Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Did anyone agree with Mike Carey on his ruling? Is this a fumble or an incomplete pass?


ReMeDy

Did anyone agree with Mike Carey on his ruling?  

150 members have voted

  1. 1. Is it a fumble or an incomplete pass?

    • It's a fumble.
    • It's an incomplete pass.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I honestly can see it go either way. If this picture is of TY then the vote will be an incomplete pass.

Andre catches the ball with his left foot down, takes a right step, and on the second full step the ball comes loose tucking the ball in. Now did he make a football move? The NFL rules don't define what that is. The precedent has always been two full steps. So since he starts losing control on the second full step is that established control? Is it a classic drop scenario, no. But there has been clearer fumbles that went called as incomplete, and clearer incomplete passes go as fumbles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's your point? It's still a fumble whether Andre dropped it on his own or Vontae caused it. Andre clearly gained control of the ball before losing it. As open widow so eloquently put it "Carey was high".

 

Exactly.

 

Clear fumble.  Not sure why this is viewed as any sort of controversy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was a fumble.  He had control of the ball and was running.  He fumbled it when he tried to secure it with his right arm (I believe) so he he stiff arm Davis with the other.

 

For the most part I don't think the refs were that bad last night.  The call on Kerr, while devastating was the correct call.  I never saw a reply of VDs pass interference so I can't comment on that.  AJ offensive pass interference was the correct call and something he has done for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Carey likes to side with our opponents when he is asked to comment 

 

Johnson tucked the ball under his arm made two steps and then lost the ball, it was obviously a fumble, you could even tell by Johnson's demeanor on the sidelines before the call was made and it sounded like Carey speaking when Johnson was upset saying it is incomplete 4 times

 

Carey looks silly when he comments,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I typically respect Mike Carry. But he made a clown out of himself by insisting that wasn't a fumble. The ball looked clearly secured immediately upon catching it, 3 steps and he tries to switch arms to free up his stiffarm and dropped it. 

 

Carry was wrong. Remember, these calls are being double verified through a control center in NY. Carry did not earn his paycheck with that clumsy assessment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly can see it go either way. If this picture is of TY then the vote will be an incomplete pass.

Andre catches the ball with his left foot down, takes a right step, and on the second full step the ball comes loose tucking the ball in. Now did he make a football move? The NFL rules don't define what that is. The precedent has always been two full steps. So since he starts losing control on the second full step is that established control? Is it a classic drop scenario, no. But there has been clearer fumbles that went called as incomplete, and clearer incomplete passes go as fumbles.

You're trying way too hard to be objective and condescending at the same time. Yes, we're Colts fans and, yes, we're biased but that doesn't make this any less an obvious fumble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trying way too hard to be objective and condescending at the same time. Yes, we're Colts fans and, yes, we're biased but that doesn't make this any less an obvious fumble.

 

I don't know if it was obvious or easy. I think if it was called incomplete on the field, it would have been tough to overturn. It's a judgment call, made in the heat of the moment. I could see arguments for it being incomplete, but to me, it's a catch and a fumble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if it was obvious or easy. I think if it was called incomplete on the field, it would have been tough to overturn. It's a judgment call, made in the heat of the moment. I could see arguments for it being incomplete, but to me, it's a catch and a fumble.

It was pretty close.  But I saw a catch and ball brought into a ball carrying position, so to me, I thought it was a pretty easy call.  But then again, I thought this was an easy call, too:

 

Andrew_Luck_Interception_Down_Video_Pict

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at it 'different'.  I think of AJ catching that at the one yard line and 3 yards from going out of bounds.  No defender nearby.  I think if it goes as it did, comes out and goes out of bounds at the 1, they call it a catch and fumble out of bounds.  So it should be the same here.  But I thought it had a chance to be overturned.

 

Make  no mistake, Blandino, the VP of officiating, is heavily involved directly in all replays.  His voice is strong.  I've seen him overturn calls, and also agree with them.  The reason Blandino has the 'pull' ?  Consistency.  Blandino wants all calls that involve him (reviews) go the same way every game for every team.  All review calls set precedence for the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly can see it go either way. If this picture is of TY then the vote will be an incomplete pass.

Andre catches the ball with his left foot down, takes a right step, and on the second full step the ball comes loose tucking the ball in. Now did he make a football move? The NFL rules don't define what that is. The precedent has always been two full steps. So since he starts losing control on the second full step is that established control? Is it a classic drop scenario, no. But there has been clearer fumbles that went called as incomplete, and clearer incomplete passes go as fumbles.

It doesn't matter who is in the picture a catch 3 steps then dropping the ball is a fumble .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at it 'different'.  I think of AJ catching that at the one yard line and 3 yards from going out of bounds.  No defender nearby.  I think if it goes as it did, comes out and goes out of bounds at the 1, they call it a catch and fumble out of bounds.  So it should be the same here.  But I thought it had a chance to be overturned.

