Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Why all the Luck hate?


Trace Pyott

Recommended Posts

Today I was reading a article on Russell Wilson vs luck and it seemed 75% of the comments after the article (which basically said luck is way better than wilson) about 75% of the comments were negative on luck saying that he is way over rated and my absolutely favorite that luck has 0 rings while Wilson has one lol. Some even had the nerve to say that luck has had a good offensive line and if luck had the line Wilson has to work with luck would have retired already. I just don't understand all the anti luck sentiment around the nfl. Is it because of all the hype that was following him after college? I mean my god it can't be his personality. He isn't selfish and seems like as nice of a guy as any. I'm not trying to start a luck vs Wilson thread here I just want to better understand all the anti luck sentiment going on. Btw if you don't believe me look at comments following any Andrew luck article online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Today I was reading a article on Russell Wilson vs luck and it seemed 75% of the comments after the article (which basically said luck is way better than wilson) about 75% of the comments were negative on luck saying that he is way over rated and my absolutely favorite that luck has 0 rings while Wilson has one lol. Some even had the nerve to say that luck has had a good offensive line and if luck had the line Wilson has to work with luck would have retired already. I just don't understand all the anti luck sentiment around the nfl. Is it because of all the hype that was following him after college? I mean my god it can't be his personality. He isn't selfish and seems like as nice of a guy as any. I'm not trying to start a luck vs Wilson thread here I just want to better understand all the anti luck sentiment going on. Btw if you don't believe me look at comments following any Andrew luck article online.

I don't think there is any dislike of Luck. I haven't seen many people say negative things about him. Wilson has the advantage because he plays on a much better team but that guy is getting better all of the time. I think Luck does fine if he were playing for Seattle and I think Wilson would have been very good in Indy. These are two great young QBs and this argument will rage for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont hate wilson. I actually enjoy watching him because hes exciting. will I defend luck in the debate against wilson? of course, but why cant people just enjoy watching two up and coming young QBs

For some reason that is not allowed. You have to pick one side and tear down the other. Manning vs. Brady, Luck vs. RG3, Luck vs. Wilson... It's *ic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most common negative comment I see is "Luck is overrated". Then when you look at his numbers, those people look like fools. Its just an easy way/term for them to hate on Luck without giving reasons and then they switch to "well such and such has done this". Has anybody really determined who is better between Manning vs Brady? We all have our personal opinions but there's still no clear answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lemme guess....it was written by some "let me start an argument" columnist who never wore a jock strap, unless it was draped over his face in gym class by a member of his high school's football team.

 

You're misunderstanding.

 

The article was very pro-Luck.   Very supportive of Luck.

 

It was the comments from readers that get posted afterwards where most backed Wilson and not Luck.

 

It was Average Joe folks like you and me who made the comments,  not the columnist.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I was reading a article on Russell Wilson vs luck and it seemed 75% of the comments after the article (which basically said luck is way better than wilson) about 75% of the comments were negative on luck saying that he is way over rated and my absolutely favorite that luck has 0 rings while Wilson has one lol. Some even had the nerve to say that luck has had a good offensive line and if luck had the line Wilson has to work with luck would have retired already. I just don't understand all the anti luck sentiment around the nfl. Is it because of all the hype that was following him after college? I mean my god it can't be his personality. He isn't selfish and seems like as nice of a guy as any. I'm not trying to start a luck vs Wilson thread here I just want to better understand all the anti luck sentiment going on. Btw if you don't believe me look at comments following any Andrew luck article online.

 

You're really asking why fans get so crazy?      Because they're fans!    Which is short for fanatic!

 

And odds are there are many, many more Seattle fans writing on ESPN.com than there are Colts fans.....

