Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

T-Rich Colts @ Broncos


SIXTHOBJECT

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Looked good, I think he only got 4 carries though.  Tough when you are behind the entire game.

Trich got 6 and Bradshaw got 3.  Until Luck gets his throws under control those numbers need to be TRich 12-15 carries and Bradshaw 8-10.  Have Trich in there for the 1st three quarters and then Bring in Bradshaw to finish the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The running game was pretty irrelevant in the Broncos game. That said, they both did an excellent job picking up the blitz. No surprise from Bradshaw, who is consistently one of the best in the league, but Trich seems to have improved in this area as well. He always had the build for it, but last night he was in the right position as well.

I found myself wishing we'd run the ball more last night, especially in short yardage situations. Never thought I'd be saying that about a Pep Hamilton offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry i meant snaps overall, Bradshaw saw more plays than T-Rich.

I think that's what we should expect all season when we're in throw first mode. Bradshaw is unrivaled in pass protection and he's a pretty good receiver too.

Bradshaw played the 2 minute drill vs the Saints in preseason game 3 as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's what we should expect all season when we're in throw first mode. Bradshaw is unrivaled in pass protection and he's a pretty good receiver too.

Bradshaw played the 2 minute drill vs the Saints in preseason game 3 as well.

I would argue that Richardson is also one of the better blocking and receiving Backs in the NFL alongside Bradshaw. If Hamilton was being creative, He should have a 3 WR set with Luck in the Shotgun with Richardson and Bradshaw on either side to him, gives Hamilton the option to handoff to either back and have the other one block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would argue that Richardson is also one of the better blocking and receiving Backs in the NFL alongside Bradshaw. If Hamilton was being creative, He should have a 3 WR set with Luck in the Shotgun with Richardson and Bradshaw on either side to him, gives Hamilton the option to handoff to either back and have the other one block.

I would like to have seen more 3 WRs set forcing the Broncos to play nickel and dime.  Let's see Trent run more against that defense.  Pep loves 2 TEs but Fleener looks tentative out there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's what we should expect all season when we're in throw first mode. Bradshaw is unrivaled in pass protection and he's a pretty good receiver too.

Bradshaw played the 2 minute drill vs the Saints in preseason game 3 as well.

 

Agreed Bradshaw is one of the better blocking backs in the league, love his receiving skills out of the backfield as well. besides those few drops he had, he was solid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would argue that Richardson is also one of the better blocking and receiving Backs in the NFL alongside Bradshaw. If Hamilton was being creative, He should have a 3 WR set with Luck in the Shotgun with Richardson and Bradshaw on either side to him, gives Hamilton the option to handoff to either back and have the other one block.

I agree about Richardson but it still makes sense, at least this early in the season, to go with the most proven player for the situation.

Both Bradshaw and Richardson in the same backfield sounds like a terrific idea, much better then the traditional fullbacks they've been trying. I'd love to see that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would argue that Richardson is also one of the better blocking and receiving Backs in the NFL alongside Bradshaw. If Hamilton was being creative, He should have a 3 WR set with Luck in the Shotgun with Richardson and Bradshaw on either side to him, gives Hamilton the option to handoff to either back and have the other one block.

 

I've dreamt of that formation since TRich was brought in, I hope we see this happen at some point this season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are really looking hard to compliment Richardson. Looks a bIt better than last yr, but still just a guy.

And you know what, until he outproduces Bradshaw I wouldn't even say he's just a guy. He's a guy, who in my opinion, is getting the start and the benefit of the doubt because of his draft position but hasn't lived up to it at all. I'm not gonna go off now but I could. Ryan Grigson better hope Richardson picks it up because if he doesn't it could be his undoing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know what, until he outproduces Bradshaw I wouldn't even say he's just a guy. He's a guy, who in my opinion, is getting the start and the benefit of the doubt because of his draft position but hasn't lived up to it at all. I'm not gonna go off now but I could. Ryan Grigson better hope Richardson picks it up because if he doesn't it could be his undoing.

I seriously dought the GM of an NFL team would only consider draft position as criteria for starting or being traded for. The man had 11 tds his rookie season on a sorry team. That sorry team had a better offensive line than the Colts have had since the retirement of Glen. Worry about the O-line,pass rush and secondary. Those will be our downfall, not a running back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know what, until he outproduces Bradshaw I wouldn't even say he's just a guy. He's a guy, who in my opinion, is getting the start and the benefit of the doubt because of his draft position but hasn't lived up to it at all. I'm not gonna go off now but I could. Ryan Grigson better hope Richardson picks it up because if he doesn't it could be his undoing.

I seriously dought the GM of an NFL team would only consider draft position as criteria for starting or being traded for. The man had 11 tds his rookie season on a sorry team. That sorry team had a better offensive line than the Colts have had since the retirement of Glen. Worry about the O-line,pass rush and secondary. Those will be our downfall, not a running back.

My point is that u can't give first round I

Picks away to sub par players. Those are the decisions that take down general managers. Your point about the pass rush and o-line is well taken. As far as richardson's 11 td rookie season ok, show me now. I'm tired of people not acknowledging that brown out performed Richardson last year behind the same line and Bradshaw has done well behind it when he isn't injured

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know what, until he outproduces Bradshaw I wouldn't even say he's just a guy. He's a guy, who in my opinion, is getting the start and the benefit of the doubt because of his draft position but hasn't lived up to it at all. I'm not gonna go off now but I could. Ryan Grigson better hope Richardson picks it up because if he doesn't it could be his undoing.

One player will not be his "undoing" as you say.

