Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Broncos Game Day Thread


LucasOilStadium

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 928
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just now, James Harden said:

Well this is when 2 years ago we should have taken a defensive stud in the 1st round. Not a WR. See what Miller did to us???? We could have a a superstar on D-Line but nope...

We took a defensive stud in the third, he tore his ACL after a DROY campaign got cut short. Dorsett and Anderson over Malcolm Brown any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

And there's the game.  Kinda fitting that the game ends with Reitz getting abused

 

Precisely.  He's awful and has never been anything but awful.  No way he should be starting in the NFL.

 

This is why I won't hold back against Grigson.  We've known Joe Reitz was bad for several years now.  And we've done nothing to rectify the situation.

 

He gets whipped all the time -- not just by Von Miller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bababooey said:

We took a defensive stud in the third, he tore his ACL after a DROY campaign got cut short. Dorsett and Anderson over Malcolm Brown any day.

I rather would taken a defensive player in the 1st and still get Anderson in the 3rd. 2 Defensive superstars would have help us today 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

That falls on the coaches.  Reitz has been getting manhandled all game.  The coaches should have seen that and given him help

 

3 minutes ago, dgambill said:

A smarter OC would not leave Reitz on an island over there. You chip him or put a TE or wr in close to keep Miller from coming from so far out wide.

 

Now this is what you call a valid criticism.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dgambill said:

Luck had a chance to win this. Can't ask for more. I think a healthy defense we could have won this game. I think we are the better team.

 

This reminds me a lot of the end of the Vikes game at Denver last year. Miller stripped Teddy and the game was over. We lost 23-20.

 

Considering all the injuries, the Colts hung in there. You want to win  of course but the Colts played respectfully. They don't have to hang their heads.

 

The officiating has been awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Draft TY Hilton’s son so he can carry his father legacy of owning the Texans. 😂 
    • Sports journalism has been crap for a long time.   It's more important to be first than accurate.   I've seen articles using Twitter accounts as sources.    What happened to the old days.    Source the intel,  interview those involved .  Vet the Intel, write the story.    With the internet,  anyone with a website is a "journalist"  it's nonsense. Joseph Pulitzer is rolling in his grave 
    • I'm not a journalist either. I agree that it's best practice to offer the subject a chance to respond. My real point is that I don't think a lack of response from the subject automatically invalidates the information.   In this specific situation, I think the information was sensationalized. The initial report shared some nuanced opinions from unnamed sources, which I think is pretty common. The way the story took off from there is probably due to aggregation, for which I don't hold the initial reporter responsible.    And what it seems like here is we're pushing back against a "negative" report regarding a player the Colts drafted, rather than taking the information on its merits. 
    • There was nothing stopping Mitchell (or his agent) from contacting McGinn to say can I give you an interview so you can put out my side of the story.     Look….  Sports stories move quickly, if you had to get a response from every source in every story, stories would never get done.  Especially in a world where so much info is now getting tweeted out.  And if Mitchell or his agent didn’t trust McGinn, odds are it wouldn’t be hard to find a reporter who would be happy to interview Mitchell.  The kid has a compelling story.    So in many cases if a reporter can’t get to a player after a game, or needs more info, you can grab him before the next game and do a follow up where the player is now the full story.  I’m talking here about baseball,  basketball and hockey where there are multiple games in a week.  A little different in football, but you’d go to the team facility and get a follow up 1-on-1 for a good next day story.    Once the McGinn story was out there was time for Mitchell to do as much damage control as he thought necessary.     I don’t want to go on and on.  Hope I came close to answering.  If not, or you have more questions, hit me up, because I’m always here.   
    • I don't necessarily agree that if teams chose other WRs it means they didn't view him as a first round player. It just means they liked a different player more.    As for the rest, I think it's obvious that teams had concerns about AD Mitchell. I also think it's obvious the Colts weren't dying to draft him, otherwise they wouldn't have traded back. So the whole 'he was a surefire first rounder until unnamed sources went after him' thing doesn't quite connect for me.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...