Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The Curious Case of Khaled Holmes


John Waylon

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think so. We don't seem to even want Holmes around for depth on gameday. If we trade Harrison (No one is going to trade for a center with only a couple of starts to his credit) or Shipley, Holmes becomes the #2, and we don't even seem interested in that. 

 

Plus that would be some dirty pool to claim Shipley off of waivers only to turn around and trade him off YET AGAIN. Especially if Harrison or Holmes turns into the next satele, and we keep starting him the way we did satele. 

 

IDK...I wonder if he is on to something. Perhaps we ship Holmes off to SD since they have lost 3 C's already this year? I think we keep Shipley...he's great for depth. The trade theory isn't that far fetched.

 

In general, I support the move away from Shipley. He's a fine player but Harrison and perhaps Holmes have a much higher ceiling. I think they should keep rolling with Harrison unless he is terrible (he was OK on Sunday, IMO, and will improve with more starts). It will be interesting to watch unfold...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so. We don't seem to even want Holmes around for depth on gameday. If we trade Harrison (No one is going to trade for a center with only a couple of starts to his credit) or Shipley, Holmes becomes the #2, and we don't even seem interested in that. 

 

Plus that would be some dirty pool to claim Shipley off of waivers only to turn around and trade him off YET AGAIN. Especially if Harrison or Holmes turns into the next satele, and we keep starting him the way we did satele. 

 

I do that in MADDEN all the time!!! The computer is so dumb!  :cheer2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IDK...I wonder if he is on to something. Perhaps we ship Holmes off to SD since they have lost 3 C's already this year? I think we keep Shipley...he's great for depth. The trade theory isn't that far fetched.

 

In general, I support the move away from Shipley. He's a fine player but Harrison and perhaps Holmes have a much higher ceiling. I think they should keep rolling with Harrison unless he is terrible (he was OK on Sunday, IMO, and will improve with more starts). It will be interesting to watch unfold...

 

But the guy has played a total of 19 career snaps. Even a center needy team would look for something internal before spending picks on a guy who has 19 snaps, and almost as many healthy scratches. 

 

I heard Rick Venturi on the way home say that in his opinion Harrison is the better center and has more upside than the other two.

Could be. I just don't know why they waited this long to make the switch after letting Shipley man the spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Pagano was NO help on the situation. 

 

On Harrison at center:

 

"What's next at C? You love continuity. Evaluate every position. We've got a lot of good players."

 

On Holmes:

 

"He's doing fine. They're all doing fine. Lot of good depth."

 

Sly Chuck is sly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the way Pagano has been answering questions on the centers lately it tells me that he is evaluating all 3 guys to determine who is the best guy.  And he's doing it by live action.  I wouldn't be surprised to see him start Khaled Holmes either for the Texans game or the game afterwards.  I don't think they are settled on any one guy at this point until they have seen them all play.  Just my guess from what has transpired so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the way Pagano has been answering questions on the centers lately it tells me that he is evaluating all 3 guys to determine who is the best guy.  And he's doing it by live action.  I wouldn't be surprised to see him start Khaled Holmes either for the Texans game or the game afterwards.  I don't think they are settled on any one guy at this point until they have seen them all play.  Just my guess from what has transpired so far. 

 

Yeah. I guess it wouldn't be surprising at this point. He says he loves continuity, but he's doing the exact opposite of continuity. He's obviously saying one thing with another in mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's so complicated about it. It goes something like this...

Trade away Shipley and start Satele in 2013.

Release Satele and re-acquire Shipely in 2014.

Start Shipley. Bench Shipley.

Start Harrison. Bench Harrison.

Trade away Shipely.

Re-Acquire Satele in 2015.

 

OK, I went a little overboard towards the end. But you get the idea. The coaching staff is just a little confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want Holmes to be our center..

Why Chuck? Why?

Why do you want Holmes?

 

I personally would be surprised to see Holmes at C. I think we are moving forward with Harrison.

 

Actions speak louder than words. He is a healthy inactive that shows you where he sits on the depth chart. He isn't the answer if the C goes down or in the conversation if either G goes down. This is based on the idea that we are trying to win games by playing our best players.  

 

I would doubt and really hope we are not doing something as stupid as hiding an injury especially on someone who is of as little significance as it would appear Holmes is. Another poster has already said this but the NFL would come down hard on us for that. With the Irsay thing and the other off the field things we have had going on. I hope we are crossing our t's and dotting our i's. I also hold on to the idea that the organization is above stuff like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Khaled still isn't fully healthy?  He was healthy enough to dress and be there in case we needed him yesterday, but not fully ready for starting?  I don't know what else it could be

thats exactly what i was thinking also the only (one) other thing i can think of is Harrison pulled a Russell Wilson in practice and just blew everyone out of the water but it still doesn't explain why Holmes didnt dress

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not strange at all..  he can't stay healthy and he can't play through pain ...  obviously...

 

The staff proclaiming Holmes as "the starter" from the start of camp was a stupid move on their part.   The position battles are always fluid.     Whatever...

 

Harrison is better anyway...   

What is it with this guy?

 

He was a healthy scratch several games last season. (And I believe he was even demoted to the PS a time or two) 

 

Satele was jettisoned in the offseason, and Holmes was penciled in as our starting center. He was all through camp, and started in the pre-season before his injury. 

 

He got healthy again, but Shipley was playing the spot well. When we decided to move Shipley, who did we put in at center? Harrison. Holmes was, again, a healthy scratch.

 

How is it that a guy who was penciled in to be our starting center, a guy the team said on different occasions was going to be a starting center, can not get on the field even when we need a center?

 

Is he so bad that they were always hoping for a replacement for him even though they were planning on starting him? 

