Christian McCaffrey possibly going in top 10?

[PeterBowman]

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/cfb/134233/christian-mccaffrey

 

this could make things interesting.

[backshoulderfade]

I can see it. Guy is electric.

[UKColt13]

Yeah I can see it happening. Not many guys out there with his measurables and skill set

[KB]

Sounds good to me. Let some of these guys top 10 guys drop to our pick so we can get a beast or good trade bait.

[stitches]

I don't mind it. Let one of Lattimore, Hooker, Adams, Thomas, Allen fall to us. Let 3 QBs and 3 RBs go before us. Maybe 2 WRs too.

 

1. Cleveland (1-15) Myles Garrett

2. San Francisco (2-14) Deshaun Watson

3. Chicago (3-13) Jonathan Allen

4. Jacksonville (3-13) Leonard Fournette

5. Tennessee - from Los Angeles (4-12) Mike Williams

6. New York Jets (5-11) Deshaun Kizer

7. San Diego (5-11) Malik Hooker

8. Carolina (6-10) Christina McCaffrey

9. Cincinnati (6-9-1) Cam Robinson

10. Buffalo(7-9) Corey Davis

11. New Orleans (7-9) Marshon Lattimore

12. Cleveland - from Philadelphia (7-9) Mitchell Trubiski

13. Arizona (7-8-1) Patrick Mahomes

14. Philadelphia - from Minnesota (8-8) Dalvin Cook

15. Indianapolis (8-8) - >> Thomas or Adams ???

[LJpalmbeacher2]

I thought this Forum didn't like RB's taken early. Usually not till Day 3, let alone in Top 10 of the 1st round!

I wonder what makes this guy so popular on this forum? Lol

[stitches]

Just now, LJpalmbeacher said:

I thought this Forum didn't like RB's taken early. Usually not till Day 3, let alone in Top 10 of the 1st round!

I wonder what makes this guy so popular on this forum? Lol

The fact that if it happens it would push great defensive talent to us.

[bananabucket]

11 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

I thought this Forum didn't like RB's taken early. Usually not till Day 3, let alone in Top 10 of the 1st round!

I wonder what makes this guy so popular on this forum? Lol

 

Well people who think RBs shouldnt be taken early just dont know what theyre talking about.

[backshoulderfade]

10 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

I thought this Forum didn't like RB's taken early. Usually not till Day 3, let alone in Top 10 of the 1st round!

I wonder what makes this guy so popular on this forum? Lol

We don't have a top 10 pick so it doesn't pertain to the Colts. That said, he is easy to like. He is an electric runner, he breaks and slips tackles. He has soft hands and can really adjust to make a catch. Rare skillset.

[PeterBowman]

for those wanting D at 15, a run on running backs and QBs early would be the best possible scenario.

[gregr507]

27 minutes ago, bananabucket said:

 

Well people who think RBs shouldnt be taken early just dont know what theyre talking about.

 

 

[KB]

56 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

I thought this Forum didn't like RB's taken early. Usually not till Day 3, let alone in Top 10 of the 1st round!

I wonder what makes this guy so popular on this forum? Lol

Not that we don't want running backs drafted in the first round. Just not by the colts.

[Jason_]

58 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

I thought this Forum didn't like RB's taken early. Usually not till Day 3, let alone in Top 10 of the 1st round!

I wonder what makes this guy so popular on this forum? Lol

 

 what does the thread have anything to do with McCaffrey's popularity on the forum? 

[crazycolt1]

6 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

 what does the thread have anything to do with McCaffrey's popularity on the forum? 

I guess you have a hard time understanding sarcasm even with the lol added.

[crazycolt1]

We have no clue on what Ballard is going to do. We may think we need to take a certain position but that don't effect Ballard one bit. Not that it makes any difference Ballard has exactly zero drafts under his belt.

He may take a RB with the first round who knows?

 

[BleedBlu8792]

Wouldn't surprise me. Teams overdraft year in and year out.

[Smonroe]

1 hour ago, stitches said:

I don't mind it. Let one of Lattimore, Hooker, Adams, Thomas, Allen fall to us. Let 3 QBs and 3 RBs go before us. Maybe 2 WRs too.

 

1. Cleveland (1-15) Myles Garrett

2. San Francisco (2-14) Deshaun Watson

3. Chicago (3-13) Jonathan Allen

4. Jacksonville (3-13) Leonard Fournette

5. Tennessee - from Los Angeles (4-12) Mike Williams

6. New York Jets (5-11) Deshaun Kizer

7. San Diego (5-11) Malik Hooker

8. Carolina (6-10) Christina McCaffrey

9. Cincinnati (6-9-1) Cam Robinson

10. Buffalo(7-9) Corey Davis

11. New Orleans (7-9) Marshon Lattimore

12. Cleveland - from Philadelphia (7-9) Mitchell Trubiski

13. Arizona (7-8-1) Patrick Mahomes

14. Philadelphia - from Minnesota (8-8) Dalvin Cook

15. Indianapolis (8-8) - >> Thomas or Adams ???

 

Keep dreaming.  As much chance as that happening as Carolina taking that girl.

