Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Does Grigson not see defense as a need?


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

Grigson made it clear that drafting for need is a terrible evaluator of talent, Talent trumps need

ok sure but surely that has to be a sway to a bit of both.

 

are you saying to me if Bryce Petty is the highest player on grigs board in round 2 we take him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong here, but I believe during his interview he basically said in a off way that he didn't see really any glaring holes on our roster. He basically said certain positions could be strengthened, but he was going with BPA with the first 4 rounds. After that is the best potential starter even if they have character concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok sure but surely that has to be a sway to a bit of both.

 

are you saying to me if Bryce Petty is the highest player on grigs board in round 2 we take him? 

I don't consider Petty worth higher then a 4th round pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong here, but I believe during his interview he basically said in a off way that he didn't see really any glaring holes on our roster. He basically said certain positions could be strengthened, but he was going with BPA with the first 4 rounds. After that is the best potential starter even if they have character concerns.

Do you have the exact quote from that?  I'd love to see what he really said.  Because if he really said there aren't any holes on our roster....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok sure but surely that has to be a sway to a bit of both.

 

are you saying to me if Bryce Petty is the highest player on grigs board in round 2 we take him? 

That is completely different than what we just did. Dorsett has every opportunity to play this season. Petty would have no chance as we have absolutely no need for a extra QB that high. At first look WR seems very stacked, but if you really look at it T.Y and AJ are really the only two proven players. Moncrief has shown potential, but still looked very raw last season, and Carter hasn't played a down of NFL regular season football. We all knew that Whalen just wasn't going to cut it. I think Dorsett was the BPA on our front office's board and it also serves as a insurance pick and gives us a legitimate returner as well so that is why we picked him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

apparently that's been getting us to the playoffs and AFC championship games so... I guess so.

Yeah, that had nothing to do with grigson getting the jobs when a certain someone was the obvious number one pick. Stop using these lazy arguments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have the exact quote from that?  I'd love to see what he really said.  Because if he really said there aren't any holes on our roster....

No I don't have an exact quote yet, but I will re-watch. That is just what I came away with after watching the interview the first time. I recommend watching it again as it might shed more light on what his real view of our roster really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grigson made it clear that drafting for need is a terrible evaluator of talent, Talent trumps need

 

 

People really just need to get this through their thick skulls. That's how he was able to have the tremendous foresight to draft Werner over Xavier Rhodes, like so many of us foolish fans wanted

 

#TalentTrumpsNeed

#InsertGrigsonismHere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game.  One.  And we got stomped in it.

 

Grigson was looking for a "blue trait"....what is a blue trait? 

 

You color code traits on the draft cards of all players on your board.

 

Blue is for "rare" or special traits.     Red,  obviously would be for very bad traits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You color code traits on the draft cards of all players on your board.

 

Blue is for "rare" or special traits.     Red,  obviously would be for very bad traits.

Is that what he means, or is he trying to say he wants someone who fits the Colts' culture (ie. a horseshoe guy, someone who bleeds blue, etc.)?  I find it hard to believe they would colour code all the traits instead of just giving them rankings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that what he means, or is he trying to say he wants someone who fits the Colts' culture (ie. a horseshoe guy, someone who bleeds blue, etc.)?  I find it hard to believe they would colour code all the traits instead of just giving them rankings.

 

I suppose you could be right...   but I thought Grigson made a reference to the coding system in his pre-draft presser...

 

That's my recollection, at least.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose you could be right...   but I thought Grigson made a reference to the coding system in his pre-draft presser...

 

That's my recollection, at least.....

I'm not sure.  I've heard the terms blue chip and red chip used in reference to players, but never in reference to specific traits.  I would think it would make more sense to give a guy an actual number rank for his speed, hands, agility, etc. instead of colours.  With number ranks, you can compare players easier.  But I'm not sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be so amazing when Dorsett blows the walls off teams with some plays during the year and everyone praises Grigson. So much * talking going on right now it's ridiculous.

What happens when Malcolm Brown gets a sack and a few TFLs against the Colts next year?  Or when Blount runs for another 200 yards on us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens when Malcolm Brown gets a sack and a few TFLs against the Colts next year?  Or when Blount runs for another 200 yards on us?

So the Colts should build their entire draft mindset around the Patriots? I'd understand the extreme hatred for not selecting a run stopper if the Colts were ran on week after week. But it was 1 team. And there's 8 more picks. Everyone freaking out needs to cool their jets.

I wanted Malcom Brown really bad but I'm not going to throw a hissy fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure.  I've heard the terms blue chip and red chip used in reference to players, but never in reference to specific traits.  I would think it would make more sense to give a guy an actual number rank for his speed, hands, agility, etc. instead of colours.  With number ranks, you can compare players easier.  But I'm not sure

 

 

I think they get one number as an overall grade.

 

But I think we use a color code for certain traits.   Especially for the very positive, and the very negative.

 

You want to be reminded when you're under pressure and the bullets are flying in the war room and things are crazy.

 

I don't think it's uncommon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens when Malcolm Brown gets a sack and a few TFLs against the Colts next year?  Or when Blount runs for another 200 yards on us?

