Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts sign Hankins


Everyone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 379
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 minute ago, Boiler_Colt said:

Well, isn't that something. A little rich, but only 14.5 guaranteed. The local media (Holder) is wrong again.

 

Holder is soooo bad...

 

I will admit, I was wrong on this one. I didn't see Ballard dropping this kind of coin on Hankins. I'm kind of concerned, I don't really think Hankins is the kind of player you pay $10m/year, but there's no question he's going to be one of our best DL and will help the defensive front significantly. Good add, questionable contract, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superman said:

 

Holder is soooo bad...

 

I will admit, I was wrong on this one. I didn't see Ballard dropping this kind of coin on Hankins. I'm kind of concerned, I don't really think Hankins is the kind of player you pay $10m/year, but there's no question he's going to be one of our best DL and will help the defensive front significantly. Good add, questionable contract, IMO. 

I like Holder as a dude but his reporting is suspect. I hope its a maximum of 30, with incentives and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Superman said:

 

Holder is soooo bad...

 

I will admit, I was wrong on this one. I didn't see Ballard dropping this kind of coin on Hankins. I'm kind of concerned, I don't really think Hankins is the kind of player you pay $10m/year, but there's no question he's going to be one of our best DL and will help the defensive front significantly. Good add, questionable contract, IMO. 

I am hoping he structured the contract to be beneficial if things do not pan out after a year or so.  A great upgrade at NT though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Superman said:

 

Holder is soooo bad...

 

I will admit, I was wrong on this one. I didn't see Ballard dropping this kind of coin on Hankins. I'm kind of concerned, I don't really think Hankins is the kind of player you pay $10m/year, but there's no question he's going to be one of our best DL and will help the defensive front significantly. Good add, questionable contract, IMO. 

He was a stud in 2015, played out of position last season. With the cap consistently rising, I'm more than happy with this contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great signing IMO!  He fills a LARGE need...pun intended.  He actually brings a little pass rush and is a gigantic upgrade over Perry or the others we have.  I also like that he had an up year last year rather than Poe who we all liked who had a down year....we had the cap space, and next year we still have a ton with the structuring of the contracts, so I am pleased with this move!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

I will admit, I was wrong on this one. I didn't see Ballard dropping this kind of coin on Hankins. I'm kind of concerned, I don't really think Hankins is the kind of player you pay $10m/year, but there's no question he's going to be one of our best DL and will help the defensive front significantly. Good add, questionable contract, IMO. 

 

There was rumors that we would pay Poe handsomely too, so I think Ballard see a quality NT as fixing more than one position, like taking a bit of run stopping stress of the ILBs. I also think that they didn't want to use a draft pick on a NT, they wanted a proven anchor, and price was secondary because an anchor has that trickle down effect. 

 

But very interesting and telling deal. I personally like it despite being rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Holder is soooo bad...

 

I will admit, I was wrong on this one. I didn't see Ballard dropping this kind of coin on Hankins. I'm kind of concerned, I don't really think Hankins is the kind of player you pay $10m/year, but there's no question he's going to be one of our best DL and will help the defensive front significantly. Good add, questionable contract, IMO. 

I disagree . NT is critically important against the run. When the Colts have been good on D the last many years it was because they had a stud like Siragusa or McFarland in the middle. Now they might not be quite at top half of the league level yet but with some shrewd picks and a year or two we could be in position to be a SB contender again. They aren't good enough yet  to think your not going to have to pay up to get impact players yet. This is a good move, be happy. I didn't like Poe anyway, his performance has declined . This guy is young. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Everyone said:

He was a stud in 2015, played out of position last season. With the cap consistently rising, I'm more than happy with this contract.

 

I know he got moved out of position. I think I know how good he is, no question he's a really good player. I just never thought he was worthy of $10m/year. If we deploy him in a way that allows him to get pressure on the QB, then we can maximize his value to us. If he's just a two down guy anchoring against the run, then it's not worth it, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superman said:

 

I know he got moved out of position. I think I know how good he is, no question he's a really good player. I just never thought he was worthy of $10m/year. If we deploy him in a way that allows him to get pressure on the QB, then we can maximize his value to us. If he's just a two down guy anchoring against the run, then it's not worth it, IMO. 

Yeah, also this signing doesn't really go along with what Ballard has been saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...