Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

bradshaw?


PeprunrunrunPunt

Recommended Posts

So i was wondering what everyone thinks about bringing bradshaw back

so our backfield would look like

 

Ballard

Richardson

Bradshaw

 

the guy is talented i believe donald will want too much money, running backs are a dime a dozen haha what does everyone think???

I have always liked him but I believe that if he was consistently healthy the NYGs would never have ley him get away...

 

He's a good player and a proven champion,....but we already have Vic B coming off injury...

 

Maybe we should try a healthy back..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion we won't sign Bradshaw! To tell you the truth I feel like the Giants may bring him back... Bradshaw loves the NYG. If they offer him any contract even with low pay he might go back. And with David Wilson playing worse than me at running back they may attempt it..

I feel like we need to find a pure speed running back! I still think Rainey can be good if healthy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how the backfield shapes up. I'd love to have Bradshaw back if we could find a way to do so because I believe he brings an extra attitude and swagger to the team that goes beyond the playing field.  Not only is he a good player but he also has the will of a champion that infects everyone around him.  He's the type of back that just exerts his will on the other team in crunch time when you need to put your foot on their throats to seal the deal.  However that neck injury is a serious thing to consider if you're talking about bringing him back. It'll be a tough decision, but I hop we'd find a way to keep him.

 

Ballard, Bradshaw, Richardson, Rainey(maybe)

 

We've got Chris Rainey so maybe we could use him as a our speed guy somewhat or better than how the Niners use Lamichael James. But like others have said we need to make sure that O Line is fixed.  I certainly feel we need to do what it takes to find a top notch Center and make some real improvements at the guard position.  I like that Hugh Thornton will be in his second year and Donald Thomas will be back and healthy. Both those things provide us with something to build on, hopefully Thornton can be the starter but if not he at least provides good depth and we'd need to shell out some cash to get a quality starter through FA i think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't bring him back and I highly doubt Grigs does either. Way to injury prone. Good runner when healthy but is hardly ever healthy so whats the point. Fix the o-line and thats all that matters. RB's are a dime a dozen and whoever we sign or draft will be the 3rd string RB anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a backfield situation similar to Houston. Sorry to say it honestly. We have Ballard who looked great at the beginning of last season. We bring Trent on board. Some may disagree with his talents. I'm giving him this coming season to develope into our system. We have two potentially good backs. Which one will we invest in when the time comes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bradshaw had a year to rest that foot problem.  The neck is apparently healed....bring him back on a non-guaranteed contract and see how much Brown wants.  MAY be too much.  

 

With all of the underclassmen coming out, I feel Grigs can find a valuable UFA in this area as well...stay tuned!!   :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want Bradshaw back to be perfectly honest. I would actually love the idea of this being our backfield going into Training Camp:

 

RB1: Trent Richardson

RB2: Vick Ballard

RB3: Ahmad Bradshaw (Plus if Bradshaw is our number 3 RB then the chances of him getting injured are a lot lower)

RB4: Chris Rainey

RB5: Dan Herron

RB6: Tashard Choice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i was wondering what everyone thinks about bringing bradshaw back

so our backfield would look like

 

Ballard

Richardson

Bradshaw

 

the guy is talented i believe donald will want too much money, running backs are a dime a dozen haha what does everyone think???

 

I like him  but do not bring him back he can't stay healthy . Draft a RB .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i was wondering what everyone thinks about bringing bradshaw back

so our backfield would look like

 

Ballard

Richardson

Bradshaw

 

the guy is talented i believe donald will want too much money, running backs are a dime a dozen haha what does everyone think???

If you think that is the order in which they will be played, I think you are very wrong. Richardson is going to be the starter for about six games until he shows that he just isn't a great running back and then it will be Ballard. They will try to make that dog of a trade look good if they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think that is the order in which they will be played, I think you are very wrong. Richardson is going to be the starter for about six games until he shows that he just isn't a great running back and then it will be Ballard. They will try to make that dog of a trade look good if they can.

 

That decision has been made here by folks with no info or input just wishful thinking .

 

Unlike us with our worthless opinions the coaching staff will make those decisions  based on ability not on that trade so many have condemned from day one .

 

V.Ballard & T Rich will compete its  a toss up at this point  neither is a given . Of season work outs training camp & preseason a long way to go till we know .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That decision has been made here by folks with no info or input just wishful thinking .

 

Unlike us with our worthless opinions the coaching staff will make those decisions  based on ability not on that trade so many have condemned from day one .

 

V.Ballard & T Rich will compete its  a toss up at this point  neither is a given . Of season work outs training camp & preseason a long way to go till we know .

 

Bolder dash. Clearly they did NOT go by ability at ANYTIME with our O-Line. Not that it was important. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i was wondering what everyone thinks about bringing bradshaw back

so our backfield would look like

 

Ballard

Richardson

Bradshaw

 

the guy is talented i believe donald will want too much money, running backs are a dime a dozen haha what does everyone think???

 

Im all For bringing him in for Vet Min on a performance based / incentive laten contract. I was happy with what i saw out of Bradshaw he also is an great pass blocker/ receiver out the backfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...