[stitches]

1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

Keep dreaming.  As much chance as that happening as Carolina taking that girl.

LOL

[21isSuperman]

1 hour ago, bananabucket said:

 

Well people who think RBs shouldnt be taken early just dont know what theyre talking about.

They don't really give you that much value.  A 3rd or 4th round RB behind a good offensive line can make your running game.  You don't have to spend a first round pick on a guy who will likely only have 5 or 6 good years in him because of the nature of the position.

[krunk]

I don't think any of those teams in the top 10 need a back like Mccafrey in the first round.  I think Fournette would be more like Carolinas style.   Everybody else up there has a good back, or likely interest in another area.

[AZColt11]

Would be fine with me.  the more offensive players taken early = better for the Colts.

[Jason_]

2 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

I guess you have a hard time understanding sarcasm even with the lol added.

 

aw how passive-aggressively patronizing of you.

 

 

to your comment though, no not even slightly.  some people do have a hard time delivering sarcasm though, especially on the internet...and some people just don't understand it at all. 

[crazycolt1]

37 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

aw how passive-aggressively patronizing of you.

 

 

to your comment though, no not even slightly.  some people do have a hard time delivering sarcasm though, especially on the internet...and some people just don't understand it at all. 

I think adding the lol made it pretty clear. To me anyway.

Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, I just thought it was apparent.

[Jason_]

Just now, crazycolt1 said:

I think adding the lol made it pretty clear. To me anyway.

Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, I just thought it was apparent.

 

you didn't ruffle my feathers.  and I didn't think it was a sarcastic comment, but rather a patronizing one

[BOTT]

5 hours ago, bananabucket said:

 

Well people who think RBs shouldnt be taken early just dont know what theyre talking about.

"people" include Belichick?

[BOTT]

6 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

I thought this Forum didn't like RB's taken early. Usually not till Day 3, let alone in Top 10 of the 1st round!

I wonder what makes this guy so popular on this forum? Lol

This forum loves straight,cisgendered white privileged males......

[LJpalmbeacher2]

6 minutes ago, BOTT said:

This forum loves straight,cisgendered white privileged males......

 

Was Blair White and Griff Whalen also privileged? Lol.

[The Peytonator]

1 hour ago, BOTT said:

This forum loves straight,cisgendered white privileged males......

 

 

 

As opposed to all the trans women of color that litter the NFL? 

[FalseStart]

I think 2 QBs and 2 RBs will go before Colts pick... If so, we are back in the beating business...Foster, Barnett, Solomon, Hooker... Cincinnati and Saints...those two selections will be the final hurdles...Bengals need to draft WR.  Saints need to go CB/S/WR...or back-up QB.

[jet1968]

13 hours ago, BOTT said:

This forum loves straight,cisgendered white privileged males......

Huh?

[Smonroe]

12 hours ago, FalseStart said:

I think 2 QBs and 2 RBs will go before Colts pick... If so, we are back in the beating business...Foster, Barnett, Solomon, Hooker... Cincinnati and Saints...those two selections will be the final hurdles...Bengals need to draft WR.  Saints need to go CB/S/WR...or back-up QB.

 

Ooh, that would be a great Vegas prop bet.  At first I thought - no way.  But after thinking about it, it's maybe 50-50.  But if I were forced to make a bet, I'd say No.

[chad72]

16 hours ago, FalseStart said:

I think 2 QBs and 2 RBs will go before Colts pick... If so, we are back in the beating business...Foster, Barnett, Solomon, Hooker... Cincinnati and Saints...those two selections will be the final hurdles...Bengals need to draft WR.  Saints need to go CB/S/WR...or back-up QB.

 

LOL at this wishful thinking.  

 

Polian used to value production over potential but that could also be because we were picking at the end of round 1 constantly and it was a safer way to go then. If I had both Reuben Foster and Haason Reddick, production says Foster, potential says Reddick. That is why the GMs are paid to predict and the draft is an inexact science.

 

I am guessing no more than 1 QB and 1 RB goes before the Colts pick for a worst case scenario, we will see.

[Dark Superman]

I would love to see McCaffrey or Cook playing behind Luck.

[Colts_Fan12]

Oh please let a team be this stupid

[jet1968]

1 hour ago, I'm Negan said:

I would love to see McCaffrey or Cook playing behind Luck.

Maybe in the Pro Bowl but not as the Colts 1st round pick

[BleedBlu8792]

Would be fantastic to see a couple offensive players get taken in the first 14 picks.

[BOTT]

10 hours ago, jet1968 said:

Huh?

You need woke

[BOTT]

22 hours ago, The Peytonator said:

 

 

 

As opposed to all the trans women of color that litter the NFL? 

Lots of self identifying non binary gender transqueer people of color in the NFL.  Just not talked about.

[jvan1973]

4 hours ago, I'm Negan said:

I would love to see McCaffrey or Cook playing behind Luck.

Hopefully one is there in three second round.  Otherwise,  No thanks

[The Peytonator]

28 minutes ago, BOTT said:

Lots of self identifying non binary gender transqueer people of color in the NFL.  Just not talked about.

 

 

Yeah all the rich, white owners promote their cis heteronormativity and it's unacceptable in current year.