Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The Center Situation (Merge)


CR91

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

what was clear was luck was calling for the ball, but obviously we'll never know whos fault it truly was

Yes, he was calling for the ball and he got it but unfortunately he looked away right as the snap came. I don't see Luck taking blame unless he truly thinks it's at least partially his fault. He'd go over and comfort him, discuss what went wrong, and say "we'll get them next time" or whatever but I doubt he'd take the blame.

I think both are partially to blame, really. Harrison should have got the snap out faster and Luck should have been ready for the ball.

Either way, this play is no reason to freak out over Harrison. He's played pretty well and should only get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take Harrison over satele anyday give him a break god, Wayne dropped some passes should we bench him.....the guy has the most up side, we need him playing his best in the play off not in game 6

I will take Harrison over Satele as well.  

 

People keep saying that Harrison ahs th most potential, or most upside.  What exactly is that based on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats one way to look at it, but then why isnt holmes starting

 

 

I would guess that its either the ankle is not 100% or he just has not been as good as Harrison in practice. Holmes might be a slow healer and they want to make sure he's fully recovered. Remember that he played his whole senior season on a tender ankle and was hurt for around the first 6-7 weeks of his rookie year. I really don't know and can only guess.

 

I do hear what you guys are saying regarding the C position. I , for what it's worth , would suggest that we go with the coaches on this one. How can you really make sense of a situation that had...

 

1) Holmes ... played about 10 NFL plays

2) Costa  .... enough said there

3) Harrison ... RFA

4) Shipley  ... Colts sign off waivers , trade for a 7th , Balt waives and Colts sign off waivers. I will say that IMO , Shipley is a decent C and deserved better. 

 

Anyway , that's a heck of a depth chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that botched snap almost cost us the game and it wasnt like there were running lanes or luck wasnt getting pressured up the middle. why is shipley in the doghouse? and for that matter why is holmes in the doghouse? what has harrison done to prove hes better then shipley and holmes? starting line for next week better be canstanzo mewhort shipley thornton chelius or else peko and atkins are gonna have a field day

Holmes just isn't very good he was a healthy inactive behind Meredith time for people to realize. It is week 6 if Holmes could play he would have we have had injuries at every interior line position he still doesn't dress. He will be cut in camp next year.

 

Harrison is our C give him the Trent business if you feel you must.

Holmes has never done anything on the field I really don't get the cry for the guy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by SteelCityColt, October 10, 2014 - Double Post
Hidden by SteelCityColt, October 10, 2014 - Double Post

that botched snap almost cost us the game and it wasnt like there were running lanes or luck wasnt getting pressured up the middle. why is shipley in the doghouse? and for that matter why is holmes in the doghouse? what has harrison done to prove hes better then shipley and holmes? starting line for next week better be canstanzo mewhort shipley thornton chelius or else peko and atkins are gonna have a field day

Holmes just isn't very good he was a healthy inactive behind Meredith time for people to realize. It is week 6 if Holmes could play he would have we have had injuries at every interior line position he still doesn't dress. He will be cut in camp next year.

 

Harrison is our C give him the Trent business if you feel you must.

Holmes has never done anything on the field I really don't get the cry for the guy.

 

Link to comment

That snap was on Luck. He was looking up at play clock after calling for the snap.

 

 

Hmmm. I don't know. Off course Andrew takes the blame like he always does even if it is not his fault. My best guess is that Harrison missed or was to late with the snap, Luck then took a quick look at the game clock so it happened. Like the two bad snaps in the Baltimore game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holmes just isn't very good he was a healthy inactive behind Meredith time for people to realize. It is week 6 if Holmes could play he would have we have had injuries at every interior line position he still doesn't dress. He will be cut in camp next year.

 

Harrison is our C give him the Trent business if you feel you must.

Holmes has never done anything on the field I really don't get the cry for the guy.

 

i mean when a coaching staff comes out says a certain player is going to be our player for the future and never sees the field there is going some crys to see what hes got

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I will take Harrison over Satele as well.  

 

People keep saying that Harrison ahs th most potential, or most upside.  What exactly is that based on?

