was your post said roughly 60% percent of 1st Round WR's were successes.    Mine said roughly 40%.   Guess which one you preferred?    Surprise!   Then the second link was one of my own making.    I listed every 1st round WR since Luck came into the league in 2012.  That's 7 years.   The last 7 years.   I put into bold each 1st Round WR who was clearly a success.   It came to 41%.   It also showed how few WR's have been taken in the last few drafts.   That's the NFL talking, in case you weren't paying attention.    You didn't dispute one WR.    Not one.   But you called it cherry picking.   Clearly you don't know how to use that expression correctly.    And now you throw out a list of criteria as if you're making the rules here.   Here's another free tip.   You're not.   Never have.   I'm not surprised you don't recognize the facts I put into posts.   You don't use them.   You're all about the opinion.   Most posters here are.   Because that means every single poster can simply say.....    "I'm entitled to my opinion."    Yes, they are.   Everyone is,  even you, who has no need for facts.    But what you're not entitled to is your own facts.    Just like you stated Funchess was a terrible signing based on your facts,  and it never even occured to you that Ballard and Reich had other facts that showed DF could be useful to us.    You actually thought you knew more than they did?!?    Again, unbelieveable.   You had no facts to support your nonsense about Reich being a poor play caller.   You had one game.   And I called you on it.   You've been doing a very bad back-peddle ever since,  but that's your view, with no facts to support it.   In fact all the facts support the exact opposite view.   Yet, you still try to claim victory.   It's so intellectually dishonest that it's nauseating.   And so I observed,  that with almost nothing to base it on,  you thought Willis has inconsistancies.    Thanks, Capt. Obvious.    Tomorrow will likely be sunny during the day,  turning to widely scattered darkness at night.    Anymore obvious insights?   Funny, how you now publicly call for me to ignore your posts,  when a few days ago,  in a thread I was barely even in,  you took a completely uncalled for shot at me.    Or does the phrase "legend in his own mind" not mean anything to you?      Bottom line....    you can dish it out,  especially when you think no one is looking.....   but you can't take it.   Glass ego.   I call a fraud a fraud.   
    • During the Browns game, Venturi said S was one our strongest positions.  Not saying i agree, but i dont lose sleep over it either.
    • “...when he gets the locker room strong enough”.   That still  means drafting lots of high character guys. That’s our default. 
    • A backup to Castonzo who is his eventual replacement. 
  • Members

    • cbear

      cbear 735

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • strt182

      strt182 292

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Irish YJ

      Irish YJ 1,009

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColtsGo5150

      GoColtsGo5150 225

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 4,986

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,795

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Melancholie

      Melancholie 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,193

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 19,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...