Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

how to protect luck with this o-line


OLD FAN MAN

Recommended Posts

if we cant fix this o-line ,how do we keep luck in one piece behind this o-line? some thoughts, 1. short quick passes, 2. try to run the ball if we ever get a lead.3.if the game is gone, and we are too far behind put in hasselbeck, 4. if we get a big lead and the game is a lock put in hasselbeck, 5. put in 6 or 7 o-linemen to pass block ,any other ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the hiring of Pep Hamilton to begin with, he appears hesitant in calling the right plays.  He looks lost, i don't know if you can attributed to adjusting to the NFL culture, but from what I see he doesn't cut it.  Mr Irsay, you need to cut your losses now and cut him, get a new OC and also look at your DC, he doesn't seem to cut it either....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we cant fix this o-line ,how do we keep luck in one piece behind this o-line? some thoughts, 1. short quick passes, 2. try to run the ball if we ever get a lead.3.if the game is gone, and we are too far behind put in hasselbeck, 4. if we get a big lead and the game is a lock put in hasselbeck, 5. put in 6 or 7 o-linemen to pass block ,any other ideas?

 

1. won't work cause our wr's can't get open quickly

 

2. we tried running the ball but it doesn't work - but yes, luck gets out of the harms way

 

3. & 4. why not play hasselbeck from the start, that way luck surely doesn't get hurt - 100% proof plan 

 

5. what good are 6 or 7 linemen who can't pass protect?

 

sorry for not having any constructive ideas, i just hope luck can survive this season and next season the o-line somehow miraculously gets fixed..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the hiring of Pep Hamilton to begin with, he appears hesitant in calling the right plays.  He looks lost, i don't know if you can attributed to adjusting to the NFL culture, but from what I see he doesn't cut it.  Mr Irsay, you need to cut your losses now and cut him, get a new OC and also look at your DC, he doesn't seem to cut it either....

 

LAME POST OF THE MORNING NOMINEE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone else noticed that in the past couple games... Since Denver I believe... Luck has seemed very hesitant to run the ball.  I think if they come up with some designed runs that could help slow down the pass rush since you won't have the ends coming around as hard and they will play more contain. 

 

Granted, Luck would have to be smart about getting down or out of bounds but I think if we really want the best way to protect luck its to get him out of that joke of a pocket and let him make plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about doing what the Chiefs first popularized in the 70's with Dawson using a "moving pocket" where the QB sprints to a spot? At least try this some of the time. It was used because Dawson's strength was the short passing game and play action passing. This might be a partially effective strategy considering Luck is very mobile, throws well on the run, and gives the receivers different routes and more time to run those routes even in the short passing game. Or keep it more current and copy some of the boot plays that the Texans run to get Luck outside the pocket where he'll often just have one rusher coming at him. Or go wildcat full time and move Andrew to linebacker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the hiring of Pep Hamilton to begin with, he appears hesitant in calling the right plays.  He looks lost, i don't know if you can attributed to adjusting to the NFL culture, but from what I see he doesn't cut it.  Mr Irsay, you need to cut your losses now and cut him, get a new OC and also look at your DC, he doesn't seem to cut it either....

Regarding Pep, i'ts not that he's lost, it's that his predictable play calling is catching up to him.  There's two reasons for that one is partly his fault, the other is not.  First, our players aren't doing him any favors by showing up on the field and looking absent.  But when we the fans can watch a game and know that it's a run more often than not, you can bet that the opposing team knows it too.  Part of that is his fault, but the biggest part of that is losing Reggie Wayne and Dwayne Allen.  I don't think people realize how much of a playbook literally gets cut out of existence because a guy gets injured.  It depends on who gets cut.  Some guys are more "important" than others.  It's one thing when it's a guy like Donald Thomas (though, his injury is just as damaging in terms of our blocking effectiveness).  Maybe a package or wto gets cut out of the playbook.  But when cornerstone guys like Dwayne Allen and Reggie Wayne get injured, you lose up to half of your playbook in some instances.  Naturally, your play calling gets even more predictable.

