Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Is it time to completely bench TJ Green?


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

Hes had a personal foul penalty in 3 or 4 straight games and every one of them have been killers. I get that hes a rookie and he still may end up a good player, but why keep playing a guy who makes that mistake at least once a game? 

 

Thoughts or am I wrong in feeling this way? I just feel he needs to be held accountable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are right. Obviously we Dont have many options to replace him with, but I feel like something should be done to discipline him right? Then again maybe he is being disciplined behind closed doors, but I'm almost to the point if just yanking him if he does it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Benching  a rookie during a lost season because he is making rookie mistakes is the only coaching/ personnel choice dumber then what we are already doing.

we aren't winning a superbowl this year, might as well let the young guys get their reps, see who is worth keeping for next yr, or at least give some tape for our (hopefully new) coach to look over and make decisions from there. 

 

We knew green wasn't a polished product when he was picked. benching him won't help him learn the position better. With any luck the kid will stop looking so lost out there and eventually be a contributor for us. Can't give up on him halfway through his first season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WoolMagnet said:

He's a bit of a head-hunter.  He leads too much with the helmet, whichbseems to pop off alot too.

his leading with the helmet is what gave Vontae the concussion too.

i like what he brings tho, and i think he can improve on the penalties.

They said that about him coming out of college  lol I think his first big hit in he nfl he led with his helmet couldve injured his neck terribly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoosiernsavga said:

He is horrible in coverage but as far as stopping the run, i will take him and EJackson over anyone else on the defense past the DL! 

They need to keep playing Edwin Jackson. Clear speed, energy, physicality, tackling difference than the other backers we have. Kid loves to hit and I dig that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gavin said:

No. He is however as advertised. A hitter with size and speed. Just hasn't figured out you actually have to tackle in football. Surprised no one is complaining about Geathers. The last 2 games his play has been bad

Yes Geathers has been bad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gavin said:

No. He is however as advertised. A hitter with size and speed. Just hasn't figured out you actually have to tackle in football. Surprised no one is complaining about Geathers. The last 2 games his play has been bad

Yes.  The board seems to love Geathers.  Not sure why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Gavin said:

He was doing very well the first 5-6 games. Maybe he just got hurt and I seemed to have forgotten that

It's not a good thing that we had a plan in place to use the safeties to make up for our linebacker issues and the safeties can't cover either.  I'm not even sure what to do to solve the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, krunk said:

It's not a good thing that we had a plan in place to use the safeties to make up for our linebacker issues and the safeties can't cover either.  I'm not even sure what to do to solve the problem.

Find a couple linebackers over the next couple years that can cover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Somewhere ovr the Waynebow said:

Geathers has played well outside of covering tight ends.  He's really struggled in man coverage.  

So he cant cover in man coverage on a defense that emphasizes man coverage.  And as a safety, he can't cover TE's. 

 

Sounds like you're saying about the only thing he does well is support the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DougDew said:

So he cant cover in man coverage on a defense that emphasizes man coverage.  And as a safety, he can't cover TE's. 

 

Sounds like you're saying about the only thing he does well is support the run.

Essential yes. I don't think he's terrible at zone coverage but he's got a ways to go. 

 

This his first year as a full time starter.  Hopefully,  he'll keep getting better.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This culminates in the Colts personnel being what it is, a gang of mediocre players that would not make it on some other teams combined with a lack of a code of discipline. The Texans head coach was screaming at his players when they were  beating the Lions. Maybe I have missed the press conferences when Pagano jumps on his players but I have never heard him ticked off and saying his players are not doing their jobs. Then you have an owner saying they should be 6-0 after week six. I should be living on an island in the Pacific surround by "friendly" natives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, King Colt said:

This culminates in the Colts personnel being what it is, a gang of mediocre players that would not make it on some other teams combined with a lack of a code of discipline. The Texans head coach was screaming at his players when they were  beating the Lions. Maybe I have missed the press conferences when Pagano jumps on his players but I have never heard him ticked off and saying his players are not doing their jobs. Then you have an owner saying they should be 6-0 after week six. I should be living on an island in the Pacific surround by "friendly" natives.

Pagano has been interviewed on more than one instance heading to the locker room at half time and he publicly stated guys got to man up and do there jobs. He has not been very good as a coach in game management situations but he also has very little talent to work with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Gavin said:

Pagano has been interviewed on more than one instance heading to the locker room at half time and he publicly stated guys got to man up and do there jobs. He has not been very good as a coach in game management situations but he also has very little talent to work with

Pagano really isn't good at anything except being a nice guy. He's a talent killer. How many of our players have been consistently good under Pagano's tenure? In fact, how many rookies have had great back to back years with noticeable improvements under Pagano? I would Say Luck and Hilton, but Arians was the coach most of the first year they were on the team. So maybe Moncrief and Mewhort? I'm asking because so many of our players have good rookie years, then in their sophomore year, they fizzle out and regress. It seems too much of a coincidence for that to be on Grigson missing every time. This is a Pagano problem not developing his players and utilizing them properly to their strengths. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoBlue12 said:

TJ Green was poor in coverage at Clemson. The Colts knew that when they drafted him. He is a project.

