Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Week 18: Texans @ Colts, Sun, 1/8/23, 1:00 PM ET


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Don't worry, Matt Ryan will come in and spoil everything with a comeback meaningless win homer simpson dancing GIF

Ryan won't be playing today even if Sam thows 10 interceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OffensivelyPC said:

I’m not sure Ehlinger is the best QB on the roster. Looks like Matt Ryan out there

his legs work. he is the best QB on this roster.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OffensivelyPC said:

If he is better, it’s barely noticeable lol

oh its definitely noticeable. you're comparing him to 35-39 year old QBs, and he still is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dark_Indy said:

Remember, a win here would be catastrophic, and if the Texans win and Bears lose, the Texans lose the 1st overall pick. 

 

Always a bright side. 

That could be bad too.  I am sure the Bears would trade the 1st pick to a team that needs a QB.  If so that opens the door for two or three teams to be in front of the Colts that need a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

sAM is coming through big time. I couldn't be prouder. 

3 new QB's next season.

I think we need to keep one of them just in case we need another tank job for Caleb Williams/Drake Maye. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It really doesn't matter to Houston if the Bears get the 1st pick because they aren't drafting a QB.

No they aren’t but it opens the posibility of someone jumping the Texans. They can’t be happy about that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Back to the original post about this, seems like they got something backwards with their Johnson/Hill numbers. Johnson has decimals, Hill has whole numbers. But chart shows Hill will decimals and Johnson with whole numbers.    Johnson - 19 Hill - 6.03     Jimmy Johnson has early 6th round value   + 16.4pts - pick 183-184 range   https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp?RequestTeam=Ind   Rich Hill has late 5th round value #35 - 170pts   #44 - 135pts #110 - 30pts #158 - 10pts #211 - 3pts   +8pts - pick 167-172   https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart-Rich-Hill.asp?RequestTeam=Ind   Only thing I don't like about Rich Hill's is the value he places on those top 3 picks, where I think Jimmy Johnson's has the advantage in my eyes.   Although I like the value gained on Rich Hill's better. Lol.
    • In essense we got Julius Brents, Adetomiwa Adebawore, Daniel Scott and Titus Leo for #35... I really believe that you have to have a great reason not to trade back when that's the value you are getting. To a huge degree the draft is a crapshoot and the difference in expected value between 35 and 44 is probably negligible. And for the price you get 3 more shots at players, some of them with really high upside too.    Of course, there might be some exceptions to the rule(QBs as always break that rule... maybe some exceptional talent at another high value position), but in general if you can get that type of a deal, you should almost always do the trade back. And I think this is one area where Ballard has actually been great as a GM. 
    • I will say, me personally though, I find more value than an early 6th(compilation of trades).   We got 4 players for the 1 pick(#35), once the dust settled, and got the guy we would of probably taken at #35 in the first place.   So adding (3) guys for "free" essentially, is a big win.   So I would say I lean a little more towards value charts than trade charts for that reason. Maybe somewhere in the middle, late 3rd early 4th "value", and that's mainly because I think we would of took Brents at #35 either way.   Seems teams are closer to the trade chart when making deals, but claim the value charts after deal, if it shows a big win.    
    • I see it now. When I first read it, thought you were saying 1st trade down got 6th round value and 2nd trade got 2nd round value.     Then was blinded by just waking up and already looking for a flaw.   Clearly teams aren't using the value charts as you stated in post above.     Thanks for helping me read out the chart. Should just read the picks we kept and sent out. No need to have them cancel each other out.     EDIT: ahh who am I to tell the guy how to do his charts(have to account for the picks). It was my reading comprehension that caused the problem.
    • It is incoming value from one trade... and then it's outgoing value in the next trade. You are not claiming the value of those picks... they cancel out when you put them in the outgoing picks.    35 for 38+141  then 38 for 44+ 110 then 141 for 158 + 211 ...   when you draw the line you get 35 for 44+110+158+211   Using Johnson: 35(550) for 44(460) + 110(74) + 158(28) + 211(7)... or 550 points for 569 points. Net gain of 19 points, which by Johnson's chart is equivalent of late 5th, early 6th round pick...    Using OTC: 35(1128) for 44(1007) + 110(525) + 158(334) + 211(182) or 1128 points for 2048 points. Net gain of 920 points which is by OTC chart is equivalent to the 60th pick... or thereabout(i.e late second... )
  • Members

    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 50

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nickster

      Nickster 3,860

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 1,016

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,244

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mitch Connors

      Mitch Connors 634

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 7,264

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 5,331

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 12,505

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 13,830

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 2,494

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...