 

Other than our loss to San Diego, Manuski has been just fine.  He confuses me with his playcalling sometiems, but generally, our defense under his tenure has performed well all season.  When you draw up a plan that holds Peyton Manning to 140 yards through 3 quarters, and you only start getting beat in the 4th because you lost a couple of DBs (and we still stopped them when it mattered most - barely), you're doing good in my book.  Even Sunday's loss had more to do with lack of execution than it did bad scheme.  The defensive plan was fine.  The players were not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone else noticed that in the past couple games... Since Denver I believe... Luck has seemed very hesitant to run the ball.  I think if they come up with some designed runs that could help slow down the pass rush since you won't have the ends coming around as hard and they will play more contain. 

 

Granted, Luck would have to be smart about getting down or out of bounds but I think if we really want the best way to protect luck its to get him out of that joke of a pocket and let him make plays.

yes, it has been driving me nuts. It was very evident in the Texans game with lanes up the middle open when Luck had no one open. He could of ran but he didn't and the hesitation was obvious. I think he has been told not to run, they are worried about injury or something. I think he is at his best when allowed to run on his instincts when the play call doesn't develop. He, like Peyton, is the better play caller than his OC. The next man up should be able to step in the role of the injured on the exact same call. I'd like to see more screens, this would of helped considerably in the Texans game. Go to the dink and dunk, it works for Brady, won them many a game and kept him on his feet too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pep's West Coast system was supposed to protect Luck - a departure from Arian's system.  Yet, Luck is being hit as much as anyone in the league, is on pace to be sacked as much as last year and his completion % is dropping by the game.  Beating our heads against the wall with this power running game we do do not have the personnel to pull off is putting Luck in 2nd and long and 3rd and long consistently and it's forcing him to come from behind every game.  They are trying to protect Luck with a power runnning game, but it's having the opposite effect. 

 

More short passing on early downs.  More true WCO.  More passing to the backs.  Pass, get a lead, then run, not vice versa.  Run more out of passing sets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep him on the the bench....lol......I would move a couple guys around and see what works, the 49ers game line-up seem to work well......They got to do something, the definition of crazy is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.....I also realize that the Rams have one of the best front 4 in the NFL, so they had their work cut out for them.  McGlynn has a broken thumb now so that is not gonna help things and the Titans are not some team to take lightly, they got a good D too!  I also agree Pep needs less predictable plays, this teams passing game and running game is worse than last year....I know we had some injuries but I think a lot goes on Pep, Arians was unpredictable and defenses were more on the heels, Luck and T-Rich have a GIANT bullseye on them and defenses are swarming them........ The NFL is what have u done for me lately, lets win this week and move on.....By playoff time most will have forgotten about this game, hopefully.........GO COLTS!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever our starting lineup was against the 49ers. That's what it should be. If I recall, it was AC, Link, McGlynn, Thorton, and Cherilus. Accounting for currently active players, that's the best we've been all year. Why we do'nt do it anymore, I have no clue.

We don't do it because as long as Satele is healthy, he's starting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Puh-leeze stop running the ball on 1st and 2nd downs! Mix it up a little.

I still think Luck has started off slowly basically because he only throws once every 3 downs. Since most of our first three possesions seem to be 3 or 7 and out that essentially equates to about 5 or 6 throws for the first quarter. No way to get into any kind of a groove with that.

My numbers may be a bit off, but I believe the overall thhought is valid. Luck needs to throw a bit more often early to get into the game. This will also keep some of the LB's honest and help the OL run block when we're in less-obviouse running formations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop getting down three scores before you can blink would help.  Once you do that the other team knows you have to pass and just pins their ears back and comes.  The Colts have to figure out a way to get off to quicker starts. 

Great Point, plus bench David Reed, he constantly takes a kick off that is 7yds + in the end zone and runs it out to the 5-7yd line.  Luck and Company are handcuffed with terrible starting postion all year. But back to your point, if we don't give up the quick td's, they don't get to kick off and Reed can't mess things up......  Take a knee Reed, we'll gladly start fromn the 20 yd line!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why Pep thinks Brown and Richardson are interchangeable. They are both good in space, but have completely different running styles. Plus, Richardson is a much better blocker IMO. 

