Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

SteelCityColt

Moderators
  • Posts

    14,638
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

SteelCityColt last won the day on June 19 2020

SteelCityColt had the most liked content!

About SteelCityColt

Uncategorized

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

20,275 profile views

SteelCityColt's Achievements

Team Captain

Team Captain (4/6)

4.9k

Reputation

  1. The classic 1000% post about Barkley? He was so good there was no way he wasn't going #1 overall. It's fine making bold statements, fine if they don't come off, not so fine to just quietly climb down off the hill you chose to die on.
  2. 5th and 7th by what metric though. If it's just points scored % that includes kicks. Go look at red zone passing and there's quite a drop off from Luck to JB and Rivers wasn't much better. Now that precludes the running game of course, but Hines.up the gut is money right? What metric...
  3. I mean Gardner Minshew had better RZ stats in the same time period...
  4. He was with Luck but that was all of one season, Brissett not so much. So far that would suggest talent overcoming play calling...
  5. I really don't want to agree with this, but the evidence is becoming compelling. I like Frank, I think he's a good offensive mind, but perhaps a pretty bad play caller. The NFL has gone through a fairly rapid evolution of "roles" on the coaching staff and some teams are still slightly stuck in the traditional ideas. If you have a brilliant head coach who can call plays, great. But there's no shame in giving up play calling. BB still has a defensive play caller.. and I'd say he's the best defensive strategist ever.
  6. Bingo! He really is an absolute lunch pail guy. Underrated route runner, decent in the red zone, and you saw his blocking skills on the long Taylor run. Compare to Pittman who slightly panicked I feel down field, and you kinda saw Taylor put his hands on him to steer him into the correct block. I've long time loved Pascal and will continue to do so.
  7. I'm going to guess Taylor and you're commitment to not wanting to like him is weirdly admirable.
  8. Yet weirdly we have the "tied 4th" best receiver league wide in terms of Red Zone TDs (with 3, leagues leaders are Kupp/Hopkins with 6 each). Can you guess who it is? Height isn't everything in the red zone and I agree we cold use Hines in more creative ways.
  9. Ahh the Samson Satele effect you mean... Probably still head bobbing somewhere out there to this day. Do we? Or do we just not use them.... hmm I'd bet @EastStreet would have something to say about that Big Mac.
  10. QFT and that's coming from a guy who likes stats. People are bloody complicated.
  11. Another fallacy of us fans. We tend to be myopic about our own bad beats.
  12. I'd argue this to degree, some people are more 'injury prone' than others, but it's a guessing game still. Campbell had no history that would suggest he'd have so many injuries. I think we're kinda agreeing even if doesn't seem so. I think there's a real big difference between 'pure' stats scenarios and real world problems. My day job involves modelling some fairly complex systems. In an ideal world you'd be able to measure everything perfectly and understand cause/effect probabilities, in reality... not so much. Especially when you introduce human behaviour. I've long advocated you can't argue about not drafting a player in hindsight, especially low rounders. Some of those were very unique situations that you couldn't replicate on other teams. Like an inverse Jerry Hughes. I don't think he was ever happy here in Indy, as soon as you take him out of somewhere he didn't like he flourished. But that's why we like the NFL right? If a numbers geek could tell us all the outcomes, why would we watch?
  13. What's the best metric for assessing success of a draft class? Ages ago I dived into trying to break down drafts and looked at things such as average games stated/All pro selections/Some position based stats and it soon gets pretty noisy. But you do start to pick out a few things that aren't all that surprising. QBs tend to 'need' to be drafted higher to be long term successful vs say RBs where you can get some low rounders having long/decent careers. See I like the chart above, but it's hard presented without the context/methodology to understand if it's good analysis or not, and that's not to say it's not.
×
×
  • Create New...