Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Frank Gore interested in joining Colts


NBColtsFanatic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As long as we still bring in a talented RB in the draft I'm okay with getting Gore. RBs I like in the draft include Ajayi, Abdullah, and Cobb in rounds 3 or 4.

 

Ajayi and Abdullah will most likely be gone by round 2 sadly. I think we would be left with David Cobb or David Johnson in the 3rd or 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At first I was against signing Gore 100%, but now I wouldn't mind it. Here's why. We have several holes to fill on both sides of the ball, and Gore would only be a stopgap for a year or two until we draft his replacement. He's still a pretty good RB too, even at 31, and he would still upgrade our run game and most likely he'd rush for 1,000 plus yards. He probably wouldn't be too expensive either. So I think he'd be a fine option for next season, just not too much longer after that. What we should do if we sign him is still draft a RB in the 4th or 5th to develop though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of speculation there but if we could get Gore for say close to what we were going to pay Trent I'm all for it. The guy is a good back. Sure he isn't going to break off 20-30yd runs but he will get you those consistant 3-4yd when not much is there. We have Boom for a change of pace but most important is Frank has played in big games...he doesn't fumble a lot and he is also pretty good in pass protection...those aren't small things. Come January we would be happy to have a veteren runner that can take the punishment and will get you those hard earned yards. Doesn't mean we don't need a back later in the draft to compliment us but I don't think Boom is an every down starter for 16 games. Gore can handle the punishment and knows how to get the extra yard.

He did have two 50+ yard tds last year. When was the last one we have seen here. I would be happy if they brought him in as a short tetm fix

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At first I was against signing Gore 100%, but now I wouldn't mind it. Here's why. We have several holes to fill on both sides of the ball, and Gore would only be a stopgap for a year or two until we draft his replacement. He's still a pretty good RB too, even at 31, and he would still upgrade our run game and most likely he'd rush for 1,000 plus yards. He probably wouldn't be too expensive either. So I think he'd be a fine option for next season, just not too much longer after that. What we should do if we sign him is still draft a RB in the 4th or 5th to develop though.

 

I agree. I almost wouldn't mind it and he would fit in great here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gore is going to be 32 years old and he has carried the ball 200+ times every year since 2006. I don't really see this guy being the answer, even in the short term. He might have put up 1,000 yards behind the 49ers o-line, but the Colts are no where near that level. I'll be surprised if Gore can stay healthy for another full season as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd run the other direction. I'm really not interested in the guy to begin with, but for a minimal contract, no harm. Nearly $4m/year? No thanks.

 

I agree with you 100%. People get way too excited over a name. He turns 32 in two months and he has had the wheels run off of him. I'd sign him to a one year deal but anything more is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd run the other direction. I'm really not interested in the guy to begin with, but for a minimal contract, no harm. Nearly $4m/year? No thanks.

 

Probably no cap hit though if release after year 1. 3 year, 11 million...4 million guaranteed. No cap hit if released after year 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Played in and being effective in are two different things. He only had 4 TDs this year. He had 1100 yards this season so that's less than 70 yards per game. Not what you call a running back that's earning his salary of over 6 million a year. Plus he will be 32 years old. Like I said, pass.

how many of our rbs had 70 yard games and rushed for 4 tds this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably no cap hit though if release after year 1. 3 year, 11 million...4 million guaranteed. No cap hit if released after year 1.

 

I wouldn't do one year, $4m for Gore at this point. When we signed Bradshaw initially, he was much younger, had less mileage, and he only got ~$1.4m. That's about what I'd offer Gore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you 100%. People get way too excited over a name. He turns 32 in two months and he has had the wheels run off of him. I'd sign him to a one year deal but anything more is ridiculous.

We could sign him to 4/16m and you could change your name to FGoreWasaSteal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many other RBs in the league made 6 million a year and had 4 TDs?

 

 

He won't make 6 mil next year. He's 32.

 

He's going to be in the neighborhood of 1.5-2.5mil for this year. Yeah he had a 1000 yard season, but age is catching up to him. 

 

I'd be ok with going Gore-Bradshaw-Herron as our 3 RBs with Gore taking over Richardson's duties in the same rotation that we had this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People have been saying for years that age is catching up to him. What has he done? Put up four straight 1000 yards seasons. 

 

Reggie's getting up there in age? Why should resign him? Oh yeah, BECAUSE HE'S A GOOD PLAYER!!!!

 

There is no denying Frank Gore is a good player. Bring in him on a 1-2 year, 3-4 million deal. He would INSTANTLY be an upgrade in our backfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's better than Tipton, and there's no guarantee Ballard can come back and play well.Richardson is going to get cut.Who do you think the Colts have under contract that is a better runningback than Gore?