 

Sometimes,  that's the way it goes.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've come to realize that the comments on espn forums and related sights are pretty much the opposite of what reality is. And there's no point in arguing with them, especially when, no matter how correct your point might be, you get strong armed by sheer volume.  Case in point, ESPN posted a study by some group (I forget who it was, but they are known world wide) that found that some 60% of people felt Goodell shouldn't lose his job over the Rice saga.  All the comments were basically how the study was scripted and sponsored by ESPN and NFL and there's bias (which is ironic given how those same sports outlets posted tons of anti-goodell crap too).  My favorite comment was by a guy with a fake facebook profile who said how, judging from the comments on the espn forums, the people who did the study had no clue what they were talking about - as if a bunch of fake facebook profiles was representative of the US population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Success breeds Contempt!

 

Get used to it, been that way for a while; re: Colt QB's & Colt teams...

 

Seems that people take praise for one player as indictment of another, which is not necessarily the truth.

I can appreciate what Wilson brings to his team, without it diminishing what Luck does for the Colts.

 

Given that, Wilson sure laid an egg yesterday.  lol lol lol :2c:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Success breeds Contempt!

Get used to it, been that way for a while; re: Colt QB's & Colt teams...

Seems that people take praise for one player as indictment of another, which is not necessarily the truth.

I can appreciate what Wilson brings to his team, without it diminishing what Luck does for the Colts.

Given that, Wilson sure laid an egg yesterday. lol lol lol :2c:[/qu

Luck has laid his eggs too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're misunderstanding.

 

The article was very pro-Luck.   Very supportive of Luck.

 

It was the comments from readers that get posted afterwards where most backed Wilson and not Luck.

 

It was Average Joe folks like you and me who made the comments,  not the columnist.....

That's fine.....I didn't see a link to the article noted by the OP.

 

And regardless they're all entitled to the opinions, writers and readers alike. :)

 

But I must admit....I do enjoy taking pot shots at NFL columnists and/or studio hosts who have no actual hands-on background in the game. In other words, I consider them little more than Average Joe's too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I was reading a article on Russell Wilson vs luck and it seemed 75% of the comments after the article (which basically said luck is way better than wilson) about 75% of the comments were negative on luck saying that he is way over rated and my absolutely favorite that luck has 0 rings while Wilson has one lol. Some even had the nerve to say that luck has had a good offensive line and if luck had the line Wilson has to work with luck would have retired already. I just don't understand all the anti luck sentiment around the nfl. Is it because of all the hype that was following him after college? I mean my god it can't be his personality. He isn't selfish and seems like as nice of a guy as any. I'm not trying to start a luck vs Wilson thread here I just want to better understand all the anti luck sentiment going on. Btw if you don't believe me look at comments following any Andrew luck article online.

People don't know anything, I was reading an article once and most people in the comments section were saying that Wilson, Newton and even RGiii were easily better than Luck. Probably 15-20 people. Was pretty laughable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I was reading a article on Russell Wilson vs luck and it seemed 75% of the comments after the article (which basically said luck is way better than wilson) about 75% of the comments were negative on luck saying that he is way over rated.......

 

 

Ok, I've read this like 4 times, and I'm still confused.  Didn't have my wheaties for breakfast today... Are you saying that 75% were negative and 75% were saying Luck is better? or are you saying that the article said Luck was better and 75% of the comments afterwards were negative? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at your username and it's the first thing I thought of..

- Horror fan.

Yeah I used this name based off CotC years ago for forums, online activities, gamer tags ect and it turns out that years later I was spelling it wrong, haha!

I ended up just sticking with it anyways. The original character had it spelled Malachi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I know what article you're talking about and I wouldn't worry about it. Seattle fans do that on every pro-Luck article, and the reverse has happened also. I honestly think Wilson is a great QB but it seems like the vitriol between the two fanbases is only increasing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read that article regarding Luck being the best young QB ever and it cracks me up how many commented on how Wilson is better than Luck because he has a ring. Really? I suppose Wilson is better than Dan Marino too? Or Eli better than Peyton or Brees since he has two rings? I just don't understand their logic. Why can't people just enjoy watching these two QB. Too premature to be judging who's better than who in this stage of their careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I used this name based off CotC years ago for forums, online activities, gamer tags ect and it turns out that years later I was spelling it wrong, haha!

