Coltswarriors Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Pro Football Talk on twitter: Colts have franchise tagged P Pat McAffee, we're told. Ugh. Why couldn't a long term deal get done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcio James Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 coming soon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smonroe Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Pro Football Talk on twitter: Ugh. Why couldn't a long term deal get done?They still can. But now they don't have to worry about getting it done immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Guess everyone (mostly) was right in that Question of the Day Thread that asked who would be most likely to get Tagged Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Tagged Mathis last year to allow us more time to negotiate a deal, I imagine this was for similar reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hans Moleman Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Weird. I'm glad we're keeping Mac, but this shouldn't be a hard deal to hammer out long-term. We have one of the league's top players at a cheap (yet important) position and a ton of cap space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chad72 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 They are giving him a series of 60 and 70 yard FG kicks to make to prove he is worthy of a long term deal (j/k) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatMcAfeeFan Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Rich Eisen seems to have a new shirt in the making here. Rich Eisen @richeisenYes @PatMcAfeeShow has proven: punters can be franchise-tagged people too!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Horseman Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 They will get a deal done. This is a negotiating tactic by the Colts...gives them leverage against the McAfee camp. 'Tis a business after all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKColt13 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Good to hear.Great player and personality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Confuses me a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valpo2004 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 You wouldn't think this would be hard deal to do. 5 years 12.5 million. If he really wants us to show him the money, 5 years 15 million. But oh well, it doesn't cost us much and it's not like we where going to use the tag on anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
husker61 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 this is crazy. i don't believe there is that much difference in punters to justify this much money. i would never do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Good move. You just can't let Patty Mac walk. It would be ridiculously hard to find a punter that's as good and as charismatic as him. Hope both sides can reach a long term deal asap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dee Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 yes, and if any of you have listened to local radio lately.... Mac has been very "uptight" about getting it done and getting it done with INDY. He wanted to stay bad. Now he knows he will.They still can. But now they don't have to worry about getting it done immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dee Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 I'm glad this is done. Mac is a weapon on the field. Now on to FA..... and the OLine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schwamm Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 I'm probably wrong about this, but I thought I'd read that teams can't negotiate with their own FAs until something like 3/7, and that the deadline for tags was coming up before that. Leaving a UFA like McAfee un-tagged, then, would leave him open to negotiating with other teams, and choosing to go elsewhere, regardless of what the Colts offer... do I have that right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dee Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Mac was arguably Indy's second most valuable player after Luck this last season. Field position is something you don't worry about until you consistently never have it. Mac is worthy of top dollar, plus wasn't he the teams leading special teams tackler in 11? Not sure but... this is crazy. i don't believe there is that much difference in punters to justify this much money. i would never do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dee Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 http://www.bigcatcountry.com/2013/2/17/3995504/nfl-league-calendar-2013-combine-free-agency-franchise-tag Feb 18 it started.... I'm probably wrong about this, but I thought I'd read that teams can't negotiate with their own FAs until something like 3/7, and that the deadline for tags was coming up before that. Leaving a UFA like McAfee un-tagged, then, would leave him open to negotiating with other teams, and choosing to go elsewhere, regardless of what the Colts offer... do I have that right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schwamm Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 this is crazy. i don't believe there is that much difference in punters to justify this much money. i would never do this.Again, not expert on this, but isn't it only avg. of top 10 at his position? If punters are generally not worth much, this would only pay him as a roughly 5th highest paid... I think he's worth every penny of that, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valpo2004 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 this is crazy. i don't believe there is that much difference in punters to justify this much money. i would never do this. Doesn't even cost $3 million in cap space and they where probably going to pay him somewhere around that, maybe a little less anyways. This just lets us get a deal done on our own time without having to look over our back for other teams that might want to poach him. He's the top punter in free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltsfanmilyman Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 They are giving him a series of 60 and 70 yard FG kicks to make to prove he is worthy of a long term deal (j/k)The longer the field goal, the better the contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 I figured Patty Mac wasn't leaving Indianapolis. Can't let Mr. Boomstick leave. He was definitely key to a few of our wins this year imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