 

It's really a head scratching situation. Our whole center situation is a head scratcher. Harrison didn't play bad yesterday. But why did we move Shipley out when it wasn't broken? When Mewhort comes back does Shipley go back to Center, or does Shipley stay a guard and we bench Lance Louis? 

 

And how in the hell does Holmes fit into the equation? 

 

Very strange. Very strange indeed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May have to agree with you on that one, i seen Andrew Jackson out there on a few downs instead of Muamba and Sheppard which actually surprised me. I wonder what they may have done to get put in the Dog House.  

i mean  he only led the entire team in tackles in the pre-season, on that note i still him as our future weakside linebacker next to freeman i mean i would give him valuable reps right now doubt jackson will be here for long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im still puzzled as to why harrison got to start. even if it was a matchup decision or whatever else other reason you got, you cant tell me they think harrison is better then shipley or holmes. 

 

With the way you worded your comment I put into bold,  it looks like you're saying the coaching staff has some other reason for starting Harrison other than performance?

 

What reason would the staff have for doing this?

 

I don't pretend to know what's going on with the staff and Harrison/Holmes/Shipley,  but I don't think there's some type of conspiracy going on.   I think the coaches are doing what they think is best.     Now, whether that's right or wrong wont' be known until the end of the year....    but just because you and I and everyone else here doesn't know the reason Harrison got the start,  doesn't mean there isn't a legitimate reason.

 

There's no conspiracy.   Everyone wants to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts on this situation are...

 

After training camp, Holmes was considered the starter. But he was injured on the first series of the first preseason game and really never showed what he could, or couldn't, do.

 

When Holmes got hurt, the undrafted Harrison was inserted into the starting lineup and played a considerable amount throughout the preseason. And Harrison did do a great job.

 

But rather than having to start the regular season with Andrew Luck behind a very green, undrafted rookie at center, the Colts brought in veteran AQ Shipley to start the first four games.

 

Now several games have been played, and the coaches have been evaluating all three players... On the field, on film and in practice... I tend to believe their opinions may have changed and now they may think that Harrison is the best of the three.

Surpassing both Shipley and Holmes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From now on I'm tired of playing the guessing game at Center... I don't care who the starter is, as long as we win!!  I think its strange that the 2 biggest questions of the offseason still haven't been completely addressed and at times seem even more confusing S & C.  It will end up biting us in the end if they don't make a final decision eventually tho.  Anyway, I would appreciate it if the news would come sooner rather than later, but also wouldn't mind letting the best man have the job.  Then again isn't that what training camp was for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khalid Holmes is the doghouse.

 

Muamba seems to be in the doghouse. 

 

 

What is with the coaching staff having the Kavell Conner syndrome??

(like never letting good players ever see the field and hanging on to crappy players too long - Sheppard) 

I was with you until you mentioned Conner.  Conner was never that good.

 

But yes the Holmes situation is weird to say the least, especially since, in the limited amount of time he has been on the field he looks, quick, strong and to have excellent technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was with you until you mentioned Conner.  Conner was never that good.

 

But yes the Holmes situation is weird to say the least, especially since, in the limited amount of time he has been on the field he looks, quick, strong and to have excellent technique.

 

He was light years better than Sheppard..... and Sheppard saw considerably more playing time than Conner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's so complicated about it. It goes something like this...

Trade away Shipley and start Satele in 2013.

Release Satele and re-acquire Shipely in 2014.

Start Shipley. Bench Shipley.

Start Harrison. Bench Harrison.

Trade away Shipely.

Re-Acquire Satele in 2015.

 

OK, I went a little overboard towards the end. But you get the idea. The coaching staff is just a little confused.

 

 

Just because the fans don't understand what the the staff is doing,  doesn't mean the coaches are confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because the fans don't understand what the the staff is doing,  doesn't mean the coaches are confused.

 

Goodness, that's so true.

 

I don't know what they're doing, and I don't think anyone else knows what they're doing. But to make that kind of lineup change, seemingly unprompted, seems rather decisive. I think they know what they're doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 3 straight losses for the Reds. They have their moments where they play well. But it’s time to be real. They aren’t a playoff team and will never be as long as the Castillinis own them and David Bell is manager.    De La Cruz is fun, but his career will be wasted on this team. 
    • Am I reading this correct?   You think Ballard’s seat gets hot if the Colts don't win the AFC South?  Really?   So if the Colts don’t win the south but make the playoffs Ballard’s seat still gets hot?    Just making sure I understand your viewpoint. 
    • Yes, yes he did. If you scroll back to old Pagano post you’ll see how much blame he got. I definitely hold Pagano is regards to letting Luck down on the offensive side of the ball. I also see the Houston Texans inevitably going down the same path.   D’joun Smith is who you’re thinking of.   Grigson is looked at as an overall bust and a terrible drafter so naturally the blame will be more widely accepted. There is no doubt things will be heating up under Ballards seat if anything less then winning the division is obtained this year. The QB position has been his Achilles heel. If Richardson is healthy this season I believe his roster will be very heavily evaluated with no excuses this year.
    • But you haven't learned the narrative this forum has been trying to tell you.   Frank Reich pounded his fists for Wentz, Ryan, Pryor, and all of the WRs that busted.   OTOH, Pagano never pounded his fist for TJ Green, or Bjoern Werner, or Trent Richardson, or that little small school cornerback that got canned before the season even started.     You see, the GM is only responsible for the bad players when it helps support the previous statements that the GM is bad, and the HC is responsible for the bad players when it helps support previous statement's that the GM is a genius.   You should know this by now and be falling in line accordingly.
  • Members

    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,674

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,515

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,478

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blueblood23

      Blueblood23 1,007

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,139

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,408

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Snakeman

      Snakeman 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,841

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 206

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 1,224

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...