Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

If Pep Hamilton leaves, do you want us to go with Zone Blocking and Kubiak as OC?


chad72

Recommended Posts

Let assume Pep Hamilton leaves for Vanderbilt. If they do give him $4 mil. a year, it would be very hard for him to stay.

 

Do we run a zone blocking scheme and get the most out of our investment in Trent Richardson and hire Gary Kubiak as OC?

 

Lets not forget, when Andre Johnson was at his best, there were a lot of shots taken down the field with Kubiak and the ZBS tends to get a lot out of lesser RBs too as Kubiak's time (along with Mike Shanahan) in Denver and time in Houston has shown us. Kubiak liked to use his TEs a lot too.

 

Edgerrin James was never a home run hitter in our ZBS/stretch play offense but he got solid yardage CONSISTENTLY in that scheme, so why not do the same with Trent?

 

I think it will work. Thoughts???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

To answer this question tho:

 

No. Because we'd probably lose him to a HC position in 2-3 years anyway.

 

Unless you get that older guy with no ambitions on being a HC, that's just the situation. If Pep suddenly "gets it" and our offense takes off, he'll get hired away eventually. If we can find the older guru like Tom Moore, great. But I doubt that happens any time soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you get that older guy with no ambitions on being a HC, that's just the situation. If Pep suddenly "gets it" and our offense takes off, he'll get hired away eventually. If we can find the older guru like Tom Moore, great. But I doubt that happens any time soon. 

That's pretty much what is going to happen to any offensive coordinator who works with Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell no to Kubiak and NO to zone blocking. If Richardson can't learn to run behind power man blocking then he needs to go. You don't change your scheme to fit one player. You change the player who don't fit the scheme.

change the scheme because it is easier to find olinemen that can do it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

change the scheme because it is easier to find olinemen that can do it

 

 

People seem to be under the impression that the power run game is Pep's idea. The power run game is Pagano and Grigson's vision. They have said that since day one of them getting here. They just need to put in the work to find the right guys to do it and I think they will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to be under the impression that the power run game is Pep's idea. The power run game is Pagano and Grigson's vision. They have said that since day one of them getting here. They just need to put in the work to find the right guys to do it and I think they will. 

You can have a power run game with a zone blocking scheme.....Seattle does it pretty well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to be under the impression that the power run game is Pep's idea. The power run game is Pagano and Grigson's vision. They have said that since day one of them getting here. They just need to put in the work to find the right guys to do it and I think they will. 

 

It may have been Grigson's and Pagano's idea....   but Pep did not oppose it.

 

That's what Stanford has run for years now and been very successful with it....    Pep likes that system whether it was his original idea or not...

 

Just for what it's worth....  that's all....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I am misunderstood for my "let pep go" entry. If we install zone blocking, we need to keep some elements of a gap and pull technique or whatever they "term it". I love it when we run the football. I love the use of a fullback.

I don't really know enough to say that we need to implement a zone blocking scheme, but why not both? You see lots of gap & pull plays from primarily zone blocking teams. It seems a lot of teams use zone blocking now, but you gotta be able to surprise LBs or they'll key on which guy is coming down hill.. Linebackers, and defenses are very smart at reading their keys, so if you don't keep them off balance, your run game is going to be in for a long day. They already know based on the alignment (under/over) and which technique his big boys up front are playing which lineman is likely to be the guy who rubs off the block and comes for him.

I don't watch a whole lot of pro football, but almost every team I see on TV is running primarily zone blocking.

So basically, sure, lets install zone blocking, but don't get away from the gap and pull run plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

imo stay with pep ,as for zone blocking, the coaches try to do what is best for the o-line we have, our guys may not be suited for it.i see on here it seems to be the forum rage now. lots of posters are talking about it. imo a line is only as good as its talent level no matter the system, but it may work for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Pep were to leave I wouldn't mind Kubiak.  I think he's done a good job as an OC in the past and frankly his QBs tended to over achieve more times than not when he was in Houston as a Head Coach.  I think he could do a lot with an extremely talented QB like Luck.  I still would rather Pep didn't leave though.  I am not a fan of the idea of Luck and the other young players on offense being in a third different offense in as many years.  It's hard for guys to get better and progress when they are always relearning the basics of the offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

imo stay with pep ,as for zone blocking, the coaches try to do what is best for the o-line we have, our guys may not be suited for it.i see on here it seems to be the forum rage now. lots of posters are talking about it. imo a line is only as good as its talent level no matter the system, but it may work for us.

I remember when he was coming into the league, they talked of Castonzo and said he could thrive in a ZBS. I may be mistaken but I believe the same may be true of Holmes. I'm not sure about the other linemen but if that is what turns Richardson into a star then lets do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Pep does leave, Kubiak is one of the options/directions the Colts can go with.

 

Personally, I'd like to see the Colts stay in a west coast offense, because I don't want to see Andrew play in 3 different systems in 3 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he leaves(I hope he dont), I'd like to take a look at Texas Tech Red Raiders O Coordinator Eric Morris.