braveheartcolt Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 I figured Patty Mac wasn't leaving Indianapolis. Can't let Mr. Boomstick leave. He was definitely key to a few of our wins this year imoExpand on that one if you could. I'm struggling to see it...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throwing BBZ Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 I'm probably wrong about this, but I thought I'd read that teams can't negotiate with their own FAs until something like 3/7, and that the deadline for tags was coming up before that. Leaving a UFA like McAfee un-tagged, then, would leave him open to negotiating with other teams, and choosing to go elsewhere, regardless of what the Colts offer... do I have that right? Hmmm! The Giants just signed William Beatty, one of their FA tackles. We may yet replace Vinatari this year and certainly next year with a kicker who takes over the kickoff responsibilities, making McAfee less valuable.Pat does a nice job on punts, but I don`t see him being that much better than a Minimum wager.MUCH Rather spend the $2-2.5 M on a position player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shakedownstreet Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 pat 'the franchise' mcafee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valpo2004 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Hmmm! The Giants just signed William Beatty, one of their FA tackles. We may yet replace Vinatari this year and certainly next year with a kicker who takes over the kickoff responsibilities, making McAfee less valuable.Pat does a nice job on punts, but I don`t see him being that much better than a Minimum wager.MUCH Rather spend the $2-2.5 M on a position player. You don't see the value in having a good punter and would rather page minimum wage for a bad one instead? I don't really think we should replace Vinatari yet, his contract runs out at the end of next year. Let him play out the year, run out the contract and not have any dead money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susie Q Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Hmmm! The Giants just signed William Beatty, one of their FA tackles. We may yet replace Vinatari this year and certainly next year with a kicker who takes over the kickoff responsibilities, making McAfee less valuable.Pat does a nice job on punts, but I don`t see him being that much better than a Minimum wager.MUCH Rather spend the $2-2.5 M on a position player.All I can say is that I'm glad your not our GM by some of the post you have made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throwing BBZ Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 You don't see the value in having a good punter and would rather page minimum wage for a bad one instead? I don't really think we should replace Vinatari yet, his contract runs out at the end of next year. Let him play out the year, run out the contract and not have any dead money. You are right, I stand corrected. The ONLY punters available are all BAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 .....I think this is a fine move...and he should be OK with it.... Folks..Vinatieri's going to kick for us until he's 45...both are now signed.. .....we dont have kicking problems..... now the big issue..Did that cheerleader Megan's hair ever grow back..? That girl needed her hair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throwing BBZ Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 You don't see the value in having a good punter and would rather page minimum wage for a bad one instead? I don't really think we should replace Vinatari yet, his contract runs out at the end of next year. Let him play out the year, run out the contract and not have any dead money. $1.2 Million of dead money is Nothing for this year. Griggs won`t come even close to spending all our $$$. By replacing Vinatteri you would $AVE about $1.8 Million and very likely have a better kicker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltman51 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 .....I think this is a fine move...and he should be OK with it....Folks..Vinatieri's going to kick for us until he's 45...both are now signed.......we dont have kicking problems.....now the big issue..Did that cheerleader Megan's hair ever grow back..?That girl needed her hairMegan is super hot with or without the hair. Should be in to some degreee by now though. Colts Forum should contact her and do an update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Tell 'em CM51.... We need photos of Megan .....then and now... maybe ever photos of Chuck Pagano and Megan then and now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 this is crazy. i don't believe there is that much difference in punters to justify this much money. i would never do this. I highly doubt he plays the season on the tag. This helps us secure him long term, which is what the goal is. There's no one else on the team worthy of this tool this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21isSuperman Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Tagged Mathis last year to allow us more time to negotiate a deal, I imagine this was for similar reasons. I agree. Now, he won't leave Indy and we have more time to get a long term deal in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 To me the 'tag' just means 1.) That we DO want you.. 2.) That we DO consider you one of the top players that do what you do.. ..but 3.) You're asking for a lot...Let's get real... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dee Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Hmmm! The Giants just signed William Beatty, one of their FA tackles. We may yet replace Vinatari this year and certainly next year with a kicker who takes over the kickoff responsibilities, making McAfee less valuable.Pat does a nice job on punts, but I don`t see him being that much better than a Minimum wager.MUCH Rather spend the $2-2.5 M on a position player.You just do not watch Indy Colt football...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ÅÐØNϧ 1 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Glad to hear it hes 1 of the best a good swimmer & a damn funny dude . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTC Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 That's good! I heard franchising a punter/kicker is relatively cheap too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dee Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Glad U ain't he GM BRO.... One doesn't notice until one doesn't HAVE one.. ... Then all of a sudden.... ???this is crazy. i don't believe there is that much difference in punters to justify this much money. i would never do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now