 

We play our RB's in series instead of downs. We tend to use the same RB for a series of downs instead of switching it up for the right scenario. Like 3rd and short, it's obvious Trent should be back there, not Brown. 

 

Regardless, our "power formation" should be flushed down the toilet for everything except goal line situations. 

 

Hopefully we'll get a pick out of the A.Q. Shipley trade <- which was a mistake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep him on the the bench....lol......I would move a couple guys around and see what works, the 49ers game line-up seem to work well......They got to do something, the definition of crazy is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.....I also realize that the Rams have one of the best front 4 in the NFL, so they had their work cut out for them.  McGlynn has a broken thumb now so that is not gonna help things and the Titans are not some team to take lightly, they got a good D too!  I also agree Pep needs less predictable plays, this teams passing game and running game is worse than last year....I know we had some injuries but I think a lot goes on Pep, Arians was unpredictable and defenses were more on the heels, Luck and T-Rich have a GIANT bullseye on them and defenses are swarming them........ The NFL is what have u done for me lately, lets win this week and move on.....By playoff time most will have forgotten about this game, hopefully.........GO COLTS!!!!

 

 Gotta laugh at Arians "unpredictable.

 He got Universal Hate for his predictable offense.

 I would est. that 75% of his Predictable Big play Offense was when Andrew ran for his life, usually away from Castonzo`s man (left), making time for someone to get deep with him Winning on a number of passes that were almost Hail Mary. Think Reggie, and some TY.

 

 Andrew has to be fixed first. He is slow to make up his mind, so he holds onto the ball with guys wide open right in front of him.

 The line can`t block Anyone for more than 2 seconds, so until he Learns to throw quicker and more accurately, or gets at Least 2 New Exellent lineman, he will stink it up way to much.

 His completion % 4 of the last 5 games last year was in the 40`s as teams better maintained their rush lanes, limiting his scrambles. making him a pocket QB.

 Make him throw from the pocket, keep him from running, and his very questionable accuracy sticks out like a sore thumb.

  Low turnovers and penalties keeps us in games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will see a difference this week in effort from this team of that we can be sure. I think last week and the explosion of "Get your s$&$ together or this is your last season" lectures will make a difference.

Satelle is gone or bench fodder next season. McGlynn is the safer of the two ATM - due to his play at center in the SF game.

Losing Thomas and Allen killed any chance we had of running the ball, and protecting Luck, this year. We are just a really bad team right now between the tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever our starting lineup was against the 49ers. That's what it should be. If I recall, it was AC, Link, McGlynn, Thorton, and Cherilus. Accounting for currently active players, that's the best we've been all year. Why we do'nt do it anymore, I have no clue.

thats not right

Flip the guards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch the games closely...Luck hangs onto the ball WAYYYYYY too long...kinda like Big Ben.

Gotta go to more short quick passes and screen plays...(BTW, right up Bey's alley).

