Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Griff Whalen needs to see the field more as a WR


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Whalen sure is a valuable, reliable target on 3rd downs (and 4th downs) to move the chains...a much better option than Andre. Whalen has that quick little move to get open and great hands.

Much better option than Andre? Did you notice that once the offense got going AJ was the most reliable target/threat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not bad, but he's no elite WR either. Let's reign in the expectations for him.

We've gone some years without an Aaron Moorehead/Roy Hall/Mike Hart. (Stanley Jean-Baptiese and Tim Fugger tried real hard, but never made that fever pitch so they only get an honorable mention.)

We should strive to keep it that way.

Stanley Jean-Baptiste was a corner drafted by the Saints and is now on the Lions. You're thinking of Nicolas Jean-Baptiste, defensive tackle from Baylor!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One hand slipped?  The ball didn't move.  He had two hands on the ball and while the ball did touch the ground it did not move.  There was not enough evidence (IMO) to overturn the call on the field.

 

When the zoomed in you could clearly see his hand at the tip/crown of the ball and the ball touching the ground when the defender tackled him, Even the commentators saw it and mentioned it as well. Am i upset that they didn't make the right call? Absolutely not because they gave the Panthers plenty of breaks. He caught a break. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the zoomed in you could clearly see his hand at the tip/crown of the ball and the ball touching the ground when the defender tackled him, Even the commentators saw it and mentioned it as well. Am i upset that they didn't make the right call? Absolutely not because they gave the Panthers plenty of breaks. He caught a break. 

 

The commentators can be wrong plenty of times.  Heck, there's times where there is a blatant fall that they totally gloss over.

 

The only thing that matters is if he has control of the ball when the ball touches the ground.  He did.  It wasn't rolling about freely.  There was not enough visual evidence to overturn the call as called.  Had they called it the other way on the field, they probably couldn't have overturned it that way either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep him off special teams, but he needs to be in the offense more. He never drops anything, and he made some huge clutch catches last night. Yes, he made those catches against a clearly softer defense, but he kept getting open which is more than we can say for our other receivers and Luck has a ton of trust in him.

 

 He has a history of getting 7 yards when we need 9 because.... da ta da da.... he can`t drive ANYONE off of him. Yes the D was soft and He was out of bounds on his big play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad part is 75% of the people praising him right now will say how horrible he is once he does something wrong. I've always been a huge fan of him and have caught alot of flak for it. If he gets the chance he will shine

You and me both, I got suspended for a heated discussion about him. Lol what a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a history of getting 7 yards when we need 9 because.... da ta da da.... he can`t drive ANYONE off of him. Yes the D was soft and He was out of bounds on his big play.

He has a history of knowing where the 1st down marker is and making first downs. He has a history of making clutch catches when we need them, he has a history of catching mostly all of the horrible passes Luck throws his way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and me both, I got suspended for a heated discussion about him. Lol what a joke.

I have no idea how man arguments I've gotten in about him since I've been a member of this forum rofl he works hard man, see it every year in training camp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Whalen could be quite effective if used like how the Pats use(d) Julian Edelman (Wes Welker).  I mean, I thought that was how they were going to utilize Dorsett, but Whalen has indeed always been effective when used like this.

 

I mean, if it were up to me and Dorsett were healthy, I'd be thinking that our receivers would be Hilton and Moncrief on the outside and Dorsett used as the slot guy.  Sub in Johnson / Whalen.  Use these guys effectively like the Pats do as your quick hitter guys and check down guys.

 

Hopefully our sucky route tree design will drastically improve under Chud to properly take advantage of our receiving talent (including our TEs) and to help protect Luck, instead of all this deep route, 5 to 7 step drop back baloney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whalen would be a 100 catch wr in the pats offense

 

As much as I love Griff....

 

He's now Welker...   he's not Edelman...   he's not Amondola...

 

He's not even close to them athletically....

 

He's open as much as he is because the top defenders are busy covering our best WR's.

 

If Whalen was suddenly our #1,  he'd quickly disappear,  taken out by the top CB we faced.

 

Remember,  when he played more the last two years due to injuries to other players,   he didn't do all that well.    Because teams paid more attention to him.

 

He's good in a limited roll.     But as a featured WR?     I don't think he'd cut it.....

 

Just a much different perspective.....   (from the Stanford guy...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The timing at Stanford's pro day is hand time.    

 

The timing at the combine,  is fully electronic....   like the Olympics.

 

Hand times are much faster than fully electronic.

 

So, Griff's time is faster than it would have been if it had been fully electronically timed.

 

So,  you can ADD the time,  not subtract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I love Griff....

 

He's now Welker...   he's not Edelman...   he's not Amondola...

 

He's not even close to them athletically....

 

He's open as much as he is because the top defenders are busy covering our best WR's.

 

If Whalen was suddenly our #1,  he'd quickly disappear,  taken out by the top CB we faced.

 

Remember,  when he played more the last two years due to injuries to other players,   he didn't do all that well.    Because teams paid more attention to him.

 

He's good in a limited roll.     But as a featured WR?     I don't think he'd cut it.....

 

Just a much different perspective.....   (from the Stanford guy...)

