Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts QB Watch Party


RollerColt

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't want to waste any draft picks trading for a vet.  Sign a free agent and draft the QB.  If that's Strong this year, fine.  If we wait until next year, that's fine too.

 

If Trubisky or Mariota show something, even better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully someone better than Wentz. Most likely case is we pick up a veteran QB in the off-season and draft someone by trading up in the first. My choice for the vet QB would be Jameis but he's most likely resigning to the Saints.

 

If Ballard does draft a QB, he better hit. Might be curtains if they trade up in a generally agreed weak QB class and picks someone mediocre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MarquisJ said:

“All chips in” doesn’t include Jimmy G, Mitch, Kirk, Mariota in my eyes.

Why does "all chips in" have to mean a QB? What if the Colts went out and got Chandler Jones and JC Jackson? Or Armstead and Allen Robinson? If they get a guy like Mariota, Mitch, or Winston the drop off in production from Wentz wont be as significant as you think. Might even be better? You can fill a lot of holes this offseason while adding to the strength of your team (defense and Oline) and then swing for the fence next year and have that rookie come into a team thats ready to roll. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will say again that I felt like Wentz was a good option to hold the spot and maybe develop for you while you try to draft that QB of the future.  Now they need a bridge QB which can be pricey or difficult to find in its own right.  Also will observe that this isn't really Ballard's hand at play here, I think this move was all Irsay and Ballard just did as he was told and found the best deal he could.

 

Either way now the team needs that bridge and needs to look hard at options in the draft.  Well the options out there aren't too good, and neither is this QB class.

 

One other thing re: QBs in the draft...  Seems like every year they get ranked among their peers prior to draft season and then as the draft gets closer the top few end up being pushed to the top of teams boards by need.  That's probably going to happen again this year.  So as all that starts here's hoping a trade-up isn't required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stitches said:

 

I thought the biggest knock on him when he started at Tennessee was his injury history.  He was out of the line up a lot.  He was a first round pick and never lived up to expectations.  Combined with injury, I can see where a new coach would want his own QB.

 

Mariota may still have some decent upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone really think Ballard would have made this trade without knowing who his quarterback is going to be going forward?  I don't.  I wouldn't be surprised if the only thing holding up announcing the follow up trade is finalizing the extension for the new quarterback.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Does anyone really think Ballard would have made this trade without knowing who his quarterback is going to be going forward?  I don't.  I wouldn't be surprised if the only thing holding up announcing the follow up trade is finalizing the extension for the new quarterback.  

 

I still think something is/has been in the works, whatever it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Does anyone really think Ballard would have made this trade without knowing who his quarterback is going to be going forward?  I don't.  I wouldn't be surprised if the only thing holding up announcing the follow up trade is finalizing the extension for the new quarterback.  

I am sure he has a plan.  However if it’s a draft pick or free agent he can’t do anything yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Does anyone really think Ballard would have made this trade without knowing who his quarterback is going to be going forward?  I don't.  I wouldn't be surprised if the only thing holding up announcing the follow up trade is finalizing the extension for the new quarterback.  

I don’t think he knows.  I think he just feels he can get a cheaper average QB until he can someday upgrade…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please let’s go with a Free Agent, no trades. Frankly I expect us to be mediocre to bad next year, as I don’t see a QB that is available that can contend against Burrow, Herbert, Wilson, Mahomes, Allen. therefore giving away picks is not smart and the best move would to position ourselves to be able to move up in the draft next year when their is suppose to be a deep QB draft class

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Archer said:

I don’t think he knows.  I think he just feels he can get a cheaper average QB until he can someday upgrade…

Personally.  I don't think Irsay would accept that as a plan.  I don't think Ballard would ever present a plan like that to him.  This team can win the AFC South and make the playoffs with the right QB.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Personally.  I don't think Irsay would accept that as a plan.  I don't think Ballard would ever present a plan like that to him.  This team can win the AFC South and make the playoffs with the right QB.  

 

Oh, Ballard has a plan on who he’ll go after.  But he can’t be certain who he’ll get.  But a lot of QBs can be successful with a good line, a great RB, and a system that doesn’t require them to be the hero…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

You think Ballard is going to take the chance of this happening on the heals of the Wentz debacle?  

