Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts


Senior Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


schwamm last won the day on March 22 2014

schwamm had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,421 Pro Bowler

About schwamm

  • Rank


  • Gender
  • Interests
    Top 10 Music: The Fratellis, Louis XIV, Crooked Fingers, Iron and Wine, Leonard Cohen, The Kinks, Red Hot Chili Peppers, The Ditty Bops, Fruit Bats, The Beatles

    Top 10 Authors: China Mieville, Umberto Eco, Ayn Rand, Robert Pirsig, Aldous Huxley, Kurt Vonnegut, Tom Robbins, Paolo Bacigalupi, Roberto Bolano, Tony Vigorito

    Top 10 Movies: The Usual Suspects, The Game, Fight Club, Animal House, Monty Python's Holy Grail, Amelie, The Professional, American Beauty, Swingers, Clockwork Orange

    Top 10 Favorite Sports teams: Colts... Actually that's pretty much it.

Recent Profile Visitors

9,266 profile views
  1. FYI, not over Inman. He wasn’t on the team until after Cain was injured. Over Grant, maybe?
  2. 4. Picked up several D players who can be played at multiple positions. 5. Continued to emphasize leadership (several more college team captains), humility, character and intelligence.
  3. Dude, seriously... you need to take up a new instrument. Your horn only plays one note, and it is in desperate need of tuning.
  4. Once there was a whole crowd of Colts fans running around with their hair on fire because there was that one guy with a name they recognized... and the Colts didn’t draft him... AAAGGGHHH! The end. Good night.
  5. FWIW, most of us weren’t fans of Ballard passing on CBS in last year’s draft because of all the Q’s there, but it didn’t end up being the weakness many anticipated. They weren’t perfect, but their quality of play improved by leaps and bounds over 2017, and continued to improve all year. I wouldn’t be at all surprised that the WRs do something similar this coming year.
  6. I really appreciated when Polian was hired by the Colts, and I love that he was an integral part of bringing a culture of winning to Indy, but I grew frustrated by what I saw as a draft philosophy that relied too heavily on assigning values by position. Grigson, on the other hand seemed to over-inflate his own scouting abilities, and seemed to imagine he knew definitively which player was the BPA, at the cost of good value. I appreciated how he always seemed to look under every rock for FA talent, but he didn’t really get how to assemble a team. I’m probably one who overvalues Ballard for the moment, because from limited samples, and from the outside looking in, he appears to almost perfectly implement what I’ve long argued is the ideal draft strategy. I’m very excited by the way he approaches the draft and team building, and I can’t wait for tomorrow evening.
  7. So I think BPA, as most fans understand it, is a unicorn. Pretty in theory, but a myth. My best guess is that the Colts board is a complex, flowing river of information, where players may be loosely sorted, but “BPA” is an on-the-spot evaluation of players remaining vs. a deep understanding of relative values at that draft spot. I guess I consider needs as part of that value equation. Drafting expressly for needs is foolish, IMO, but drafting around filled needs is common sense. The Colts won’t draft a QB with early capital because they don’t have need, and therefore don’t have enough value assigned to the position.
  8. It’s been a while, but I’ve stated this in years past: I don’t think “positional value” means the same thing to NFL personnel as it means to fans. Stacking a draft board isn’t as simple as “we think this CB is better than that TE”. And I really don’t think positional bust rates weigh much in the equation. GMs need to approach drafts with total confidence in their information, and not fret about guarding against being wrong. I strongly believe truly successful teams draft for value (or should), not necessarily BPA. By that I mean they evaluate all available players, and consider the drop off in talent at each position round to round and pick to pick. For argument sake, let’s suppose the Colts are deciding between a similarly graded possible DL pick or WR pick at 34. And let’s say their info suggests the likely best DL available at their next pick represents a significant drop in talent, but there would be minimal fall off at WR... I argue that makes the DL pick the higher value choice, because you grab a similarly skilled WR later, and can therefor amass more talent overall. Im NOT necessarily arguing for DL over WR at the first pick, or any. But this WR class does seem pretty large and level, so I’d be surprised to see an early pick spent there, unless the Colts brass see a transcendent player that fits the team needs and culture perfectly.
  • Create New...