I ended up just sticking with it anyways. The original character had it spelled Malachi.

Malachi sounds like something from DBZ.

Lol. I just turned on the tv and guess what's on the SyFy channel right now..

COTC.

Weird..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't a Seattle paper it was off of espn I believe. I'm not exactly sure though I have read a lot the last few days.

ESPN or Collinsworth....  Might as well be reading the Seattle paper....  no organization or person hates the Colts and their success than those two...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I was reading a article on Russell Wilson vs luck and it seemed 75% of the comments after the article (which basically said luck is way better than wilson) about 75% of the comments were negative on luck saying that he is way over rated and my absolutely favorite that luck has 0 rings while Wilson has one lol. Some even had the nerve to say that luck has had a good offensive line and if luck had the line Wilson has to work with luck would have retired already. I just don't understand all the anti luck sentiment around the nfl. Is it because of all the hype that was following him after college? I mean my god it can't be his personality. He isn't selfish and seems like as nice of a guy as any. I'm not trying to start a luck vs Wilson thread here I just want to better understand all the anti luck sentiment going on. Btw if you don't believe me look at comments following any Andrew luck article online.

 

It's very simple: Seattle fans have become total * trolls since winning the Super Bowl last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I was reading a article on Russell Wilson vs luck and it seemed 75% of the comments after the article (which basically said luck is way better than wilson) about 75% of the comments were negative on luck saying that he is way over rated and my absolutely favorite that luck has 0 rings while Wilson has one lol. Some even had the nerve to say that luck has had a good offensive line and if luck had the line Wilson has to work with luck would have retired already. I just don't understand all the anti luck sentiment around the nfl. Is it because of all the hype that was following him after college? I mean my god it can't be his personality. He isn't selfish and seems like as nice of a guy as any. I'm not trying to start a luck vs Wilson thread here I just want to better understand all the anti luck sentiment going on. Btw if you don't believe me look at comments following any Andrew luck article online.

 

If you notice, any time an article is pro-whatever, the majority of the comments are anti-whatever.  Haters tend to post more than supporters.  It's that way on almost any comments section.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you notice, any time an article is pro-whatever, the majority of the comments are anti-whatever.  Haters tend to post more than supporters.  It's that way on almost any comments section.

 

People who agree don't tend to have that burning anger that motivates you to post. The angry minority is often much louder than the agreeable majority. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slightly OT, I detest anyone who uses SB wins as a measure of an individual players merits. At best it shows he played on a good team, and even then we all know the best team in a season doesn't always win the SB. 

 

The build up to the last SB really brought it home for me... the consensus was if Peyton wins a ring then he's considered the best QB of all time, if he doesn't then he's labelled as the biggest choker of all time. Such an illogical thought process, especially on the back of the season he had. As a general rule of thumb... people who use rings as an argument do so because "their" guy's ability doesn't stand up by itself. 

 

Then again I am a Colts fan :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

could be anything but I think

(1) people love to be negative on the internet.  so if you say 'up' they'll say 'down'

(2) Luck and the colts had some narrative going 'the season was a fluke......they can't do it again"........sound bytes that stick in peoples heads so,when they get the chance they spit those bytes back out

(3) maybe their forum linked to that article and created a posting frenzBy

(4) they've never seen andrew play

(5) Random chance

 

ESPN knows what it's doing........one day they post.........Wilson is better than luck.  The next day they post.......luck is better than wilson

 

that way they give everyone a chance to disagree

 

Kind of like the people who post here just to get a rise out of other posters

 

