Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Luck Ranked #1 QB under the age of 25


Pombi9

Recommended Posts

"Luck showed it all as a rookie. He was asked to do more than any young quarterback in the league, and he responded. It's not about the numbers. Luck racked up yardage because he threw the ball a ton, but his efficiency waned late in the year. This ranking is about Luck's traits that will allow him to be a dominant force in the NFL for the next decade."

Amazing article on NFL.com by Gregg Rosenthal, Perhaps this will appease many of the posters who claim that everyone should simply ignore him.

Full article here: 
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000208283/article/top-10-qbs-25-or-under-andrew-luck

The reason I love this article so much is every time he makes a point about Andrew he backs it up with a video. And they are all good points!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know being a Colt fan I can be bias in my opinion of Luck. That being said I think by saying Luck was the best rookie QB last season. There were some amazing rookie QBs and last season might go down as one of the greatest years of drafted QBs since 1983. Luck had a rag tag team put together by Grigson after taking over a 2-14 team. The head coach wasn't on the sidelines. He had a less than average defense. A less the average running game but that improved through the season. 37 new players on his team. 5 of his 7 receivers were rookies. He was being pounded on from the lack of a decent O-line. Took his team from a 2-14 team to a 11-5 playoff berth. Losing to the super bowl winners in the first round. Not one of the other rookie QBs faced that kind of rookie year. Not one other rookie QB put their team on their back and willed the wins the way Luck did. I think we as Colt fans couldn't have something so bad happen in 2011 with Manning missing a season and then being released. Then going through that painful season going 2-14 with Painter and the Collins. Thank god we have an owner who took the heat of releasing Manning and then the firings of the Polians. Fans and the press were ready to run Irsay out of town and or hang him from a tree. Hiring Grigson and Pagano and a whole new coaching staff took some guts. Grigson was down 38 million in dead cap space but still managed to put a winner on the field. Now steps in Andrew Luck. Time will tell the rest of the story! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was shocked to see that he topped the list, but happy someone saw all the obstacles he had to overcome as a young QB being asked to fill a huge void. The list is pretty good overall, but the top 5 should be appreciated regardless. It's going to be a lot of fun watching these guys grow in this league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck was definitely the best because he carried the Colts to 11-5 and had some amazing 4th quarter comebacks that reminded me of how Peyton would always win on the final drive.

 

Luck had his mistakes as any rookie does but I think this year will be a very good year for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The reason I love this article so much is every time he makes a point about Andrew he backs it up with a video. And they are all good points!

 

I agree!  fun read and good highlights.  I cant see the finish to the Lions game last year enough!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's take a look at the top five QBs under 25.

 

5. Russell Wilson

4. Cam Newton

3. Collin Kaepernick

2. Robert Griffin III

1. Andrew Luck

 

Of those five QBs, who is the traditional drop back passer?

Answer: Andrew Luck

 

Of those five QBs, who runs the zone read option?

Answer: Qbs #2 through 5.

 

I would argue that Luck was the #1 QB, and the zone read was the #2 QB. If you compare what Luck did this past year to QBs in any other year as traditional drop back passers-- prior to the influx of the zone read into the NFL-- you would think it's phenomenal. It's clear to me that the zone read has entered the NFL and has caused defenses to be hesitant, leading to much easer decisions and throws by the QB. This is not a knock against the other QBs, rather, my opinion that the other QBs were made to look much better by the simplicity of this offensive system. Their recent numbers are a clear outlier compared to the performance of all of the past QBs who have entered the NFL, mostly as traditional drop back passers.

 

Here's an article on teams that use the zone read, and how often. Carolina, Washington, Seattle, and San Francisco are at the top.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/95574/run-oriented-qbs-and-nfc-west-mythology

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's take a look at the top five QBs under 25.

 

5. Russell Wilson

4. Cam Newton

3. Collin Kaepernick

2. Robert Griffin III

1. Andrew Luck

 

Of those five QBs, who is the traditional drop back passer?

Answer: Andrew Luck

 

Of those five QBs, who runs the zone read option?

Answer: Qbs #2 through 5.

 

I would argue that Luck was the #1 QB, and the zone read was the #2 QB. If you compare what Luck did this past year to QBs in any other year as traditional drop back passers-- prior to the influx of the zone read into the NFL-- you would think it's phenomenal. It's clear to me that the zone read has entered the NFL and has caused defenses to be hesitant, leading to much easer decisions and throws by the QB. This is not a knock against the other QBs, rather, my opinion that the other QBs were made to look much better by the simplicity of this offensive system. Their recent numbers are a clear outlier compared to the performance of all of the past QBs who have entered the NFL, mostly as traditional drop back passers.