But Grigson, channeling the late Al Davis, seems enamored with speed over skill. See Phillip Dorsett who was not very productive at Miami.

 

I was thinking it was just at the WR position but you might be right.  The Grigson obsession with speed may go deeper then that.  

 

I also noted that Grigson seems to prefer safeties who are hard hitting run stoppers over safeties that can actually cover.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

I was thinking it was just at the WR position but you might be right.  The Grigson obsession with speed may go deeper then that.  

 

I also noted that Grigson seems to prefer safeties who are hard hitting run stoppers over safeties that can actually cover.  

And that is stupid imo I'd rather have safeties that can cover and get me INTs as long as they can tackle then safeties that hit hard but give up chunks of yards at a time and produce zero INTs or pass defenses  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pgt_rob said:

Him burnt on the long ball tee'd me off pretty good. He was running and didn't even turn to look at the ball or he could have popped it out easily. No instincts there. Hopefully he learns.

 

 Looked like at the last second he was doing the Monster Mash. lol
 He seems like he is a serious competitor so i will be rooting him on till he becomes really good.
 Better in year 2, even better in year 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There's more about his diabetes and about him being uncoachable and hard to work with. Can't find direct link. The rest might be behind a paywall, but it's quoted in the linked article by Destin Adams. You can read it there.
    • The McGinn column that I can find describes what happened at the combine in front of all of the scouts (below). Is there another column from him about Mitchell? There must be based on the conversation in this thread.    DRAFT Part 1, WR/TE: Hall of Fame talent at the top, then (many) questions Marvin Harrison Jr. leads the way. You'll see receivers fly off the board the first two rounds. But scouts have concerns. Bob McGinn's 40th annual series begins.   Part 1, WR/TE: Hall of Fame talent at the top, then (many) questions - golongtd.com   By Bob McGinn   (About halfway through the column is a discussion of Mitchell's combine performance)   Coming off a 55-reception, 11-touchdown season at Texas, Mitchell did everything at the combine other than the short shuttle, the 3-cone and the bench press. And, after his blazing 40 of 4.35 and exceptional distances in the jumps, his decision to work at the combine appeared to be paying off.   Then Mitchell, wearing the WO19 jersey, started running the various routes in line with other wide receivers. His performance was insufficient, to say the least.   “He blew that 40 out, which didn’t surprise me,” one veteran scout said. “But then his position workout might have been the worst I’ve seen by a top receiver. He was falling over. He dropped balls. He had to keep redoing. It seemed as if he didn’t know how to run routes. He just seemed out of it.   “Generally, I don’t get alarmed by a combine. That was alarming.”   Based on television coverage, Mitchell staggered and fell during the gauntlet, dropped the first two slants, dropped an out and either messed up the route or failed to make the catch on his next three attempts. His performance was adequate after that.   “He was very linear, very straight line,” another scout said watching Mitchell at the combine. “Which surprised me, because in my limited exposure, for a fast guy, I thought he could actually bend and get in and out of his cuts.   “After running fast, the position stuff didn’t match. It wasn’t terrible. It wasn’t fatal. But it definitely raised some alerts with me. He didn’t have a great combine.”   Mitchell stood on his combine numbers and did position drills March 21 at Texas pro day, leaving the bench press and shuttles void.
    • Pretty much sums up what most of feel on here but it is the slow time of year and hopefully can enlighten some and spark some conversation.   https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/32-nfl-teams-in-32-days-colts-need-a-healthy-anthony-richardson/ar-BB1omOPy?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=72b391309fba48589a10207956078d03&ei=29  
    • Does a reporter bear any responsibility about what he includes in his pieces? Sourced or not? Is everything a source tell you printable? Is everything worth printing? BTW I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, I just wonder if there are any ethical considerations a reporter might have when reporting on this type of touchy subject, especially when some of those anonymous scouts might have vested interest in a player getting drafted higher or lower than currently projected? 
    • Again….   McGinn didn’t do the damage to Mitchell.  The scouts did.     And there are columnists like McGinn at every major paper.  Their job is to gather info and report it, whether it’s popular or not.    Let me turn this around.  Hypothetically, a few years from now if Mitchell doesn’t pan out and he’s moody and difficult to deal with and he’s a bust, then the scouts will have been proven correct.  And people here will say McGinn’s column was spot on.   Another person who should’ve handled his business better is Mitchell himself.  He’s been living with this since he was roughly 16.   And scouts said he interviewed badly with them.   Even Mitchell admits it.     I don’t think this is as black and white as it seems to you.      To be clear…. I love Mitchell.  Glad we drafted him.  I’ve said several times that Ballard defending him draft night was smart and scored points with the kid.  Now he comes out and says that exact thing.  He appreciates that Ballard defended him so hard and he wants to pay the Colts and Ballard back by being the best player he can be.   
  • Members

    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,969

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,214

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • atapcl

      atapcl 83

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Ernest Brunelli

      Ernest Brunelli 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 302

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,317

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MB-ColtsFan

      MB-ColtsFan 2,666

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,518

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...