Bradshaw although not under contract is not gone yet , and Frank although good is over 30 not a good choice . When you look at a RB you must always look at the OL .Is SFs better than ours as it sets ? Probably so is he really that good does he really fit ? This draft has some very good looking RBs with young legs and you don't actually need to blow a first round or possibly 2nd round to get them. Some will be there in the third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's better than Tipton, and there's no guarantee Ballard can come back and play well.Richardson is going to get cut.Who do you think the Colts have under contract that is a better runningback than Gore?

Just wondering how long does everyone want to continue the revolving door of RBs ? Or due we want a young stud to c arry the load for 4 or5 years ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a gimme the colts bring in someone in FA. Who are the other options besides gore? Murray-injury prone, ran behind a good line Spiller-injury prone hasn't played well lately, Moreno-injury prone, Forsett-old as well, McFadden-injury prone hasn't played well huge risk, Ingram-played well last year, ryan matthews-injuries, chris johnson- just No, Bradshaw-good but injury prone.

Gore-old

With all of the other RBs we may have to get Gore, if not gore bring in Ingram. Although gore is old he is more durable than most of the other rbs. No reason not to bring in a good vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He won't make 6 mil next year. He's 32.

 

He's going to be in the neighborhood of 1.5-2.5mil for this year. Yeah he had a 1000 yard season, but age is catching up to him. 

 

I'd be ok with going Gore-Bradshaw-Herron as our 3 RBs with Gore taking over Richardson's duties in the same rotation that we had this year. 

I understand that but my comment was directed to another post. He talked about him averaging 70 yds. a game and 4 TDs last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, Atlanta may go down in flames to the Padres, but it will have been a season to remember.  MVP Acuna - lost for the season; CY Young potential starter Strider - lost for the season.  All-Star 3d Baseman Riley - lost for the last two months of the season; All-Star Shortstop Ozzie Albies missed two months; and now probable CY Young winner Chris Sale will likely miss the Wild Card Series with San Diego.   Wow.
    • Love Bortalini playung well. I wonder if we will get some play from Gonvlaves this year.   How does everyone think the line shakes out next year? I could see Kelly and Smith gone. I wonder if Kelly retires or goes to another team. 
    • If theirs is one thing in particular that is night and day with Ballard compared to Grigson, it’s his ability to draft good offensive lineman. Fries turned his career around and in his 1st game, Bortolini stood out. In the past 3 years he’s drafted Rainman, Fries, and Bortolini.   I’ve got my issues with Ballard when it comes to other things, but man can the guy draft some OL. We might have gotten our center of the future.
    • Good players make plays when the game is on the line. Like Reggie Wayne in the green bay game. One thing is for sure you don't  target a guy that has down next to nothing  all game when the game is on the line. That be as silly as when Taylor averages 8 yards a carry all game and with the game on the line and it being 3rd and 2 you substitute  him for a back who got stuffed at the line of scrimmage  all game. Every team has a go to guy. Brady had gronk and edleman Brees had Michael Thomas and Jimmy Graham. Stroud most dependable  target is nico Collins ect
    • It really was pretty wild to see the difference in AR to Flacco as it pertains to processing in live time.  They really are pretty much the opposite QB at this point in their careers, Like some have mentioned- AR is just unrefined in everything he does.  His reads are too quick, his footwork is too unsettled and he looks like a wild stallion in that pocket.  When he makes big plays it usually isn't because of the aforementioned traits, its because he can release the ball quick with superior velocity.    In Flacco you have a guy who makes perfectly settled, on rhythm reads, has solid and quiet footwork in the pocket and looks calm and collected out there. When he makes big plays its because of his veteran decision making within the construct of the offense. However, if that breaks down his chances of overcoming it are very slim. He won't run for the first down and his 40 year old arm (while still good and lightyears better than a 37 year old Matt Ryan's) is limited.  You could see the difference in his arm strength on the deep ball.  His float like a balloon and Richardson's are absolute ropes.    In theory, Flacco should be the perfect QB from a skillset standpoint to mentor Anthony on his weaknesses, and those seem to be Flacco's strengths.    Ultimately though, for every pass Joe has to throw in a game means less chance of Anthony developing.  He needs to be on the field.  Having Joe is nice if you are contending or in a playoff hunt, but having Joe on the field for meaningful time in week 4 was NOT and is NOT in the blueprint of what we are building.    A lot of people are complaining ad nauseum about Anthony and if he will ever get there- but nobody denies the upside that we've seen. I think the first step in his development is being able to hone down on what he needs to work on the most and I really think that stage is almost complete.  He will grind, and by week 8 lets have another conversation.  Injuries aside of course.  The kid needs to also learn the physicality of the NFL and had no time to sink his teeth into S and C last offseason.     
  • Members

    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,406

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,862

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,942

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,925

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 284

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 2,107

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lancer1

      Lancer1 2,794

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TrueBlue4ever

      TrueBlue4ever 357

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,752

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...