BINGO!.....Well except right up Beys alley part, that was the reason for my comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand where you're coming from. It's not my intention to call out everyone who doesn't like how the AD stuff was handled. It just seems like typical draft season stuff to me, which everyone peddles in every year, but now that it's a highly drafted Colts pick, we're raising the standard.    Wasn't it 'unnamed sources' who claimed Caleb Williams didn't want to play for the Bears, or wanted ownership equity, etc.? Weren't 'unnamed sources' repeated when questions about Levis' personality started to float around? To me, some stuff is either factual, or it's not -- it's a fact that AD has diabetes. Other stuff is opinion/projection -- rude, abrasive, immature, uncoachable -- and should be treated as such.    The AD stuff was a mix of both. He has diabetes, the claim is that it has affected his ability to practice. Either that's true or it's not. I don't find it hard to believe, since AD definitely has diabetes, and that kind of stuff is typical of a young person with that condition. Someone else might view it differently, but we're never going to get anyone to corroborate that stuff on the record. One of the scouts said he has bad character reports from Georgia and Texas, which isn't going to be validated by anyone in the know, but it's hard to imagine someone just making that up. And that scout -- who I think was the harshest -- also said that when AD's blood sugar is right, he's great. So to me, he offered a reasonable explanation, and I don't think he came across as someone who dislikes AD or would have him as a character red flag. I think there was nuance that doesn't get fully considered when this stuff gets repeated.   Even maturity is a spectrum, not a black and white consideration. A person -- especially at a young age -- might be incredibly responsible in one area of their life, while still figuring things out in another area. One person might see something as immature, and another has no problem with it. So a source gave an opinion, and I think it should be treated like one person's opinion, and not a rubber-stamped designation that the monolithic scouting community has agreed upon.   And I don't think that Bob McGinn's collection of quotes from unnamed sources impacts how teams handle their draft board. I think McGinn is getting this stuff from people who work for teams; the teams already have the info. So I don't see the quotes as affecting AD's draft stock. It would have been balanced to offer some counter quotes, if those were available, but I don't think the quotes are as negative as they seem from the headlines.    My only reservations about Ballard's presser is that it seemed like an "outburst," but knowing that he kind of did the same thing last year, I think it was sincere, and he did it for the right reasons. Without that background, he might have come across as being petty and unprofessional, but context is important.   Short version: I don't think the reports are made up, I think there's probably some truth to them. And I assume the Colts did their homework, because that's how they operate. So if they're comfortable with AD Mitchell and have a plan to help him succeed, I have no concerns about it. 
    • Ability to cover one on one which is what happened... We haven't seen any cornerback play yet this year, so I'll reserve judgment until so. Otherwise we are predicting what is going to happen based on two rookies playing last season. I am more concerned about the depth, as I can't imagine they aren't as well. I was hopeful for Scott bringing serious competition and elevating the secondary. I hope Flowers does that at cornerback. Can always improve though, and there is still plenty of time. I hope Cross becomes our permanent guy and elevates. We have a lot of youth on the backend of this roster. It's obvious the plan is for them to grow. Hopefully we see it out of the gate and consistent growth throughout the season.  I don't see any way the pass rush is not more effective. I don't see the secondary getting worse, far from it. That will help to begin. We added the best pass rusher in the draft. We now have a deep d-line that is going to be rotated heavily, which will lead to fresh bodies bringing pressure, all the way up until the big gal sings her final tune each game.    I may be crazy, but I'm not concerned as much as other's are about the defense. I'm concerned about #5, 11, and 28's health, as I think they drive the offense, which is going to be the difference in the W/L column. If they can stay healthy, and our defense can grow throughout the year, I think we'll be positioned well. Our depth in the trenches is going to be a major advantage over the course of a long season. I believe in Shane Steichen, more than anyone.
    • I saw the media tried to make it out that the Celtics had an easy path to the finals. They went 64-18 during the season and 16-3 in the postseason. That is absolute domination from start to finish. Awesome to see Indiana native Brad Stevens get his first ring!!  I hope the Pacers close the gap and look forward to battling the Celtics the next few years. 
    • I do agree about the great OL and play caller.    The DL will come down whether Latu is a legit stud pass rusher right away. JT has been a great RB, but not the past two years. The receivers are solid, but seems like most teams have good-great WR groups anymore.    This feels like a "if everything goes right" kind of thing. But it's the offseason.  
    • Sure. It's possible that teams could have had boards that included many WRs as R1 grades, including Mitchell, and they just chose one over him. I worded that weirdly, but what I meant was that teams that didn't have him as a R1 player, it was for reasons beyond the rumors in this article.   But the "surefire first rounder until he was done dirty by rumors" doesn't track.    We know that AD ranked poorly in some advanced metrics (like yards per route run) that typically operate as requisites for successful NFL WRs (outliers are rare). We know what some team scouts had concerns from his Combine drills. And we know what happened at the draft.    And those comments that McGinn published weren't even his thoughts...they too were from NFL scouts.   Seems like the easiest and logical explanation is that teams had legit concerns (for multiple reasons) about AD and that, not rumors, is what pushed him down in the draft. But Destin seems to be spinning a couple of those concerns (that Ballard had addressed) to drive his narrative.
  • Members

    • Superman

      Superman 21,097

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,223

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,977

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 1,051

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DEColtsLover36

      DEColtsLover36 2,116

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,162

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 1,213

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Demo627

      Demo627 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...