 

 

I think Richardson looks just plain slow running with the ball.

He looked pretty good last night while in space, and made some good moves.  None the less, we were behind the whole game... and there wasn't going to be many carries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One player will not be his "undoing" as you say.

He looked pretty good last night while in space, and made some good moves. None the less, we were behind the whole game... and there wasn't going to be many carries.

U might be right. Probably are right but giving away a first round pick to a slug won't help his cause. I'm not labeling Richardson a slug yet but he's giving his critics plenty of fire power

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson still didn't run for a good average but I could definitely tell a difference last night.  The few times he got the ball he got some hard dirty yards.  He had a couple of 6 or 7 yard runs that he really had to work for.  He looked more decisive last night.  Still not good but definitely better than last year, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

U might be right. Probably are right but giving away a first round pick to a slug won't help his cause. I'm not labeling Richardson a slug yet but he's giving his critics plenty of fire power

Ummm, you called him a name then said you won't call him one yet. You can't have it both ways... You can criticize a lot of people for last night, but Trent Richardson isn't one of them. He did his job when called upon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm, you called him a name then said you won't call him one yet. You can't have it both ways... You can criticize a lot of people for last night, but Trent Richardson isn't one of them. He did his job when called upon.

I didn't word it quite right. My point is that when u give a first round pick for a running back these days he better be a guy who is a work horse and gets u 80-100 yards a game. Richardson has been nowhere near that and like many are pointing out, he is too slow. It's becoming painfully evident. I realize last night we got behind and the run game was abandoned but I didn't see much different from the guy than what I saw last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't word it quite right. My point is that when u give a first round pick for a running back these days he better be a guy who is a work horse and gets u 80-100 yards a game. Richardson has been nowhere near that and like many are pointing out, he is too slow. It's becoming painfully evident. I realize last night we got behind and the run game was abandoned but I didn't see much different from the guy than what I saw last year

You lose the pick, but it isn't like he is making a ton of cash because he is still under his rookie contract. If things don't work out you chalk it up to a learning experience. I still don't think it was a bad move, and Trent knows he needs to prove his worth... So next we I look to see him run with reckless abandon with Bradshaw as the receiving back. Provided we don't have to play from behind then you get what we saw Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You lose the pick, but it isn't like he is making a ton of cash because he is still under his rookie contract. If things don't work out you chalk it up to a learning experience. I still don't think it was a bad move, and Trent knows he needs to prove his worth... So next we I look to see him run with reckless abandon with Bradshaw as the receiving back. Provided we don't have to play from behind then you get what we saw Sunday.

And it's not like we gave up the third overall pick for him. We "drafted" him slightly higher then Addai and Brown. He still has every opportunity to outperform them both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Notices of posts on this thread kept popping up. I knew there was no way the conversation was still about TB and the roast…. so I literally just hopped in here to see where the conversation veered off to. Wow, what a tangent!  Might be one of the best I’ve seen on the forum 
    • We’ve had many long time posters who’ve gone MIA…    I’d like to imagine he retired from many years of teaching and is enjoying the quiet life on a beach somewhere.    @southwest1 always posted interesting topics as well that I miss reading. 
    • Does anybody know what happened to or became of Princeton? I used to enjoy his "everything will be alright" comment.
    • Wilt dominated Bill Russell when they played, what Boston fans don't comprehend for some reason is, the Celtics had all the best players on their team other than players like West, Baylor, and Robertson. Outside of that the league had a bunch of MEH players back then except on Boston. Boston had Cousy, Havlicek, Sam Jones, Tom Heinsohn, and KC Jones besides Russell. Russell could get away with playing a bad game on occasion because Havlicek or Sam Jones or even Heinsohn could go for 25 and they would still win. Cousy wasn't a great shooter but was a great Assist guy and would just run that team like a great QB does.   Bill Simmons has Bill Russell as the 2nd greatest player ever, that is what ruins his list and I agree with a lot of his rankings. Loved his book and love his knowledge on ranking players but his Russell ranking is simply because he is from Boston. No way in hell is Bill Russell the 2nd greatest player of all-time. He had too many offensive deficiencies to be that. To me Larry Bird was the better player compared to Bill Russell.    Simmons top 10 updated: 1. Michael Jordan 2. Bill Russell 3. LeBron James 4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 5. Magic Johnson 6. Larry Bird 7. Wilt Chamberlain  8. Tim Duncan 9. Kobe Bryant  10. Jerry West   Mine is: 1. Michael Jordan (we agree)   2. Magic Johnson   3. LeBron James (we agree)   4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (we agree)   5. Kobe Bryant   6. Larry Bird (we agree)   7. Wilt Chamberlain (we agree)   8. Steph Curry - Bill has Curry 15th.   9. Shaq O'Neal - Bill has Shaq 13th.   10. Bill Russell - yes, he makes my top 10, great defensive player, great rebounder, a good scorer but not a dominant scorer and a winner. His 11 championships can be viewed in a lot of different ways compared to how players won theirs in the 80's-up until now. 11 is 11 though so a top 10 list without him would not like right.   He had West and Duncan in his top 10 - I don't. I have Shaq and Curry instead. To me Shaq was more dominant at his peak than Duncan was, and Curry changed the game with his 3-point shooting. Shaq is the only player in NBA history other than Michael Jordan to win 3 straight Finals MVP's (2000-2002), he has to be top 10. I never thought I would see a better shooter than Reggie Miller, then Steph entered the building. Steph also does have 4 championships, a Finals MVP, and 2 League MVP's + he has the most 3 pointers made in NBA history.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...