 

 

Grigson will talk about how he finally has learned his lesson that you need to build the trenches, and promptly bring in a guy who was cut from the CFL. He'll talk about leaving no stone unturned and finding diamond in the rough prospects. Every fan on here will worship the ground he walks upon because this one time he brought in a slightly above average linebacker from the CFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have the exact quote from that?  I'd love to see what he really said.  Because if he really said there aren't any holes on our roster....

Grigson- "With the BPA mentality I think it is the healthiest mentality to have. Um, especially when I feel for the most part the roster looks pretty balanced. We have some areas of concern, but there is always those no matter what stage of the game you are in." To look at the actual interview it is the very first question he answers in the pre-draft interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok sure but surely that has to be a sway to a bit of both.

 

are you saying to me if Bryce Petty is the highest player on grigs board in round 2 we take him? 

 

It this really that complicated to you, or are you being facetious?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be so amazing when Dorsett blows the walls off teams with some plays during the year and everyone praises Grigson. So much * talking going on right now it's ridiculous.

I think Dorsett will be a very good player for the Colts. I just dont wanna see Indy continue to have the same problems over and over every year on defense when they play quality teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grigson will talk about how he finally has learned his lesson that you need to build the trenches, and promptly bring in a guy who was cut from the CFL. He'll talk about leaving no stone unturned and finding diamond in the rough prospects. Every fan on here will worship the ground he walks upon because this one time he brought in a slightly above average linebacker from the CFL.

 

Wow.....  that's some serious Grigson hate....

 

If I didn't know better,  I'd almost guess you were Dustin posting under another person's handle....  but you just share the same disdain.....

 

Oh well.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Dorsett will be a very good player for the Colts. I just dont wanna see Indy continue to have the same problems over and over every year on defense when they play quality teams.

 

Extremely well put.  I will hope for the best with him and be happy if he does well but I don't think he was worth a first round, especially since we have other pressing needs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok sure but surely that has to be a sway to a bit of both.

 

are you saying to me if Bryce Petty is the highest player on grigs board in round 2 we take him? 

 

I am forever amazed at the # of people who don't get it.

 

1) No it does not mean they take Petty.

 

2) Teams have a grading system and allow for a small sample of players whose grades make them draftable at a given spot.

 

3) Teams rate every draftable player but also have a smaller list of players they like that may be about 100-125 players.  Players like Petty who is very clearly not a need for them would not even be on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that why we didn't take a defender at 29?

Help me out I'm confused.

Dont be surprised if we trade up now and take a Collins or Eddie Goldman type player. Dorsett is a homerun threat and in a league where passing is king you cant have enough of those.

 

Personally I like the kid from UCLA Owamagbe Odighizuwa. Versatile DE/OLB

 

Carl Davis DE Iowa

 

Eric Kendricks LB UCLA

 

Michael Bennett DT OSU

 

I'd put $20 Grigson moves up in the 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Id say avoid drafting or taking players from your team that you’re a fan of. I’m an avid fantasy guy and also a sports bettor. I literally will avoid taking any Colts players In fantasy and also during the week in fantasy football I avoid taking the props of the players I’m playing against. I never want to wish bad on anyone so for that very reason I avoid those guys. For me personally it has helped tremendously, I can still enjoy the game without bias. 
    • I will just say this about the comparisons between Luck and AR.  And even Manning.   First, as far as overall talent?  I think AR has more talent than Andrew.  And I say that as the biggest Luck fan that there is.  I loved that guy.  But he always reminded me of a Manning wannabe.  Someone who had more pure talent.  Who was very smart.  But I never ever got the feeling that he wanted to win and put in the hours that Manning did.  And I think that was proven when he retired so early.  Manning was like an AI robot who studied 23 hours a day.  Just a huge will to win.    But what Luck had was pain tolerance, drive and overall ability due to his teaching since he was a kid...and his will to do what is right for the team.    IMO that was 100% MORE than AR's is right now.  Not even close.    If only you could clone a combo between Manning and his smarts, Luck and his pain tolerance, and AR and his pure athletic ability.    I am sorry but unless AR is the unluckiest person in the history of the NFL, NO ONE gets hurt this much.  He is a wreck.  Heck I remember in his first pre season game last year he ran out of bounds and started to limp.  Literally his very first hit ever.  Right then I said to myself "uh oh".  And then he has not finished what......4 of his all time starts?  Out of 8?  I mean....that is not normal QB behavior.  He seems to get hurt on almost every hit he takes.    Make that make sense.    It is very VERY odd to say the least.   I want AR to do well because he seems like a good guy and he has all the talent in the world  But after this last game and his words after? For lack of a better word I don't think he has any ability at all to do 2 things.     One....protect himself.   Two.....take a hit and feel pain without it being the end of the world.  He seems to have no pain tolerance whatsoever.  Which is fine.  Just don't be an NFL Qb as a result. 
    • I'm not creating anything.  Till AR can stay on the field it's Flacco that has to be tough. 
    • I understand that but till AR shows he can stay on the field, Flacco has to be the man. It's that simple. 
    • Yeah because AR wasn’t 100%.  The Colts are clearly being protective of him after last year and frankly the Luck situation.  Irsay has said more than once they learned from the Luck mistakes and would be more cautious with AR.  You are trying to create QB controversy that doesn’t exist.
  • Members

    • #12.

      #12. 3,391

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 20,331

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • il vecchio

      il vecchio 134

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ProblChld32

      ProblChld32 786

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,216

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...