Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Shanahans


gnet550

Recommended Posts

I could see it but I think Mike is done and I would think if Kyle was coming it would be for a promo to HC.  I could see Mike maybe in a consulting role but that'd be about it.  Not to crap on your hypothesis as I don't know anymore than anybody else, just my "gut".  Where are you seeing this?

 

At this point, I wouldn't mind it because I REALLY don't want to stay status quo.  That is the very definition of insanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AZColt11 said:

I could see it but I think Mike is done and I would think if Kyle was coming it would be for a promo to HC.  I could see Mike maybe in a consulting role but that'd be about it.  Not to crap on your hypothesis as I don't know anymore than anybody else, just my "gut".  Where are you seeing this?

 

At this point, I wouldn't mind it because I REALLY don't want to stay status quo.  That is the very definition of insanity.

Kravitz said Mike wants to coach still...dunno, more hearsay probably

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

Huh, that's interesting.  Seems like he would want to just stay retired and do some "consulting".  That's where the big bucks/low pressure are anyway.

Getting Kyle Shanahan in at HC with Mike Shanahan as his councilor and mentor could be very interesting. Add Peyton in FO and we're back in business! 

:rock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr Clueless said:

Getting Kyle Shanahan in at HC with Mike Shanahan as his councilor and mentor could be very interesting. Add Peyton in FO and we're back in business! 

:rock:

We could only hope.  Cause what we have right now is not going to cut it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Luck2Hilton4TD said:

Don't see why anyone would want Mike Shanahan--he was awful with Washington, but Kyle Shanahan appears to have a bright future. Found a solid write-up here:

 

http://horseshoeheroes.com/2017/01/15/kyle-shanahan-next-head-coaching-solution-colts/

 

 

He also had lots of success...I'd be pleased...the two of them would be better than paganism IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind because Kyle has done wonders with that Atlanta offense. At this point I'll take him, Josh McDaniels or anyone with a pulse at this point :lol: but I doubt that Jim is really trying to do ANYTHING at this point though considering Chuck and Grigs have 3 more years left on their contract. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just tired of heresay and rumors. I want answers and definite answers. If Grigs and Pags are sticking around for another year, then it is what it is and we as fans just have to support our team. 

 

I for one am tired of the circus we have in our FO and coaching staff, but I know there is nothing that I can do about it. I'll just keep being a fan and endure the mediocrity we are being fed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Indyfan4life said:

I'm just tired of heresay and rumors. I want answers and definite answers. If Grigs and Pags are sticking around for another year, then it is what it is and we as fans just have to support our team. 

 

I for one am tired of the circus we have in our FO and coaching staff, but I know there is nothing that I can do about it. I'll just keep being a fan and endure the mediocrity we are being fed. 

Agreed just an answer would be nice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like it. But I can't see Kyle taking a sideways move to a worse team when he's a top guy at a SB contender.

 

I could see Kyle getting the HC job. 12 running the Falcons offense could be scary good. Mike may well come on as a consultant or a Coughlin type role maybe. 

 

As much as I like Peyton I might be inclined to go for the experience that Mike Shanahan has when it comes to VP of Football Ops. 

 

If Shanahan comes on board and brings on the best DC available I would be very much in favour of the move.

 

Only issue is, I can't see them working with Grigson and Irsay has been sticking to his guns with him. I can't see us getting a VP of FO anytime soon since whoever it may be would not want to answer to or argue with Grigson as GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luck2Hilton4TD said:

His success was also a long time ago. I just don't see the point, if we want Kyle Shanahan then sign just him and use the savings to bring in a legit defensive coordinator. 

So was grudens success yet everyone was jumping for joy over the possibility for him. 

There are a lot of people who would be happy if we got rid of Chuckles and Grigson for Ryan Leaf at GM and JaMarcus Russell at HC. 

 

Also we could still be in the running for Kyle but we can't really do anything while he's still coaching for Atlanta. Maybe when the Falcons are done he will get the call from irsay.  At this point we simply don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SaturdayAllDay said:

So was grudens success yet everyone was jumping for joy over the possibility for him. 

There are a lot of people who would be happy if we got rid of Chuckles and Grigson for Ryan Leaf at GM and JaMarcus Russell at HC. 

 

Also we could still be in the running for Kyle but we can't really do anything while he's still coaching for Atlanta. Maybe when the Falcons are done he will get the call from irsay.  At this point we simply don't know.

 

I think because Gruden's career didn't end on such a sour note, and he also had success with two teams as opposed to Shanahan--whose Broncos team was loaded with talent initially. I also think that it was reported that Shanahan interviewed with the Broncos last week, so there's still a little that could be done now--although that window may be closing the further along the Falcons advance until their season's end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luck2Hilton4TD said:

Don't see why anyone would want Mike Shanahan--he was awful with Washington, but Kyle Shanahan appears to have a bright future. Found a solid write-up here:

 

http://horseshoeheroes.com/2017/01/15/kyle-shanahan-next-head-coaching-solution-colts/

 

 

I'm not advocating for Mike Shanahan here, but I think Mike had a rough go of it in Washington due in large part to Snyder's meddling. As far as the Shanahans go, I'd rather see Kyle at the helm, if anything actually develops down this route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr Clueless said:

Getting Kyle Shanahan in at HC with Mike Shanahan as his councilor and mentor could be very interesting. Add Peyton in FO and we're back in business! 

