Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts are signing Justin Houston [Merge]


zibby43

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Finally...a move to win now. You don't give a 30 year-old Houston $24M if you don't plan on competing during the upcoming two-year window.

 

Colts need DEs...and even at age 30...Houston probably still has better athleticism than anyone but Turay and can get after it.

 

Wonder if this opens up a possibility for a Suh signing as well.

 

He's 30, not 50.  Of course he still has his athleticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

I think it's more like Houston, Sheard, Turay and Ward right now. I think those other guys play inside more...outside of special situations.

 

Ward isn't playing outside. He played exclusively inside in the 6 games he played last year. Swap Lewis with Ward. With Hunt, Autry, and Ward, Lewis will be playing behind Sheard in my opinion.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shastamasta said:

 

Interesting...I think I might have bit the bullet and did that Ford trade (with the #59 pick)...if I believed he could be a DE in this defense.

 

But Houston should be a decent consolation...especially if they squeeze a couple of years out of him. But you never know with aging pass rushers.

If he was like 32 or 33 I would be concerned. But at 30 he should be able to give us two very solid years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shastamasta said:

 

Interesting...I think I might have bit the bullet and did that Ford trade (with the #59 pick)...if I believed he could be a DE in this defense.

 

But Houston should be a decent consolation...especially if they squeeze a couple of years out of him. But you never know with aging pass rushers.

I don't like Ford.  I'm glad Ballard passed.  We now hear we just missed out on Preston Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stitches said:

 

 

Houston for 2 years at $12M vs Smith for 4 years at $12.5M is a win for me.

 

I wouldn't want to have to pay out all 4 years to Smith and if we didn't and we got out of the deal after a couple years, then I would bank on Houston over the next two years to out-perform Smith in those 2 years.

 

Solid move.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DougDew said:

 

I'd like to know what's up with the KC front office.  A great pass rush but they let both Houston and Dee Ford leave.  They must have somebody on the roster to take one of those spots or they are telegraphing their draft plans pretty badly.

 

They are saving cap space for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BleedBlu8792 said:

 

Ward isn't playing outside. He played exclusively inside in the 6 games he played last year. Swap Lewis with Ward. With Hunt, Autry, and Ward, Lewis will be playing behind Sheard in my opinion.

 

Ward is also not on the team right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TomDiggs said:

 

Houston for 2 years at $12M vs Smith for 4 years at $12.5M is a win for me.

 

I wouldn't want to have to pay out all 4 years to Smith and if we didn't and we got out of the deal after a couple years, then I would bank on Houston over the next two years to out-perform Smith in those 2 years.

 

Solid move.

Pretty much all contract in the NFL have outs after 1-2-3 years... IMO if you are signing Smith who is young and getting better you want him tied for more years rather than less. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BleedBlu8792 said:

 

Ward isn't playing outside. He played exclusively inside in the 6 games he played last year. Swap Lewis with Ward. With Hunt, Autry, and Ward, Lewis will be playing behind Sheard in my opinion.

 

You are correct...had him confused with Muhammad. 

 

I think Lewis is ticketed for DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TomDiggs said:

 

Houston for 2 years at $12M vs Smith for 4 years at $12.5M is a win for me.

 

I wouldn't want to have to pay out all 4 years to Smith and if we didn't and we got out of the deal after a couple years, then I would bank on Houston over the next two years to out-perform Smith in those 2 years.

 

Solid move.

I agree. Houston can still ball. 30 isn't young but not old either. If he was like 32 or 33 I wouldn't like the move but he still has at least 2 good years left in him. We needed a Pass Rusher badly that could make an impact, now we have it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CR91 said:

That might put it an end to Ridgeway. Most likely the starting line will be Sheard Autry Pick/Hunt Houston and then you have Lewis Turay and Ward/Mohammad

Add in a first rd defensive tackle and I will sit in the corner and

laugh uncontrollably like an asylum inmate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I've liked most of Ballard's signings in the past, but this one seems a bit pricey. 

 

I don't know.  I haven't watched KC that much to tell how much Houston has left in the tank.  At that price, I hope we won't be thinking Trent Cole by mid season.