 

Age and experience. A 23 year old rookie generally has much more room to grow than a 28 year old journey man. Clearly the coaching staff believes in Harrison to displace Shipley who was playing well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats one way to look at it, but then why isnt holmes starting

Holmes isn't even dressing. He isn't even a back up. What is the deal with that guy on the board?

 

He is a healthy inactive every week what does that say? It says he isn't even the back up. Maybe he can make a move to G at some point I would not hold my breath.

 

Harrison is our C and is doing a great job. We have not lost since he took over against the Ravens and Texans two of the best front 7 we will see all year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with Harrison starting.  The guy is solid and strong.  Nice to see him holding up at the point of attack, even when taking on the NT or DT one on one.....as opposed to Satele who was always being driven back into Luck.  

 

I just still wonder about Holmes.  Either his performance plummeted, even after healing up, or Harrison just shot through the roof in the past 6 weeks.  Hard to image anything so dramatic happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i mean when a coaching staff comes out says a certain player is going to be our player for the future and never sees the field there is going some crys to see what hes got

The coaches are trying to win games. If he was better than anyone or had anything to offer don't you think he would be dressing at least?

 

He has never done a thing don't understand the cry for the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Age and experience. A 23 year old rookie generally has much more room to grow than a 28 year old journey man. Clearly the coaching staff believes in Harrison to displace Shipley who was playing well.

 

So because he's younger then he has more upside?  Young does not mean upside it just means you don't know what his peak is... it could be he's reached it.

 

Yup, for some reason or another the coaching staff feels Harrison is a better option than Shipley.  Just like the coaching staff felt Satele was a better option than Shipley.  Or that Justice was a better option than Linkenbach or that Linkenbach was a better option than a bag of sand or that McGlynn was a better option than anyone else available at the guard position.

 

I like some of the moves that Grigs and the staff have made but when it comes to the line they have had a lot more misses than hits, especially when it comes to free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that botched snap almost cost us the game and it wasnt like there were running lanes or luck wasnt getting pressured up the middle. why is shipley in the doghouse? and for that matter why is holmes in the doghouse? what has harrison done to prove hes better then shipley and holmes? starting line for next week better be canstanzo mewhort shipley thornton chelius or else peko and atkins are gonna have a field day

 

 

your wrong luck said he # up on that play .  go lest too his interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have not seen the increase in pressure up the middle the last two games then you are not really watching the line.

I wouldn't say it's coming from up the middle. It's basically coming entirely from the right side of the line. Thornton struggled in pass pro in the Ravens game, as did Louis last night, and Cherilus has been disappointing all season. LT, LG and C play has been solid the past 2 games (outside of the snap issues) in my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So because he's younger then he has more upside?  Young does not mean upside it just means you don't know what his peak is... it could be he's reached it.

 

Yup, for some reason or another the coaching staff feels Harrison is a better option than Shipley.  Just like the coaching staff felt Satele was a better option than Shipley.  Or that Justice was a better option than Linkenbach or that Linkenbach was a better option than a bag of sand or that McGlynn was a better option than anyone else available at the guard position.

 

I like some of the moves that Grigs and the staff have made but when it comes to the line they have had a lot more misses than hits, especially when it comes to free agents.

 

A young inexperienced player generally has more room to grow (not that he will) than an older veteran. That's what I said and I don't think it's all that foreign. At this point in Shipley's career I think what you see is pretty much what you get. Whereas Harrison can still mature a lot mentally and physically or he can crumble but still I think the potential is there and I think he's looked solid in his first two start..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

luck is a proven starter while harrison is making his second start. im sure harrison was already down on himself  and luck wanted to ease the pain by taking the blame. its what the QB does. takes the blame from others 

 

 

I think it's clear you don't know what you're talking about.

We really can't be sure who's at fault. One thing we do know is that Luck took blame when he met with Harrison, but that means nothing to you because it doesn't support your skewed view and if it doesn't support your opinion, you disregard it.

 

 

That's true, but sometimes the QB takes the blame for himself as well. 