I don't think ANYBODY is suggesting that he should be our number 1.  But as a number 4 guy, he can be quite effective if the Colts' play structure evolves to take advantage of what he brings, much in the way that NE uses/used Edelman / Welker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think ANYBODY is suggesting that he should be our number 1.  But as a number 4 guy, he can be quite effective if the Colts' play structure evolves to take advantage of what he brings, much in the way that NE uses/used Edelman / Welker.

 

Look up at CR91's post.

 

Said Whalen would be a 100 catch WR in the Patriots system.

 

I'm respectfully disagreeing with this as much as possible.

 

As a 4th, 5th WR,  I've got no problem with Griff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look up at CR91's post.

 

Said Whalen would be a 100 catch WR in the Patriots system.

 

I'm respectfully disagreeing with this as much as possible.

 

As a 4th, 5th WR,  I've got no problem with Griff.

Exactly. That's hopefully where Griff stays, too. He's serviceable enough for his role, and that's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense to Griff but I wish we would use more two and three TE sets with Dorsett out. With Fleener and Allen we can do a lot of multiple things like run to either side or motion Allen into the backfield. They also receive really well so I feel like we can run or throw out of it. Plus I like them chipping on rushers to give Andrew more time (think Houston game). Griff is a possession receiver...nice kid...plays hard...not a threat. I think he plays faster then he is because he knows this offense inside and out due to his time in Stanford. Install a new offense next year and I'm not sure he plays as instinctual and quick...probably doesn't make the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The timing at Stanford's pro day is hand time.

The timing at the combine, is fully electronic.... like the Olympics.

Hand times are much faster than fully electronic.

So, Griff's time is faster than it would have been if it had been fully electronically timed.

So, you can ADD the time, not subtract.

You didn't look at the article did you? Some people had him at 4.52.

Regardless, .07 is nothing. They are all 4.5 runners, and even if it's 4.6 it still doesn't make a significant difference.

You're nitpicking. The numbers are the same for them all, which was my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, Atlanta may go down in flames to the Padres, but it will have been a season to remember.  MVP Acuna - lost for the season; CY Young potential starter Strider - lost for the season.  All-Star 3d Baseman Riley - lost for the last two months of the season; All-Star Shortstop Ozzie Albies missed two months; and now probable CY Young winner Chris Sale will likely miss the Wild Card Series with San Diego.   Wow.
    • Love Bortalini playung well. I wonder if we will get some play from Gonvlaves this year.   How does everyone think the line shakes out next year? I could see Kelly and Smith gone. I wonder if Kelly retires or goes to another team. 
    • If theirs is one thing in particular that is night and day with Ballard compared to Grigson, it’s his ability to draft good offensive lineman. Fries turned his career around and in his 1st game, Bortolini stood out. In the past 3 years he’s drafted Rainman, Fries, and Bortolini.   I’ve got my issues with Ballard when it comes to other things, but man can the guy draft some OL. We might have gotten our center of the future.
    • Good players make plays when the game is on the line. Like Reggie Wayne in the green bay game. One thing is for sure you don't  target a guy that has down next to nothing  all game when the game is on the line. That be as silly as when Taylor averages 8 yards a carry all game and with the game on the line and it being 3rd and 2 you substitute  him for a back who got stuffed at the line of scrimmage  all game. Every team has a go to guy. Brady had gronk and edleman Brees had Michael Thomas and Jimmy Graham. Stroud most dependable  target is nico Collins ect
    • It really was pretty wild to see the difference in AR to Flacco as it pertains to processing in live time.  They really are pretty much the opposite QB at this point in their careers, Like some have mentioned- AR is just unrefined in everything he does.  His reads are too quick, his footwork is too unsettled and he looks like a wild stallion in that pocket.  When he makes big plays it usually isn't because of the aforementioned traits, its because he can release the ball quick with superior velocity.    In Flacco you have a guy who makes perfectly settled, on rhythm reads, has solid and quiet footwork in the pocket and looks calm and collected out there. When he makes big plays its because of his veteran decision making within the construct of the offense. However, if that breaks down his chances of overcoming it are very slim. He won't run for the first down and his 40 year old arm (while still good and lightyears better than a 37 year old Matt Ryan's) is limited.  You could see the difference in his arm strength on the deep ball.  His float like a balloon and Richardson's are absolute ropes.    In theory, Flacco should be the perfect QB from a skillset standpoint to mentor Anthony on his weaknesses, and those seem to be Flacco's strengths.    Ultimately though, for every pass Joe has to throw in a game means less chance of Anthony developing.  He needs to be on the field.  Having Joe is nice if you are contending or in a playoff hunt, but having Joe on the field for meaningful time in week 4 was NOT and is NOT in the blueprint of what we are building.    A lot of people are complaining ad nauseum about Anthony and if he will ever get there- but nobody denies the upside that we've seen. I think the first step in his development is being able to hone down on what he needs to work on the most and I really think that stage is almost complete.  He will grind, and by week 8 lets have another conversation.  Injuries aside of course.  The kid needs to also learn the physicality of the NFL and had no time to sink his teeth into S and C last offseason.     
  • Members

    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 284

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,942

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 2,106

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lancer1

      Lancer1 2,794

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TrueBlue4ever

      TrueBlue4ever 357

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,406

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,752

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,758

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,559

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...