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-hammers-chiefs-for-tampering-with-huge-fine-loss-of-two-draft-picks/

There you go.  The Chiefs got caught.  You don't think it happens.  Of course it does.  There are 32 teams.  They all don't play by the rules.  The object is not to get caught.  Didn't Ballard learn his trade in the Chiefs front office?  Anyhow I don't think any of the FA quarterbacks are an improvement over Wentz.  I am expecting another trade but that's just me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • UDFA: QB - Kedon Slovis, BYU QB - Jason Bean, Kansas K - Spencer Shrader, Notre Dame WR - Xavier White, Texas Tech  RB - Trent Pennix, North Carolina State  OG - Dalton Tucker, Marshall  DT - Isaiah Coe, Oklahoma LB - Craig Young, Kansas   Tryout: DT - Jeblonski Green, South Carolina State  TE - Malcolm Epps, Pittsburgh OT - Jake Hornirook, Duke RB - Justin Strong, Southern Illinois  LS - Michael Vinson, Notre Dame  OC - Jake Kradel, Pittsburgh  OL - Aidan Hemphill, Texas Southern  DB - Brandon Bishop, Liberty  OT - Daniel Johnson, Purdue 
    • Oh no doubt about that. I absolutely value the fact that people like Brugler, Cosell, Jeremiah, etc. actually do the work and take their job seriously. And I also agree that others do very surface level stuff(more akin to what most of us here are doing here as a hoby. Except... they get paid for it).    My angle is not exactly "everyone is the same", they are not. That's why I value extremely highly the work some do and not so much others. And I agree that just because a player doesn't hit, it doesn't mean the evaluation was faulty... or just because a player hits unexpectedly, I don't think the evaluation was necessarily faulty either. It's important to see the reasoning behind the projections and it is important to recognize the uncertainty in any projection really. IMO the uncertainty covers for a lot of shoddy "work" and rankings because a lot of talking heads can just parrot hits and omit misses. So they are not all the same, but their results might be very close to each other. Just like in the NFL - the difference between good and bad GMs in hit rate is in single digit number over the long term. You won't get one GM that hits 80% and another that hits 20%(Although... Grigson probably was close to that one).   Part of it is because the ones that don't do the work, actually copy and plagiarize the work that the great ones do... example, they will take the Jeremiah and Brugler's big boards and will mash them together and just switch a few names around, or if they have a favorite they will bump him up while dropping a specific one they don't like, but in the grand scheme of things the results wouldn't be dramatically different. So the value for me is from the actual verifiable work those people do and the way they present information. WIth people like Brugler or Cosell you can actually tell that it's them that are doing the work. They give you detailed reports on why they think what they think about those prospects. And they are almost never extreme in their opinions - i.e. "this player is trash, he would never succeed in the league". You know they actually sit down and watch those guys play and actually do scouting reports from what they see on tape, rather than from what they've heard someone else say about those players. And with Brugler, even furthermore, you see a ton of background information about those players. He's pretty much doing what scouts for the teams are doing. He's digging about the childhood and adolescence of those players, he's digging up red flags, medical information(whatever is available), etc. And he's just one person. And he's doing it for 400+ players every year. You can only respect that. And I derive a ton of more value out of it than I do out of a random pundit's QB ranking for which I probably have watched more tape than he has. 
    • Agreed   By mid year, this offense might be special,    I wonder if our defense can at least get to 15, in points allowed   Having an offense that grinds it our, will help the defense stay fresh
    • You’re welcome! I agree, some really good information and worth a watch. 
    • Bortolini was very good at the Senior Bowl. Technically sound and quick. I would not be surprised at all if either him or Concalves starts right guard this year, and I like Fries, I'm one of the few on here who doesn't think he sucks. We may be so good running the ball this year Richardson won't have to throw much(20-25 times a game?) This offense is going to be fun to watch and we should win a lot of games as long as we aren't playing cb's 10 yards off the line and dropping linebackers 12 yards deep on 3rd and 3. Go Colts!
  • Members

    • boo2202

      boo2202 702

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • erock

      erock 3

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,231

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 847

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,156

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Down under wonder

      Down under wonder 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indyfan4life

      Indyfan4life 4,258

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shaolin06

      Shaolin06 28

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...