 

Here's an article on teams that use the zone read, and how often. Carolina, Washington, Seattle, and San Francisco are at the top.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/95574/run-oriented-qbs-and-nfc-west-mythology

 

This whole post seems to imply that these guys wouldn't be anything special without the read option.  I disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole post seems to imply that these guys wouldn't be anything special without the read option.  I disagree.

I stated that their recent numbers are a clear outlier compared to the performance of all of the past QBs who have entered the NFL, mostly as traditional drop back passers.  The four mentioned and especially RGIII, Wilson, and Kaepernick have passer ratings at or very near 100, which is absurd for a first year player.

 

I did not say that they would not be anything special. I did imply that they too would have faced the same type of adversity as other QBs who have entered the league previously. That's a fair assessment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude said he dropped off at the end of the year.  That wasn't really true, he had a long stretch of games with no INT's at the end of the year, and had a great game at home against the Texans.

 

He did have a bad playoff game against Baltimore though.  But he actually improved at the end of the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, this is not a surprise, he is ranked where he should be ranked, and I agree with the rest of the Rankings, except I may put Wilson ahead of Newton, Kaepernick.

We are definitly on the same page there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my opinion that the other QBs were made to look much better by the simplicity of this offensive system.

 

I would word that slightly different.  After all, the offenses are still the same as they've always been, verbiage, play-calls, etc.  There is the added element of the read option, but the system is still the same.  Its the play-action that makes the first read open and appear simplistic.  Slight difference  :)

 

Luck deserves everything he's getting.  And while RG3 mania may be drowning out a lot of the other things, anyone with half a brain knows Luck is right up there with the rest of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorite comment on that article was ...

 

Luck and Wilson had 8 opponents in common, against those teams Luck had 14 TDs and 12 INTs, Wilson had 20 TDs and 1 INT. All the other statistical categories are also that one-sided. But I guess none of that matters, stats apparently don't matter when it comes to Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorite comment on that article was ...

Luck and Wilson had 8 opponents in common, against those teams Luck had 14 TDs and 12 INTs, Wilson had 20 TDs and 1 INT. All the other statistical categories are also that one-sided. But I guess none of that matters, stats apparently don't matter when it comes to Luck.

Hey look its this guy again.

I thought these boards were too cheery and optimistic. Get to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Rosenthal is not quite as bad as you think?

Rosenthal is terrible.  The people who do the Around the League articles on NFL.com are brutal.  They write these short, choppy article that have no analysis, are written poorly, and aren't even news.  A lot of times, it's things like "Romo prefers McDonald's to Burger King".  Stuff that isn't relevant to anything and has nothing to do with football.  Get rid of those guys and bring in more people like Bucky Brooks who help fans learn about the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey look its this guy again.

I thought these boards were too cheery and optimistic. Get to work.

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

 

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

 

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique. 

 

Where should we start?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique.

Where should we start?

You're trying too hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique.

Where should we start?

Lol at least we know jokes aren't your specialty.

Relax. Just busting your chops. But I mean if you feel the need to keep seeing ghosts where there are none far be it from me to stop you lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

 

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

 

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique. 

 

Where should we start?

I am really bothered by your name.....  my :2c:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique.

Where should we start?

Dat username.

3/10. Troll harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

 

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

 

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique. 

 

Where should we start?

 

Mob mentality? Really?

 

How is your position so much more objective? You clearly hate Luck because we released Peyton to draft him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique.

Where should we start?

At least you've stopped pretending to be unbiased about Luck though. God was that an annoying facade lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique.

Where should we start?

"Mama, I still miss Peyton"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even though I haven't been here you are still so insecure about luck you have to post every morsel of proof that we made the right decision.

 

Which decision? I'll let you decide between March or April.

 

Get to work...LOL... mob mentality. I'll make quick work you and your little clique. 

 

Where should we start?

 

Luck has to be the nicest guy in pro football.  There's no need to hate him.  Change your name to PeytonHurtIrsayStartsOverMeMad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about under the age of 24? What about among QBs who lived in Europe? What about QBs with Father's who were former NFL players?

 

:facepalm:

This coming from a man who blogs? This is good information by a good writer one would hope for some respect on that level from a fellow "writer". I would imagine a blogger would be the first to appreciate it. (not to mention a blogger Colts fan)

Also it is the offseason. Articles like this will garner attention. If you don't like power ranking articles such as this you do not have to read them. Appears many other posters enjoyed the thread.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
  • Members

    • coltsfan1965

      coltsfan1965 82

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 1,224

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Creekside

      Creekside 765

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,757

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 1,335

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 427

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 16

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • sellmyhousefast

      sellmyhousefast 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 102

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...