 

 

what was clear was luck was calling for the ball, but obviously we'll never know whos fault it truly was  

 

Coltsrule91 -- you contradict yourself from the first quoted post here and the last.

 

You said it yourself best "What was clear was luck was calling for the ball" -- when the QB picks his leg up and the noise is as loud as it was at an away game, that is the signal for the center to hike it. Luck called for it, not Harrison's fault at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coltsrule91 -- you contradict yourself from the first quoted post here and the last.

 

You said it yourself best "What was clear was luck was calling for the ball" -- when the QB picks his leg up and the noise is as loud as it was at an away game, that is the signal for the center to hike it. Luck called for it, not Harrison's fault at all.

he called for it, but didn't get it when he called for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what has player A done to prove hes better then player B. I understand im not in the colts faculty and I dont have insider information on what pagano and his staff sees that makes harrison our best option at C, but when you lose your job abruptly not because of play or injury then something is up 

bingo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he called for it, but didn't get it when he called for it

 

I am glad you aren't making any calls. 

 

There is a reason Harrison has taken over right when the teeth of our schedule hit if you watched him the last two weeks and all you saw were the bad snaps.....everyone has their opinion

 

We are 2-0 since he took over looks like you just need something to complain about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what has player A done to prove hes better then player B. I understand im not in the colts faculty and I dont have insider information on what pagano and his staff sees that makes harrison our best option at C, but when you lose your job abruptly not because of play or injury then something is up 

You just answered your own question and clearly pagano is not saying he's been asked several times by the media and refuses to answer the question so you might as well move on and get use to harrison at center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say it's coming from up the middle. It's basically coming entirely from the right side of the line. Thornton struggled in pass pro in the Ravens game, as did Louis last night, and Cherilus has been disappointing all season. LT, LG and C play has been solid the past 2 games (outside of the snap issues) in my opinion

 

 

That increase in pressure is coming from the guards, not the center.

It's not coming from just the guards.

 

that's due to the better teams

I don't think the Texans front 3 or 4 is significantly better than the Ravens, Titans or Broncos.

 

And I don't dislike Harrison, I have mentioned in a few threads the things I think he does well but I'm not going to pretend he's done as well as Shipley or ignore obvious shortcomings I've seen so far just because I hope the FO made the right move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harrison is better at run blocking thats for sure. For being an undrafted free agent and only his second start the kid is playing big time.

Agreed. He run blocks better, and if this is who they are going to go with, then by all means play him. He'll get better and with Mewhort returning the line will have some young guys to complement the vets. There must be a reason that Shipley and Holmes aren't starting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coaching staff is doing a great job of resting nicked up guys to heal injuries

and adding depth with getting guys experience by playing multiple different linemen.

 

This will payoff at the end of the season when we have a team full of fresh players

ready to do some damage in the playoffs, now if we were losing games then it would