I am not as well versed in college coordinators as you clearly are Gavin, but I do appreciate how you always come up with vacancy options that no one else thinks about. What I'm trying to say Gavin is that SW1 likes your ability to think outside the box & come up with an OC that isn't even on many peoples radar screens.  

 

Keep doing it man! Just to broaden my horizons if nothing else.  :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kubiak no. I read on here a while a go a comparison of Alabama RBs running a doing well in a ZBS as opposed to a man blocking scheme. If it will help Trent, I would be all for it. 

 

We all want Trent to do well, but the team is not going to be constructed with the sole purpose of squeezing production out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kubiak is a better offensive coordinator then Pep and he would improve the run game. I would rather have Kubiak then Pep but i still would try to get someone from the Saints or Bears coaching staff. 

 

The Saints have the best offensive sets and do a great job of getting the best out of their RB's and TE's. The only thing that's missing from that offense is someone that can take the top off the defense but we have that in T.Y. 

 

The Bears with Trestman are great at getting their WR's open with multiple sets and the best combination of routes. Marshall was already great but some of the routes they designed made it so much easier for him and is one of the reasons Jeffrey had a break out year. They also have one of if not the best offensive line coaches in the NFL. If Pep leaves the Bears QB coach would be a good option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My issue with the bolded when someone tries to use this to discredit a fan is that the worst GM isn't competing against fans, he's competing 31 other GMs who are better than him. Not saying Ballard is the worst GM, but he's probably middle-of-the-pack when you put everything together and if you are willing to give him a break on the QB situation. Even so, if you are viewing him as a GM in the 14-18 range, then he is a GM that will borderline make the playoffs every year. I believe fans should have the right to criticize a GM and compare him to other teams GMs.    That's what I do, I compare him to the other GMs, and if he does poorly against them in aspects such as the draft, FA, trades, and other things, then he deserves to be ridiculed. Right now, he isn't cutting it. IMO, he should have been fired at the end of last season. If he doesn't make the playoffs, then show him the door IMO. I mentioned Lynch above making two SBs in 2019 and 2023 when both Ballard and Lynch took over as GMs in 2017.    I'm tired of not winning the division. I'm tired of missing the playoffs. I'm tired of injuries to our stars. I'm tired of seeing the AFC hitting on franchise QBs and us getting nothing. Richardson needs to be the guy. He can't miss. Failure is not an option.
    • I’ve often said the worst GM knows more than the smartest fan.  In the end I wasn’t a fan of Grigson and I’m not a fan of Mike Tannenbaum.   But both are smarter than any fan.  Because they’re on the inside, they have a relationship with the owner.  Is the owner patient and realize that things may take a few years to build, or has the owner given the order to win or else?  Is the owner willing to spend on players and facilities or not?  These things make a big difference.    So I try to cut the GM as much slack as possible.  There are just too many moving parts.     And for what it’s worth…. I think Purdy is really, really good.   Is he the real deal?   Not sure, but only because he’s surrounded by premium talent at every skill position plus a very good line plus a very good play calling HC.  All that can make a big difference.  But I think we’ll all know more after the 24 season.  
    • Yeah, It's the same guy he was working with before the draft as far as I remember. Seems like they have somewhat long-timeish relationship, so he probably feels like he's getting benefits from working in that camp. Last year Minshew worked with the same coach in the off-season, no idea if he's still working with him now.  Latu on draft day receiving the call from the Colts. 
    • I just want to address the bolded. The 49ers have not won a SB under John Lynch. This is true. However, they made two SBs in 2019 and 2023. If Ballard did this, everyone on this forum would love him right now and would be singing his praises. Lynch helped give the 49ers two chances to win the SB as a GM. That's more than anyone besides the Chiefs and Pats can say in that time period. They were just unfortunate and didn't get the job done. 
    • Several people like to play GM in here, but they have no clue how hard it is to be a GM of a football team. They study the game more than anyone, only 32 people in the world have that job. 32! They have the pressure on them to build a winning team and all it takes is 1 or 2 blunders every season or not getting the QB right to not being a SB contender. If people would look at it like that, they would appreciate Ballard much more. As great as Lynch has been, he still hasn't won a SB, doesn't have the QB. Purdy is good but not great. Reason why I predicted the Chiefs would win the SB is because of the QB and Coach. Chiefs FO have nailed both, just like the Pats did with BB and Brady. We sort of did with Peyton and Dungy. It takes a lot of luck to build a winning team and get draft picks right too. I have seen great college players just bust and then you have a QB like Brock Purdy who was a nobody play like Joe Montana at times  .    I would venture to say all the armchair GM's never thought Ryan Leaf would be a bust and the jerkbutt he was. I can use 100 other examples, but I don't want to write a book here .
  • Members

    • colts89

      colts89 1,051

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,457

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,312

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...