 

The money part imo is insignificant, especially considering all the money we have. I don't think 12per is that high nowadays anyway?

 

I like the signing. :D

Even if he doesn't workout were TRYING to upgrade with a playmaker.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CR91 said:

That might put it an end to Ridgeway. Most likely the starting line will be Sheard Autry Pick/Hunt Houston and then you have Lewis Turay and Ward/Mohammad

I like the rotational approach to pass rushers/DLs, keeps them fresh, but I'd like to get one guy who has superior talent/youth than the list presented.  Yes, I hope the draft pick used is high.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stitches said:

Pretty much all contract in the NFL have outs after 1-2-3 years... IMO if you are signing Smith who is young and getting better you want him tied for more years rather than less. 

 

Agreed.

 

All I am saying is the value of going younger with Smith is locking him up longer. And if I have to pay him $52M to get the value benefit over Hosuton then I would rather not.

 

As is, Smith's contract is essentially 2 years and $27.5M before they can get out of it.

 

So Houston comes cheaper and with a better track record and even a better season last year despite his age.

 

Definitely all for that.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MacDee1975 said:

 

No, he isn't.

 

He signed a 2 year deal last year with the Colts last year. 

 

Just now, shastamasta said:

 

You are correct...had him confused with Muhammad. 

 

I think Lewis is ticketed for DT.

 

I like Muhammad too...

 

I don't see it with Lewis. I think they halt that experiment this year and get his weight back down to what he played at at OSU (260'ish) and let him take over the Sheard's strong side spot next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I agree. Houston can still ball. 30 isn't young but not old either. If he was like 32 or 33 I wouldn't like the move but he still has at least 2 good years left in him. We needed a Pass Rusher badly that could make an impact, now we have it.

To add to this, he had 9 Sacks last yr in just 12 games. KC has now lost their 2 best pass rushers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

The money part imo is insignificant, especially considering all the money we have. I don't think 12per is that high nowadays anyway?

 

I like the signing. :D

Even if he doesn't workout were TRYING to upgrade with a playmaker.

Yeah, I was looking at the 24 and wondering how much is guaranteed.  With him constantly dinged (even going back to our 38-10 comeback win after he went out of the game), that price has a certain amount of missed plays built into it, that was my thinking.  I assume the first year is guaranteed but its team friendly after that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may end up being right on this,    I am in a minority here that thinks that we have young CBs that should keep improving I would go with what we have at CB   Because we are young at CB, thats why we need the vet at FS to back them up.     To me FS is by far the biggest hole on this team   To me, its like beginning a cross the country drive, and you have 3 good tires, and one that his leaking air Do you fix the tire? or do you HOPE that the leaky tire can somehow make it for the long drive.   IMHO  We have the $$$$ and we have the need...........  Just fix the dang tire before we start the trip     But.....  what do I know....... (Not much... ask my wife)                   
    • That has to be one of the most solid DE rotations in the league. No star power(yet) but solid top to bottom. I believe you have mentioned Charlie Partridge multiple times as an addition. I hope he elevates these DE’s 10-20% along with Buckner, Grover and Davis. We have the makings of a dominant DL that excels in all phases including endurance from rotating. I’m really excited to see this line come into their own as the season develops. 
    • Hello, I'm back in.   By the way and after the small discussion we had last year, I would like to revisit the last playoff spot rule.   The initial idea of this rule was to remove randomness from the game and the head 2 head system. You can have a great team scoring a lot of points but facing the highest scorer almost every week and have a bad record.   A modification was made to the rules making it more difficult, even I voted Y to it, something I think was a mistake.   In my opinion the last playoff spot should be for the team with the most points scored between seeds 6th - 12th with no other requeriments or added condition.  
    • Ya darn right bad things can happen. In the late 70's, my brothers BB team was 1 game away from a trip to the State Tournament when our All-State center was goofing around after practice and went up for a dunk and came down and tore his ankle all to hell. End of tournament run.
    • Cubs just won their 5th in row, the Professor looked great for a change. Big win over the Cards. I am not sure what has lit a fire with this team but I hope we can keep it going. It's jumbled up again between the Cubs, Reds, Pirates. Cubs and Reds are at 46-49, Pirates 46-48.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...