be a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If I had to guess Unitas, Berry, Lenny Moore, Buddy Young, Jim Parker, Gino, Art Donovan, and Mackey. Maybe Bert Jones.
    • The site created their own way of trying to compare the value of a any player, regardless of position.  Over time, they call it the "weighted average value" or "wAV".  I don't know how well it works out, but at least they tried!   If you want to read through their exhaustive methodology, here's the link for it. https://www.sports-reference.com/blog/approximate-value-methodology/  
    • How many players from the Baltimore Colts are in the Ring of Honor?
    • To continue kicking the dead horse of sacks/pressures...   I decided to compile some numbers from PFR, to investigate whether the Colts sack/pressure ratio on defense in 2023 is an outlier, and unsustainable. The Colts were 5th in total sacks, but 24th in pressures. I think that's an anomaly, so let me share the numbers that support my case.   In 2023, the Colts defense had 51 sacks on 127 pressures, converting 40% of their pressures into sacks. (From this point forward, I'll use the term "sack rate" in reference to this ratio.) This is the second highest sack rate in 2023, and the fourth highest sack rate of any team in the last five years (42% twice, 45% once). It's my opinion that this high sack rate is an unsustainable outlier.   From 2019 to 2023, the league-wide sack rate was 27% (6,362 sacks, on 23,204 pressures). In 2019, 28% (1,276 sacks, 4,585 pressures). 2020, 24% (1,135 sacks, 4,739 pressures). (Lowest sack rate and number of sacks) 2021, 25% (1,244 sacks, 5,056 pressures). (Highest total pressures) 2022, 30% (1,297 sacks, 4,325 pressures). (Lowest total pressures) 2023, 31% (1,410 sacks, 4,449 pressures). (Highest sack rate and number of sacks) It's only a five year sample, so I wouldn't say for sure that there's a trend in either direction. It's interesting that the two highest sack total and sack rate years were 2022 and 2023, so maybe there's a trend forming; but I think understanding how many QBs have been injured lately would help to explain the recent increase. In 2019, the lowest sack rate was 20% (Bears), and the highest was 34% (Panthers). 2020, the lowest was 14% (Raiders; this is also the lowest sack rate for all five years), highest was 36% (Rams). 2021, the lowest was 17% (Falcons), highest was 39% (Bears). 2022, the lowest was 21% (Jaguars), highest was 45% (Saints; this is also the highest sack rate for all five years). 2023, the lowest was 22% (Lions), and the highest was 42% (Ravens; Colts were second, at 40%).  And for comparison: The Colts sack rate for the last five years: 31.6% (209 sacks, 661 pressures) 2019, 31% (3 points above league average) 2020, 27% (3 points above league average) 2021, 28% (3 points above league average) 2022, 33% (3 points above league average) 2023, 40% (9 points above league average) So that’s a lot of info. It’s not comprehensive, it’s actually a really small sample. I’m also not analyzing the quality of the defenses, because pass rush is just one element of a successful defense.   The questions I set out to answer were 1) Whether the Colts 40% pressure to sack rate is an outlier, and I think it’s obvious that it is an outlier. Out of 160 results (32 teams x five seasons), it’s the fourth highest sack rate of any team defense since 2019, and it’s 13 points higher than the average sack rate during those five years. Compared to the Colts own performance, the 2023 sack rate is 7 points higher than 2022 (Bradley’s first year), and it’s more than 8 points higher than their five year average. So I think it’s clearly an outlier result.   And 2) Whether that sack rate is sustainable, I think this is less conclusive, but the sample indicates that it’s not sustainable. From 2019 to 2022, the Colts have a history of outperforming the league average sack rate, by 3 points each year. But in 2023, that tripled to 9 points above league average. And it’s by far the highest sack rate the Colts posted in the five year sample. So I think calling it unsustainable is accurate. (It's more likely that the Colts will be closer to 3 points above league average in 2024; with a similar number of total pressures, that would cost the defense about 10 total sacks.)   Just to further support the idea that it’s not sustainable, I looked at the Ravens sack rate over the last five years, simply because they led the league in sack rate in 2023. They went 42%, 38%, 22%, 22%, 26%, and over the five years, they averaged a 29% sack rate. So they've been well above the league average the last two seasons, but below league average the previous three seasons, and only 2 points higher than league average overall.    That’s a lot, so what’s my point? To be clear, I'm not saying that having a high sack rate is a bad thing, or that pressures are more important than sacks.    What I'm saying is a team converting 40% of their pressures into sacks is a statistical outlier, and it would be a mistake for the Colts to rely on converting pressures to sacks at such a high rate moving forward. That's not reliable output, based on recent history and trends. Even converting 30% of pressures to sacks is above typical league average, but at least that seems reasonable for the Colts' defense.   So if the Colts want to reach that 50+ sack threshold again in 2024, 127 total pressures (7.5/game) won't get it done. We need to count on having a sack rate closer to 30% than 40%, and that means we need to be closer to pressuring the QB 170 times total (10/game) next season. 
    • Good. I want to see this offense and Richardson shut up the naysayers. 
  • Members

    • Samu-Rye

      Samu-Rye 75

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,103

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 3,257

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,630

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SwedishColt

      SwedishColt 170

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 4,376

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DEColtsLover36

      DEColtsLover36 2,119

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,527

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • G8R

      G8R 59

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,955

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...