Maybe the best answer is, if you write something about which QB is better than the other you are guaranteed comments.  I mean look at the manning v brady threads that still go on here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If being a GM were easy, anyone could do it. Reality in life is like a hard teacher, she gives the test first, then the lessons come later.
    • Championing the Art of Mediocrity   In the realm of NFL management where big splashes and bold moves often steal the spotlight, Chris Ballard of the Indianapolis Colts stands as a beacon of mediocrity—oops, I mean, moderation and stability. Ballard has mastered the art of steering clear of both spectacular success and abject failure, opting instead for a comfortable middle ground where his team consistently hovers around average.   While other GMs chase after flashy signings and high-profile trades, Ballard prefers a more subtle approach. His teams are like the middle child of the NFL—neither the star of the family nor the problem child. Take, for instance, his draft picks: solid, dependable players who rarely make headlines but also rarely make Pro Bowls. It's a strategy that ensures the Colts remain perennially in the hunt for the playoffs without ever seriously threatening to win it all.   Critics may scoff at Ballard's reluctance to swing for the fences, pointing to the lack of marquee names on his roster or the absence of Lombardi Trophies in his trophy case. Yet, Ballard remains unfazed, steadfast in his belief that consistently finishing just outside the top tier is a commendable achievement in itself.   In a league where greatness is often measured by Super Bowl rings and MVP titles, Ballard's Colts serve as a refreshing reminder that there's honor in being consistently okay. While other teams chase after glory, Ballard quietly celebrates the virtues of stability and predictability—a strategy that ensures his team remains perpetually good enough to keep fans interested without ever giving them false hope of a championship.   So here's to you, Chris Ballard, our unsung hero of NFL mediocrity. May our Colts continue to embody the spirit of contentment in a league that sometimes seems obsessed with extremes. Your dedication to the middle ground is a testament to the fact that in a world of winners and losers, there's beauty in just being average.   Our Chris Ballard, the enigmatic mastermind behind the Indianapolis Colts' draft selections, continues to astound with his unconventional approach to player evaluation. Known for his ability to turn perceived draft flops into valuable lessons in resilience, Ballard has elevated the art of optimism in the face of adversity.   Take, for instance, his selection of Quincy Wilson, a cornerback whose career trajectory seemed to follow the path less traveled—straight to the sidelines. Wilson's ability to excel in the role of 'spectator extraordinaire' brought a new dimension to the Colts' bench, proving that even inactivity can be a form of contribution.   Then there's TJ Green, whose ability to redefine the term 'safety' by providing the opposing offense with a false sense of security is a testament to Ballard's commitment to strategic innovation. Green's unpredictable presence on the field undoubtedly kept quarterbacks on their toes, in excitement.    And who could forget Ben Banogu, a defensive end whose knack for demonstrating the art of camouflage by seamlessly blending into the turf has left spectators marveling at his commitment to environmental integration. Banogu's ability to remain inconspicuous during critical moments showcases Ballard's emphasis on adaptability and the importance of being one with your surroundings.   Ballard's genius lies not just in his ability to select players, but in his skillful navigation of the delicate dance between expectation and reality. His selections may not always align with conventional wisdom, but they consistently challenge perceptions and redefine what it means to be a draft bust.   As Ballard continues to forge ahead, his unorthodox approach serves as a beacon of hope for aspiring NFL general managers everywhere, including those perusing fan forums. Because if there's one thing Chris Ballard has taught us, it's that in the unpredictable world of professional football, even the most unexpected outcomes can be reframed as victories in disguise.   AKB
    • He started 14 games at SS in 2019 and started 8 games in 2018 for the Jags.  I meant to post this earlier in the thread.   https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HarrRo02.htm        
    • The additions of say Taylor, Raimann, and looking back to Leonard could be called important, savy drafting.  Our Colts have been waiting for awhile for a special, difference making player to surprisingly fall to US. Right when we really really needed it to happen, it sure looks like we got two of them. 🙏 for good health.  AR a surprise at 4, not at all.  But      
    • You're not certain...but you know it's a fact.  How does that work? Haha
  • Members

    • dw49

      dw49 1,386

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AKB

      AKB 5,271

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bluephantom87

      bluephantom87 1,193

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • compuls1v3

      compuls1v3 1,999

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 341

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 1,211

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 85

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheRadiantAerynSun

      TheRadiantAerynSun 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...