:rock:

Kyle maybe but no way do I want to see Mike in here as head coach. Not sure why some people want to keep these recycles in the light. Mike S. hasn't done anything since obtaining Terrel Davis back in the days of Denvers final good years with An elite QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Jdubu said:

Kyle maybe but no way do I want to see Mike in here as head coach. Not sure why some people want to keep these recycles in the light. Mike S. hasn't done anything since obtaining Terrel Davis back in the days of Denvers final good years with An elite QB. 

The guy made it to the playoffs with guys like Brian Griese, Jake Plumber and RG3. What's Belichick ever done without Brady?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Shanahan?

My brain hurts so bad...

*

You mean former Super Bowl champ Mike Shanahan?

Yeah yeah yeah, I think that is the same one. The one who underachieved and won one super bowl with John Elway. The one who hung around Denver for years after that and didn't get much farther than the middle of the road. The one who had a disastrous run with the Redskins.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's the same one.

*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, lennymoore24 said:

Oh the "great" Mike Shanahan.  So he had a great offensive line, Terrell Davis, and a fading John Elway and won two Super Bowls very early.  Then he....well, didn't accomplish much of anything.  I would put him in the Brian Bellick group.  No thanks!

 

"Early". So, Brady and Belichick won 3 of their 4 SBs early as well, so that diminishes those SBs???

 

I am not advocating for Mike Shanahan but it is mighty short sighted to sell him short. He is a good coach that gets a lot out of his running game and we have drafted the guys for the ZBS that he loves to run. The issue with him was when he started playing GM. That would be the reason I wouldn't want Mike, because he might want to play GM at this point.

 

Hence, I would not mind Kyle Shanahan for HC that would maximize the west coast system efficiency with our O, and Brian Guntekunst for GM (a Packers head of scouting guy).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, GwinnettColt said:

If we're talking Shanahans, I think I'd rather have Kyle.  He's done a great job in Atlanta.

 

I also think that if Pagano goes, Grigson needs to be in the seat on the bus next to him.  

 

I'm not sure who we'd get for GM.  

An interesting idea could be to put Mike as GM and Kyle as HC. Mike has great scouting ability. He had the foresight to draft Kirk Cousins and has stated that he was high on Andrew Luck since day 1. Snyder wanted RGIII and the Shannahan's were some how able to get a playoff birth out of a terrible QB. Plus Mike is responsible for Sharp, Davis, and Morris. Not my top choice but I wouldn't mind him as GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Defjamz26 said:

An interesting idea could be to put Mike as GM and Kyle as HC. Mike has great scouting ability. He had the foresight to draft Kirk Cousins and has stated that he was high on Andrew Luck since day 1. Snyder wanted RGIII and the Shannahan's were some how able to get a playoff birth out of a terrible QB. Plus Mike is responsible for Sharp, Davis, and Morris. Not my top choice but I wouldn't mind him as GM.

 

Mike being GM had very mixed results and there was a loss of talent on their roster as time went on, that is why he was shown the door in Denver. I'd get someone who has worked heavily in scouting and football operations recently. Just my opinion.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t listen to games anymore because I don’t work on Sundays anymore. But man sometimes listening to the game is better than watching it. Kinda miss Matt Taylor getting all pumped..  I-N-D-Y lol 
    • Absolutely zero chance a 40 year old Flacco starts unless Richardson is too hurt to go.  Top 5 pick, 22 year old QB who needs reps more than any player in the league vs a 40 year old that has zero chance of being in our plans beyond this year The people that want Flacco to start are way too short sighted of what the Colts are trying to accomplish here. They really don't care about this season if it means that by WEEK 17 they are sure Anthony is the guy and he has improved substantially.    What I don't think they anticipated is the fact that Anthony could be injury prone and has a low pain threshold.  I don't think he is the unluckiest QB to ever play.  But I do think he is one of the youngest.  Practically nobody on the planet (Even at 6'5 255) is mature enough to take  NFL physical punishment at the age of 21 years old IF AT ALL. Only time in the league will prove that.  I don't think he had any benefit in the offseason to prepare his body for this type of punishment- I think his offseason work was mainly to rehab his shoulder and his throwing mechanics.  Perhaps jacking AR up even more than he naturally is might be the play here?  Or the opposite- focus on pliability and durability ALA Brady in his late career. Either way, we will need to spend next offseason addressing this somehow to rule out weather or not its durability.  In the meantime, our QB is going to have to learn and learn quick to suck it up and grind through the bumps and bruises.  Given his career choice, he signed on for 15 year of it. Given his size, he should be able to handle it.  Given his game experience- it was an absolute coin flip weather he could handle it.
    • Never did I suggest that AR wasn’t the starter.  AR has looked got at times  but his type of play is hazardous to himself.  Till he stays on the field, Flacco is the guy. 
    • AR said he couldn't run or plant the way he wanted to.   Shane didn't put him back in because he was hurt
    • Find a hobby. Listen to the game instead of watching it while you do that hobby, or home maintenance. I’ve been really busy during this football season and am watching less games. I haven’t been able to watch a full game yet this year. Just can’t afford to waste 3+ hours on Sundays anymore. So if I can I’ll listen to the game otherwise I’ve got things to do. So my advice would be that if you find a hobby or enjoy working on things around the house, listening to the game while doing those things can be more enjoyable. 
  • Members

    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,428

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JMichael557

      JMichael557 557

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Believe blue1306

      Believe blue1306 100

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,938

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JAS90

      JAS90 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 4,012

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NYFAN

      NYFAN 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nevbot

      Nevbot 126

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Aaron86

      Aaron86 441

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...