 

Make  no mistake, Blandino, the VP of officiating, is heavily involved directly in all replays.  His voice is strong.  I've seen him overturn calls, and also agree with them.  The reason Blandino has the 'pull' ?  Consistency.  Blandino wants all calls that involve him (reviews) go the same way every game for every team.  All review calls set precedence for the rest of the season.

 

I had a similar thought.  If that initial catch had been made at the 1 yard line and then dropped in the end zone, I strongly believe it would have been called (and upheld as) a TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a play just like this in the Saints/Bucs game on the last drive before OT where Colston fumbled after catching the ball and pressing both feet down (the ball was stripped after his feet were down), and they ended up calling it an incomplete pass and there was no officiating challenge on it. You heard it from me, that was a fumble, and so was this last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a play just like this in the Saints/Bucs game on the last drive before OT where Colston fumbled after catching the ball and pressing both feet down (the ball was stripped after his feet were down), and they ended up calling it an incomplete pass and there was no officiating challenge on it. You heard it from me, that was a fumble, and so was this last night.

not close to the same thing. AJ took three steps before he fumbled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Carey's logic (the ball was still moving), a ball carrier can juggle the ball 99 yards, drop it at the 1, and it's an incomplete pass. 

 

I would love to sit down in a room full of officials after a week of games and ask them what the hell they were thinking when making calls XY and Z. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that would be true, if the receiver never establishes control of the football. 

 

I was referencing how the ball started to slip in Johnson's hands after he established controlled (tucked, turned, and started running).

 

According to Carey, because the ball started to move again, he still didn't have control.  That's not simply true.  The ball can move all the time (from hand to hand, etc.) after there's control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was referencing how the ball started to slip in Johnson's hands after he established controlled (tucked, turned, and started running).

 

According to Carey, because the ball started to move again, he still didn't have control.  That's not simply true.  The ball can move all the time (from hand to hand, etc.) after there's control.

 

That's the key, once he establishes control, it's a catch. He doesn't need to make a football move, he doesn't have to take two steps, etc. 

 

The only time he must maintain control for an extended stretch of time is if he's going to the ground while trying to make the catch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone catch the interception in Cleveland that Mike Carey continually said "no way it would stand"?

He wasn't even close and the commentator called him out on it.

Yep I'm just glad he's not on the field anymore . There was no evidence the ball hit the ground right call by the refs that still have there jobs .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep I'm just glad he's not on the field anymore . There was no evidence the ball hit the ground right call by the refs that still have there jobs .

The commentator was like "so even though you can't see the ball hit the ground you're just going to assume it did?" and Carey said, "Yes. This will be overturned."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The commentator was like "so even though you can't see the ball hit the ground you're just going to assume it did?" and Carey said, "Yes. This will be overturned."

 

Blandino will make the call, and teach the refs each game.  That's why every review is done in New York. Blandino would have overruled Carey a few times already this years while they were in the booth and in communication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Only if Sheldon isn’t available.  
    • Yeah, Ebukam almost looks clumsy next to Latu. He's just so fluid.
    • Did Hou actually get that much better? This really does remain to be seen. I am of the opinion that the signing of Diggs is a signing that has been made about 2 years too late. He won't be bad, but he isn't a top 10 WR in the NFL anymore. I wouldn't put him as any more dangerous that Pittman, so WR's are a push. We have the better RB, Mixon is great and all, but he is not JT. We have the better Oline, and it isn't even close. TE's are a push, we have a lot of upside, but until it is realised im very "meh" on our TEs. QB - I would argue that Stroud is probably more likely to regress to the mean in year 2 vs improve. That rookie season of his was a bit silly, and they had an easier schedule last season too. If he really does build on last year and get even better, then our entire discourse here is probably irrelevant as we will have another Mahomes level QB on our hands to deal with in the AFC and within the AFC South no less. So unless Richardson is also a Mahomes level talent in that scenario, we are done for anyways. To me, our success in this coming season comes down to 2 groups on this entire team. 1. The QB (because... duh) 2. Our DBs. If we even get average play from the DBs, I think this team has the ability to win the whole damned thing (supposing Richardson stays healthy and is what we all hope he is). I would also argue that Houston are paper thin. If they lose a OL starter, Mixon or even one of their starting WRs.... they have a very big drop off. And injuries happen in the NFL. Just sayin...
    • If he wasn’t fast enough or athletic enough anymore for linebacker, then he’s not going to be able to cut it at Safety where speed , quickness, athleticism are even more important.    Wish it wasn’t so…. 
  • Members

    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,764

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 1,217

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chrisfarley

      chrisfarley 409

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 5,808

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,968

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 16,350

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...